JNITED
IATIONS
. Distr.
Economic: and Social GENERAL
Council E/CN.4/1992/34
2 January 1992
Original: ENGT.JSH/FRENCH/
SPANISH
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Forty-eighth session
Item 12 of the provisional agenda
QUESTION OF THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDA 6ENTAL FREEDOMS
IN MW PART OF THE WORLD, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO COLONIAL
MD OTHER DEPENDENT COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES
Report on the human rights situation in IIe Islamic Republic of Iran
by the Special Representative of the Commission on Human Rights,
Mr. Reynaldo Galindo Pohl, pursuant to Commission resolution 1991/82
GE. 92—10023/4211B
E/CN.4/1992/34
page ii
CONTENTS
Paraaraohs Page
INTRODUCTION 1 - 3 1
I. COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN AND THE SPECIAL
REPRESENTATIVE 4 - 21 2
A. Oral communications 4 2
B. Written communications 5 — 21 2
II. INFORMATION RECEIVED BY THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE 22 - 201 9
A. The right to life 23 — 126 9
B. Enforced or involuntary disappearances 127 23
C. The right to freedom from torture or cruel,
inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment .. 128 — 145 23
D. The administration of justice 146 — 166 26
E. Freedom of expression, opinion and association
and the right to peaceful assembly 161 — 179 30
F. Political rights 180 32
0. The situation of women 181 — 192 33
H. The situation of children 193 35
I. The right to leave one's country and to
return 194 — 195 35
.1. Freedom of religion and the situation of
the religious minorities 196 — 191 35
K. The situation of the Baha'i community 198 — 201 35
III. REPORT ON THE THIRD VISIT TO THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC
OF IRAN 202 — 368 36
IV. CONSIDERATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS 369 — 471 70
V. CONCLUSIONS 472 — 478 89
Annexes
I. Official programme of the third visit of the Special
Representative to the Islamic Republic of Iran
(8—14 December 1991) 91
II . List of prisoners whom the Special
Representative requested to interview 93
III. List of violations committed by the personnel of
prisons in connection with prisoners 96
IV. List of persons (and the crimes they committed) executed
during 1991 after due judicial procedures 97
E/CN.4/ 1992/34
page iii
CONTENTS ( continued)
Page
V. Government information relating to the list of
prisoners handed to the Iranian authorities on
8 December 1991 in Tehran 102
VI. Government information relating to the list
of female prisoners presented by the Special
Representative by memorandum dated 2 October 1991 105
VII. Act concerning the Reform of Lawyers Associations
of the Ministry of Justice of the Islamic Republic
of Iran 108
VIII. Letter dated 18 December 1991 from the Director of the
Department for Human Rights and International Social
Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
Islamic Republic of Iran addressed to the Special
Representative 111
IX. Letter dated 18 December 1991 from the Director of the
Department for Human Rights and International Social
Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
Islamic Republic of Iran addressed to the Special
Representative; The Role of Development in the
Promotion of Human Rights 113
X. Judgement of the Police Tribunal of the Canton of
Geneva concerning Myriam Gazut Goudal 116
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 1
INTRODUCTION
1. At its forty-seventh session, the Commission on Human Rights, in its
resolution 1991/82 of 7 March 1991, welcomed the full cooperation extended by
the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Special Representative,
which had reached its highest level, as well as the intention of the
Government to continue its full cooperation with the Special Representative:
called upon the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran to comply with
international instruments on human rights, in particular the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which the Islamic Republic of Iran
was a party, and to ensure that all individuals within its territory and
subject to its jurisdiction, including religious groups, enjoyed the rights
recognized in those instruments: took note of the invitation extended by the
Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the International Committee of
the Red Cross to visit prisons in that country following the conclusion, as
soon as possible, of an agreement in accordance with standard Red Cross
modalities: endorsed the view of the Special Representative that the question
of displaced persons and refugees as well as victims of chemical weapons in
the Islamic Republic of Iran could fall within the mandate of the Special
Representative and could be covered in his report: invited the
Secretary—General to respond favourably, in accordance with the normal
practices of the Centre for Human Rights, to requests for technical assistance
from the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran : requested the Special
Representative to maintain his contacts and cooperation with the Government of
the Islamic Republic of Iran and to report on further progress with regard to
the recommendations contained in his report, on the basis of his mandate
pursuant to Commission on Human Rights resolution 1984/54 of 15 March 1984:
and also requested him to submit a report to be considered by the Commission
at its forty—eighth session. The resolution further stated that the
Commission would consider the report with a view to its discontinuing the
mandate if there was further progress achieved regarding the
Special Representative's recommendations. Lastly, the Commission requested
the Secretary—General to give all necessary assistance to the Special
Representative. In its decision 1991/261 of 31 May 1991, the Economic and
Social Council approved the requests contained in that resolution.
2. In the light of the mandate entrusted to him by the Commission in
resolutions 1984/54 and 1991/82 the Special Representative has continued to
receive pertinent information from governmental and non-governmental sources
and has transmitted such information to the Government of the Islamic Republic
of Iran for comments and observations. He has also had a series of oral and
written contacts with the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of
Iran to the United Nations Office at Geneva and has undertaken a third visit
to the country, from 8 to 14 December 1991.
3. The present report follows the pattern of previous reports and is divided
into four chapters: I. Communications between the Government of the Islamic
Republic of Iran and the Special Representative; II. Information received by
the Special Representative: III. Report on the third visit to the Islamic
Republic of Iran; IV. Conclusions and Recommendations. Various annexes
complete the information on events and allegations referred to in the main
body of the report.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 2
I • COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF TEE ISLANIC
REPUBLIC OF IRAN MiD THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE
A. Oral communications
4. The Special Representative travelled to Geneva in June and September 1991
for consultations at the Centre for Human Rights on questions pertaining to
his mandate. During those visits he had extensive conversations with the
Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations
Office at Geneva, Ambassador S. Nasseri, on 14 June and 30 September. The
discussions concentrated on how best to implement the mandate as contained in
the two above—mentioned resolutions, and on the recommendations contained in
his previous report to the Commission on Human Rights (E/CN.4/1991/35). The
Special Representative emphasized inter alia that in order for him to be able
to assess and report on further progress with regard to those recommendations,
as mandated by the Commission, it would be necessary to make a third visit to
the country.
B. Written communications
5. By letter dated 22 April 1991, the Permanent Representative of the
Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations Office at Geneva informed the
Special Representative that:
‘on the occasion of 1st April (12th of Farrardin), marking the day of the
establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 124 convicts of the
Public, Revolutionary and Military courts in 15 cities of Iran were freed
or their sentences were commuted, as proposed by Ayatollah Yazdi, the
Head of Judiciary and agreed upon by Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khomenei, the
Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran'.
6. On 14 June 1991 the Special Representative addressed the following letter
to the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the
United Nations Office at Geneva:
‘... In the framework of the co—operation which your Government
accords to my mandate I should like to bring to your attention that I
have received reports concerning Ms. Farzneh Amouyi, who has been in
detention since the end of 1981. According to the information provided,
Ms. Amouyi had a mental breakdown allegedly as a result of ill—treatment
in prison. It was also reported that she does not appear to be receiving
any psychiatric treatment and is said to be beaten as a punishment for
behaviour due to her illness, such as refusing to eat, wash or look after
herself. Ms. Amouyi is aged in her early 3Os and is reportedly held in
Evin Prison.
‘I would be most grateful if you could provide me with full
information on her situation including her trial or, possibly, release.
Should Ms. Amouyi continue to be detained I would further appreciate
receiving assurances that her right to physical and mental integrity is
protected and that she receives humane treatment as well as every medical
attention required by her condition.” (See also Annex VI)
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 3
7. On 30 September 1991 the Special Representative handed to the Permanent
Representative an aide m moire, requesting information prior to his third
visit to the country, as follows:
“1. Please provide a list of all persons executed since the
beginning of the year 1991, specifying in each case: (a) the charge
resulting in conviction: I I) the tribunal, date and place of sentencing:
and (c) the date, place and manner of execution.
“2. With respect to the cases of Xli Ardalan, Abdol Xli Bazargan,
Habib Davaran, Khossro Mansourian, Nezaxnedine Movabed, Hashem Sabaghian,
Shams Shahshahani, Mohamutad Tavassoli Hojati and Akbar Zarrinehbaf, who
were recently tried and sentenced, please indicate: (a) the specific
provisions of Iranian penal legislation forming the basis of the charge
and conviction in each case: (b) the specific provisions of Iranian
judicial legislation forming the basis of the procedure of trial in each
case; and (c) the possibilities of appeal available in each case. In
addition, please provide a copy of the transcript of the sentence in each
case.
“3. As concerns Iranian law governing access to, and the rights of,
an attorney—at—law before the Revolutionary Courts, please specify the
present status of the law.
“4. With regard to publicity of trials before the Revolutionary
Courts, please specify the present situation.
“5. In relation to recent reports indicating changes to regulations
and practices concerning the publication of books and journals, please
specify the content of such changes.
“6. Please provide all information concerning the present situation
of negotiations with the International Committee of the Red Cross
relating to prison visits.
“7. Please indicate those measures which have been taken to
introduce the technical amendments to the Iranian Penal Code recommended
in the latest report to the Commission on Human Rights (E/CN.4/1991/35,
para. 494).
“8. Please indicate any other measures which may have been taken in
relation to the recommendations contained in the report to the Commission
on Human Rights referred to above.”
8, On 1 October 1991 the Special Representative addressed the following
telegram to the Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran:
“In the framework of the cooperation which your Excellency's
Government accords to my mandate, I should like urgently to bring to your
personal attention reports I have received concerning the state of health
of Mr. Xli Ardalan who is said to be held at the present time at the
Komiteh Mushtarak Prison in Tehran. According to these reports,
Mr. Ardalan's precarious health has seriously deteriorated in recent
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 4
days. His weight is now reported to be only 48 kilograms and in addition
to his heart disease he is said to be suffering from kidney failure,
hypotension, prostate problems, fainting spells and deteriorating
eyesight. Reportedly he was recently examined by a prison doctor, who
recommended his hospitalization in order for him to undergo surgery for
the installation of a pacemaker, but such hospitalization was allegedly
denied by the authorities.
“in view of the reported circumstances, and given the advanced age
of Mr. Ardalan, I am taking the liberty of appealing to your Excellency
to intervene urgently with the competent authorities in order to ensure
that Mr. Ardalan receives every medical attention required by his
condition.”
9. By letter dated 1 November 1991, the Permanent Representative of the
Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations Office at Geneva transmitted
the following information to the Special Representative:
“With reference to your cable regarding the healII situation of
Mr. All Ardalan and the concern expressed thereof, I have the pleasure to
inform you that he was taken to the hospital and underwent necessary
medical examinations. He is now convalescing in his own house.”
10. On 1 October 1991, the Special Representative addressed a letter to the
Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations
Office at Geneva in which he stated:
“... I am most grateful for the assurances you gave me IIat your
Government will extend an invitation to me to visit the Islamic Republic
of Iran before the completion of my next report to the Commission on
Human Rights. In order to facilitate the process of determining a
mutually convenient date for the visit, I would like to reiterate the
indication I gave you yesterday that I definitely have to submit my next
report to the competent services of the United Nations for translation
and further processing on 20 December 1991 at the latest. I wish to add
that I consider it of utmost importance that my report for once be
available to the Commission on Human Rights in time and in all
languages. Furthermore, I should like to mention that my own schedule of
professional obligations does not permit me to travel during the period
from 10 to 30 November 1991.”
11. On 2 October 1991 the Special Representative addressed the following
letter to the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the
United Nations Office at Geneva:
“,..1 should like to transmit to you herewith a memorandum
containing the allegations of human rights violations which I have
received since the last renewal of my mandate as Special Representative
of the Commission on Human Rights.
. E/CN.4/ 1992/34
page 5
“I would be most grateful if these allegations could be investigated
by the competent Iranian authorities and if I could be informed of the
results of such investigations, as well as of any comments or
observations your Government might wish to make thereon, if possible
before 30 November j99j,O
12. By letter dated 11 October 1991, the Permanent Representative informed
the Special Representative that:
“on the occasion of the birIIday of the prophet of Islam, 702 convicts of
public, revolutionary, military and special courts of clergy were freed
or their sentences were commuted, as proposed by Ayatollah Mohainanad
Yazdi, the Head of Judiciary and agreed upon by Ayatollah Seyed All
Khomenei, Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran.'
13. In reply, the Special Representative wrote to the Permanent
Representative on 18 october 1991 as follows:
“You may be assured that I shall certainly take this important
information into account in the preparation of my report to the
forthcoming session of the Commission on Human Rights. In this regard,
I would be grateful if you were to provide me with more precise
information on the 702 freed convicts, In particular, I would be
interested in receiving:
(a) a full list of names, indicating for each person the date and
content of the sentence;
(b) the charges having resulted in conviction;
(c) the court(s) having convicted and sentenced each person; and
(d) the content of the commutation order in each case.”
14. By letter dated 15 October 1991, the Permanent Representative informed
the Special Representative that “Mr. John Pattis, a United States citizen, who
was imprisoned in 1987 on spying charges, has been set free and flown to his
country” (see E/CN.4/1991/35, para. 427).
15. On 1 November 1991, IIe Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic
of Iran to the United Nations Office at Geneva addressed the following letter
to the Special Representative:
“Pursuant to the note dated 16 January 1991 I have pleasure to
inform you that on 3 October 1991 the Council for the Determination of
Exigencies of the State (a body which is empowered to give binding ruling
on disputes between the Parliament and the Council of Guardians) has
passed a bill containing a single article in connection with the right of
the parties to a legal case to appoint an attorney. May I remind you
that the bill, which was originally approved by the Parliament on
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 6
31 December 1990, later on was disputed by the Council of Guardians (a
body of theologians and jurists who are required to affirm that any new
proposed legislation is not in conflict with the principles of Islamic
Law and the Constitution). the matter was brought up in the Council for
the Determination of Exigencies of the State and the final text which was
approved reads as follows:
‘Single rticle. The parties to a legal case have the right to
appoint an attorney and all courts which ate formed according to the Law
are obliged to receive the attorney.
‘Sub—article 1. The parties to a legal case in the Special Court
for the Clergy also have the right to appoint an attorney. For this
purpose the court designates a number of competent clergymen as
attorneys. The defendant may choose any one of them for the defence.
‘Sub-article 2. It a court denies the right of a party to appoint
an attorney, with the approval of the Supreme Court, the verdict issued
shall be considered as null and void. OEis failure for the first time
shall be punishable according to the third degree of disciplinary
punishment and for the second time by dismissal from judicial post.”
16. On 15 November 1991 the Special Representative addressed the following
letter to the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the
United Nations Office at Geneva:
“I should like to refer to my letter dated 1 October 1991 in which
I expressed my appreciation for the assurances you gave me that your
Government will extend an invitation to me to visit the Islamic Republic
of Iran before the completion of my next report to the Commission on
Human Rights.
“In the same letter I also indicated to you the time periods which
could be considered for the visit, i.e. the period October to
mid-November and the first half of December 1991.
“In view of the fact, which I also mentioned in my previous letter,
that my report has to be submitted to the translation services of the
United Nations on 20 December 1991 at the latest and since I have not
received any further notice from your Government, I would be grateful if
you could let me know at your earliest convenience whether it is still
the intention of your Government to invite me, keeping in mind that under
the circumstances the only period left for my visit would be the first
half of December. I wish to emphasize that it would not be possible for
me to envisage a visit at a later moment given the time constraints
dictated by the dates of the forty—eighth session of the Commission on
Human Rights.
“ 1 also wish to remind you of my letter dated 2 October 1991 by
which I transmitted to you a memorandum containing the allegations of
human rights violations which I had received since the last renewal of my
mandate and on which I requested comments or observations from your
E/CN • 4 / 1992/34
page 7
Government before 30 November 1991. You will further recall that during
our conversation in Geneva on 30 September 1991 I handed to you an
aide m&moire containing a number of questions on which I would appreciate
receiving specific answers. For ease of reference I enclose a copy of
that aide m moire . One of the questions raised therein concerned the
recommendations included in my last report to the Commission on Human
Rights. Since resolution 1991/82 specifically mandates me to report on
further progress with regard to these recommendations I would like to
reiterate my request to your Government to provide me with information on
all the measures taken in relation to the implementation of my
recommendations so that I would be in a position to take these measures
fully into account in the process of finalizing my report.”
17. On 3 December 1991, the Permanent Representative replied as follows:
“I regret that due to your preoccupations in the month of December,
only one date in this month could be proposed by you for your visits to
Iran such that even a minor adjustment would apparently run into your
other prearranged schedule. As you are aware, the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs is in charge of the coordination of your visits to Iran and, as
you have been informed, most of the officials in charge of this matter
are accompanying our President on a trip abroad, therefore the
arrangements for your visit under these conditions within the time limit
that you have proposed would be extremely difficult. Yet on the basis of
our good will and in furthering the full cooperation on our part and
noting that your visit this time is only in the context of verifying
further progress vis— -vis your recommendation, the Ministry for Foreign
‘ Affairs will make every effort to arrange preparation to receive you in
Tehran at any time that you desire.”
18. On 5 December 1991 the Special Representative addressed the following
letter to the Permanent Representative:
“I should like to express my appreciation to your Government for
having invited me to make a third visit to Tehran during the period S to
14 December 1991.
, ,
. . .
“I am attaching the tentative programme of activities which I intend
to carry out during my visit and would be most grateful if the requested
appointments with the authorities indicated therein could be arranged.
‘SI would of course be greatly honoured if in addition I could be
received by His Excellency the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran,
if possible, and at his convenience.
“The terms of reference of my visit remain identical to those
described in the annex to the letter I addressed on 24 November 1989 to
the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the
United Nations.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 8
S 5 1 am enclosing the summary of allegations I have received since
August 1991, updating those reflected in the memorandum I communicated to
you by letter dated 2 October 1991.
“I would be most grateful if I could receive the comments of your
Government on the allegations contained in both memoranda during my
forthcoming visit to Tehran.”
19. On 18 December 1991 the Permanent Representative addressed the following
letter to the Special Representative:
“Following the discussion we had during your recent visit in Tehran
and your concern and special attention expressed thereof to the “Fatwa”
(religious verdict) of the late Imam Khomenei on the author of the
blasphemous book The Satanic Verses I would like to indicate that:
“In the aftermath of the publication of The Satanic Verses the
Muslim people of the world who considered the content of the book as an
affront to the sacred principles of Isla m expressed their protest and
hatred towards the author through organizing vast demonstrations. Indeed
the publication of the book severely provoked the sentiments of Muslims
throughout the world and as a result of violence and clashes in some
Islamic countries many were killed or injured. Here are some reported
cases:
“IRNA (Islamic Republic News Agency) reported on 11 February 1989
that 35 Muslim Ulama (clergymen) of the cities of Ravelpendi and
Islamabad in Pakistan issued a statement condemning the publication of
The Satanic Verses and invited the people to participate in a protest
demonstration against it.
“On 5 February 1989 the Voice of America in its Persian programme
announced that according to New York Times the Muslims participated in a
vast demonstration in Islamabad protesting against Salman Rushdie.
During this demonstration five people were killed and some others were
injured.
“According to the reports of various international news agencies in
the period after the appearance of The Satanic Verses and before the
issuance of the religious verdict of Imani Ichomenei there were numerous
demonstrations in many Islamic countries including Indonesia, Algeria,
United Arab Emirates, Mali, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, India,
Senegal, Sudan, Somalia, and Malaysia in protest at the insult to the
sacred values of Muslims throughout the world,
“As you may agree, Sir, in consideration of the case of
Salman Rushdie all aspects of the subject should be taken into account
including the direct insult to the most sacred values of Muslim people
and the right to life of those who lost their life in protest at this
criminal act of Salman Rushdie.
E/CN • 4 / 1992/34
page 9
“OEerefore, in the light of the aforementioned, I would like to
request that in addressing this issue in your report to the Commission on
Human Rights you take also into account the violation of the right of
life of Muslims and the abuse of the right of expression. It goes
without saying that one cannot pass a judgement on tile case without
considering all aspects involved in the issue.”
20. Also by letters dated 18 December 1991, the Permanent Representative
transmitted a list of violations committed by the personnel of prisons (see
annex III) and a list of persons (and their crimes) executed during 1991 after
due judicial procedures (see annex IV).
21. By a further letter dated 18 December 1991 IIe Permanent Representative
forwarded the text of two letters from the Director of the Department for
Human Rights and International Social Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the role of development in the
promotion of human rights and terrorist activities in Iran, as well as a
letter from the association of the families of the victims of the airbus which
was shot down on 3 July 1988 in a flight over the strait of Hormoz by a
missile fired from the American warship USS Vincennes .
II. INFORMATION RECEIVED BY THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE
22, The following paragraphs contain allegations of human rights violations
received by the Special Representative and transmitted to the Government of
the Islamic Republic of Iran by memoranda dated 2 october and
5 December 1991. Replies regarding some of the alleged incidents and cases
were received during the Special Representative's visit to the country and are
reflected in chapter III. Other replies received have been reproduced in
Chapter I or in the annexes. Relevant references are given in the present
chapter in connection with the respective allegations.
A. The Right to Life
23. During 1991 the number of executions in the Islamic Republic of Iran were
said to have been particularly high. A total of 884 executions were reported
during the period between 1 January and 7 December 1991.
24. Most of the reported executions were said to have been related to drug
offences, and were mainly carried out by public hanging. Based largely on
reports published in Iranian newspapers identifying 680 cases
(over 76 per cent) by name, the criminal charges resulting in the executions
were reportedly as follows: 651 for drug trafficking; 19 for drug trafficking
and arms dealing; 28 for murder; 3 for a combination of murder and rape: 3 for
murder and prostitution; 25 for political reasons; 7 for armed robbery; 15 for
a combination of gang—related crimes including distribution of narcotics,
homicide, armed robbery, terrorizing local people, blackmail, illegal
possession of arms, gambling and other corrupt activities. One unnamed judge
was executed for taking bribes and a woman was executed for adultery. For a
further 131 executions, no reasons were reported.
E/ CN.4 / 1992 / 34
page 10
25. As regards particularly cruel methods of execution, mention must be made
of three alleged cases of stoning to death, as well as the case of a man
reportedly pushed from a cliff top in July 1991. .
26. Specific cases of application of the death penalty since 1 January 1991
have been reported as follows. All the names and dates given have been
published in the Iranian press.
27. On 6 January 1991, four persons, including one woman, were hanged in
Nahavand, Hamadan province, after being found guilty of the possession and
distribution of narcotics. Their names were given as follows: Neek Mahmood
Parsa, Hadi Abmadvand, OEdulmorad Momivand and Eshrat Hafez Abadi.
