Site icon Iran Human Rights Documentation Center

Report of the working group on the universal periodic review

          
          United Nations AIHRC/14/12/Add.l
          General Assembly Distr.: General
          3 June 2010
          Original: English
          Human Rights Council
          Fourteenth session
          Agenda item 6
          Universal Periodic Review
          Report of the Working Group on the Universal
          Periodic Review*
          Islamic Republic of Iran
          Addendum
          Views on conclusions and/or recommendations, voluntary
          commitments and replies presented by the State under
          review
          * The present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services.
          GE .10-14058 P1encre cyc1e
        
          
          A/HRC/14/12/Add.1
          1. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran reviewed all the recommendations
          made during the Seventh Session of the UPR Working Group on 15 February 2010 as
          contained in document A/HRC/WG.6/7/L.X. From the total of 188 recommendations, 123
          were accepted in the Working Group's session and 45 recommendations did not enjoy the
          support of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Islamic Republic of Iran decided to state its
          position vis a vis 20 remaining recommendations in the 14 th Session of the Human Rights
          Council. The position of the Tslamic Republic of Iran with regard to the rejected and
          pending recommendations is as follows:
          I. Position of the Islamic Republic of Iran on 20 pending
          recommendations
          A. Recommendations those are partly acceptable:
          2. Recommendations 6 and 7: The Islamic Republic of Iran has a very progressive
          attitude toward women and has also taken practical and effective measures, which are fully
          presented in our national report. Islamic Republic of Iran follows a continuous policy of
          guarantying the rights of women in legislation and practice and promoting the principle of
          non- discrimination.
          3. Recommendation 19: The Constitution and the ordinary laws of the country
          guarantee citizens' rights of all nationals of Tran regardless of their religious affiliations.
          The government is making all its efforts to this end. Elimination of discrimination is a firm
          policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and therefore the discrimination stated in the
          recommendation is not a factual judgment.
          B. Recommendations which do not enjoy the support of the Islamic
          Republic of Iran:
          4. Recommendation 20: this recommendation contains non- factual assumptions and
          prejudgments and therefore could not enjoy the support of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
          C. The recommendations that the Islamic Republic of Iran takes note of:
          5. Recommendations 3 to 5: The Special Rapporteurs mentioned in the three above
          recommendations, have visited Iran on previous occasions and presented their reports. The
          government will continue its constructive cooperation with the Rapporteurs in line with its
          human rights promotional programmes. In this regard, Iran welcomes visits by the
          Rapporteurs in due course of the time.
          6. Recommendations 1, 8, 9: Accession to the international conventions including the
          Tntemational Convention against Torture, entails certain legal processes. The Parliament
          constantly reviews and evaluates accession to international conventions as well as
          amendments to previous reservations, in light of the internal circumstances and laws.
          Therefore, the government is not in a position to make any prejudgment and predictions
          concerning the outcome of debates by the Parliament. Meanwhile it is noteworthy that
          Islam is against all forms of torture and the Iran's constitution forbids it in the strongest
          terms. Moreover, the concept and meaning of capital punishment is different from what
          Sharia intends in applying Qisas. Qisas is in the domain of private law (civil matter), while
          execution comes from the power of the state in public law.
          2
        
          
          A/HRC/14/12/Add.1
          Recommendations 2, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18:
          7. The Government has enforced and implemented its domestic laws and regulations
          according to its international obligations. With respect to death penalty, Iran fully observes
          the content of Article 6 of ICCPR and exercises its reservation right in accordance with
          Article 37 of CRC relating to the age of criminal responsibility which emanates from
          principles of Sharia and the laws of the country.
          8. The Judiciary does its utmost to solve the issues relating to offences committed by
          the offenders under age of 18 through converting Qisas into financial punishment.
          II. Position of the Islamic Republic of Iran on those
          recommendations which it didn't support during 7 th UPR
          Session
          9. Recommendation 1: Accession to the International Conventions requires going
          through certain legal formalities and processes. In fact, this issue is a legislative process and
          the government is not in a position to make any prejudgment and predictions conceming
          the outcome of debates by the Parliament on accession to the new treaties.
          10. Recommendation 13: Article 19 of the Constitution stipulates that all people of
          Iran, whatever the ethnic group or tribe they belong to, enjoy equal rights. Color, race,
          language, and the like, do not bestow any privilege. Chapter 3 of the Constitution is
          dedicated to the rights of people. According to the articles under this chapter all citizens of
          the country, both men and women, regardless of ethnic and religious background ,equally
          enjoy the protection of the law and enjoy all rights including political, economic, social,
          and cultural rights.
          11. Recommendations 14, 15, 38, 39, 40 and 41: In the Constitution, like many other
          countries, a certain number of religions are recognized as official religions. Bahais,
          although not recognized as an official religion, enjoy all citizens' rights. It is noteworthy
          mentioning that the Bahaism is not recognized as a religion either by other Islamic
          countries or OIC because of the content of their cult, sectarian character and violations of
          human rights by their leaders. Bahais have their own cemeteries throughout the country and
          their dead are buried according to their own burial rites. Their enrolment in schools is done
          without any regard to their sectarian affiliation. They enjoy freedom of movement both
          inside and outside of the country, like other citizens and can obtain passport freely. In the
          economic areas, they enjoy relatively good situation and access to engage in various
          businesses and professions. There is also the possibility to continue their education in
          universities and many Bahais receive academic degrees every year. In Iran no person is
          prosecuted simply because of his/her faith.
          12. Recommendation 23, 25, 26, 37 and 45: Torture is strongly prohibited by the
          Constitution and other laws of the Country. Torture is a punishable criminal offence and the
          perpetrator is severely punished. Article 38 of the Constitution prohibits torture and
          different provisions of the Islamic Penal Code of Iran clearly forbid torture and stipulate
          severe punishments for the perpetrators. Prison sentence, termination of employment in the
          government and compensation for damages and losses are envisaged. The Government
          deals with cases of torture seriously both in law and practice.
          13. Recommendation 29: On the basis of article 24 of the Penal Procedure Code, no
          one may be arrested except by the order and in accordance with the procedure laid down by
          law. In case of arrest, charges with the reasons for accusation must, without delay, be
          communicated and explained to the accused in writing, and a provisional dossier must be
          forwarded to the competent judicial authorities within a maximum of twenty-four hours so
          3
        