28. On 12 January 1991, three drug traffickers were hanged in Hamadan after
being sentenced to death by the Islamic Revolutionary Court of Hamadan. The
three men were found guilty of possessing and distributing narcotics.
29. On 13 January 1991, seven persons were executed in Sanandadj, reportedly
for political reasons. Their names were given as follows; Farajollah
Menbari, Shapour Shariati, Shabriar Assadi-Moghadam, Khaled Benafchi,
Ayoub Zandi, Ebrahim Moasi and Sanan Hakimi.
30. On 14 January 1991, 24 persons, including five women, were executed in
Mashhad, after being found guilty of the possession and distribution of
narcotics. OEeir names were given as follows: Abmad Goolbakhshi, Ghorban
Hooshangi, Esmael Rezai Olf at, Deen Mohammad Roohi Abadi, Reza Dozdmeh Naroui,
Mohammad Ebrahim Mohammadi, Mohammad Asaf Safi, Marjan (Efat) Sanjaripour,
Narges Of tadeh, Maryam Naji, Zebra Oftadeh, Xli Akbar Khalili, Behrooz (Yahya)
Sadeghi, Mehdi Samarghandi, A u Asghar Chassemi, Mahmood Jafari, Seyed Hossein
Ghassemi, Asaf Afghani, Cholam Xli Cheisarnia, Aziz Habibi, Mohammad Anvar
Moharnmadzabi, Hossein Hatamirad, Fatemah Maziyani and Gholamreza Mohammadi.
31. On 15 January 1991, 13 drug traffickers were hanged in Hainadan after
being sentenced to death by the Islamic Revolutionary Court of the city. The
13 were found guilty of the possession and distribution of several kilograms
of heroin and opium. Over 25 kg of opium, several weapons and 15 vehicles
were seized. According to the Tehran Times , a number of those executed had
confessed to smuggling drugs to European countries through the north—western
border. Their names were given as follows; Najafali Eskandari, Xli Akbar Ibn
roussef, Daryoush Ebrahimi, Abmad Ramezani, Taymoor Razavi, Zoli Soltani,
Saied Ghasseoezadeh Tehrani, Xli Mirzai, Hashem Alizadeh, Mohammad Reza Amin,
Saied Tavakoli, Mustaf a Mansoori Siyavoush and Ahmad Abassi.
32. On 23 January 1991, four drug traffickers were executed in Qouchan. Their
names were given as follows: Barat All Hasanzade, Ibrahim Soleymanzade,
Sultan AU Rahimi and Noorallah Asgharyan.
33. On 26 January 1991, three persons were executed in Chah Bahar on charges
of murder and prostitution. Their names were given as follows: Delmorad Hoti,
Majid Balochi and Halok Balochi.
E/CN • 4/1992/34
page 11
34. On 26 January 1991, four persons were executed in Neishabour on charges
of drug trafficking. Their names were given as follows: Abbas Saleh Vakili,
Husine Khaleghi, Reza Lashghari and Abbas Xli Ghorgh.
35. On 26 January 1991, Djamshid Bahari was executed in Andimeshk on drug
trafficking charges.
36. On 28 January 1991, 18 persons were executed in Bakhtaran. No reasons
were given for their execution.
37. According to reports in Kevhan , IChalil Abedi and Esa Righipoor were
sentenced to 74 lashes and the deaII penalty for drug trafficking: they were
said to have been executed in Bandar-Abbas on 28 January 1991.
38. In addition to the names mentioned above, the names of other persons
reportedly executed during IIe month of January were given as follows:
Farhad Shabrandi. Layegh Akraini, Mohammad Sharifi, Saadollah Maghrouzi and
Manocher—Afghani Dazeky, executed in Kirmanshab for political reasons;
Yusef Akbari, Rasul Amiri Morad, Ghasem Khalaj, Almas Shafiyan, Hamidollah
Kamazani and Assadollah Takashvand, executed in Hamadan for drug trafficking;
Ismael Ardambohi, Abdolali Zargherani, Xli Khatabi, Hasan Noorozi and Ezeth
Doberar, executed in Neichabour for drug traficking; Abdolrezagh Barkzehi,
executed in Bebbahan for drug trafficking; Shokrallah Biggie, Mangool Naseri
and Seyed Mohammad Ghasemi, executed in Isfahan for drug trafficking:
Hamid Elyasi Radpour and Sahereh Barahooie, executed in Zahedan for drug
trafficking; Ghasem Nikravesh, Aziz Shahbazi, Gholkan Zen,
X}unadshah Afghani, Miryabya Afghani, Lal Mohammad Gholbache, Shin Teymoni
and Abdul Chader Chadeni, executed in Mashhad for drug trafficking; and
Mohammed Xli Fazli, executed in Orumieh for reasons unknown.
39. On 3 February 1991, 17 persons were executed in Neichabour on charges of
drug trafficking. Their names were given as follows: Mohammad A u Semsali,
Alikhan Akbar Panah, Falaknaz Khodadadi, Faiz Mohainmad Chopan,
Salar Khodadadi, Aminallah Pahlavan, Ghorban X li Patlavan, Vakil Ibrahimi,
Sakhi Makoei, Abotaleb Hanson, Abdol Xli Kheirabadi, Husine Zorabadi,
Ghorban Xli Rivandehi, Sadrallah Ghamirabadi, Mohamrnad Reza Hasanpoor,
Gholam Husine Moallemi and Rohallah Emdaddehi. .
40. On 3 February 1991, six persons were executed in Karadj on charges of
drug trafficking. Their names were given as follows: Avaz Karimi,
Ismael Tajik, Gholam Shokri, Xsghar Saljoghi, Jozali Khazaei and Mashallah
Momeni.
41. On 3 February 1991, six persons were executed in Racht on charges of drug
trafficking. Their names were given as follows: Ibrahim Kazemian, Mohanunad
Nayer Keyani, Reza Pin Mojdehi, Abmad Mirzaei, Zara Kazemzade and
Homayon Rezaei.
42. On 3 February 1991, Ibrahim Khoshkho, Noor Mohammad Beyhaghi and
Busine Xlamdar were executed in Qouchan on charges of drug trafficking.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 12
43. On 20 February 1991, 27 persons were executed in Torbat—e Jam. No
reasons were given for their execution.
44. On 25 February 1991, 10 persons were executed in Bakhtaran after being
sentenced to death by the Islamic Revolutionary Court of Bakhtaran for
distributing drugs. According to Reyhan of 28 February 1991, their names were
as follows: Rabmatollah Kakavandi, son of Jan-Mohammad; Mimad Hemati, son of
Tabznasb; Mohammad-Hasan Afzali, son of Kheydan; Ezzat-Ali Moemeni, son of
Kheyrollab; Ezzatollah Jabbari, son of Jabbar—Ali; Ebrahim Mehr—Afrouz, son of
Shaf Se; Cholam Valizadeh, son of Mohaminad; Mohammad Rezail, son of Morad;
Azad- Khan Rezaii, son of Baba—Rad; and Mohammad Rosein Rahimi, son of Hamid.
45. On 27 February 1991, six persons were executed in Evin prison in Tehran
on charges of armed robbery. Their names were given as follows:
Ahmad Asghari, Yaghob Mi Karimi, Mohammad Nasim Ghasemi, Gholam Hazrat Ataei,
Gho l Mohamgnad Sakhavat and Gho lam Momanie.
46. On 27 February 1991, Mr. Ali—Khan Mazaher-Zehi, son of Shah-Beyg,
aged 42, was executed in Gorgan on the charge of possession of 4 kg of heroin.
47. On 28 February 1991, nine persons were executed in Mashhad. The names
and ages of those executed after being found guilty of possession and
distribution of narcotics were as follows: Hasan Mattaleh, son of Alahverdi,
aged 28; Amir Yousefi, son of Najaf, aged 28; Shir—Ali Jahedi, son of Mir—Ali,
aged 27; Mollat Mohsen Khavafii-Sariani, son of Gholam-Reza, aged 34;
Aziz Shah—Mohammadi, son of Karim, aged 20; Hosein Ghorbani, son of Davar,
aged 56; Ali—Akbar Sattar, son of Hosein, aged 28; Ismaiil Salehi, son of
Hasan, aged 80; Mohammad Roshani, son of Sar-Afraz, aged 58.
48. On 28 February 1991, two persons were executed in Racht. Their names were
Raxnazan-Ali Dehghane—Moghadamme-Sharestani, son of Abolghasern, and
Mehdi Atash-Afrouz, son of Yadollah. They were found guilty of procuring and
distributing more than 10 kg of heroin and opium.
49. On 28 February 1991, nine persons were executed in Sirjan. Their names
were as follows: Daryush Hamzeii, son of Gang-Alit Mohammad Sadaghat
(Mahmmoud), son of Hosein; Jan-Ali Barehi-Nezhad, son of Amir-Ali;
Chorban-Ali Bani—Asadi, son of Kaeb-Ali; Hedayatollah Khojasteh-Nezhad, son of
Zolf-Ali; Amrollah Ghasemi, son of Gholam—Eosein; Mansour Salimpour Jalali,
son of Ismaiil; Hosein Balaghi man-Lou, son of Iraj; and Iraj Najmod-Dini,
son of Kaeb—Ali. They had been found guilty of drug trafficking and of
procuring and distributing arms. Their properties were also confiscated.
50. On 28 February 1991, five persons were executed in Zahedan. No reasons
were given for their execution. .
51. In addition to the names cited above, the names of other persons
reportedly executed during the month of February were given as follows:
Ruhanikhah and Mohri, executed in Qom for political reasons; L. Iraj and
Hamze Mi, executed in Tehran on charges of murder; Rahnama, executed in
Qouchan for drug trafficking; Reza Anayat, executed in Ghorgan for drug
trafficking; and Akhtan Mohammad Kakavand and Mahmood Yornorozehi, executed
for drug trafficking.
E/CN • 4/1992/34
page 13
52. On 4 March 1991, nine persons were executed in Isfahan on charges of drug
trafficking. Their names were given as follows: Rhod Morad Borji,
Ismael Tavakol, Yadallah Kamaldini, Melaizet Taranejad, Asghar Ghanbari,
Nosratallah Salmani, Seyedali Akbar Ghazi, Abdolraof Mazarei and Eatam Zanaki.
53. On 5 March 1991, 28 persons were executed in Tehran on charges of drug
trafficking. Their names were given as follows: All Safari, Akbar Ahmad,
Sadegh Konjkar Khoshakhlagh, Mohainmad All Khosh Ghoftar, Rasan Molla Mirzaei,
Jan Mohainmad Samani, All Ghaeni, Lad Mohammad-Tajik Tajik,
Seyed Zaber Hashimi, Mi Abmad Abdullahi, Abbas Navaei, Gholam Hazrat,
Jafar Moheb Alizadeh, Eyde Mohammad Yosefi, Hasan Yosefi, Rajab All Torghan,
Cholam Husine Torghan, Mohammad Al! Shaken, Mostafa Eywazi, Mohsen Karbala
Chasein, Michel Khan Banghesh, Jafar Ghorbani, Bahram Heydarnejad,
All Mohasheghi, Seyfalrabman Seyed Morad, Mostafa Moradi, Mehdi Mohtashami and
Abdolghadir Safari.
54. On 5 March 1991, 10 persons were executed in Bakhtaran. No reasons were
given for their execution.
55. According to the Tehran Times , nine professional drug traffickers were
executed on 6 March 1991 in Isfalian upon verdicts of the Islamic Revolutionary
Court, endorsed by the prosecutor—general. They were condemned to death for
possession of and dealing in some 522 kg of opium and heroin. One of them was
an Afghan national.
56. On 9 March 1991, four persons were executed in Bojnourd. According to
Keyhan of 10 March 1991, the names and crimes of those executed in Bojnourd
were as follows: Khodaverdi Paliz, son of Heydar-Ali, found guilty of buying
and selling 15 kg of heroin and three bags of opium. By-Mohammad Rastgari,
son of Nourod-Din, found guilty of participation in the buying and selling of
15 kg of heroin and three bags of opium, and buying and selling 4.7 kg of
heroin, on two different occasions; Ali-Mohammad Davari, son of Mohammad,
found guilty of buying and selling 1.1 kg of heroin; Mohainmad Neyestani, son
of Vali, found guilty of buying and selling 43 grams of heroin. The named
persons were each executed according to a decision of the Islamic
Revolutionary Court in Bojnourd.
57. On 9 March 1991, four persons were executed in Karadj. No reasons were
given for their execution.
58. On 9 March 1991, four persons who had allegedly committed premeditated
murder were hanged in Ghasre central prison in Tehran. According to Kevhan of
10 March 1991 . their names and crimes were as follows: Hassan, son of
Khodaverdi, found guilty of the murder of Seyyed Zaer Mirzaii; Hamid, son of
Jahanbakhsh, found guilty of the murder of Mabmoud Teymour—Bourian; Behrouz,
son of Vallyol].ah, found guilty of the murder of Ali Ghasem—Ali; Mehdi, son of
Shams—Al!, found guilty of the murder of Mohammad ToraH. The death sentence
of a fifth person, 1IImad Imanpour, who had allegedly committed premeditated
murder, was commuted with the consent of the family of the victim.
EtC H • 4/1992/34
page 14
59. On 10 March 1991, 29 persons, including two women, were executed in
Ghasre central prison in Tehran. According to Ete laat of 11 March 1991, these
individuals had allegedly procured and distributed drugs for many years. Up
until the time of their arrest they had allegedly distributed a total of
3,300 kg of narcotics. Their names were as follows: Hamid Nazari, son of
Mohammad-Karim; Abdolniomen Hashemi, son of Chalandar; ?.bdolkheyo Sharifi, son
of Khodad Bakhsh; Abdol—Ali Hour-A u, son of Hour-All; Rahim Karim, son of
Kan e; Shamsoddin Mousavi, son of Sadroddin; Shamsi Akbari-Tehrani, daughter
of Nasrollah; Batoul Dezfouli, daughter of Gholam; Kamran Rashid, son of
Mohanimad-Ebrakim; Eslam Saudi, son of l3horban-Ali; Jomeh Khan-Ali, son of
Rostam; Mohammad ?aivar-Jami, son of Mohammad-Osman; Tajbar Yousef-Zehi, son of
Gholazn—Anvar; Hainid-Baba Morad-Soltani, son of Baba—Morad;
Mohaminad-Kabir Feyzi, son of Moheb-Khan; Serajoddin Ata-Mohammad, son of
Moloud-Dad; Mohammad-Anvar Salem-Jan, son of Mohammad-Alam; Hamidollab Niazi,
son of Shah-Mohanunad; Shir-Ali Safi, son of Mohaoemad-Ayoub;
Asadollah Jomeh-Khan, son of Abdolkhalegh; Hasan Khalili, son of Bashar;
Maeddin Alahverdi, son of Moezzoddin; Mohammad Gol-Mohammad, son of
Gol-Mohammad; Abdolkhalegh Senzer-Khalil, son of Abdolmalek; Habib Akbari, son
of Mohammad-Akbar; Majid Rahimi, son of Ezzatollah; Abbas Didar, son of
Yadollah; All Taghavi, son of Ghouch All; and Aniir-Houshang Shin, son of
Chazanfar.
60 , On 17 March 1991, 34 persons, including a woman and two Afghan nationals,
were executed in Mashhad. According to Etelaat and Kevhan International of
18 March 1991, the Islamic Revolutionary Court of Mashhad, Khorasan province,
had delivered their sentences on drug trafficking charges. Each of the
convicts had been found guilty of the possession, distribution and sale of at
least 30 grams of heroin or 5 kg of opium. Their names were given as
follows: Soleyznan Rakhshani, Abdollah Mazar-Zehi, Abdol—Ghaf far Abbassi,
Mohainmad—Vali Brahouii, Malek Hasanzadeh, Hasan Eklion, Abdollab
Valad-Mohammad, Mohammad Davani, Khodadad Ali-Jani, Seyyed-Mehdi Meshkat,
Hosein Mabmoudi Arya, Nazar Defa-Nya, Reza Yousefi, Amanollah Banouf an,
Mohammad-Ali Shahraki, Rajab Pour-Ali, Abmad Amiri, Abolghasem Hasanzadeh,
Nader Shaiibi, Abbas Salehi, Rabmat Ravan, Gholam-Reza AM, Mohsen Seifollahi,
Hakim Mokarrami, Ali-Akbar Yaghoubi, Yousef Habibi, Din-Mohammad Arab-Pour,
Gholam-Reza Ghouchani, Hayat Dasar-Far, Mashaallah Yousefi, Hasan Esmaiili,
Safar-Ali Arab-Teymouni, Hasan Khazaii Pourang and Hosein Shojaii.
61. On 29 March 1991, six members of a criminal gang were hanged in public in
Vali-Asr Square, Zahedan, upon convictions of the Zahedan Islamic
Revolutionary Court. According to the Tehran Times of 31 March 1991, those
hanged were found guilty of the distribution of narcotics, homicide, armed
robbery, terrorizing local people, blackmailing, illegal possession of arms,
gambling and other corrupt activities, threatening people and disturbing
social order. According to Keyhan of 2 April 1991, their names were:
Heydar Hashemzehi, son of Malekdad; Nouroddin Sanjouli, son of Gholam-Ali;
Mohammad-Nabi Mourpishi, son of Hasan; Hazrat Tajik, son of Gholam-Heydar;
Isa Brahouii, son of Gholam; and Mohammad-Ali Shakib, son of Sat ar.
62. In addition to the names mentioned above, the names of other persons
reportedly executed during the month of March were given as follows:
Samad Imamali and Jafar Manouchehni, executed in Jalula for political
reasons; Hasan Hussain Cholizade, executed in Tehran for murder;
E/ CN • 4/1992 / 34
page 15
Ashgar Yusef I, Abbas Tajeek Kurd, .Jalil Chasemi, Af shar Hussainpour,
Mi Akbar Hamidi, Yabya Khooshdell, Au Akbar Salari and Batool Mohammadi,
executed in Karaj for drug trafficking; and Gholamreza Janati,
Mohammad Cholimarri, Ali Zamani and All Akbar Gharmaei, executed in Neyshapoor
for drug trafficking.
63. On 4 April 1991, Mohammad Saudi and Fazlollah Pasha, nationals of
Afghanistan, were executed in Ahwaz. According to Keyhan of 5 April 1991,
they had in their possession a large quantity of heroin and hashish when
arrested.
64. On 4 April 1991, Reza Gore—Tapah Mianji, son of Abmad, and Ali Mousavi,
son of Badal, were executed in Birj and for allegedly procuring and
transporting 780 kg of opium.
65. On 4 April 1991, eight drug traffickers, including one woman, were
executed in Zahedan on charges of buying and selling drugs and of illegal
possession of arms, according to Keyhan of 5 April 1991. Their names were as
follows: Abdolsattar Shah-Karani--Zehi, son of Fazlolah; Mohainmad Hosein Asef,
son of Asef; Alan Amiri, son of All; Mohammad Tisheh-Kan, son of Shomouli;
Bakhsh-Ali Doganehi, son of Arab-Ali; Seyyed Vali Doganehii, son of Arab-Ali;
Khanoum—Zarbanou Narouii, daughter of Shirkhan; and Zaher Ghanbar Zehigargij,
son of Mohainmad.
66. On 19 April 1991, three nationals of Afghanistan were executed in Karaj
on drug trafficking charges. According to Kevhan of 20 April 1991,
Bashir Payel—Zahi, son of Mir-Ahsnad, born in 1968, was found guilty of buying
and selling 5 kg of opium and 350 grams of heroin. Mohkam Babaii, son of
Rahinatollah, born in 1969, was found guilty of buying and selling 494 grams of
heroin. Vali-Mohammad Khodadadi, son of Akbar, born in 1974, was found guilty
of buying and selling 150 grams of heroin.
67. On 19 April 1991, according to a decision of the Islamic Revolutionary
Court in Arak, Ghorban-Ali Karimi, son of Raj—Baba, was hanged in Arak on
charges of buying and selling 1 kg of heroin.
68. On 22 April 1991, 11 persons were executed in Hamadan. According to
Keyhan of 23 April 1991, the names of those executed were as follows:
Mohainmad Mohri, Mohaminad Rahimi, Ali-Reza Soltani, Abdollah Ayadi,
Motalleb Rhandani, Ali—Abmad Rostami, Ardeshir Rostami, Mohammad Fathi,
At shar Hajir, Gholam-Reza Nowrouzi and Kheyrollah Jafari. They were executed
in the Central prison of Hamadan after having been found guilty of buying and
selling more than 1,000 kg of drugs and of being involved in arms trading.
69. On 22 April 1991, four persons were executed in Bojnourd. They were
found guilty of buying and selling drugs. Their properties were confiscated.
70. On 22 April 1991, two persons were executed in Racht. No reasons were
given for their execution.
71. On 29 April 1991, 24 persons were executed in Masbhad, Khorasan
Province. According to Keyhan of I May 1991, each of them was found guilty of
procuring, distributing and hiding at least 30 grams of heroin or 5 kg of
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 16
opium. They were sentenced to death by the Islamic Revolutionary Court of
Mashhad. Their names were given as follows: Hasan Ghaffari-Hematabadi, son
of Hosein, aged 33; Mohammad Asef Afghan!, son of Ismaiil, aged fl;
Gholam Jahani, son of Abdairabman, aged 24; Mohammad—Hosein Arab, son of
Najaf—Ali, aged 31; Kazem Albekerd, son of Abdolghaffar, aged 46;
Cholam Heydar-Nari, son of Gol-Mohammad; Mohammad Hajizadeh, son of Ramazan,
aged 28; Ramazan Raghir, son of Hosein, aged 32; Sholam Afghan!, son of
Rabbani, aged 36; Rasoul Afghan!, son of Zya, aged 31; Abmad Afghani, son of
Yousef, aged 44; Yar-44ohammad Afghan!, son of Gholam-Heydar, aged 39;
Sakineh Mehdipour; Gholam Reza Chafari; Morteza Poorhashemi; Mahrokh Afghani;
Mirkhan Afghan!; Atarallah Barikzehi; Abdolislam Zori; Mohammad Reza Mehreban;
Ibrahim Khafali; Rasan Shin; Ui Mohamynad Nernatshahi; and Khodbakhshe Khani.
72. On 29 April 1991, 30 persons were executed in Ghasre Central prison in
Tehran. They were found guilty of possessing and distributing more than
2,500 kg of drugs. According to Keyhan of 30 April 1991, their names were as
follows: Nazar Salar—Zehi, Mousa Hasan-Zehi, Ali—Reza Kord—Bacheh,
Mohammad Zahmatkesh, Jebril Sheikhverdizadeh, Hosein Zoud—Fekr, Bahram Jafari,
Atao].lah Nazari, Mehdi Morteza-Ghaserni, Mazaher Mohammadi Sarghoushi,
Chodrat Zareii—Bijafa, Abdol—Khalil Jajick (Afghan!), Ahxnad Mohseni,
Gholam—Hosein Pourshir, Soleyman Ehsani, Abbass Nowbari, Mohaxnmad-Hosein
Tajiki—Afghani, Majid Khatibi, Ali Alavi-Babol-Hakim, Ali-Reza Ahangar
Ghorbani, Ali-Gholi Derakhsan, Shahab Mohebbi, Cholam-Reza Hasan-Tafreshi,
Reza Raygan, Mohammad Raygan, Rochieh Raygan, Tabere Javan, Sina Javan,
Farid-Reza Ayazi and Malek-Mohammad Ebrahimi.
73. In addition to the names mentioned above, the names of other persons
reportedly executed during the month of April were given as follows:
Reza Ghorghtape Meyanji and Al! Mosavi, executed on drug trafficking charges
in Mashhad; Mehdi Khaneyan, executed on charges of murder in Hamadan; and
three persons, named Naser, Rasan and Ali, executed on charges of murder in
Tehran.
74. On 1 May 1991, 14 persons were executed in Torbat—e Jam. Their names
were given as follows: Mohammad Zabouri, son of Nematollab;
Barat Shah-Mohammad, son of Mohaxnmad-Khan; Gholam Anvari, son of Fazel;
Abmad Nazari, son of Ali—Mohammad; Mohammad-Omar Afghani, son of
Seyyed Mohammad; Rahim Rashidi, son of Karim; Ali Rezaii, son of Hasan;
Hosein Rezaii, son of Hasan—Jan; Rahmatollah Chasemi, son of Habibollab;
Jahingir Mehdjzadeh, son of Mohammad; Gol-Alimad Jahan-Beygi, son of
Mohammad-Sadigh; Gol—Abmad, son of Golmir; Barakat Afghani, son of Kadar; and
Mohades Afghani, son of Shah-Mohammad. All of them were sentenced on charges
of drug trafficking.
75. On 1 May 1991, Ezzatollah Sahraii and Reza Harati were executed in
Malayer, convicted of possession and distribution of narcotics.
76. On 1 May 1991, Mohammad Darabi, son of Habibollab, and Hosein Zargari,
son of Ismaiil, were executed in Karaj, convicted of buying and selling more
than 60 kg of opium.
E/CN.4/ 1992/34
page 17
77. On I May 1991, five persons were executed in Kachan on drug trafficking
charges. Their names were given as follows: Rasan Rahiini, Morad Rahimi,
All Reza Choldar, Parviz Rahimi and Au Mohammad Sharifzade.
78. On 2 May 1991, a woman named Kobra Mousavi was stoned to death in Ghorveh
(Jezin). She was accused of having relations with a Guardian of the Islamic
Revolution who served in the Guardian's station in Ghorveh.
79. On 15 May 1991, a group of 40 drug traffickers, including 22 Afghans,
were executed in Masbhad following verdicts issued by the Islamic
Revolutionary Court. They had been found to be carrying 30 grains of heroin
or 5 kg of opium, according to the information provided by the Tehran Times
International Weekly of 16 May 1991. Their names were given as follows:
Assadallah, Abdulghafor, Sadralddin, Mohainmad Ghos, Ahinad Valadshah,
Abdul Baghi, Abubakr, Jainshid, Seyed Nasraldin, Moharnmad, Abmad Vali Sot i,
Abdul Samad, Abdul Chani, Bazar, Gholam Heydar, Hasrat, Jotne, Rashid,
Allah Nazar, Mola Afghani, Heydar Keshiniri, Mehdi Salehi, Majid Moradi,
Hasan Vahidi, Baratali Rezaei, Ali Ibrahurnian, Heydar Mohammad Chasemi,
Jamshid Azarian, Mohammad Mahsori, Ali Akbar Kheyabani, Ibrahim Ashori,
Bahram Kalami, Mohsen Dehghan, Mohamrnad Bagher Akhteraei, Mehdi Sabonati,
Reyhane Ghochani, Xli Soltani, Gholam Busine Delarami, Cholam Husinezade and
Mabmod Abadi.
80. On 15 May 1991, five persons were executed in Rachan. A woman
over 60 years of age was among those executed. No reasons were given for
these executions. According to Keyhan of 23 May 1991, demonstrations were
held in ICachan against the executions. According to other sources, most of
those executed were subjected to a secret, summary trial, and were not given
access to a lawyer. It was reported that some political opponents were among
those executed.
81. On 19 May 1991, 24 persons were executed in Mashhad on charges of drug
trafficking. Two women and 11 nationals of Afghanistan were among those
executed.
82. On 23 May 1991, six persons were executed in Bakhtaran on charges of
drug trafficking. Their names were given as follows: Ja].il Teshekani,
Reza Mirzaei, Masod Moradneya, Shahbaz Ali Akhtari, Allah Bakhshi Mirzaei and
Behroz Pooreyan.
83. On 23 May 1991 . Mabmood Rostami and Husine Mosayan were executed in
Rhorramabad on charges of drug trafficking.
84. In addition to the names mentioned above, the names of other persons
reportedly executed during the month of May were given as follows:
Bahram Hedayeti, executed on charges of murder in Babol; Ashegha li Sa limzade,
executed on charges of murder in Ardabil; Hainid Chasemi and Rasol Ashorizade,
executed on charges of murder in Bandarabbas; and Mohammad Sabori,
Barat Shabmohanimadi, Gholam Anvari, Abmad Nazari, Mohammad Omar Afghani,
Rahim Rashidi, Ali Rezaei, Husine Rezaei, Rabmatallab Ghasemi,
Johanghir Mehdizade, Gholabmad Johanbeyghi, Gholabmad, Barakat Afghani and
Mohades Afghani, executed in Mashhad on drug trafficking charges.
E/CN.4/ 1992/34
page 18
85. On 8 June 1991, Dr. Jabangir Salimi, Associate Professor at Tabriz
University, was executed. It was said that the Revolutionary Court of Tabriz
handed over the body of Professor Salimi to his family upon the payment of
five million rials (about US$ 70,000 at the official rate of exchange) and an
undertaking not to arrange burial and mourning rituals. It was asserted that
the family was forbidden to bury his body in a public graveyard.
Professor Salimi had allegedly criticized the Government s economic and social
policies in Tabriz University on 16 May 1991.
86. On 30 June 1991, 10 drug smugglers, including an Afghan national, were
executed in Mashhad for heroin trafficking, subsequent to death sentences
issued by the Islamic Revolutionary Court.
87, In addition, the following executions were reported to have taken place
during the month of June: Mabmood Reza Monfared and Siyavoush Mi Mirzaie,
executed in Ghasre prison for murder; Nasrollah Saedi and Firouz Bonyani,
executed in Karaj for murder; Sager Dehghani, Abdolrazibeh Nasseri,
Abdolvakil Youssoufi, Mohammad Hussain Chisaki, Mord Mi Nassiri,
Hooshang Niknejad, Mi Ghareh Ghozlooh and Valiallah Ghorban Khanloo,
executed in Karaj for drug trafficking: and Ghods Barahooie, Hussain Dadi,
Mohammad Esmasili, A u Reza Badiei, Moharnmad Kaykhah, Javad Barkoordari,
Mohammad Namani, Elhaoe (Tehrani) Shelooghom, Ibrahim Asghari,
Choorbanali Kazemi, Mohanunad Choos Sarafrazi, Rajabali Eslamifard,
Hussain Sookhteh, Nader Reegie, Gholamreza Sookhteh, Mohammad Adelizadeh,
Sheer Mohammad Janbaygie, Ali Maghsoodi, Beebak Earahoot,
Masooneh Ramezanipour, Showkoor Abmad kfghani, Mir Saidi,
Khan Mohammad Afghani, Ramezan Saidi, Khoodaveri Afghani, Abdulrazagh Afghani,
Rabman Afghani, Moharnmad Zamani Bajgiran and Abmad Mokari, executed in Mashhad
for drug trafficking.
88. On 3 July 1991, 17 persons were executed in Mashhad, Khorassan province,
on drug trafficking charges. Their names were given as follows:
A u Reza BadPi, Mohammad Kaykhah, Javad Barkhordari, Mohammad Nameni,
Elham Veshloqom (known as Tehrani), Ebrahim Asqari, Qorban Ali Kazemi,
Mohammad Qos Sarfarazi, Rajab Mi Islamifard, Hossein Sookhteh,
Qolam Reza Sookhteh, son of Hossein Sookhteh, Nader Rigi, Mohamrnad Adelizadeh,
Shir Mohaioenad Jan Baygi, Ali Maqsoodi, Bibak Barahooti and
Ms. Massoumeh Raniezanipoor.
89. On 3 July 1991, Morteza Meshkani and Bassir Abmad Haydari were executed
in Neyshapour prison, Mashhad, Khorassan province, on charges of drug
trafficking.
90. According to Abrar and Kayhan of 4 July 1991, a man named Reza B. was
executed in Ghasr prison, Tehran. No reasons were given for his execution.
91. According to Kayhan of 1 July 1991, 36 persons were executed in Raja'i
prison in Karaj, province of Tehran. Their names were given as follows:
Validad Akbari, Abdolnabi Naroo'i, Qolam Reza ToraH, Reza Pakhireh,
Abdolkha].il Sorori, Mohammad Abbassi, Nasser Naroo'i, Fakhreddin Moussavi,
Ahmadyar Mohammad Lashgari, Abdolaziz Payeh Barahoo'i, Hossein Khezli,
Abdollah Shahbakhsh, Qodrat A'Ala'i, Rassoul A hmadi, Kazem Rooman,
E/CN.4/ 1992/34
page 19
Bandar Singh, Ahdolsamad Nasser!, Abdolrabman Youssef Zehi,
Sedig Soror Pol Zehi, Zarif Tajik, Mansoor Darvish, Youssefzadeh roussef Zehi,
Mohammad Barahoo'i, Majid Naroo'i, Mohammad Bakhsh Qanbar Zehi,
Mohammad Youssef Salar Zehi, Mohssen Hosseini Shekar'abi, Abdolaziz Barahoo'i,
Noor Mohammad Narooi, Jama' Nooti Zehi Deraklzsh, Habibollah Rashid Barahoo'i,
Majid Sedaqat Barahoo'i, Mohanimad Reza Goon Baini, Abdolrabman Naroo'i,
All Qolkhani and Majid Abdollahirad. No reasons were given for their
execution.
92. According to Kavhan of 11 July 1991 and Ettela'at of 20 July 1991,
seven persons were executed in Malayer prison, province of Hamedan, after
being found guilty of possession and distribution of narcotics. Their
names were given as follows: Hossein Zanganeh, Ms. Malook Zahrehvand,
Ms. Sakineh Gholivand, Eedayat Razi, Mohammad Ali Mooradi,
Mohammad Shadallah Ainiri (known as Shadi) and Ahoead Nayaf 1.
93. On 15 July 1991, a man named Qodratollah was hanged in Ghasr prison in
Tehran. No reasons were given for his execution.
94. According to JonIIouri Islaini of 18 July 1991, Akbar Kamali was hanged in
Dowlatabad, Isfahan Province. No reasons were given for his execution.
95. According to Ressalat of 8 July 1991, ‘a number of drug traffickers were
executed in Tebran”.
96. According to Kayhan of 23 July 1991 and Ettela'at of 27 July 1991, a man
named Samad was hanged after receiving 74 lashes in Ghasr prison in Tehran, on
22 July 1991, on charges of murder.
97. On 25 July 1991, seven persons were executed in Birjand, Khorassan
province. Their names were given as follows: Noroz Sanjari, Ramezan Bebmadi,
Mohainmad Nokhah, Rand Ghalche'i, Mohaininad Rajabi, Dadkhodad Naroo'i and
Naf as Go]. tajik. No reasons were given for their execution.
98. During IIe month of July 1991 the following persons were reportedly
executed on charges of drug trafficking: Norrabmad Reegi Konhari,
Pasand Shahbaksh, Moorteza Roohani, Ebrahum Abbasi and Bando Ghanbar Zahi in
Isfahan; and Maryasn Sheikhie and Khatoon Zafari in Khoramabad.
99. It was further reported that an unnamed man, aged 21, was executed in
July for the rape of three boys and the murder of two of them; he was said to
have been pushed from a cliff top.
100. In early July 1991, five persons were executed in Rasht, Gilan province,
after being found guilty of IIe possession and distribution of narcotics.
Their names were given as follows: Akbar Maljoo. Mehdi Daemi Fir Ka lachaj,
Akbar Davani, Jalal Sakhtroozi and Hadi Yazdanyar.
101. In July 1991, Zolfaghar Mullaiy was executed in Sanjan, reportedly for
political reasons.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 20
102. In addition to the names mentioned above, other executions of unnamed
people during the month of July were reported as follows. One unnamed person
was executed in Kerman, Kerman province, on charges of murder and rape.
Another person was executed in Tehran on charges of murder. Two unnamed
persons were executed in Malayer, Ramedan province, on drug trafficking
charges, and 36 unnamed people were executed in Tehran on charges of drug
trafficking.
103. On 2 August 1q91, six persons were executed in Sirjan, Kerman province.
Their names were given as follows: Seyed Akbar Poor Seyed, Qolam Reza Naderi,
Morad Bolordi, Davood I chajavi, Majid Kamjoo and Akbar Shahryari. No reasons
were given for their execution.
104. According to of 21 August 1991, a man named Mohammad Reza and a
woman named Kobra were stoned to death after receiving 70 lashes in
Qazian Sangar, Gilan province. No reasons were given for their execution.
105. In August 1991, five persons were executed in Mahabad prison, allegedly
for political reasons. Their names were given as follows: Khaled Sharifi,
Soleiman Sheiky, Ibrahim Tazah, Mohammad Sharifi and Kamran Munadzadah.
106. Also in August 1991, Mashallah Sahraie was executed in Sanandaj and a
person named Nader in Tehran, both on charges of murder. Delshad Dastres and
Faiza llah Paykani were executed in Bakhtaran on drug trafficking charges.
107. According to Jomhouri Islam ! of 5 September 1991, three persons were
executed in Khorrantabad prison, Lorestan province. Their names were given as
follows: Xli Karam Kasa'inejad, Melir Xli tranfar and Arikbak Kheradmandan.
108. Also in September 1991, Nasro llah Sahraie was executed in Malayer,
Hamedan province, after being found guilty of the possession and distribution
of drugs. A person named Chofoor was executed in Ghasr prison in Tehran, on
charges of murder, and Azadeh Shahnavazi was executed in Isfahan. No reasons
were given for his execution.
iou. During October 1991, 81 persons were said to have been executed. Among
those executed were Mizra Karami, in Moamseni, on charges of armed robbery;
Hassanali .Jafarzadeh and Mostafa Mehdizadeh, in Isfahan, allegedly for
political reasons; a person named Arshad, in Ghasr Prison in Tehran, on
charges of murder: Amir Farshbaf, in Tehran, on charges of murder; a person
named Rabman, in Tehran, on charges of murder; and Sohrab Kabkazan, in
Dashtestan, Barazjan, on charges of murder and rape.
110. Also in October 1991, the following 28 persons were executed in Mashhad,
Khorassan province, on drug trafficking charges: Seyed Ataa llah Axnir Amjadi.
Ezatal lah Ramezanpour, Avaz Yousefi, Karim Zivazi, Mashallah Jahani,
Gholam Mohammad Bolandi, Mohammad Omrani, Gholam Reza Shahjoie,
Noorali Shamani, Isa Farkhondeh, Safdar Goloui, Kalandar Barahvie,
Ghorbanalj Tatari, Emamdad Taj-Mohammadi, Cholam Hussain Torbati,
Ghorbanali Bazar, Hussain Dadvar, Nik Mohammad, Gholbiebie Rezaie,
Alarn Barahovie, Zeyvar Tabaheri, Soolat Alijani, Esmat Yavari,
Zeinulabedeen Choolami, Hedieh Aftiyan, Abdullah Sa lehzadeh,
Sadeegh layegh Teezabi and Hussain Arjavic.
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 21
111. Also in October 1991, another 25 unnamed persons were executed in
Mashhad, Khorassan province, on charges of drug trafficking, and one unnamed
judge was executed in Mashhad for taking bribes.
112. It has also been reported that in early October 1991 20 unnamed Baluchis
were executed in Zahedan, province of Sistan and Baluchistan. They were
reported by the Iranian press as armed bandits and as having been engaged in
drug trafficking. Baluchi sources have reportedly claimed that the death
sentences and executions took place on political grounds, and that a period of
only one week elapsed between arrest and execution.
113. The following other cases or incidents concerning the right to life have
been reported.
114. On 18 April 1991, Mr. Abdol—Rahman Boroomand, an opponent of the Iranian
Government, was stabbed to death on a Paris street, allegedly by government
agents.
115. On 20 May 1991, Guardians of the Islamic Revolution in Tabriz allegedly
shot dead Hosein Ahari, a student at the Technical Faculty of the University
of Tabriz, and Fariba Akhavi, a student at the Faculty of Odontology of the
University of Tabriz, and a medical student of the same university. It has
been reported that the incident took place when the Guardians attempted to
arrest Doctor Yousef Mohseni, a professor of the university, who was at the
time giving a lecture in the amphitheatre. Students demonstrated in protest
against the arrest of their professor and the Guardians reportedly reacted by
shooting at the demonstrators.
116. According to the Iran Times (a newspaper published in Washington, D.C.)
of 24 May 1991, the Bead of the Judiciary, Ayatollah Yazdi, revealed in a
press conference in Tehran that a number of clerics had been executed in Qom
after having been tried by a clerics' special court. Ayatollah Yazdi was
quoted as saying that the executed persons were clerics from Qom OEeological
School who claimed prophecy and had started ignoring some of God's rules. The
news concerning these executions was first reported by the Salpam newspaper,
which referred to these clerics as “resurrectionists”. Elaborating on these
reports, the Head of the Judiciary reportedly said that, since the
establishment of the clerics' special courts in 1987, 14 clerics had been
executed and 236 other clerics had been discharged from their religious
offices.
117. On 15 June 1991, several women were reportedly shot by Revolutionary
Guards for protesting in a street near Vali—Ahd—Place against the obligation
to wear Islamic dress.
118. Concern has been expressed to the Special Representative about the
continuing endorsement by the Government of Iran of threats to the life of IIe
author Salman Rushdie. On 21 January 1991, Hojjatoleslam Seyed Mohammad
Mi Abtahi, Deputy for international Affairs at the Ministry of Culture and
Islamic Guidance, reportedly stated that Imam Khomeini's edict against
Salman Rushdie was designed to foil a perverse cultural invasion against
Islam's sanctities. On 14 February 1991, a statement by clerical groups
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 22
marked the second anniversary of the Imam Khomeini's Fatwa against
Mr. Rushdie. According to a Reuters cable, the statement said: “Even if
Salman Rushdie becomes the most pious person of the age, he cannot be
pardoned”. According to the Tehran Times of 7 March 1991, the head of the
Khordad 15 Foundation, Eojjatoleslazn Hassan Sane'i, stated that the foundation
would give 2 million dollars to anyone, “even if he or she is from among
Rushdie's associates, neighbours or bodyguards”, who brought the apostate to
justice.
119, On 3 July 1991, Mr. Alberto Ettore Capriolo, who translated The Satanic
Verses into Italian, was stabbed in Milan by a hit squad demanding the address
of Rushdie's place of residence. On 12 July 1991, Mr. Hitoshi Igarashi,
aged 44, who translated the novel into Japanese, was murdered at the
University of Tsukuba, near Tokyo. In this connection, the Special
Representative has also taken note of the information provided by the
Permanent Representative of the Isla mic Republic of Iran to the United Nations
Office at Geneva in his letter dated 18 December 1991 (see para. 19 above).
Furthermore, the Special Representative requested the Governments of Italy and
Japan to provide him with any information they would be able to make available
to him with regard to the investigations into the above-mentioned crimes.
120. Mr. Shahpour Bakhtiar, the last Prime Minister before the Islamic
Revolution, was found stabbed to death on 8 August 1991 at his home outside
Paris. His secretary, Mr. Katibeh Fallouch, was also assassinated. The
killings took place while Mr. Bakhtiar s home was under police protection.
Allegations have been received that the killings were carried out by agents of
the Iranian Government. According to L'Express of 22 August 1991 and Le Monde
of 23 August 1991, a communication from the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence
to one of its intelligence posts in Europe, reportedly requesting confirmation
of Mr. Bakhtiar's death, was intercepted before his corpse had been discovered
by the French police. A more recent article in Ce Monde of 21 September 1991
reports the confession of a person who claims to have facilitated arrangements
through the Iranian Government for, inter alia , the preparation of the Iranian
passports bearing false identities which were used by the two persons accused
of having carried out the assassinations.
121. According to French press reports, Mr. Massoud Hendi, aged 44, an Iranian
businessman charged with complicity in the murder of Mr. Shahpour Bakhtiar and
his secretary, Mr. Katibeh Fallouch, has implicated the Iranian Interior
Ministry in the plot to kill these persons. Mr. Hendi is said to have helped
the three presumed assassins by providing two of them with false visas to
enter France and false Turkish passports to facilitate their escape. The
Special Representative has requested the Government of France to provide him
with any information it would be able to make available to him with regard to
investigations into this case.
122. With respect to executions in general, the Special Representative
continued to receive information according to which the families of the
executed are not informed of the place of burial. In this regard, requests
were received concerning the place of burial of Mr. Reza Esmati, born in 1950,
and Mr. Farzad Dadvar, both said to have been executed in Evin prison
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 23
in 1989. A similar request was received for information concerning the burial
site of Hr. Hehran Samadzadeh, who was said to have been executed on
30 July 1988 after having spent almost seven years in prison subsequent to his
arrest in Karaj on 21 September 1981; information was also sought by his
family in relation to his last written will.
123. Subsequent to transmitting his memorandum to the Iranian Government on
5 December 1991, the Special Representative has received the following
additional allegations.
124. According to Kayhan International of 5 December 1991, four persons,
including two Afghan nationals, were executed on 4 December 1991 in Mashhad,
Rhorasan province. They were found guilty by the revolutionary court of the
city of dealing in 5.85 kg of heroin. Their names were given as follows:
Abdolghani, aged 36, Afghan; Sattar, aged 50, Afghan; Mohammad Sarkhouhi,
aged 31; and Mohammad All Nik—Farjam, aged 36.
125. On 1 December 1991, nine persons were hanged in Zabedan, Sistan and
Baluchestan province, upon a verdict issued by the revolutionary court.
According to Tehran Times of 9 December 1991, the executions were carried out
in public while residents of the city chanted slogans. The nine persons were
charged with having clashed with disciplinary forces, blocking the roads to
passengers and creating a state of terror for people.
126. In the closing meeting of the Special Representatives visit to the
country only 85 executions were officially confirmed for the year 1991 (see
also chapter III). Subsequently a list was provided by the Government with
details of the names and crimes of those 85 persons (see annex IV).