          
          A/HRC/14/12/Add.1
          that the preliminaries to the trial can be completed as swiftly as possible. The judge may
          issue an order requiring a kind of guarantee for the provisional release of the accused. If the
          offence is a felony or serious offence, the judge orders detention of the accused on remand.
          14. Accordingly, to issue a ruling for remand detention in serious offences three judges
          review the case: inspector judge issuing the remand order, the prosecutor that agrees and
          the presiding judge reviewing the appeal.
          15. Recommendations 28, 42, 43, 44: According to the Intemational Covenant on Civil
          and Political Rights, freedom of expression is not an absolute right. In articles 24 and 27 of
          the Constitution, freedom of expression and assembly are guaranteed. Annually numerous
          political and trade unions assemblies and meetings are being held.
          16. According to article 6 of the Law Conceming Activities of Political Parties, groups
          and societies and trade unions, permission from relevant authorities is required for
          assemblies and public meetings. Based on the same above-mentioned articles of the
          Constitution and article 6 of the Press Law, press and publications are free to express their
          opinions except when it is detrimental to the fundamental principles of Islam or the rights
          of the public. According to article 3 of the same law, the press has the right to express its
          views, criticisms, proposals and suggestions and views by the people and officials.
          Considering the fact that there is no purely political offence, individuals that have violated
          the law have been tried according to fair and due process and have been duly found guilty.
          In light of these circumstances, the request for the unconditional release contravenes the
          law.
          17. Recommendation 19: the principled position of Iran on sexual orientation is crystal
          clear. The issue of same sex maniage is in full contradiction with domestic laws and
          regulations and Iran does consider it neither as legal issue nor as an issue of human rights.
          18. Recommendations 20 and 21: Death sentences are only issued for the most serious
          crimes and none of the intemational instruments totally reject them and countries may
          choose to use capital punishment. Elimination of capital punishment emboldens the
          criminals and leads to repetition of crimes. Islamic countries believe that punishment of
          those found guilty will prevent repetition of commission of a grave and serious crime like
          murder. For issuing death sentence or Qisas for commission of a serious and grave crime,
          the judicial system in Iran exhaust all procedures and remedies available in the law. It goes
          through a long process in the lower, provincial and supreme courts and according to article
          18 of the Penal Code the approval of the head of the Judiciary is required for the
          enforcement of death sentence ruling. According to the laws of Iran, punishment for
          intentional homicide is Qisas. The punishment of Qisas is only applied at the request of
          “owners of the blood” and can be commuted to financial penalty (blood money) at their
          request.
          19. Recommendation 22: The term of “cruel punishment” is applicable to none of the
          punishments stipulated in the laws of the country.
          20. Recommendation 33: Paragraph 1 of the article 2 of the Charter of the United
          Nations emphasizes on the sovereign equality of all Member States. In light of the above
          principle, any kind of intervention in domestic courts of any Member State of the United
          Nations is a clear breach of the undisputable and generally accepted principles of law and
          obligations of Member States emanating from the Charter of the United Nations. Tn view
          of the fact that the courts in Iran try the cases by maintaining the independence of judges,
          and issue their rulings in light of the possibility for appeal and further review by higher
          courts and by fully observing legal principles and due process, since rulings are not final
          before exhaustion of all legal remedies, any intervention and supervision by a body outside
          the legal supervisory authority will have no effect for the judges enforcing final rulings. In
          practice, all trial procedures are observed, the defense lawyers are present in the trial and
          4
        
          
          A/HRC/14/12/Add.1
          after the ruling becomes final, the proceedings are reflected in the press in full
          transparency.
          21. Recommendations 3 and 4: Considering that the draft of the bill on amending the
          Islamic Penal Code is presently being reviewed by the Parliament, the Government has no
          specific comment on these recommendations at this stage. Meanwhile, we emphasize that
          the pre-judgments made concerning existing grounds for abuse of laws of Iran for
          imposition of restriction on fundamental freedoms are false.
          22. Recommendations 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11: By extension of a Standing Invitation to
          Human Rights Council's Special Procedures, taking into account 6 visits taken place so far
          by them, Iran has demonstrated its intention to promote cooperation with the international
          human rights mechanisms. Iran has further consolidated these cooperative relations by
          planning and conducting meetings and direct contacts with the Office of the High
          Commissioner for Human Rights. In line with its promotional plans for human rights, the
          Tslamic Republic of Tran will prepare and thaw up relevant mechanisms for interactions
          with Special Rapporteurs.
          23. Recommendation 27: Based on Sharia, the Constitution and ordinary laws ratified
          by the Parliament forbid any form of gender-based violence. The three branches of the
          government have also adopted their own preventive measures. The Tslamic Republic of fran
          has pursued policies based on gender justice. Creating family courts, establishing safe
          houses for women without guardian, social emergency centers for women and many other
          facilities. Needless to say, punishment of individuals that commit rape, establish gangs of
          sex slaves and other immoral and evil acts is a totally different matter. These crimes are
          punishable offences in all legal systems and societies.
          24. Recommendation 30: Article 57 of the Constitution separates the three branches of
          the government — Executive, Judiciary and the Legislative. Chapters 6, 9 and 11 of the
          Constitution explain the duties of the three branches. According to these articles in the
          Constitution, each branch is separate and independent and no branch can intervene in the
          affairs of other branches. Contrary to many counties that their judiciary branch is under the
          minister of justice, in Iran the minister of justice coordinates relations between the Judiciary
          and other branches of the government and has no role in appointing or removing judges.
          Concerning collective trials of individuals, stated in a number of recommendations,
          according to article 209 of Penal Procedures Code, if several persons act together in
          committing an offence; charges against them are heard jointly. This is the practice in many
          other judicial systems.
          25. Regarding the right of defense and presence of a defense attorney in the court trial,
          article 35 of the Constitution stipulates that both parties to a lawsuit have the right to select
          a lawyer and if they are not able to do so, arrangements are made to provide them legal
          counsel. Moreover, articles 128, 185 and 186 of the Penal Procedures Code, the accused
          can even have a lawyer accompany himlher in the preliminary investigations. But in
          offences that their punishment according to the law is life imprisonment or death penalty, if
          the accused does not personally introduce a lawyer, designating a lawyer for himlher is
          mandatory.
          26. Recommendations 31, 32 and 34: the Constitution, Penal Procedures Code, and
          other laws in Iran are very careful in ensuring fair trial proceedings. Fair trial enables the
          authorities and competent officials to protect the rights of individuals in the society by
          ensuring fairness in arrests, investigations, prosecution, trial proceedings, issuing verdicts,
          appeal process and enforcement of court orders and rulings regardless of race, religion,
          gender, ethnic background or any other advantages. Legal proceedings, such as legal
          decisions by the accused and regulations such as the right of defense and to select a lawyer
          in different stages of arrest, investigations and review and the right to protest decisions by
          5
        