B. Enforced or involuntary disavpearances
121. As regards reports of enforced or involuntary disappearances, the Special
Representative wishes to refer to the report of the Working Group on Enforced
or Involuntary Disappearances (E/CN.4/1992/18). The Working Group has
transmitted to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran a total of 491
cases of missing persons, two of which were reported to have occurred in
1991. So far only one case has been clarified by information received from
non-governmental sources.
C. The Right to freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or deara ing
treatment or punishment
128. Torture and ill-treatment of detainees continued to be reported.
Although torture for the purpose of extracting confessions is explicitly
forbidden by article 38 of the Constitution of the Isla mic Republic of Iran,
it was alleged that this prohibition continues to be routinely flouted in
order to obtain confessions, particularly in the case of opponents of the
Government. Reported methods of torture included flogging with whips or
cables on the feet or on the back, suspension by the wrists, deprivation of
sleep for extended periods and various forms of psychological torture.
E/CN.4/l992/34
page 24
129. The Special Representative received testimony from former political
prisoners who were in detention in 1990 and 1991 and who claim to have
suffered or witnessed such practices as those noted above. They alleged that
torture was commonly applied during interrogation and that, in some instances,
it continued even after trial. They further alleged that other prisoners were
frequently required to witness these practices as they awaited their turn. In
this connection, it has been said that prisoners have no means of seeking
redress for ill—treatment and torture suffered while in prison. No measures
are known to have been taken during 1991 to establish legal or procedural
safeguards against prisoners being tortured or otherwise mistreated.
130. It has also been reported that no members of the security forces and no
prison officers have been brought to justice during 1991 for the torture or
ill-treatment of prisoners. In this regard the Iranian Government provided
the Special Representative with a list of violations committed by prison
personnel which is reproduced in annex III.
131. It has been reported that Mr. Abdol All Bazargan, one of the persons
arrested for signing a critical open letter to the President of the Republic
(see paras. 170—173 below), and at least two other co—signatories of the
letter were beaten during the early stages of their detention in the Komiteh
Mushtarak prison in Tehran.
132. Information recently received details the alleged torture in detention
of Mr. All Gaffari Hosseini in 1990. According to the information,
Mr. Gaffari Hosseini reported that he had been stripped naked and left in a
dark cell for two days upon his detention in Tehran in August 1990. Following
these first two days, he claims to have been taken to an upper floor in the
same building where he was beaten repeatedly and thrown down a staircase
before being taken to another room where he was tied to a table and beaten on
the soles of his feet. After these beatings, he was placed in a basement cell
filled knee-deep with water. Later that day, he claims to have been suspended
by his wrists with a stone tied to his penis, and then further beaten
(particularly in the area of his kidneys) while being interrogated about his
contacts and activities abroad. He reports that such treatment continued for
days, that some of his toe—nails were forcibly removed, and that he was kept
blindfolded throughout, except when left alone in his cell. Following these
tortures, Mr. Gaffari Hosseini claims to have been transferred to Evin prison
where he was placed in a small cell and remained incommunicado for six weeks.
Some three and a half months later, he was taken, blindfold, to a court in
Evin prison where he was apparently acquitted of all charges against him,
resulting in his release about two weeks later.
133. It was reported that on 24 April 1991 Ms. Parivash Amen, aged 19, was
arrested at Va li-Ahd Square, Tehran, by Guards of the Islamic Revolution
because she was not dressed in accordance with Islamic regulations (see
section G below). She was allegedly tortured while in detention. On
5 June 1991, while in a coma, she was handed to her parents who took her to
?ahlavi hospital. Dr. Houshang Oveissi and Dr. Mohaxnmad Sadeghi reported to
the police (at station No. 8) Ms. Amen's state as a result of torture. OEe
authorities allegedly suspended the doctors from their jobs, imprisoned them
and later proclaimed IIat Dr. Oveissi and Dr. Sadeghi were responsible for the
death of Ms. Amen.
E/CN • 4/1992/34
page 25
134. It was reported that Hojatol—Eslam Haj-Agha Khaleghi, head of Ghazvin
prison and a religious judge, was arrested and jailed in May 1991, accused of
raping female prisoners. It was alleged that he had arranged for female
prisoners to be placed under his personal and direct supervision. Women who
resisted his sexual advances were allegedly tortured and raped. It was said
that police authorities sent a female detective disguised as a prisoner
charged with drug trafficking to the prison under the supervision of
Hojatol—Eslam Khaleghi. He was allegedly arrested while making sexual
advances towards her and sent to Tehran for trial. Although he was arrested
in flagrante delicto , he was released shortly after his arrest and returned to
Ghazvin where he is now allegedly working as an interrogator in the Islamic
Revolution s Central Komiteh.
135. It has been reported that Mr. Elyas Kohan was tortured while imprisoned
in Evin prison in Tehran from 25 February 1991 to 23 May 1991. He was taken
blindfold from his single cell to the prison office. There he was made to sit
on a chair near the washbasin, where he was hit. Interrogators (among whom,
allegedly, were Mr. Dehbozorg, Mr. Omidwar and a man called Mahmoud Nia) then
dipped a sponge into cold water and let the cold water flow over his neck and
chest. Afterwards, he was reportedly taken to another room where the
interrogators beat him with hard plastic sticks on his head, face and
fingernails. L.ater, they hit his toe—nails in the same manner. The torture
was repeated several times, sometimes on the same day. As a result of the
torture, his upper jaw was reportedly broken and he is now gradually losing
his eyesight.
136. The imposition of judicial punishments which constitute torture or cruel,
inhumane or degrading treatment reportedly remains widespread. Commonly
reported punishments included amputation of limbs or fingers for theft, and
flogging for a wide range of offences. Notable among such incidents is the
reported sentencing of nine persons to between 10 and 30 lashes, in addition
to lengthy terms of imprisonment, for having signed their names to an open
letter criticizing Government policies (see section E below).
137. In January 1991, Jomhouri Islami newspaper reported that
Rossein Rhoshefat had the tour fingers of his right hand amputated for theft.
138. Also in January 1991, two men were reported to have been subjected to a
flogging of 74 lashes before being executed on drug trafficking charges.
139. It was also reported that in April 1991 five thieves were sentenced
in $hiraz to have their hands cut off. OEe verdict, issued by Shiraz Penal
Court No. 1 and approved by IIe Supreme Court, was carried out in Adelabad
prison in Shiraz.
140. According to Abrar of 30 April 1991, four fingers of a robber's
right hand were cut off in Borazjan. OEe ruling, issued by Bushehr Penal
Court No. 1 and approved by the Supreme Court, also condemned the robber to
50 lashes and reimbursement to the original owners of 1,530,000 rials.
141. According to a report in Keyhan in June 1991, Firous Bonyani was
sentenced to an unspecified number of lashes in addition to the death penalty
for a murder (see para. 87 above concerning his execution).
E/CN.4/1992 / 34
page 26
142. It has been reported that during April and May 1991 the Guardians of the
Islamic Revolution Komitehs arrested many women for violations of Islamic
regulations on dress and appearance, in particular for wearing thin stockings
and make-up. Other forces, such as the so—called “RAD” and “TAEMIN”, have
allegedly participated in such arrests. It has been further alleged that the
Guardians forced the arrested women to put their feet into bags full of
cockroaches and mice. Many women were allegedly sentenced to flogging.
143. According to Kevhan of 25 May 1991, two women and seven men were
sentenced by a trial court in Bakhtaran after having been found guilty of
misuse of public funds and mismanagement in relation to the Office for
Reconstruction of Bakhtaran, The men were each sentenced to two years'
imprisonment and a payment of fines which differed in amount depending on each
individual case, while the two women were sentenced to flogging.
144. It has been reported that on 13 September 1991 the Head of the Judiciary
stated:
“In Islam, we have Hodood and Ta'azirat. Hodood refers to the
punishments prescribed by the Almighty. God has specifically designated
certain punishments for individuals guilty of certain crimes, for
example, gessass , stoning or Ta'azirat which are not considered Ta'azir ,
in the true sense of the word. Rather, they are hadd , punishments which
are carried out by the whip. These are the type of things which are
inherent in Islam. Many of these things are not replaceable or
interpretable at any cost. No authority can revise, remove, tone down,
or tone up these things. So, we have not violated any human rights.
Rather, we have acted in accordance with the Universal Declaration of
Divine Human Rights. We have observed all the laws established by
religious principles. The punishments have been specified by our
religion” (see also chapter III).
145. Subsequent to sending his second memorandum to the Iranian Government
on 5 December 1991, the Special Representative has received additional
allegations of torture, including detailed descriptions of psychological and
physical torture in various prisons of the country. For example,
Sayed Mohammad Moosawy, son of Sayed Khalaf, is alleged to have been beaten
several times by guards of the General Drug Traffickers' Prison of Ahwaz
during the last three years. A number of persons also wrote to the Special
Representative complaining about health problems as a result of ill-treatment
or torture in prison.
D. The Administration of justice
146. With respect to the conduct of trials, it has been reported that
political trials in the Islamic Republic of Iran continue to fall far short of
international standards of fair trial. Defendants often have no access to
legal counsel, and proceedings are frequently said to last only a matter of
minutes. OEe public and press continues to be barred from revolutionary court
hearings. In this connection, it would seem necessary to recall the minimum
international standards for fair trial as set out in articles 10 and 11 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in article 14 of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (see also chapter III).
E/CN • 4 / 1992/34
page 27
147. Despite the notification by the Government of Iran to the Special
Representative (see letter of 16 January 1991 referred to in E/CN.4/1991/35,
para. 148) of the parliamentary adoption of legislation relating to the right
to appoint an attorney, that legislation attained force of law only in the
autumn of 1991 owing to a dispute between the Majlis and the Council of
Guardians, who had rejected the legislation. On the insistence of the Majlis,
the bill was submitted to the Council for the Determination of Exigencies,
which resolved the dispute in favour of the Majlis (see also chapter III).
148. In relation to the aforementioned legislation, it has been said that the
new measure will not safeguard the right to legal representation provided for
in article 35 of the Iranian Constitution and article 14 of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The bill approved by the Majlis was
said to purposefully omit all references to “attorney-at-law”
(“vakil—e—dadgostari”) and to replace such references with the word ‘attorney”
(vakil), who need not hold legal qualifications, on the grounds that under
Shari'a any Muslim is eligible to represent the accused in court. It was
reported that following the revolution the argument that qualified lawyers
were not sufficiently learned in the Shari'a was used to exclude them from the
courts, regardless of the wishes of the accused and their right to be
represented by a legal counsel of their own choice.
149. It has also been reported that there is currently no independent bar
association in Iran. Although the Law on the Independence of the Bar
Association. which dates from 1952, has not been annulled and remains legally
in force, Iranian lawyers are unable to elect their representatives. OEe
current president was appointed by the Ministry of Justice in 1982. He
informed the Special Representative during the first visit that in 1991 his
provisional term of unelected presidency would come to an end, and that
lawyers would again be able to elect the executive body of the association.
However, reports indicate that these elections have not taken place (see also
chapter III). Reference may be made in this regard to Principle 24 of the
Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, adopted by the Eighth United Nations
Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (see
A/CONF.144/28), which stipulates that the executive body of lawyers'
professional associations shall be elected by its members and shall exercise
its functions without external interference. The Basic Principles also
require that professional associations of lawyers ensure “that lawyers have
appropriate education and be made aware of the ideals and ethical duties of
the lawyer and of human rights and fundamental freedoms recognized by national
and international law” (Principle 9).
150. According to the Tehran Times of 21 April 1991, the Head of Judiciary.
Ayatollah Mohaminad Yazdi, stated that “some convicts may appeal against the
ruling passed after the first hearing and according to the law should be given
a second hearing. Therefore only the term passed after the final hearing can
be relied on'. This would seem to indicate that the right to appeal is
granted arbitrarily, in that not all may appeal.
151. It was reported that the President of the Supreme Court of Justice,
Moghtadaei, stated on 18 June 1991 that “in one case of criminals last week,
the Q ssass (death punishment) sentence was carried out even before the
S/CN.4/1992/34
page 28
murdered person's burial”. Regarding cases of drug traffickers sentenced to
death, it was reported that, in general, a very short period of time elapses
between arrest and execution, sometimes only a matter of days.
152. It was further reported that on 21 May 1991, Mullab Seyed Hossein
Mousavi Tabrizi, Majlis deputy from Tabriz, stated:
“The length of various stages of judgement leads to holding individuals
in prisons for years with their cases unresolved. Inappropriate
approaches of interrogators in courts or at the Ministry of Information,
which should definitively be under full judiciary supervision, irrelevant
and sometimes malicious summons and arrests, issuing judgements in some
courts in absence of a defence lawyer or any observer or even relatives
of the defendant, extracting confessions under force, threat, pressure,
etc., altogether are never compatible with the spirit of Islamic laws and
sacred goals of the revolution ... and the Constitution of the Islamic
Republic.”
153. Furthermore, it was reported that on 11 September 1991, Farhang Saleh,
Commander of the Guards Corps Special Unit of the Greater Tehran Security
District, stated that “with the cooperation of the sisters of the Guards Corps
of the anti—vice unit, 3,433 persons were arrested on charges of social
corruption in the past two months, 976 of whom have been turned over to the
judicial authorities”.
154. Reports have been received of arrests in Baluchistan in recent weeks as a
result of an increase in armed clashes between governmental forces and members
of Baluchi tribes. Those arrested reportedly include the elderly and the very
young, often taken from their homes, apparently as substitute prisoners for
other relatives engaged in armed combat (see also chapter III).
155. According to Abrar of 18 August 1991, Mr. Lajevardi, Head of the Prison
Organization, stated in Tabriz:
“Brothers attending the Fourth Seminar of the National Prison Directors
and Officials shared the view that, to uproot addiction from society,
addicts who turn to drugs for the fourth consecutive time must be
executed. Based on their experiences, the national prison directors and
officials felt that the existing addiction law is not effective and needs
to be revised.”
He reportedly noted that currently drug addicts and convicts make up
60 per cent of the prisoners in Iran (see also chapter Itt).
156. It was also reported that on 2 October 1991 Mr. Khalil Hariri, Director
of the Anti-Drug Department of the Greater Tehran Security Area, stated:
“721 key distributors of drugs have been arrested since 4 April 1991.
Most of them, vagrants with previous record, will be sentenced to death.
7,856 addicts have been identified and turned over to the relevant
authorities”.
E/CN • 4 / 1992/34
page 29
lie added that drug smugglers and addicts released from prison “must report
their addiction and occupational status every 15 to 20 days” and that “they
will be prosecuted and harshly treated should they fail to do so” (see also
chapter I II).
157. As concerns practices in sentencing, testimony received from former
prisoners continues to indicate that prison sentences never take into account
presentence terms of detention, which are sometimes very lengthy. During the
visit to the country the Special Representative was informed that a note to
article 18 of the new penal code recently approved in part by the Majlis
provided that, in future, prison sentences must take into account presentence
terms of detention (see also chapter III).
158. Moreover, reports indicate that release upon completion of a prison term
may in fact remain contingent on other factors, such as statements of
repentence and denunciation of personal views in the case of political
offences. Refusal may result in continuing detention. In this connection,
the Special Representative was told that such repentences and denunciations
are sometimes required on video-tape.
159. With respect to prison conditions, reports indicate that there seem to be
no effective rules regulating the conduct of prison guards who routinely act
with apparent impunity in beating and otherwise abusing prisoners and in
applying arbitrary punishments without explanation. It has also been said
that for the last two years political prisoners have been grouped with common
criminals in generally unhygienic conditions, with up to 32 persons said to be
crowded into rooms of less than 30 square metres, exacerbating the situation
considerably. In addition, political prisoners are said to be required to
endure forms of indoctrination, with refusal to participate resulting in
corporal punishment and extended periods of solitary confinement. One former
prisoner recently interviewed by the Special Representative claims to have
suffered several months of solitary confinement for such reasons.
160. With respect to IIe situation of Mehdi Dibaj (see E/CN.4/1991/35,
para. 136), the Special Representative requested further information. He also
requested information on the situation of the persons listed in annex I n to
document E/CN.4/1991/35 concerning whom there had been no official reply from
the Iranian Government (see annex III).
161. As regards the particular situation of female prisoners said to be held
in Section 209 (Asayeshgah) of Evin prison in Tehran, the Special
Representative requested information on their situation and legal status,
The Government s reply is contained in annex VI.
162. By the memorandum sent to IIe Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran
on 5 December 1991, the Special Representative requested information on the
situation and legal status of the following additional prisoners at Evin:
Abdol, Farzad Barati, Baghir Borzui, Changiz, Cheragh, Darkhast,
Muhammad Dihqan, Naser Farokhnia, Vazir Fathi, Gol-Mohammad, Abrahim Hajji,
Noor—Mohammad Hajji, Hamid, Amin Hajji, Hakimi Habibu'llah, Hassan, Hayat,
Kayvan Khalajabadi, Hainid Omid Zhan, Hassan Khan, Jangi Kahn, Jihand Ehan,
Joma flan, Morad IChan, Mirza Khan, Omid Rhan, Youssef Khan, Majid,
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 30
Akbar Mansouri, Mirshir, Bakhshu'llah Mithaqi, Bihnam Mithaqi, Mi Mohammad,
Malakeh Mohammadi, t4ortazavi, Mabnioud Mottahedine, Nasir, Fathollah Pirasanan,
Mehrdad Razaghi, Reza, Mi Reza, Rohollah, Shahnoor, Hossein Shetabi,
Yadollah, Haidar Youssef, Abbas Zaboli and All Ziaiha.
163. Subsequent to transmitting his memorandum to the Xranian Government
on 5 December 1991, the Special Representative has received the following
additional allegations.
164. It has been reported that the following persons were arrested for
political reasons during the months of September and October 1991:
Hossein Dashtgerd, aged 49, married with five children, arrested
on 29 September 1991; Mohainmad Rahim Bakhtiari, aged 40, married with three
children, arrested on 23 September 1991: Farhad Javian, aged 24, married,
arrested on 30 September 1991; Rouhollab Partieli, aged 56, married with five
children, arrested on 30 September 1991; Mohammad-Reza Afshari-Rad, aged 26,
single, arrested on 30 September 1991; Ms. Shahrbanu Akhshi, wife of
Moharramali Akhshi, arrested on 30 September 1991; Morteza Afshari—Rad,
married with two children, arrested on 7 October 1991; Moharramali Akhshi,
married with four children, arrested on 7 October 1991; Reza Pajouhesh,
arrested on 9 October 1991; and Mansour Moussavi, arrested on 9 October 1991.
165. In October 1991, members and sympathizers of an organization known as
Sazeman—E Jihan (the World Organization), were arrested for distributing
leaflets and cassettes and writing slogans on walls. Among those arrested
were Hesam Ghoreishi, Bahman Moussavizadeh, Akbar Mojaveri, Davoud Masoumi,
Cholain eza Bayat, Mohammad Ghaffari, Mehdi Elyasi, Amirchani, Amir Latifi,
Shahram Moini, Jaafar Mehdinejad and Kamran Riyahi, all aged in their 20s.
166. Furthermore, in November 1991 more than 300 persons were arrested in
Tehran, reportedly on various charges ranging from “sinful occupations” and
“misappropriation of funds” to “unauthorized political activities”, “having
bank accounts abroad”, and “frustration of government spiritual policies”. It
was said that in some cases charges were so vague that it would be impossible
for the prosecutor to formulate concrete accusations,
E. Freedom of expression, opinion and association and
the right to peaceful assembly
167, It has been reported that in spite of the Political Parties Act of 1981,
which legalized peaceful political opposition, and the statements by Iranian
Government authorities issued in December 1988 announcing its intention to
comply with that Act, the Ministry of Interior is still refusing to legalize
the Freedom Movement (Nehzat-E Azadi), established in 1961, and the
Association for the Defence of Freedom and the Sovereignty of the Iranian
Nation, established in 1986. Both organizations claim that their members have
made an important contribution to the cause of freedom in Iran, both before
and after the Islamic Revolution and enjoyed the support of the late
Imam Khomeini. They have reportedly declared that they do not oppose the
Islamic Republic and have pledged to abide by the Constitution,
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 31
168. It has been reported that six statements sent by the dissolved
Association for the Defence of Freedom and Sovereignty of the Iranian Nation
to several Iranian newspapers between March and July 1991 have not been
published.
169. Furthermore, it was alleged that under the Political Parties Act of 1981,
the only parties authorized so far are different factions of the Islamic
clergy. Non-political groups, such as the Society of Zoroastrian Priests, the
Society of Surgeons, the Association of Pediatricians, the Islamic Centre of
Teachers and the Islamic Association of Graduates from the Indo-Pakistan
Sub-Continent, have also been allowed to register under the 1981 Act.
170. According to reports received by IIe Special Representative, nine of the
co—signatories of an open letter which Mr. Mehdi Bazargan (Prime Minister of
the first provisional Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran), together
with 89 other persons, addressed to the President of the Republic have been
sentenced to imprisonment for terms ranging between six months and three years
and 20 or 30 lashes respectively. The names of those so sentenced were given
as follows: Ali Ardalan, Abdol Ali Bazargan (son of Mehdi Bazargan),
Habib Davaran, Khossro Mansourian, Nezamedine Movahed, Hashem Sabaghian,
Shams Shahshahani (former Prosecutor of Tehran), Mohammad Tavassoli Hojati
(former Mayor of Tehran) and Akbar Zarrinehbaf.
171. On 23 June 1991, the above—mentioned persons were said to have been tried
in summary proceedings held in camera . According to reports, the defendants
had no access to legal counsel, and former interrogators were called as
witnesses for the prosecution. The defendants were allegedly charged with
‘committing an outrage against the power of the State, the injury of
government officials, with attempting to destabilize the Government and
misleading the people into error”. OEese accusations were said to be based on
the Iranian Penal Code. The defendants were allegedly prevented from
answering the charges during the trial, which was concluded on 25 June 1991.
Ali Ardalan, Habib Davaran, Khossro Mansourian, Nezainedine Movahed,
Shams Shahshahani and Akbar Zarrinehbaf were each sentenced to three years
imprisonment. Abdol Ali Bazargan and Mohammad Tavassoli Hojati were reported
to have been sentenced to two years' imprisonment and Hashem Sabaghian to a
six-month prison term. The appeals lodged by the group have reportedly been
rejected (see also para. 130 above).
172. It was further reported that Mr. Abdol Ali Bazargan and at least two
other members of the group were beaten in the Komiteh Mushtarak prison in
Tehran during the early stages of their detention.