          
          A/HRC/14/12/Add.1
          Prosecutor Office during initial investigations, during trial and final ruling by the higher
          courts, and having such tools as suspension of arrest warrant, delaying the arrest, expunging
          the case under special circumstances for minor offences and always assuming presumption
          of innocence are ways to ensure fairness. As is the case in many court systems in the
          advanced countries, in order to make trials more equitable and to compensate for judicial
          errors, trials are conducted at different phases. The Islamic Republic of Iran also follows
          this general principle and the courts in the country are divided into court of first instance
          and higher courts. All rulings may be appealed. According to articles 19 and 20 of the
          Constitution all citizens of the country equally enjoy the protection of the law and no
          official or authority is immune from prosecution if he/she commits a punishable offence. In
          actual practice, even the president who is the highest executive official of the country can
          be prosecuted and removed from the office. This right to impeach the president was
          exercised in the past. The provincial criminal court can investigate and try offenses by
          members of the Expediency Council, Guardian Council of the Constitution, ministers and
          vice-ministers, senior advisors to the three branches of the governments, ambassadors,
          prosecutor general, president of the Auditing Tribunal, judges, governors general, and
          military and police officers above the rank of brigadier general and directors general of
          intelligence ministry in provinces.
          27. Meanwhile, the Islamic Republic of fran regards above-mentioned recommendations
          to be irrelevant to internal situation of the country.
          28. Recommendations 35, 36: we have held more than 32 elections over the past 30
          years in accordance with the Constitution and ordinary laws of the country. These elections
          took place with extensive participation and large turnout of eligible voters. Altogether 500
          million votes have been cast in these elections. On 11 June 2009 tenth presidential election
          was held in Iran. Four candidates from different political orientations were contesting that
          election. Close to 40 million out of 45 million eligible voters participated in this election. It
          was an unprecedented record of voter's turnout, more than 85%. The ballot boxes witnessed
          the most impressive demonstration of democracy. The votes of the people were collected
          under the supervision of trusted persons from the communities (650 thousand), and
          statutory bodies at 45,000 ballot boxes throughout the country. In all stages of taking the
          votes and counting them, more than 90,000 observers selected by the candidates supervised
          the boxes. Subsequently, the relevant legal and oversight mechanisms verified the election
          and then the legal president of the country was elected.
          29. After the election certain events took place in the country which was properly
          investigated by the relevant and competent legal authorities.
          6
        

Download Attachments:

Exit mobile version