173. The Special Representative has also received several urgent reports about
the deteriorating health of Mr. Mi Ardalan. It was said that he had been
denied sufficient access to medicines required for his cardiac problems, which
had been aggravated by lengthy periods of incommunicado detention. Since his
sentencing, Mr. Ali Ardalan's already fragile health condition has reportedly
further deteriorated and, given his age of 77 years, concerns have been
expressed that his life might be in serious danger (reportedly his weight was
only 48 kilograms and in addition to his cardiac problems he was suffering
E/CN • 4/1992/34
page 32
from kidney failure, hypotension, prostate problems, fainting spells and
deteriorating eyesight). Upon examination by a prison doctor, hospitalization
was recommended in September in order for him to undergo surgery for the
installation of a pacemaker, but such hospitalization was allegedly denied
(see also paras. 130 and 170 above).
174. Concern has similarly been expressed about the health of Mr. Abdol Al!
Bazargan, Mr. Habib Davaran, Mr. Hashem Sabaghian, Mr. Nezamedine Movahed and
Mr. Akbar Zarrinehbaf. It has been reported that Mr. Movahed, aged 74, has
eye and cardiac problems and has apparently lost the use of one leg.
175. According to the Iran Times of 24 May 1991, Mr. Ghorban—Ali Saleh-Abadi,
a member of the Majlis from Mashhad, was asked to appear before the Islamic
Revolutionary Court at Evin prison on 16 May 1991 where he was questioned
about critical remarks IIat he had made in the Islamic Consultative Assembly
about the Government's policies. He told Ressalat that he has been asked to
appear for a second time before the Court for further questioning. .
176. According to a Reuters cable dated 15 August 1991, the t.eader of the
Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ali IChamenei had stated that “attacks on
the Government are treason which I would not tolerate for long”. Furthermore,
he had urged writers, preachers and government cultural organizations to
combat “an all—round, organized offensive against the revolution's cultural
values, mounted by opportunist elements in IIe form of artistic and
intellectual activities” (see also chapter III).
177. Subsequent to transmitting his memorandum to the Iranian Government
on 5 December 1991, the Special Representative has received the following
additional allegations.
178. Hojjatol-Eslam Hossein Hashemian, Senior Deputy Speaker of the Majlis,
was summoned in November 1991 by the Clerics' Special Court for questioning,
and was allegedly charged with conspiracy against the late Imam's decrees.
According to Salaarn of 7 November 1991, Hashemian's summons created great
concern among the Majlis deputies. He was reportedly questioned for several
hours and subsequently allowed to go home,
179. Mr. Asghar Hashemi, a cleric in Masshad and the editor of Khorrasan , was
allegedly convicted in a secret trial and sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment
and 80 lashes for having published features criticizing certain policies as
being contrary to the late Imam's edicts,
F. Political rights
180. With regard to the next election for the Majlis, it was alleged that no
candidate may engage in the election campaign before his or her candidacy has
been sanctioned by local religious and government institutions. It was said
that the Ministry of Interior must screen all candidates and submit their
names to the Guardian Council for final approval (see also chapter III).
E/CN • 4/1992/34
page 33
G. The situation of women
1B 1. The Special Representative has received the following complaints about
the situation of women in the Islamic Republic of Iran, in addition to the
allegations contained in his last report to the Commission on Human Rights
(E/CN.4/1991/35, chapter II, section H).
182. It has been reported that, according to the Law of Retribution and
Punishment, if a woman murders a man his family has the right to ask for
retribution or “blood-money”, a sum paid to the next of kin as compensation
for the slaughter of a relative. By contrast, if a man murders a woman, it is
reported that her murderer must, before retribution, pay half the amount of a
man's blood—money to her guardian. OIIer discriminatory practices are found
in the law of inheritance whereby women inherit half as much as men. It has
also been stated that women have to obtain the official permission of their
husbands in order to travel abroad. Further, it has been reported that the
public display of women's sports is subject to several restrictions, and women
are to be segregated from men on public transport.
183. Other reports indicate that 89 per cent of Iranian rural women are
illiterate. Strict sexual segregation of teachers and students in Iran has
allegedly resulted in the closure of many schools for girls, owing to a lack
of female teachers, overcrowding of classes and a severe decline in
standards. In rural areas in particular, this has allegedly meant a denial
of education to girls.
184. Concern continues to be voiced over legal provisions requiring women
to observe “Hijab” by showing no more than their face and hands in public,
wearing clothes that must completely cover their curves. Offenders may
receive a maximum of 74 lashes for “Bad—Hijabi”, be jailed or fined.
According to reports received by the Special Representative during 1991,
arrests of Iranian women on charges of non—use of full Islamic dress or
wearing make-up continue. It has been said that women are searched at the
entrances to government offices to see if they have cosmetics or are wearing
thin stockings.
185. It has been reported that the Guardians of the Islamic Revolutionary
Xomitehs frequently harass and inconvenience women in Haft-Hoz Square and
Narmak district in Tehran. Regular clashes have allegedly taken place between
the Guardians and the young men of the neighbourhood who try to defend these
women.
186. It has been reported that in April 1991 the Office of Disciplinary Forces
for Greater Tehran, which is run by the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution,
issued a communiqu in which all traders and shopkeepers were asked not to
sell goods to women who do not wear full Islamic dress. Shopkeepers and
persons responsible for government offices, hospitals, cinemas and other
public places have also been asked to prevent women not wearing full Islamic
dress from entering their premises.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 34
187. It was further reported that in April 1991 the disciplinary forces in
Tehran closed down hundreds of shops and businesses on charges of having or
selling ladies' underwear or “indecent dresses and goods'. Shopkeepers have
complained that no criteria have been set out for distinguishing “indecent”
from “decent” dresses or goods. The agents of the disciplinary forces
reportedly have complete freedom to consider anything as indecent. Allegedly,
this usually includes women's corsets or underwear, night-dresses and
cosmetics.
188. According to Irna and Reuters cables, Tehran police detained 800 women
for flouting the Islamic dress code on 22 and 23 April 1991. Tehran Police
Commander General Abbas Ogbaei was said to have reported that 50 shops were
also closed for neglecting Islamic codes during a campaign launched on
21 April 1991.
189, According to the Jomhouri Island of 15 July 1991, the Department of
Public Areas for the Greater Tehran Disciplinary Region stated:
“All car rental agencies must refrain from offering any service to
the improperly-veiled women. the special investigative teams of this
Department will begin inspecting agencies across the city once this
statement is published. Any violations in this regard will result in
the closure of the agencies”,
190. On 26 July 1991, in downtown Isfahan, a group of women were allegedly
harassed, beaten and arrested by Revolutionary Guards on the charge of being
improperly veiled. Various groups of people attempted to free the arrested
women from the Guards, and were allegedly shot and wounded by the Guards who
opened fire in an attempt to disperse them; 355 persons were allegedly
arrested. According to Salaam of 29 July 1991, the clash began after police
and members of the “Headquarters to combat social vices” organization stopped
women in a central 1sf ahan square. 5alaazn referred to notorious elements
who ca ine to the support of the women breaking the dress code, shouting
“deviationist slogans” before smashing windows in the city centre. According
to a Reuters cable of 29 July 1991, the clash was the biggest reported in
recent years over enforcement of the dress code.
191. It has been reported that on 15 August 1991 the Prosecutor—General,
Abolfazl Musavi—Tabrizi, said that “anyone who rejects the principle of the
‘Hijab' (dress code) is an apostate and the punishment for an apostate under
Islamic law is death” (see also chapter III) ,
192. Furthermore, it was reported that the Interior Ministry's
Director—General for the Affairs of Foreign Citizens and Immigrants,
Abmad Hosseini, stated on 30 March 1991:
“Marriages between Iranian women and foreign men will create many
problems for these women and their children in future, because the
marriages are not legally recognized. Religious registrations of such
marriages will not be considered as sufficient documentation to provide
legal services to these families.” (See also chapter III.)
E/CN.4/l992/34
page 35
H. The situation of children
193. It has been reported that on28 April 1991 the Cabinet approved
government regulations revising the allocation of benefits for spouses and
children. In accordance with the new regulations, it was reported that
families who already have three children will not receive any benefits for any
other child born one year after the new regulations come into effect. It was
said that this regulation implied abolishing several legal rights of the
child, such as coupons for basic commodities, allowances for the child's
guardianship, and maternity leave for employed women (see also chapter III).
I. The right to leave one's country and to return
194. It has been reported that relatives of Iranian expatriates and refugees
have been detained and threatened in order to pressure expatriates and
refugees to return to Iran.
195. It has also been reported that, in accordance with a draft resolution
presented to the Majlis in May 1991, unmarried women and girls will not be
allowed to leave the country. According to Keyhan of 23 May 1991, although
at present there is no law forbidding girls from leaving the country, the
authorities in practice create many obstacles for those who wish to leave.
The authorities are allegedly particularly severe with those unmarried women
and girls who have won scholarships to study abroad.
.1. Freedom of religion and the situation of the religious minorities
196. It has been reported that members of the Assyrian community are suffering
harassment and threats of imprisonment in Orumiyeh, West Azerbayjan. Assyrian
shopkeepers are reportedly obliged to place a sign in their shop windows that
identifies their religious faith, a measure reportedly bringing about a
decrease in their sales,
197. It has also been reported that all religious minorities must abide by the
contents of a directive issued by the Ministry of Education in September 1991
on the observance of Islamic veiling regulations and appropriate dress codes
for elementary and secondary students (see also chapter III).
K. The situation of the Baha'i community
198. The Special Representative has received information describing an ongoing
general policy of discrimination against followers of the Baha'i faith.
Specific accounts in 1991 include the following reports: Baha'is in Karaj,
Sari, Mashhad and other cities were required in January 1991 by the Ministry
of Security and Information to stop educating their children in Baha'i values;
Baha'is are generally denied passports necessary to travel abroad, with
some 400 passport applications pending as of June 1991 and none having been
issued since March 1991; and Baha'is continue to be discriminated against in
economic matters ranging from employment in the public sector to control over
their private property. Well-documented individual cases describing various
incidents which have occurred in 1990 and 1991 support reports of general
discrimination in the public sector.
E/CN.4/1992 / 34
page 36
199. With respect to discrimination involving social security. reports
indicate that two persons received notifications from the Department of Social
Security in March 1991 informing them that IIey would not receive their
pensions because of their “membership in IIe misguided Baha'i sect”. A third
case of denial of pension was reportedly decided in March 1991 by Branch 4 of
the Administrative Court of Justice, the same reason being given.
200. Recent reports indicate that Baha'i cemeteries in various parts of the
country continue to be desecrated, with tombstones being removed and sold,
In one case in Tehran, it is said that two school buildings have already been
constructed on top of the graves and that other construction is planned.
Baha'i pleas against IIese desecrations have reportedly been ignored.
201. The lack of attention by judicial authorities to appeals regarding
confiscated personal properties in Yazd, Bawyer—Ahmad, Ilkhchi, Saysan and in
some areas in the province of Fars was also reported. It was pointed out that
properties confiscated from non—Baha'is have meanwhile been returned to the
rightful owners, whereas properties belonging to Baha'is are still being
retained by the authorities. Furthermore, it was alleged that Baha is are
still not admitted to the universities.
III. REPORT ON THE THIRD VISIT TO THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
202. The third visit to the Islamic Republic of Iran took place from
8 to 14 December 1991. The United Nations mission was composed of the
Special Representative, the Chief of the Special Procedures Section,
Mr. Georg Mautner-Markhof, Mr. Miguel de la Lama and
Miss Carmen Cuevas Garcia. Mrs. Ir ne Abrahamian acted as interpreter.
The Special Representative wishes to express his appreciation for the
cooperation of the staff of the Centre for Human Rights and that of the
interpreter.
203. Ambassador Hosseini, Director of the Department for Human Rights and
International Social Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Af fairs, welcomed the
mission at Mehrabad Airport in Tehran. The first exchange of information took
place on that occasion; it focused on the Department's activities, especially
the international seminar on human rights held in Tehran in September 1991.
Mr. Mautner-Markhof and Mr. de la Lama accompanied the Special Representative
on all official and private interviews and prison visits.
204. The programme of work appearing as annex I to this report covers only
meetings with the authorities and prison visits. The Special Representative
conducted his own inquiries, which did not appear in the official programme.
In particular, he talked with preselected individuals, whose information was
frequently at variance with information from official sources. He also held
discussions with persons who requested them and with representatives of
non—governmental organizations.
205. The non-official programme, which often involved interviews with persons
who requested anonymity, mostly took place after the interviews with the
authorities, beginning on 8 December. Government officials presented the
official view on the main points of inquiry. It was possible to interview
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 37
several prisoners during the visits to Evin and Gohardasht. At Gohardasht the
Special Representative spoke with six prisoners who were being held in
solitary confinement, of whom he had had no previous information. The visit
to the “I(omiteh Mushtarak” building, located in downtown Tehran, concerning
which the Special Representative had received allegations that it was
operating as an interrogation and prison centre, did not result in interviews
with prisoners, for the reasons described in the relevant section of the
report (paras. 311—312).
A. Interview with the Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs
206. In the absence of the Minister for Foreign Affairs,
Mr. Ali Akbar Velayati, who was attending the Conference of Islamic Countries
at Dakar, the Acting Minister, Mr. Ali Mohammad Besharaty, received the
Special Representative, Mr. Mautner-Markhof and Mr. de l.a Lama in order to
present the Government's position on human rights. That interview took place
on the afternoon of 8 December.
207. Mr. Besharaty said that there had been many problems in Iran during the
early period of the Islamic Revolution, and that such problems might be
considered as inevitable during a period of far—reaching political and social
change. The French had had similar problems during their revolution in the
late eighteenth century, as had the Russians during the October Revolution.
He added that a reading of the famous novel Ouiet Flows the Don was sufficient
to provide an idea of the tremendous scale of that disruption.
208. He noted that he himself had spent five years in prison under the Shah's
Government, one year of which had been in solitary confinement, and had been
subjected to barbaric torture. He expressed regret that during those years
neither the Commission on Human Rights nor any international body had taken it
upon themselves to investigate the crimes and torture being committed in his
country. Furthermore, if Iran had not defended the rights of the
Palestinians, the attitude of the international bodies towards his country
would have been different. In conclusion, he said that for a number of
countries, mainly Western countries, human rights amounted to acceptance of
their international policies.
209. He said that the Iranian Revolution of 1979 had brought about fundamental
changes in the country, but had not caused as many problems as the oIIer two
revolutions he had mentioned. Fifty days after the revolutionary triumph, the
people had decided by referendum to give a new form to the Iranian State, and
a commission of leading figures had begun to draft a new constitution. The
people had approved the constitution by direct vote. One and a half years
after the revolutionary triumph, the President of the Republic and the
Parliament had been elected by the people. In no other country had a return
to normal institutional life been achieved so rapidly after a revolution.
210. At that point, he said, violent forms of dissidence, sometimes taking the
form of terrorism, had begun to occur. The Government had reacted by
implementing new laws. Such a reaction would have occurred in any other
country. Since then, he maintained, everything in Iran had taken place
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 38
lawfully. The country was an Islamic Republic, and that should always be
borne in mind, because it gave rise to special features that were not found in
other countries. The citizens could establish political parties. Unlike
parliaments in other countries, the Iranian Parliament worked continuously,
and members expressed themselves with complete freedom and were not at all
made to account for their statements.
211. He also referred to the occupation of part of Iran's territory by Ira q,
which he considered to be equal to the occupation of Kuwait by Iraq but which
had given rise to a very different international reaction. He concluded that
Iran had been treated in a biased manner for exclusively political reasons.
212. He cited the agreement with the International Committee of the Red Cross
for visits to prisons and penitentiaries as a sign of the Government's will to
cooperate with the international bodies and to heed the recommendations of the
Special Representative. The media in other countries often lied about the
situation in Iran and pressed for the international monitoring of human rights
in his country to continue. Paradoxically, now that a regime of freedoms had
been introduced in the country and the free press had become the fourth pillar
of democracy, the Islamic Republic of Iran found itself the constant butt of
criticism by the Commission on Human Rights, for the sole reason that its
policies were not in conformity with those of the West.
213. He stated that another important sign of Iranian cooperation was the
release of the hostages who had been held in Lebanon for several years. He
himself had travelled to Lebanon several times to try and obtain the release
of the Western hostages, and he had negotiated with their abductors. That had
caused him to be summoned for questioning before the Parliament, some of whose
members considered it inappropriate for Government officials to take such
steps.
214. He discussed other questions, which are summarized in the paragraphs
below, noting that the Islamic Republic of Iran was still suffering the
consequences of the prolonged economic blockade which was hampering the
country's reconstruction. The damage caused by the eight-year war imposed on
Iran by Iraq was enormous, and it had not yet been possible to repair it
completely.
215. He asserted that the Government of Iran was not against international
monitoring of human rights as such, or against the activities of the
Commission on Human Rights, of which it was currently a member, but it was
opposed to the selective application of such monitoring. The Government of
Iran would like such monitoring to apply to all the countries that genuinely
deserved to be monitored, with no exceptions of any kind.
216. He added that the Special Representative's report had been used for
political ends. The Government of Iran felt that international monitoring
should cease, since there was no justification for continuing it. The
consensus resolution of 1991 pointed towards such an outcome. At its
forty-eighth session, the Commission on Human Rights should put an end to such
monitoring, since in his view “the human rights situation in Iran is improving
day by day' and is “better than in two thirds of the countries of the world's.
E/CN • 4 / 1992 / 34
page 39
217. The Special Representative thanked the Minister for his invitation to
make a third visit to the country. He also referred, during the conversation,
to some points raised by Mr. Besharaty, especially his criticism of
United Nations action. In that connection, he noted that the prison visits
conducted by the ICRC during the last days of IIe previous regime had been of
benefit to persons who had later come to hold high office in the Islamic
Government, including His Excellency the President of the Republic,
Mr. Ajcbar Hashemi Rafsan5ani.
218. Regarding the mandate and its duration, the Special Representative said
he adhered to IIe text of the consensus resolution adopted by the Commission
on Human Rights. That document alluded in an indirect and uncertain manner to
the possibility of ending international monitoring. The consensus resolution
set out in writing a possibility that was and always had been present, without
being mentioned: the ending of international monitoring. That resolution
having been achieved by consensus, the Government of Iran had accepted the
extension of the mandate for the current year. Consequently, international
monitoring was being continued with its full co—participation, and the visit
was an integral and fundamental part of the mandate.
219. The Special Representative made a few comments on the issue of
selectivity, along the same lines as those expounded more fully in the chapter
of this report containing comments and observations.
B. Interview with the coordinator of the visit.
Ambassador Syrous Nasseri
220. Late in the afternoon of 8 December, the Special Representative met
Ambassador Syrous Nasseri, Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic
of Iran to the United Nations Office at Geneva, and four Directors of various
departments of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to examine certain
specific issues and consider how the official programme of work would be
conducted.
221. Mr. Nasseri expressed satisfaction at the fact that the visit would
include consideration of two new questions that appeared in paragraph 5 of
resolution 1991/82. He then repeated the official position, to the effect
that during 1991 the mandate had been limited to two issues: contacts and
cooperation with the Government and consideration of the progress achieved in
the previous year in the field of human rights. That interpretation
restricted the present study to the events of the year and excluded anything
that had occurred in previous years. As explained in the chapter on comments
and observations, according to the Special Representative's interpretation no
restrictions are permitted.
222. During the conversation, Ambassador Nasseri referred for the first time
to the case of the Iranian commercial aircraft Airbus A-300, which had been
shot down on 3 July 1988 in the Persian Gulf, and asked the Special
Representative to hear the victims relatives, who had some important matters
to lay before the United Nations through the Special Representative which
involved the human rights of Iranian nationals.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 40
223. Ambassador Nasseri announced that, on the occasion of the
Special Representative's visit to the country, a ceremony would be held to
celebrate the reunion of repentant former guerrillas of the People's Mojahedin
organization with their relatives living in Iran, and requested the Special
Representative and his staff to attend. The Special Representative declined
to participate in the ceremony, which he considered to be inappropriate in the
context of his mandate.
224. The Special Representative requested information on the arrest and
conditions of detention of 350 individuals, who, according to an Agence France
Presse report, had been detained in various parts of the country and included
monarchists, former members of the secret police of the previous regime, the
Savak, and other political figures. Mr. Nasseri said that he had no
information on the case but that the Special Representative would receive
information during his visit.
225. At the end of the interview, the Special Representative made a
humanitarian request. Mrs. Mesrijan Sohrabifilabadi had been sentenced to
death for committing an ordinary offence and was about to be executed. As she
had a six-month-old daughter, the request was for the execution to be
postponed for an indefinite period of time, in view of the existence of the
six-month—old baby, and for the court subsequently to consider clemency.
Ambassador Nasseri promised to take care of that request, and at the last
interview told the Special Representative that the execution of the sentence
had been postponed indefinitely.
C. Interview with Brigadier General Reza Sayfollahi,
Chief of the Narcotics Division
226. The Special Representative explained that his interest in the campaign
against drug traff icing focused on the fulfilment of the guarantees of due
process of law and the excessive application of the death penalty.
General Sayfollahi said that there were many aspects to the fight against
drugs in Iran and that before addressing the points mentioned above he would
like to examine the roots of the problem.
227. He expressed his deep satisfaction at the fact that
Mr. William F. Beachner, Director of the United Nations Fund for Drug Abuse
Control, had acknowledged, in a note to the Ministry of the Interior dated
7 August 1992, the Government's positive actions in that field. A photocopy
of the note contained the following passage: “After having spent more than a
week in Iran, our mission was able to understand fully the pride with which
you described your Government's strategy and actions to deal with the various
manifestations of the narcotics menace. Indeed, the magnitude of the
resources being devoted by the Iranian Government to anti-narcotics activities
and the motivation of those involved at all levels of your Government are
extremely impressive.”
228. General Sayfollahi also said that a United Nations body, the
Sub-Commission on Illicit Drug Traffic and Related Matters in the Near and
Middle East, at its twenty-eighth meeting held in Tehran, had praised Iran's
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 41
anti-drug action and held it up as a model. Thus the Special Representative's
criticisms indicated quite a different position. All United Nations bodies
should adopt a united position towards the Islamic Republic's fight against
drug traff icing and abandon their contradictory attitudes. He noted that the
Islamic Republic of Iran had always shown respect for human rights in its
struggle against drug trafficking and that the human factor was an essential
part of its campaign against narcotics consumption. If addicts were arrested
and sent to rehabilitation centres, that was to save both them and their
relatives. The anti—drug campaign in the country had considerably reduced the
traffic from Afghanistan and Pakistan towards Europe.
229. General Sayfollahi said that Iran did not produce drugs but was a country
of transit between the producer countries and the European markets. The
Iranian Government could take the position that drugs in transit did not
concern it and wash its hands of the problem, but the Government, in
cooperation with other countries, and concerned for the physical and mental
health of the young people of other nations, had decided to fight the drug
traffic with all its strength. Iran had ratified the United Nations
Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances of 1988, aimed at combating drugs. He added that drugs were
transported through Iran by well-organized and invariably well-armed groups,
which fought and killed to attain their goals. Only very recently, 70 members
of the Iranian security forces had died in an ambush by such groups of
bandits. Shortly before that, 30 more had died in the performance of their
duty. In his opinion, the only way to fight that kind of criminal activity
was the death penalty, because the people involved were hardened recalcitrants
and beyond reform. The drug problem was continuing to grow. And if the
problem was growing, so should the fight against it.
230. The Special Representative said that he was not trying to hamper the
fight against drugs but urging that it should be conducted with the guarantees
of due process of law. In that connection, he mentioned the guarantees which
in his opinion were not being applied in the country. The death penalty was
used excessively, and its effects were felt throughout the population because
of its intimidating nature. The death penalty had been applied for many years
now, yet the problem did not appear to have diminished. That suggested that
the solution did not lie in increasing the use of the death penalty but in
other measures. The history of the death penalty showed that it had never
yielded the results expected from it, and that criminals, driven by other
motives, defied it time and time again. Adopting a pragmatic attitude, it was
time to review the real effects of the death penalty and to seek other
methods, such as international agreements and cooperation to eradicate drug
production in other countries of the region.
231. The Special Representative said that he was considering the fight against
drugs from the point of view of the application of international legal
instruments. Those who did not take into account the legal aspects might view
the problem from another angle. The opinions of Mr. Beachner, a
United Nations official, were not in contradiction with the views of the
Special Representative, because Mr. Beachner had not referred to the legal
aspects.
E/CN.4/l992/34
page 42
232. The conversation ended with the.following exchange: General Sayfollahi:
“I invite you to visit the eastern border area of Iran, where the problem is
the most acute; that would give you an idea of who these drug traffickers are;
they are unscrupulous people, capable of the worst abuses”. OEe Special
Representative: li 1 would be pleased to accept your invitation”.
General Sayfollahi: “Let me warn you that they are going to kidnap us; and
after the kidnapping, if we survive, you won't be against the death penalty
any longer”. The Special Representative: “My opposition to the death penalty
is a point of principle, deeply rooted in my conscience; I can assure you,
General, that even after the terrible experience of being kidnapped I would
still be against the death penalty”. General Sayfollahi: “OEen if that
really happened, I would drop the death penalty”.
D. Interview with Mr. Hosseini, Director—General
of the Ministry of the Interior .
233. The discussion with Mr. Hosseini focussed on the situation of refugees in
Iran, one of the new topics that the Commission on Human Rights asked the
Special Representative to examine during 1991. Mr. Hosseini said that he was
responsible for 4 million refugees, 24 branch offices and 70 camps. Iran had
received 3 million Afghans and 1 million Iraqis and other nationalities. OEe
1 million Iraqis who had arrived in the country some 10 years before were an
additional problem,
234. Mr. Rosseini said that Iran was continuing to take in Afghan refugees,
many of whom were economic refugees, due to the drought that had afflicted
central Afghanistan. Fifty thousand Afghans had just arrived in Iran, and
30,000 more were on the way. The reception centres in eastern Iran took in no
less than 380 refugees per day. Ninety per cent of the Kurds who had come to
Iran at the end of the Gulf war had returned to their country of origin;
65,000 Kuwaitis who had fled their country after the Iraqi invasion had also
returned to Kuwait.
235. Ee stated IIat, when refugees arrived in Iran, they were kept in
quarantine to avoid the spread of disease. They were then divided into
groups: some were granted temporary residence and went to various provinces,
while others were sent to live in camps supplied with water, sewage and
electricity. Refugees chose between living in the provinces or in camps. No
refugees were turned away. All were provided with identity cards. The
Iranian Government had prepared emergency plans to meet a potential influx of
refugees from the southern republics of the former Soviet Union.
236. The refugees were provided with the following services: (1) lodging in
towns or camps; (2) food (wheat and oil provided by international
organizations and the World Food Programme, which the Government supplemented
with meat, eggs, vegetables and fruit); (3) financial aid (monthly allowance,
because they were nearly always very poor); (4) education (150,000 Afghan and
Iraqi children attended schools supported by Iran, because the international
organizations did not provide assistance for education); and (5) Clothing and
linen.
E/CN.4 / 1992/34
page 43
237. A repatriation programme was being developed in keeping with the
following requirements: (1) free consent of the person repatriated;
(2) acceptable situation in the country of origin; and (3) acceptance of the
repatriation by the country of Qrigin. The refugees return was being
organized with assistance from non-governmental organizations and the Office
of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. He said that UNHCR
assistance had been extremely valuable, as had that of other international
organizations and agencies such as UNICEF, 132W ?, WHO, TAO and the Office for
the Coordination of United Nations Humanitarian and Economic Assistance
Programmes relating to Afghanistan. International organizations covered one
twelfth of the needs and expenditures, and the rest was met by the Government
of Iran.
238. During the Gulf war Iran had spent $15 million daily. International aid
had amounted to $30 million over one year, and 700 airplanes had brought
17,000 tonnes of food, blankets, tents, medicine, etc. Even so, that was
little compared with the needs of the vast multitude of refugees. Iran was
currently spending $70 million per year, not counting emergencies.
E. Interview with Mr. Atrian-Far, Under—Secretary for Political
Affairs.pf the Ministry of the Interior
239. Mr. Atrian—Far was accompanied by Mr. Mobalegh, who is responsible for
political parties and elections, and Mr. Zargar, who is in charge of the
reconstruction of the places that had been damaged or destroyed during the
eight-year war with Iraq.
240. Mr. Zargar mentioned the war damage and its effect on the enjoyment of
economic and social rights. Iraq had occupied 96,000 square kilometres of
Iranian territory. There had been 1,249 villages and towns completely
destroyed and 1,427 partially destroyed. Thirty—five cities had been
destroyed and 15 regularly bombed. There had been 120,000 civilian deaths and
several times as many wounded. Material damage had amounted to
$97,200 million and production losses and other indirect damage had amounted
to 34,535,360 rials. Of the 50 cities bombed, 36 had been rebuilt. Of the
2.5 million displaced persons, 900,000 were now living away from the province
of their habitual residence, a situation which implied a massive violation of
the human rights of those individuals. He added that the reconstruction
programme would require many more years.
241. Mr. Atrian—Far said, ‘This is a much more serious human rights problem
than the violations which the international bodies are investigating in the
prisons'. The Commission on Human Rights has asked the Secretary-General of
the United Nations to make a study on displaced persons. The Iranian
Government was consulted on the matter, and said it hoped that the problem of
displaced Iranians would be given full coverage in the study.
242. Mr. Mobalegh said that there had been many changes in the Near East and
the Persian Gulf in recent years. In his view the past year had been one of
success for Iran and for the world in general. It had been accompanied by a
revival of political activity in the country. Although a law on professional
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 44
associations and political parties had been in existence for several years,
few political parties had been operating and many professional associations
had not been able to organize. At the current time, numerous parties had been
formed in order to run in the parliamentary elections to be held in the spring
of 1992.
243. He stated that the same law governed the following bodies: (1) political
parties; (2) professional. scientific and technical associations:
(3) religious minorities; and (4) Islamic associations. The Commission on
Political Parties and Professional Associations had authorized 16 political
parties, 24 professional associations, 17 associations of religious minorities
and numerous Islamic associations. In a profoundly Islamic society, Islamic
associations were established and grew spontaneously and naturally. There
were also non—Islamic associations, based not on religious premises but on
philosophical reflections. Most of the parties had an Islamic ideology. The
law in question was based on a fundamental principle: loyalty to the regime
of the Islamic Republic, in accordance with the Constitution (art. 26). That
did not mean that they necessarily had to be Islamic but that they had to
respect the legal order of the Islamic Republic, the sovereignty and
independence of the State, the liberty of its people and national unity. In
that context, they could even criticize the Government.
244. The Special Representative inquired about the status of the application
for authorization from the Freedom Movement, mentioned in previous reports.
Mr. Mobalegh replied that, since the application had been incomplete, the
organization had been requested to complete it and to meet all the necessary
requirements. The application had been resubmitted two weeks earlier and was
on the list of applications which the competent commission would be
considering and deciding upon. The application was in its proper place
according to the order of submission.
245. When asked how soon a decision might be taken on that application,
Mr. Mobalegh replied that that would be in the next few months. The
Commission met every fortnight, and many other applications had precedence.
He added that the Government had been obliged to protect the members of the
Freedom Movement, because some citizens had, on their own initiative, tried to
attack them.
246. Replying to questions aimed at clarifying certain points, the speakers
indicated that lawyers' and doctors' associations were not covered by the law
in question but by special laws. Intervention by the Ministry of the Interior
in those associations, they said, was of a formal nature and not substantive.
247. The electoral procedure in the country was simple, they said. There were
no restrictions on being elected. In order to vote it was necessary to be an
Iranian national, to be 15 years of age, to have no criminal record and not to
have undermined the national interest. The basic requirement for being
elected was to be not less than 25 and not more than 75 years of age. An
executive committee made up of “men of experience” in each constituency
examined the candidates' qualifications and considered any complaints that
El CN . 4/1992/ 3 4
page 45
might have been lodged concerning any possible irregularities. The members of
the committee were nominated by the Council of Guardians. The Council of
Guardians could review the decision and adopt a final decision. OEe Ministry
of the Interior did not intervene in the process. OEe Committee itself
decided where the voting would take place and looked into claims of
irregularity.
F. Interview with the Minister of Justice,
Mr. Hpjiatplislam Esmail Shoushtari
248. the Special Representative mentioned the consensus resolution of the
Commission on Human Rights and asked several questions on the reforms of the
Penal Code, the penalties involving torture (flogging, amputation, stoning),
the situation of the 350 persons arrested recently and the number of
executions that went beyond the restrictive terms of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The Minister of Justice referred to
those and other questions. A summary of his explanations appears below.
249. the Parliament had adopted, on an experimental basis, a new bill on
penalties and punishments which would replace the outdated system in force
once it became law. The bill contained some important reforms, including the
following: although it did not disappear completely, the punishment of
flogging could in many cases be commuted by the judge to economic compensation
or imprisonment.
250. Regarding the defence of an accused person, he said that a law was in
force stipulating the need for a defence counsel, subject to annulment of the
judgement. OEe accused could ask to be defended by someone who did not have a
licence. And when IIe accused did not appoint a defence counsel, one was
appointed by the court. The defence counsel requirement had already been in
existence for the military and revolutionary courts, but not for the religious
courts, whereas now the Special Court for the Clergy was also obliged to
provide an attorney.
251. The power of the monitoring bodies, such as the Administrative Court of
Justice and the Inspectorate-General, had been increased. He also mentioned
the recently founded High Disciplinary Court for Judges. Judges who did not
treat accused persons properly could be tried before the High Court.
252. Referring to the penalties of amputation and stoning, he indicated that
Iran's system of government was Islamic, thus Islamic laws were enforced and
some penalties could not be changed. Murder, for example, was punished by the
death penalty, and that rule could not be changed; however, judges were
empowered to negotiate with the victims' relatives to replace the death
penalty by another, and that did happen in 95 per cent of cases. theft was
punished by amputation, and adultery by stoning. Those penalties could not be
changed, because they were punishments especially established under Islam.
253. Regarding IIe number of executions in the Islamic Republic of Iran, he
said that was a result of a strict implementation of the law in force. A few
days earlier, three recidivist drug traffickers who had been carrying drugs to
Europe had been executed. He was aware of the criticisms being levelled at
E/CN.4 / 1992/34
page 46
Iran from abroad concerning the number of executions. The figures were
usually exaggerated and did not reflect the real situation. Thus it had been
claimed abroad that one third of all the executions in the world occurred in
Iran, which was absolutely untrue. In any event, since the executions took
place in conformity with the law, their number lacked the meaning attributed
to it abroad. He added that minors were not executed in Iran and that no one
was executed for a first offence, which was not the case in other countries.
254. Since the data compiled came from the Iranian press, the Special
Representative repeated his request concerning the official list of persons
executed in 1991, in order to make the appropriate comparisons, with an
indication of the places and dates of execution and the charges. The Minister
said that he would submit the list to the Special Representative through the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and added that he hoped that the United Nations
would continue supporting Irans efforts to combat the drug traffic, which
would bring the countries of Europe greater peace of mind.
255. With regard to the 350 persons arrested in December 1991, he confirmed
that the arrests had occurred but said that there had been no monarchists,
former members of Savak or other political figures among those arrested,
contrary to what had been reported in the press, and that all had been
Government employees convicted of acts of corruption. He repeated that the
group of arrested persons contained no political figures and that the persons
in question were allegedly guilty of administrative abuses.
256. Regarding the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, he
said that the restriction on applying the death penalty referred to the
substance of offences and not to the number of executions. He added that in
his country, the great majority of cases in which the death penalty was
applied involved drug trafficking.
G. Interview with Inspector-General Hpj-jatplislam Mohaczheghe Dainad
257. Inspector—General Hojjatolislam Mohagheghe Damad said that he had
occupied his post since the establishment of the Inspectorate—General some
10 years previously. He was also a professor at the University of Tehran and
taught both civil and Islamic law. The Inspectorate—General monitored the
activities of all administrative and judicial bodies to ensure compliance with
applicable law. Its main function was to identify violations of the law.
258. The Inspectorate—General had a large staff, which allowed it to cover the
whole of the country: 50 judges and 150 experts in a variety of fields, such
as engineering, accounting, military science, medicine, and veterinary
science.
259. The bodies responsible for judging violations of the law were the High
Disciplinary Court for Judges and the Administrative Court. The
Inspectorate—General received complaints, carried out investigations and
referred cases to the two Courts mentioned above, which informed the
Inspectorate—General of the results of the trials. The Inspector—General
could order preventive suspension of officials against whom there was evidence
E/CN.4/19 92/34
page 47
of professional misconduct. For example, he had suspended a number of
provincial governors from office. The suspension was only temporary, because
the Courts later took a final decision. Ministries could not refuse to comply
with the suggestions made by the Inspectorate-General.
260. The Inspectorate—General had been reorganized during the previous two
years in order to improve both its monitoring capacity and its efficiency.
The Inspector-General said that he was prepared to consider any irregularities
that might be detected by the International Committee of the Red Cross in
connection with prison visits after January 1992. He said that he received a
large number of complaints from Amnesty International, and that all of them
were followed up, although many of the complaints had been found to be false.
He also said that all citizens could submit complaints all of which were
carefully investigated. He had received complaints from prisoners, from
accused persons who had complained of ill—treatment or of disrespect during a
trial, and from foreign citizens. He added that on 15 occasions he had
visited all prisons in Iran, investigated conditions in them and received
complaints from prisoners, which had subsequently been examined. He pointed
out that the situation in prisons had improved over the previous two years.
H. Interview with the Deputy to the Head
of the Judiciary, Mr. Mebrpour
261. The interview was held with the Judicial Deputy, Mr. Mehrpour, and
several high—ranking departmental directors of the Iranian judiciary.
Mr. Mehrpour drew attention to the laws which had been adopted or which were
about to be adopted in 1991, and which were designed to follow up the
recommendations made by the Special Representative.
262. Mr. Mehrpour mentioned the following reforms: (1) for the purpose of
serving a sentence, the period of imprisonment would no longer be counted from
the date of sentence, but from that of arrest (note to art. 18 of the
Penalties Act); (2) material and moral compensation would be granted for
injury suffered by the accused as a result of an unjust or incorrect sentence,
of ill-treatment by the judge or during detention; (3) a study would be made
of the various types of penalties to ensure that the punishment fitted the
crime; (4) the constitutionally established right to defence had been the
subject of special measures to ensure that accused persons exercised that
guarantee; refusal by a court to admit a defence counsel would constitute
sufficient grounds for the Supreme Court to quash the sentence and to suspend
the judge from office; in addition, defence counsel enjoyed the same
immunities as judges: (5) in principle, all trials should be public.
Parliament was examining the bill on penalties, which inter alia severely
restricted the number of cases in which flogging and other forms of corporal
punishment were applied. New provisions relating to pardoning and a reduction
of sentences had been introduced.
263. Applications for pardon, which could even be submitted by persons
sentenced to death, were considered by a Commission. The sentence could not
be carried out until the application had been acted upon. The Commission on
Pardon met three times a week, and applications that were approved were
referred to the Head of the Judiciary and finally to the Leader of the Islamic
Republic for a final decision.
E /CL 4 / 1992 / 34
page 48
264. The judiciary had been actively involved in ensuring compliance with
applicable law: it had cooperated in preparing the reforms and had itself
prepared reports in accordance with the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights.
265. The Special Representative asked what stage the reforms described had
reached, and particularly whether they were incorporated in an act or acts
that were currently in force. Mr. Mehrpour replied that the question of the
proportionality of penalties was being examined and that the other questions
had gone through all the stages necessary to become law. Parliament had
approved the chapter containing the general provisions and that relating to
the penalties established by Islam. It had also approved a number of sections
on specific issues, such as questions relating to homicide, theft, bodily
injury, etc. A section concerning issues such as swindling, fraud and other
economic of fences for which Islamic law did not prescribe specific penalties
was under consideration.
266. Mr. Lavassan, Director of the Office of Pardons, expressed satisfaction
that Islam had formulated human rights at a time when they were unknown in
other parts of the world. The Prophet had decreed humanitarian laws long
before human rights had become an issue. In the Islamic Republic of Iran, the
Leader had granted a pardon for the first time two months after the triumph of
the Revolution. Since then, 70 amnesty decrees and decrees of pardon or
diminution of sentences had been promulgated, benefiting thousands of
individuals. Those who had most benefitted from the policy of granting pardon
had been counter—revolutionary groups. The Leader Ayatollah Khomenei had
promulgated more than 29 decrees of pardon, which the office headed by
Mr. Lavassan was responsible for enforcing. During 1991, 12,040 individuals
whose military service had been extended as punishment for their having
attempted to avoid that civic duty had been pardoned and were serving their
normal period of conscription. A few days previously, 312 prisoners had been
pardoned, at the initiative of the Head of the Judiciary.
267. The Special Representative asked how many persons under sentence of death
had benefited from a commutation of their sentence. He was informed that in
recent months some 100 persons sentenced to death had had their sentences
commuted to a prison sentence. $
268. The Head of the Department of Crime Prevention described his Department's
activities. The Constitution vested responsibility for crime prevention
measures in the Judiciary. However, it was only recently that crime
prevention had been given due importance. He said that it was not simply a
judicial problem, but a social one with economic and cultural roots.
Consequently, it was necessary to adopt both judicial measures and measures of
a social, technical and scientific nature in order to draw up and implement a
broad policy for the prevention of crime and the rehabilitation of offenders.
269. A commission composed of specialists planned and provided advice in
respect of crime prevention. Judges, criminologists, sociologists and
psychologists carried out research to assist in the formulation of general
policy.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 49
210. Mr. Alizadeh said that the Attorney General ensured that the law was
implemented, but if an individual considered that he had been injured by the
Prosecutor's Department, he could appeal to the Judiciary, after which the
Judges' Supervisory Office went into action. In urgent cases, his department
expedited consideration of complaints and transmitted its findings rapidly to
the Head of the Judiciary.
271. Mr. Mehrpour and his colleagues replied to a number of questions intended
to clarify various points. From the questions it transpired that the new Act
on mandatory assistance by defence counsel was not retroactive, and
consequently nullity did not apply to sentences handed down, albeit in the
absence of defence counsel, before the Act came into force. Mother point
concerned the means of proving that the assistance of a defence counsel had
been denied. OEe participants in the round table said that proof could be
found in the case file, as a record was kept of all the trial proceedings.
I. Interview with the Governor of the Central Bank.
Mr. Mohammad-Hussein Adeli
272. The organizers of the visit insisted on the desirability of this meeting
which had not originally been planned. The Governor of the Central Bank
provided information on the economic situation, on the problems of
reconstruction after the eight—year war, on current and future Iranian
economic policies and their impact on development programmes and on the
enjoyment of economic and social rights.
273. Mr. Adeli described the changeover from a highly centralized and
regulated w&r economy to an economy of reconstruction and development which
sought to eliminate Government control. During the war the Government had
directly intervened in all economic activities to harness them to the war
effort. As an indication of the trend towards the abolition of restrictions
and regulations within the new economic climate, Mr, Adeli mentioned the
reopening of the stock market. The Stock Exchange had reopened in 1989 and
was thriving. The total volume of business during its first year had been
2 billion rials. The figure had rapidly risen to 12 billion rials and in the
first half of 1991 business had reached the figure of 300 billion rials. He
said that a major effort was under way in Iran to promote investment, and that
production, distribution and consumption had been deregulated.
274. Rationing had been in force during the war, and consequently subsidies
and controls had applied. That system was being gradually abolished. The new
economic policy was based on the lifting of price controls and the
rationalization of subsidies. The prices of most agricultural products were
already free of subsidies or controls. Controls and subsidies for imported
goods had also been suppressed, with the exception of those on wheat and
medicine. Government controls on imports of many products, which had
previously been in force, had been completely eliminated. In addition, export
controls had been abolished and it was not necessary to pay export earnings
into the Central Bank. The so-called ‘surrender reguirement ' had been
abolished.
E/CN.4 / 1992/34
page 50
275. Banking and tax policy had been adjusted to the new circumstances. The
fiscal deficit, which had represented 12 per cent of gross domestic product,
had been reduced to 2 per cent. OEe World Bank and the International Monetary
Fund had expressed satisfaction at that achievement. Inflation had been
brought down from an annual figure of 30 per cent to 20 per cent, and its
persistence was attributable to the shortcomings of Iran's economic
infrastructure.
276. He said that a distinction was currently made between central banking
activity, for which the Government was responsible, and commercial banking,
which was in private hands. In addition, the currency was freely convertible
and commercial banks could purchase and sell dollars without restriction.
However, he stated that prevailing political circumstances had delayed the
introduction of a single exchange rate.
277. Mr. Adeli set his explanations against the background of what he
described as a hostile economic environment, and stated that if the five-year
development plan was to succeed, a favourable economic environment was
necessary. He said that oil exports had still not returned to normal, because
Iran was plugging the supply gaps left by other countries, and was a residual
exporter because Iranian petroleum was only purchased as a last resort.
Recent events, including IIe assistance provided in solving the problem of the
hostages in Lebanon, had helped to improve Iran's international standing.
However, he complained that many Governments still prohibited their firms from
importing Iranian products or applied prohibitive tariffs.
J. Interview with Mr. Mouspyi, Press Director of the
Ministry of Culture and Isla mic Guidance
278. Mr. Mousavi first of all expressed his dissatisfaction with the Special
Representative's previous report for having presented in a bad light the
subsidization and distribution of newsprint, which in his view represented an
effort on the part of the Government, at a time of war and shortage, to supply
the country's media with that essential input. He added that what the
Special Representative viewed as a weak point and a shortcoming was actually a
praiseworthy practice. Control over the supply of paper was attributable to
the war, and had been the means by which the Government had supplied the media
at a time of import restrictions.
279. Mr. Mousavi said that in IIe last 16 months the publication
of 82 periodicals and magazines had been authorized. OEere were 728
publishing houses, 20 of which belonged to the Government and 23 to
cooperatives. Each day, between 42 and 45 books came out. There was no paper
shortage, although there were still problems in obtaining foreign currency and
the paper produced in Iran was more expensive and of poorer quality. It was
now possible to import paper freely, although the Government continued to
import and distribute paper at a subsidized price. The difference between the
price of freely imported paper and the price of Government-subsidized had
shrunk: the current price of freely imported paper was 8,000 rials and that
of subsidized paper 4,500 rials, as against previous figures of 70.000 rials
and 3,500 rials respectively. He promised a reward to anyone who could
provide evidence of a paper shortage. He added that 28 daily newspapers, 72
weeklies and 21 fortnightly magazines were currently published in Iran.
E/CN.4 / 1992/34
page 51
280. Mr. Mousavi said that the newsprint imported and subsidized by the
Government was distributed to applicants in the order in which they submitted
their applications, and that the warehouses were able to fill all orders.
K. Meeting with officials of the Institute for the
Treatment of the Victims of Chemical Weapons
281. This meeting took place in the offices of the Institute for Research into
the Effects of Chemical Weapons. Dr. Foroutan, who is responsible for the
treatment of the victims of chemical weapons, gave an oral presentation of the
topic, which he complemented with statistical tables, photographs and slides.
282. According to Mr. Mtir Esmail Saghafi, 400 attacks involving chemical
weapons had been made by Iraq during the early days of the war. He presented
tables showing the places, dates and number of victims caused by the attacks.
He said that during the war, there had been seven periods when chemical
weapons had been employed, during which the attacks had been directed both
against members of the armed forces and against civilian targets.
Dr. Foroutan and his colleagues had begun their work as soon as the first
attacks, which had become systematic in 1985, had taken place. They had been
unprepared and lacking experience of the subject, and there had been a dearth
of information from other countries. The Institute was currently pursuing its
research and was in contact with the small number of foreign institutes
specializing in the study of the harmful effects of toxic gases. However, he
regretted that a large number of countries did not cooperate as fully as
possible, on the grounds that the information was classified military
information.
283. Mr. Saghafi cited five toxic agents: mustard gas, tabun, sarin, cyanide
and asphyxiating gas (the last of which had been clinically observed).
Some 100,000 persons had suffered at least intoxication. Half of them had
been mildly affected and the other half moderately or seriously affected. The
5,000 dead had been without protective apparatus: 4,000 had been killed by
nerve gases and 1,000 by mustard gas. He said that the critical phase was
reached between 24 and 48 hours after the attack. Those who lived through the
critical phase generally survived, although there could be delayed-action and
even lethal effects in the long run, depending on the nature of the toxic
agent. Medical care was provided without discrimination both to Iranians and
to Iraqis living in Iran. In March 1986, the United Nations had recognized
that Iran gave proper treatment without distinction to all persons affected by
toxic gases.
284. The Government of Iran had immediately appealed to the international
organizations, including the United Nations, but the response had been slow in
coming. Subsequently, journalists had carried out investigations and the
United Nations had sent a group of investigators which had verified the
charges and Iraq's direct responsibility.
285. Mr. Sadr, Director—General for Foreign Affairs of the Red Crescent, said
he had been in the areas in which toxic gas attacks had taken place. He had
treated many wounded and seen many people die in terrible suffering. His
organization was currently caring for some 37,000 people still affected by the
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 52
gases, in eight centres located in the most seriously affected areas. Some
victims developed lymphomas, leukaemia, solid tumours and anaemia. Others
suffered from depression and from a variety of psychological problems. Cases
of impotence and infertility had been identified and there were still a large
number of unresolved problems. The genetic consequences were still unknown.
He felt that the international community should immediately accelerate the
destruction of chemical weapons.
I .. Interview with IIe Special Prosecutor for Narcotic Druns
286. The Special Representative had a third meeting with the Special
Prosecutor for Narcotic Drugs. Mr. Hojjatolislam Zargar. OEe Prosecutor first
of all said that the struggle against drug trafficking in Iran was based on
deep moral and religious convictions. Islam combated anything that debased
and devalued human life. Drugs destroyed the lives of human beings,
especially young people. The struggle against the drug trade in Iran would
continue until the evil had been totally eradicated.
287. Drug seizures had diminished in 1991, an indication that the traffic had
also declined. In 1990, 25 tons of opium and other drugs had been seized, as
against only 10 tons in the first months of 1991. However, seizures of
morphine had increased. During the first six months of 1991, seizures of
morphine had been similar to total seizures in 1990 (4,485 kilograms in 1990,
as against 4,172 kilograms during the first six months of 1991). Much of the
morphine had been found in Iran s western provinces, i.e. at points where it
could be slipped to Turkey and to European markets.
288. In the first half of 1991, 6,800 persons involved in the drug trade
had been arrested. The number of those executed for the offence had been
one tenth of the figure for previous years. Recently, the sentences
of 30 drug traffickers sentenced to death in Tehran had been commuted.
289. Drug dealers were arrested. Consumers were taken to rehabilitation
centres, where they were taught to work so that they could earn an honest
living when they returned home. Heroin addicts went to four special centres.
290. Efforts were made to re-educate them in the special centres, with
successful results. OEe re—education programme for addicts included leave to
visit their homes, and so far all the addicts had returned to the centres — an
indication that their personality had changed for the better. During the
first half of 1991, 2,464 addicts arrested had been given permission to leave
the centres and all of them had returned. Thus, the Government was performing
its Islamic duty to help them.
291. The Special Representative asked how long the Special Prosecutor thought
it would take to control the drug traffic. The Prosecutor replied that for
the time being the initiative in combating the drug traffic was taken by IIe
Government, although he was unable to forecast how long it would take to
control the problem effectively. He added that United Nations representatives
had recently visited Iran's eastern provinces and observed the methods used to
combat drug traffickers.
E /CN.4/1992 / 34
page 53
292. He said that poppies were not grown in Iran, although they were
cultivated on a vast scale in Afghanistan and Pakistan. It would be necessary
to eradicate those crops in order to prevent the traf tic to the West.
However, the Governments of Afghanistan and Pakistan did not exercise
effective control over the areas of cultivation. The United Nations could and
should, prepare a programme to tackle the problem at its roots, i.e. in areas
of poppy cultivation. If it did so, Iran would cease to be a country of
transit.
293. The Special Prosecutor also said that allegations had been made abroad,
and repeated by media hostile to Iran . that executions of drug traffickers
were occasionally a cover-up for political executions. With regard to the
Special Prosecutor's allegations that inaccurate information on the reasons
for the executions had been put about abroad, IIe Special Representative
pointed out that transparency had become much appreciated and sought after
throughout the world, and that if the Iranian Government wished to avoid such
allegations regarding the way in which drug traffickers and persons tried by
Revolutionary Courts were dealt with, the best means would be to hold public
trials which relatives of the accused, journalists and the public could attend
without restrictions. In that way there would be no secret as to what went on
during trials. Hence, the Government of Iran itself had the power to solve
the problems about which it was complaining. As long as proceedings were held
in camera and public trials were for one reason or another avoided, the
reports about which the Special Prosecutor complained would continue.
M. Meeting with representatives of URHCR
294. The Special Representative met in Tehran with the head of the UNHCR
office in Tehran, Mr. Omar Bakhet, and with his deputy, Mr. Mohainmad Boukry.
He also received supplementary information on the activities of UNHCR in the
Islamic Republic of Iran from the competent regional bureau of UERCR at Geneva.
295. As concerns refugees from Afghanistan, the representatives of UNHCR
pointed out that the policy of the Iranian Government has aimed at integrating
Afghans to the maximum extent possible in both rural and urban centres.
Afghan refugees are permitted to take up a limited number of professional
activities and this has contributed substantially to reducing the need for
financial assistance from the Government or the international community. The
number of Afghan refugees presently stands at around 3 million, the vast
majority residing in urban centres. Some 300,000 persons reside in
‘spontaneous settlements” (predominantly Afghan villages or towns in rural
areas that have sprung up as a result of the influx).
296. Since 1983 UNHCR has supported the Iranian Government in its efforts to
provide refugees with minimum services in respect to health, sanitation,
education, water and training. The World Food Programme has for the past two
years also provided for 290,000 persons in spontaneous settlements”. During
1990 and 1991, tens of thousands of refugees returned to Afghanistan, where
they received UNHCR assistance to return to their areas of origin. Repeated
requests by UNHCR to be allowed a presence at Iranian border posts to monitor
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 54
and assist such movements have till now not been granted. The representatives
of UNHCR expressed the hope that the recent permission to open a sub-office at
Mashad would allow UNBCR to exercise its important protection mandate in this
area.
297. As regards refugees from Iraq, approximately 1 million asylum seekers,
mainly of Kurdish origin, were received by the Islamic Republic of Iran during
the eight years of war with Iraq (this figure was established by an Iranian
Government census of 1990). The majority of these persons have become
integrated into Iranian society and require no assistance from the
international community.
298. In 1987 and 1988 some 70,000 new ICurdish arrivals found asylum in several
western provinces. They are being assisted by the Iranian Government, UNHCR
and the World Food Programme. These persons have not been allowed to
integrate, and reside in camps. During the summer of 1988 a voluntary
repatriation movement and, simultaneously, a new influx took place which
increased the caseload to 100,000 persons. UNHCR and WFP programmes were
correspondingly increased.
299. Following the Persian Gulf war, more than 1 million refugees of both
Kurdish and non-Kurdish origin, entered Iranian territory and received
asylum. The efforts of the Iranian Government to help these refugees were
supplemented by assistance from governmental and non—governmental sources
estimated at $US 70 million. Before the beginning of the winter 1991 the
majority of these refugees had returned to Iraq, the caseload, both “old” and
“new”, remaining in camps being less than 100,000. UNHCR has a presence in
the western provinces but until now has not been allowed to exercise fully its
protection mandate.
N. Visit to Evin orison
300. On 10 December 1991 the Special Representative visited Evin prison where
he was received by the head of the prison organization, Mr. Lajevardi, and the
prison director, Mr. Pishvand. Mr. Lajevardi emphasized that the main
objective of the new Iranian prison system was to educate the inmates. The
prison organization was supervised by a superior council of the Judiciary and
the prison police had to a large extent been replaced by new wardens
particularly instructed to work towards the above—mentioned objective. In
that regard, steps had been initiated for the creation of a university for the
administration of prisons. Mr. Lajevardi also referred to the problem of drug
trafficking and stated that 65 per cent of all inmates in Iranian detention
centres were drug traffickers or addicts.
301. The Special Representative emphasized that the main purpose of the visit
was to interview in private the 30 prisoners whose names had been given to the
Foreign Ministry at the outset of the visit. When the Special Representative
was informed that out of the 30 prisoners only 12 could be interviewed, he
handed an additional list with seven names to the prison director. However,
the director stated that only one person on that additional list could be
presented. The names of the 37 prisoners, as well as the reasons given by the
authorities why 24 of them could not be met, are contained in annex II to the
present report.
EtC H .4/1992 / 34
page 55
302. The Special Representative expressed surprise that for five of those
persons the reason invoked was that they were currently under investigation.
He pointed out that during his second visit he had been given permission to
speak to persons under investigation and in this connection also referred to
the recent agreement between IIe Iranian Government and the International
Committee of the Red Cross (XCRC), which gave ICRC access to the prisoners
without exception. He was told that new regulations did not enable the prison
administration to allow the Special Representative to speak to persons under
investigation without prison officials being present. An official of the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs who was present at the meeting added that the
agreement between the Government and ICRC was neither applicable nor relevant
to the visit of the Special Representative. An offer by the prison director
for the Special Representative to meet IIese inmates in his presence was
declined by the Special Representative. The Special Representative explained
that he had referred to ICRC because the application of the new regulation
could jeopardize the agreement between the Iranian Government and the
Red Cross.
303. The interviews with the other 13 prisoners took place in a room of the
prison administration without Iranian officials being present. Nevertheless,
several prisoners stated that they did not feel safe to speak to the Special
Representative and asked for his understanding that they would not be able to
answer his questions. Other prisoners whom the Special Representative had
interviewed on previous occasions declared that their complaints had resulted
in reprisals against them and in one case even in a particularly heavy
sentence compared to other cases in which the accusation had been identical.
The Special Representative therefore does not wish to repeat his conversations
with the prisoners case by case; rather he has summarized their content
according to the substantive points discussed.
304. Concerning trial proceedings, almost all inmates confirmed the summary
nature of the proceedings before revolutionary courts, which does not appear
to have changed since the last visit of the Special Representative. None of
the persons interviewed had had the benefit of legal counsel or had been able
to call witnesses and in some cases had not even been allowed to expose the
arguments for their defence. One prisoner reported that with the help of
friends he had contracted and actually paid a lawyer but had never been able
to speak to him. Another prisoner stated that his family had attempted to
find a lawyer for him but that such efforts had not succeeded since none of
the lawyers contacted agreed to take the case owing to the impossibility of
taking effective action before the revolutionary courts. In two cases the
irregularity of the proceedings was exemplified by a series of trials during
which charges were repeatedly amended and various sentences, including the
death penalty, rendered. None of the trials tiesctibed was held in public and
in some cases the proceedings lasted only for a few minutes. It was also
stated that it was at times difficult for the accused to distinguish between
an interrogation session and the actual trial and in one case the accused had
not been informed of the verdict three years after the trial.
305. With regard to the problem of torture, the interviews confirmed earlier
impressions that torture was mainly used during the interrogatory stage with
the aim of extracting confessions and consisted mainly of beatings and
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 56
suspension from the ceiling for extended periods. The practice of mock
executions was also mentioned in this connection. Testimony was also received
about the application of corporal punishment which had been applied in
accordance with the respective verdicts.
306. As regards prison conditions, the statements varied considerably from
satisfactory to harsh conditions. According to the testimonies received,
prisoners charged or convicted of having participated in activities of
political opposition groups are detained under much more difficult conditions
characterized by poor food, and lack of heating, hot water, regular exercise
in fresh air and books, except the Koran. This group of prisoners was said to
be frequently subjected to various threats, had to work without remuneration
and occasionally had to participate in pro-government demonstrations. One
prisoner not falling within this group complained that for three years no
permission had been given to correspond with his family abroad. In other
cases confirmation was received of the practice of leave from prison,
including the possibility for a physician sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment
to work three days per week in his private practice. Prison conditions were
reported to have been particularly harsh during the years 1980 to 1985 when
Evin prison was so overcrowded that up to 45 persons were kept in one cell.
The Special Representative also received testimonies about mass executions and
various practices of torture and ill—treatment on a wide scale alleged to have
taken place during this period.
0. Visit to Gohardasht nrison
307. On 12 December 1991 the Special Representative visited Gohardasht prison,
which is located some 40 kms outside Tehran. The prison director explained
that some 2,000 persons were detained at Gohardasht, 80 of them female
prisoners. Of those prisoners, 64 per cent were detained for drug related
offences, 15 per cent for burglary, 10 per cent for financial crimes,
6 per cent for murder and 5 per cent for armed robbery. In reply to a
question by the Special Representative, he stated categorically that there
were no political prisoners at Gohardasht except for three persons who were at
present on leave.
308. The Special Representative also asked to see Mr. Reza Mohammadi,
allegedly a member of the People's Mojahedin Organization, and
Mr. Bakhshu'llah Mithagi, a member of the Baha'i community, and was informed
that the former was not known to the prison director and the latter was no
longer in Gohardasht.
309. Subsequently the Special Representative was shown the hospital of the
prison, a bookbinding and carpentry workshop, the prison library, the kitchen
and a hall apparently used for cinema and theatrical performances. Be was
also shown several empty cells, as well as rooms used for family visits and
private visits for married couples. He then requested to see solitary
confinement cells. He was conducted to a ward containing some 25 solitary
confinement cells and, in the presence of prison officials, he was able to
speak to inmates held in the first seven cells.
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 57
310. The Special Representative was surprised to find two political prisoners,
when a few minutes before the director of the prison had categorically stated
that there were no political prisoners in Gohardasht. One of them,
Mr. Massoud Dana Ban, declared IIat he had been prisoner of war in Iraq and
had joined the Mojabedin organization there. He had come back under the
amnesty recently decreed by IIe Iranian Government and had duly surrendered to
the authorities, but nevertheless had been arrested; he expected to be tried
shortly for having joined the organization. He had not been given the
possibility of making use of legal counsel. OEree oIIer persons interviewed
were soldiers (two majors and one private soldier) charged with bribery and
one of them charged in addition with spying for France. The latter prisoner,
Major A u Choda H., stated that he bad been detained for six months, the last
two months in solitary confinement. He said that he had been tortured and as
a consequence was suffering from serious kidney and stomach problems, but had
refused to sign a confession. He also complained that the authorities had
exercised undue pressure on his wife and that no lawyer had been allowed to
defend him. Two other persons also said that they had not been given the
right to consult a lawyer. One of them Mr. Sayed Mabmoud Hosseini, complained
that the investigators had attempted to force him to confess to charges of
bribery; as he had made no confession he had been in solitary confinement for
68 days and was not allowed to have family visits.
P. Interview with the deputy director of the organization
fQr the discovery and investigation of crimes
311. The Special Representative requested several times to be allowed to visit
the detention facilities in the so—called Central Xomiteh of Tehran, also
referred to as Komiteh Mushtarak or Tohid prison, which is mentioned in many
testimonies he received. He was informed that no such prison existed and the
term “Komiteh Mushtarak” was used for the detention centre of the Savak, the
secret police of the former regime. When he nevertheless insisted on visiting
the place, he was received by the deputy director of the organization for the
discovery and investigation of crimes, Mr. Tab, who informed him that during
the revolution the old Komiteh Mushtarak building had been destroyed and had
been replaced by a new building, called NunIIer 2 Police Station. It was used
mainly for administrative purposes of the police and no persons were brought
there for interrogation except in very special cases such as passport or
currency forgery or minor burglary offences. Such persons were, however, not
kept for any extended period at the police station, at the maximum for
24 hours. The police forces were not allowed to maintain their own prisons
and all detainees were under the control of the prison organization. Replying
to a question by the Special Representative, he stated IIat the term Tohid
prison was not known to him and he denied categorically that there was any
prison in central Tehran.
312. Mr. Tab then referred at length to the problem of drug trafficking and
recommended to the Special Representative that he should investigate the
number of martyrs killed in the tight against drug traffickers, that he should
further study the plight of the families of the victims of the People's
Mojahedin Organization and that he should also report on the situation of
Afghan refugees in the country.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 58
Q. Interviews with non—governmental organizations
313. On 12 December 1991, the Special Representative met IIree representatives
of the Organization for Defending Victims of Violence, who briefed him on
their activities in 1991. They said that they had continued to promote and
develop human rights in the country and had begun to contact other
non-governmental organizations throughout the world. They also reported that
they had paid particular attention to the problem of foreign refugees in Iran
and that they had requested the international organizations and
non-governmental organizations to show more interest in the refugees and
assist them. They said that they had offered the foreign refugees help from
the very moment they arrived in the country, that they had succeeded in
collecting US$ 50,000 on their behalf and had sent material aid to the camps
set up in the western part of the country.
314. Xn Iran itself, they had continued to help the victims of violence,
especially those victims of what they called guerrilla and urban terrorist
activity carried out by the Peoples Mojatedin Organization, which they held
responsible for the deaths of over 10,000 people between 1981 and 1982,
including 67 children under 2 years of age and 638 old people. They claimed
that several foreign Kurds who had sought refuge in Iran had testified that
the Mojahedin had been involved in killings and violations in Soleimanieh.
They also said that they had supported all the amnesties and pardons decreed
during 1991 by the Leader of the Islamic Republic, because they considered
them an expression of magnanimity and compassion of Islam which was the
precept underlying the country's legal system and the noble sentiments of the
Leader. They said that they were working on translating the most important
documents of the Commission on Human Rights into Farsi, that their
organization had issued several statements in support of the Children's Week,
condemning the treatment of the Kurds in northern Iraq, and denouncing the
assassination of Mr. Bakhtiar, and that at present they were in the process of
studying various bills from a human rights point of view.
315. Finally, they thought that a comparative study of the main international
human rights instruments and the Islamic legal system was vitally important,
and that it should be conducted jointly with Islamic religious leaders.
They asked the Special Representative to bear in mind that the majority of
the country's citizens were Muslims and to be sensitive to the feelings
of 1 billion Muslims throughout the world when he cited religious precepts and
Islamic laws, and to discount any allegations made by foreign mercenaries and
agents who could not empathize with the Iranian people.
316. On the same day, the Special Representative met representatives of the
Writers' Association, who said that through the efforts of the Special
Representative the problems which they had raised the year before concerning
the allocation of paper had been completely overcome (see E/CL4/1991/35,
para. 440). The requirement that all literary works should be cleared by the
Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance before publication had also been
abolished. They pointed out that previously the Ministry could ban the
publication of a work, but that no one had been arrested because of his
ideas. They said that there was currently an atmosphere of great freedom of
expression in the country, and that the President of the Republic had called
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 59
upon writers to maintain and strengthen that freedom and urged them to take
advantage of that climate to produce high-quality literary works. However,
they said that they were still being criticized in certain quarters for being
unduly influenced by the false values of the period of the Shah or of the
West, for not being imbued with the revolutionary fervour which galvanized the
younger generation in the country and for reducing the social and economic
problems to a purely individual level.
317. On 12 December, the Special Representative also met representatives of
the Organization of Iranian Women, who said that unlike what occurred in the
West, women in Iran were not regarded as objects of pleasure or as a means of
reproduction but were seen in their full capacity of human beings useful to
society. They said that in Iran most women devoted themselves to taking care
of their families, but that there were still over 1 million women working in
various sectors of production and that many had distinguished themselves in
the areas of creative, artistic and literary work, science and technology.
They added that women were usually more successful at their jobs than men
because of their perseverance, precision and delicacy and of the understanding
and support they were given by the authorities. They claimed that in the West
women always occupied marginal and menial jobs and were relegated to the lower
rungs of the economic ladder. They asserted that in Iran the role of the
woman as the builder of a virtuous family was also promoted and that in recent
years the status of women in the social, political, cultural and religious
areas had improved considerably. They said that the next decade in Iran would
be devoted to women and development, as a way of commemorating the anniversary
of the daughter of the prophetess Hazrat Fatima Zebra, whom all Iranian women
looked up to as a model. Lastly, they warned the Special Representative
against paying attention to the allegations of Iranian women living abroad,
because many of them were influenced by corrupt and false materialistic
Western values.
318. Also on 12 December, the Special Representative met members of the
Students Association, who complained about the racial discrimination against
Iranian students in Germany and other Western European countries and in the
United States of America, which had even led to the death of some of them.
They claimed that in Iran, on the other hand, students were provided with all
the facilities they needed. OEe Faculties of Medicine alone had more than
90,000 students, who enjoyed all the laboratory facilities and libraries they
needed to pursue their studies successfully.
319. In the afternoon of 12 December, the Special Representative also met
representatives of the Association of Victims of Chemical—Weapon Attacks. One
of them said that he was under permanent medical supervision and that every
week he had to have a six—hour session of artific!al respiration as a result
of the injuries he had sustained. The Iranian Government had sent him to
Germany for one year and paid all his expenses for expert medical treatment,
but the period had probably not been long enough and he continually faced the
possibility of death. The Special Representative saw for himself the serious
and unusual injuries which he had sustained. The second person said that he
was suffering from internal injuries, and that his brother, who had apparently
E/CN.4/l992/34
page 60
escaped unhurt from the attack, had suddenly begun, to have back pains in
1990, and was completely paralysed today. The third said that he had not
suffered any injuries but that he had witnessed the death of nine relatives
and friends three or four years after the attack.
320. On 13 December, the Special Representative net representatives of the
Organization of Former Mojahedin, who said that during the Gulf war, many
Mojahedin had voiced their disagreement with fighting on the side of Iraq and
taking part in internal repressive operations, as a result of which they had
been committed to prisons administered by the Mojahedin. They said that 300
of them were in a prison called Ramadieh, to the north of Baghdad, and that an
equal number was being held in other secret prisons where many were allegedly
being tortured. According to them some of them had been imprisoned with their
wives and children and the children were denied milk in order to pressure the
parents into returning and fighting against the Iranian regime or against the
Iraqi opposition. They thanked the Government of Iran for allowing them to
return despite their earlier crimes and the International Committee of the Red
Cross for supervising their return. They said that 50 of the recent returnees
had been pardoned by the Government, were temporarily being accommodated in
one of the best hotels in Tehran and enjoyed complete freedom of movement.
R. Information received from private persons
321. During his stay at Tehran, the Special Representative met several private
persons, most of them members of the legal profession. He also spoke again
with Mr. Mehdi Bazargan, Prime Minister of the First Provisional Revolutionary
Government. The other persons the Special Representative met requested that
their names be kept confidential.
322. With regard to the general evolution of the human rights situation in the
country Mr. Bazargan referred to certain improvements concerning the freedom
of the press and the policy relating to the publication of hooks. The
publication of several new magazines had been authorized and some new ideas
could be expressed which were unheard of a few years previously. The office
for the censorship of books in the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance
had been dissolved and authors were no longer required to obtain authorization
prior to the publication of their works. However, literary works could and in
some instances had in fact been prevented from appearing after the printing
process, so that the new system in practice did not constitute a major policy
change. Other interlocutors also expressed the view that the new measures had
not brought about a truly meaningful liberalization in these areas and that
both journalists and writers had to exercise a high degree of self—censorship
if they wanted to avoid problems with the authorities. In this connection
reference was made to the publication of a picture of ambiguous content in the
newspaper Gardoon , which had led to the closing of that paper in June 1991.
The editor had been beaten by female demonstrators. A female novelist,
Ms. Sharzooz Parsipoor, had been arrested immediately after the printing of
her novel.
323. The Special Representative was also informed that the general feeling of
insecurity persisted although on some occasions people had attempted to talk
more freely. Several demonstrations in the provinces against decisions
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 61.
concerning local problems had taken place but had been repressed. The
situation was still very unstable and even parliamentarians, such as
Hojatoleslam Ijossein Hashemian, Senior Deputy Speaker of the Majlis, had been
subjected to interrogation after paying a visit to Ayatollah Montazeri.
324. Concerning the status of the Freedom Movement, the party of which
Mr. Bazargan was chairman, it was pointed out IIat members of the Movement
were still suffering attacks and defamation on the part of several authorities
and the media controlled by them. A number of members had been physically
attacked and their complaints had been ignored by the judicial system. Two
months previously the confiscated building of the Movement had been returned
with the argument that it needed repair: it was again confiscated soon after
the repair work had started.
325. Concerning the legal status of the Freedom Movement, Mr. Bazargan
recalled that the Movement had provided all the information required by the
Commission of the Ministry of Interior in charge of political parties and
associations, in accordance with the law on political parties, and that IIe
Commission had not declared its functioning illegal within the three-month
period stipulated by the law. Nevertheless the authorities did not consider
the Movement as legally recognized and six months previously the Commission
had informed the Movement of new by—laws with which it would have to conform.
Three weeks previously the Freedom Movement had communicated the additional
information requested under those regulations. So far the Commission had not
considered the additional information provided.
325. Mr. Bazargan further confirmed that nine co-signatories of his open
letter to the President of the Republic of May 1990 had been sentenced
to prison terms and flogging and that their sentences had been upheld by
the Supreme Court (see paras. 131 and 171 above). He also confirmed that
Mr. Ali Ardalan had received treatment in hospital and was convalescing at
home; his prison sentence had been suspended (see also para. 173 above).
Since their transfer from the Central Xomiteh prison (Komiteh Mushtarak)
to Evin prison conditions for the other eight prisoners had gradually
improved; they received better medical attention, were permitted family visits
and on certain occasions had been granted leave from prison. His own son,
Mr. Abdol Mi Bazargan, and Messrs. Habib Davaran, Nezamedine Movahed and
kkbar Zarrinehbaf were on leave at the present time.
327. During the interrogation period at the Komiteh Mushtarak prison
Mr. Mohammad Tavassoli Hojati had been tortured as he had complained about
torture during a previous detention on the occasion of the Special
Representative's first visit. The Special Representative was also informed
that Mr. Hashem Sabaghian and Mr. Khossro Mansourian had been beaten and all
of them kept for extended periods in solitary confinement of up to five
months. Their trial proceedings before the Revolutionary Court had been held
without the assistance of legal counsel and the periods of their pre—trial
detention had not been counted in the prison sentences they had received. In
the case of Mr. Movahed and Mr. Mansourian, the signing of the open letter was
the only charge. Nevertheless Mr. Mansourian had been sentenced to a prison
term of three years (the highest prison term given to any member of IIe group)
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 62
as he had complained to the Special Representative about the torture he had
suffered during pre-trial detention. OEe Supreme Court had confirmed all
sentences within 48 hours after the appeal, including corporal punishment
(74 lashes in 5 cases), which so far had not been executed (see paras. 170 and
171 above).
328. Other private persons whom the Special Representative met in Tebran
confirmed the view that in most of the areas of concern to the Special
Representative there had been no substantial progress since the last visit.
Certain improvements had been announced and promises had been made, but
most of them had not been fulfilled. Reference was made in this regard to
the announced elections to the board of the Bar Association scheduled for
8 October 1991. However, the elections had been cancelled 24 hours before the
scheduled time. The official reason given reportedly was that certain persons
appearing as candidates had supported the People's Mojahedin Organization of
Iran or the former regime. According to the persons the Special Representative
interviewed, the list of candidates had in reality included several independent
intellectuals whom the authorities had considered unacceptable (see also
para. 149 above). A copy of a bill deferring the elections, adopted by
the Majlis on 12 October 1991, was handed to the Special Representative
(see annex VII).
329. The continuation of the Islamic Revolutionary Court system was also
considered as a major indication of lack of real progress. The persons
interviewed expressed the view that it was unacceptable that a decade after
IIe Revolution a special court system lacking most of the guarantees provided
for in the international human rights instruments continued to operate. The
trials before such courts of the persons having signed Mr. Bazargan's open
letter were frequently cited as the best documented recent example of the
arbitrariness of the procedure of revolutionary courts. The situation was
considered even more arbitrary in the special courts for the clergy and
reference was made in this regard to the recent execution of a mullah
named Rafik Sodeghi. With regard to persons in the armed forces, or the
Revolutionary Guards Corps it was alleged that many were executed without
any court procedure or that they simply disappeared.
330. The Special Representative was also informed that the new law concerning
the right to legal counsel before all courts had had no practical effect so
far. It was not known whether lawyers had had any access to military courts,
courts for the clergy, courts dealing with questions of women and in cases
involving narcotic drugs and sensitive political questions (see also
paras. 147 and 148 above). Defence lawyers did not enjoy immunity and
generally had difficulties in obtaining access to the files. In addition
the irregularity of the procedures in the revolutionary courts made it
practically impossible for them to perform their functions in a meaningful
manner. Reference was made in this connection to the imprisonment of lawyers
for having given legal opinions which were not in line with the off icial
position.
E/CN.4/l992/34
page 63
331. OEe Special Representative had the clear impression from these
conversations that the feeling of fear and insecurity among the population
persisted. Several interlocutors asked for guarantees that they would not be
prosecuted after having spoken to the Special Representative and reference was
made in this regard to some cases of reprisals following previous visits.
S. Meeting wiII members of the Baha'i community
332. On 13 December, the Special Representative interviewed three members
of the Baha'i community in Tehran. They said that the persecution of the
Baha'is for their belief had abated, that no Baha'i had been executed in the
previous four years and that the number of Baha'is in prison had declined.
Nevertheless, the Bahais continued to be denied access to higher education
and that was a problem which affected virtually all the families of the
community and had caused deep frustration and disappointment among the young
Baha t is. According to them, the Baba'is continued to encounter serious
difficulties in obtaining a passport which would enable them to travel abroad,
even in cases where they required specialized medical treatment. Many Baha'is
who applied for passports were ill-treated and even insulted or ridiculed.
333. Recently, government officials had informed several Baha'is applying
for passports that the Office of the President of the Republic had issued
a directive that no Baha'i was entitled to obtain a passport, although
no written evidence had been adduced to prove the accuracy of those .
statements. Of the 250 Baha'is who had applied for passports during 1991,
fewer than 10 had obtained them.
334. The representatives of the Baha'i community informed the Special
Representative that the Baha'is continued to be denied the right to
inheritance despite the fact that the Constitution of the Islamic Republic
establishes that no one shall be deprived of his right to an inheritance, and
despite a recent ruling issued by Section 41 of Court No. 42 establishing that
this said constitutional provision should also apply to the Baha'is.
335. The Baha'is also had to face the problem of arbitrary confiscation
of their property. The representative said that, since the Special
Representative's second visit to Iran, the home of Mrs. Sh. Miraftab had been
confiscated for no reason and her furniture cruelly thrown out into the
street, where she had had to live until finding a place to rent. All her
requests and petitions so far had been rejected. The home of Mohammad Rahimi
had also been confiscated and his furniture thrown out into the street during
the summer of 1991. His petitions had also been rejected. Neither of those
confiscations had been carried out on the basis of any court order, and the
victims had not even been informed in writing of the reasons for them.
The day before, 12 December 1991, another Baha'i woman had had her house
confiscated in Yazd. Her belongings had been thrown out into the street and
sold at public auction. She had even been informed orally that the telephone
line of the building would be transferred to someone else.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 64
336. The Baha'is were also subjected to enforced displacement. In Ilkhchi, a
village near Tabriz, 35 Baha'i families had been compelled to leave, their
houses burnt to ashes and their lands, farms and orchards put up for sale.
The Baha'i farmers in Saissan had also suffered the same fate. In both cases,
all the petitions and requests submitted by the victims had been rejected.
In some instances, the confiscated property had been handed over to the
Mostaz'af fan Foundation. The many petitions submitted by the Baha'is who had
been expelled from the Sovair Ahmad region in 1981 and whose properties had
been confiscated had also been disregarded.
337. In Seissan, a city where many Bahais lived, over 200 Baha'i families
were being pressured to leave. A similar problem was being faced in
Bovair Abmad, where over 1,200 Baha'i families were being subjected to severe
pressure to leave the region. The Imam Khomeini Foundation was currently
putting up for sale the properties confiscated from Eaha'is in the city of
Yazd and surrounding area. Other houses, farms and orchards confiscated from
Baha'i citizens throughout the country had not been put up for sale but were
being occupied by government agencies and bodies. A large tract of land
belonging to the Bahai community situated to the north of Tehran, on which
the community had planned to construct a temple, was currently being used to
build housing for the Revolutionary Guards.
338. The representatives of the Baha'i community also informed the Special
Representative that Bahai cemeteries continued to be desecrated and destroyed
all over the country. A large area of land south of the capital, which had
been purchased by the community to contain the future Baha'i cemetery of
Tehran, had also been confiscated. In exchange, the authorities had given it
a small tract of wasteland without services or public utilities. They claimed
that the Bahais were forbidden to pray for their dead in the cemeteries.
339. The Special Representative was also told that the Baha'is were being
subjected to serious economic discrimination. They were denied entry into the
public service as civil servants and administrative employees and those who
had retired from the public sector were not entitled to receive retirement
pensions. They said that seven recent decisions of the Court of Justice for
public—sector personnel had rejected a number of other petitions from former
Baha'i civil servants who were claiming their pensions after a life of service
to the State. In one case, the Supreme Court of Qom and the Supreme
Disciplinary Court of the Judiciary had recognized the right of the former
Baha'i public employee, Heshniattullah Kashefi, to receive his pension. The
decision had not, however, been put into effect, in open defiance of the
judicial authority. In recent years, thousands of Eaha'is had been dismissed
from the public sector and that discrimination was being gradually extended to
the private sector. In 1991, the Ministry of Information had distributed forms
to all private businesses of the country which they were required to return to
the Ministry stating the religion of each member of their staff. Similarly,
the Islamic associations and the so—called associations for IIe protection of
interests, which existed in all large and medium—sized enterprises, were also
bringing constant pressure to bear on the owners to dismiss BaMa'is or not to
hire them.
E/CN.4 / 1992/34
page 65
340. One positive development was that, at the present time, Baha'i children
and young people could attend primary and secondary school. The problems
posed in that respect were usually solved quickly once the case was reported
to the relevant authorities. OEree confiscated houses as well as seven plots
of agricultural land in Abadeh had been returned to their Baha'i owners over
the last four years. Baha'i citizens had been issued with the ration coupons
needed to obtain supplies of food and other essential commodities.
341. Finally, they said that several Baha'i-owne6 businesses and commercial
establishments, which had been closed by the authorities, were gradually being
reopened. Similarly, in 1991, the operating licences of opticians' businesses
owned by Baha'is in Tehran were being renewed after three years of non-renewal,
On the other hand, various commercial establishments belonging to Baba'is had
recently been closed, including over two dozen opticians' businesses in Abadeh
and Karaj.
T. Final interview with Ambassador Syrous Nasseri and
Directors of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
342. On the morning of 13 December, the Special Representative had a long
final interview with Ambassador Nasseri, who had coordinated the visit, and
several Directors of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Ambassador Nasseri
referred to the second memorandum of the Special Representative which had been
transmitted on 5 December 1991 and contained fresh allegations of human rights
violations in Iran. The Special Representative, in order to have detailed
replies at his disposal, requested a written record of the information
supplied orally during that meeting and said that it would be desirable if
those replies could reach the Centre for Human Rights by 20 December 1991, at
the latest. Up to the time this report was completed, the Special
Representative had not received the majority of those written replies.
343. A summary of the main subjects raised by Ambassador Nasseri is given
below. Regarding the number of persons condemned to death in 1991, as
reported on Iranian radio and in the Iranian press, he said that only
85 persons had actually been executed, and that the other announcements made
by the mass media had been a publicity measure to serve as a psychological
deterrent against delinquency (see annex IV ).
344. Regarding the recent reports that many people had been arrested and
executed in the provinces of Sistan and Beluchistan (see paras. 112 and 154),
the Ambassador said that they were pure fabrication designed to smear Iran.
According to him, the events in Beluchistan were not politically motivated,
nor were they a manifestation of tribal or ethnic repression but were simply a
problem of drug trafficking.
345. As to the situation of the Baha'is, he said that they were free to lodge
complaints with the authorities. An appeal could be made to the judicial and
administrative authorities regarding any of the cases reported, and the
authorities were willing to hear and settle any petitions or complaints
brought. In any event, the matters in question were private, affecting the
Baha'is as individuals and not as members of a community.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 66
346. The references to the Rushdie case in the first memorandum submitted to
the Government on 2 October 1991 were strongly contested and rejected by the
Ambassador. He said that the case as presented in the memorandum was
incomplete, because it failed to take into account the many deaths that
Rushdie's book had caused all over the world, especially in India and
Pakistan. Furthermore, the Special Representative was not, in his view,
competent to take up the Rushdie case or the case of the attacks on the
translators of Rushdie 1 s novel in Italy and Japan. The issue had to be
settled by an analysis of the circumstantial evidence and its probative value,
as well as the probative value of the concurrence of the various items of
circumstantial evidence.
347. In reply, the Special Representative said that he had received no reports
of Muslims who had died as a result of the publication of Rushdie's book and
that he could not unilaterally suppress any information. Besides, it was the
responsibility of the Government to give any explanations which it deemed
necessary to justify the rejection of that information. Furthermore, it was
not the business of the Special Representative to include facts which had not
been communicated to him when preparing a memorandum setting out the
allegations received and asking the Government for a reply. A request for
information was distinct from an analysis and an assessment of the facts. Zn
the instant case, it was incumbent on the Government, in its written reply, to
include the facts referred to during the course of that conversation. The
Government had given that reply in its letter dated 18 December 1991 (see
para. 19).
348. This topic was discussed at length, with each side maintaining its
original position. The Ambassador repeated that the Rushdie case did not fall
within the Special Representatives mandate and the Special Representative
contended that he could not unilaterally suppress any allegation in the
process of requesting a reply from the Government. The Special Rapporteur
reiterated that the mandate was open and based on the adversary procedure.
Every allegation received by him from another Government, international
organization, non-governmental organization or individual had to be
communicated to the Iranian Government so that the latter could reply. He
himself could not a priori or unilaterally suppress any allegation received.
After the Government's reply was known, the Special Rapporteur could draw his
own conclusions. The mandate was open and flexible and was not a judicial
procedure. Its sole purpose was to improve the situation of human rights.
349. Ambassador Nasseri also registered a strong protest at the inclusion of
the murder of Shahpour Bakhtiar and his Secretary Katibeh Fallouch in the
first memorandum. The Iranian Government had, he said, condemned those
murders and there was not the slightest circumstantial evidence that Iranian
officials had been implicated in them, to justify their inclusion as an
allegation. The Special Representative repeated that he could not but
transmit any allegation received and that it was up to the Government to reply
as it deemed appropriate.
350. Ambassador Nasseri said that, in the past, some violations of human
rights had occurred, despite the Governments determination to respect those
rights, but that the situation had changed and that human rights were at
E/CI4 • 4/1992 / 34
page 67
present being observed. The fact that fewer allegations had been received in
1991 was to him an indication that the situation had improved in Iran. In his
opinion, the situation regarding refugees, war damage and victims of chemical
weapons should have been much more important for the Special Representative
than the individual cases which had been gathered during his mandate, because
the former involved massive human rights violations.
351. Ambassador Nasseri asserted that notwithstanding the burden of the past
war, the sanctions and political and economic pressure, the Islamic Republic
of Iran had never shirked its duty to observe and respect human rights.
Regarding corporal punishment, he said that that was laid down in Islam, whose
religious precepts constituted the best guarantee that human rights would be
respected. According to him, considering the size of the Iranian population,
corporal punishment was applied in very few cases, and chiefly in the rural
areas. He recalled that those punishments were based on the Shariah, which
also inspired the legal system of 17 other countries.
352. Regarding the allegations made in statements by the President of the
Supreme Court, Mr. Moghtadaei, by the deputy for Tabriz, Mullab Seyed Hoosein
Mousavi Tabrizi, by the head of the Prison Organization, Mr. Lajevardi, by the
Director of the Anti-Drug Department of the Greater Tehran Security Area,
Mr. Khalil Hariri, and by the Commander of that Department's Guards Corps
Special Unit, Mr. Farhang Saleh, concerning the administration of justice (see
paras. 150, 151, 152, 154 and 155), he observed that the statements
demonstrated the great freedom of expression that existed in the country. In
addition, the Special Representative had had the opportunity to interview
those authorities during his visit and to confirm whether they had in fact
made those statements, which in any case were the expression of their own
personal views.
353. Ambassador Nasseri said that the reproduction of a quotation by the
Leader of the Islamic Republic about an affront to the cultural values of the
Islamic revolution, contained in the second memorandum (see para. 176) was
partial and had been taken out of context. Those words had been spoken at a
particular time, when a propaganda campaign of false cultural values and
inducement to corruption from abroad was being waged against the
Islamic Republic.
354. He denied the allegation that the Prosecutor—General, Abolfazi Musavi
Tabrizi, had announced that anyone who rejected the principle of the “Hijab”
(Islamic dress code) was an apostate and should be condemned to death
(see para. 191). He also denied that the Director—General for the Affairs of
Foreign Citizens and Immigrants of the Ministry of the Interior,
Abmad Hosseini, had declared that marriages between Iranian women and foreign
men were not legally recognized (see para. 192). All Mr. Hosseini bad done
was to cala upon mixed couples to have their marriages recorded in the civil
register, in order to avoid any harm to themselves or their children.
355. Regarding the allegation that according to government regulations
approved on 28 April 1991, families with three children would not receive any
benefits for a fourth child (see para. 193), he said that the rate of
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 68
population growth in Iran was a serious problem which the Government had
decided to address. In any case, the matter was purely administrative and
could not be construed as a violation of the rights of the fourth IIild.
356. Concerning political rights, he acknowledged the accuracy of the report
that candidates for the next elections to the Islamic Advisory Assembly
(Majlis) could not launch their campaigns until their candidatures had
received the final approval of the Council of Guardians (see para. 180). The
matter was, in his view, one of internal debate and some organ should confirm
the moral suitability and past administrative record of candidates for the
post of deputy.
357. He acknowledged the truth of the allegation that the religious minorities
were also required to comply with a Ministry of Education directive on proper
Islamic dress, issued in September 1991 (see para. 197), although he made it
clear that that directive concerned only educational institutions. He
recalled that, in any event, everyone on Iranian territory was required to
observe the Islamic dress code in public, out of respect for the religious
beliefs and the cultural traditions of the country.
358. Regarding the allegations contained in the first memorandum sent to the
Government, he denied that Revolutionary Guards had shot to death University
of Tabriz students, Hosein Ahari and Fariba Akhavi on 20 May 1991 (see
para. 115). According to him, those persons did not exist and no such
incident had taken place.
359. Ambassador Nasseri said that there had been no proven cases of torture in
the country during 1990 and 1991. He denied the allegations that torture had
been inflicted on A u Gaffari Hosseini, Parivash Amen and Elyas ICohan (see
paras. 132, 133 and 135). The last—named was apparently well known for his
mendacity and for being a charlatan and had left the country. Regarding the
alleged torture and rape of women prisoners attributed to Hojatol-Eslam
Haj -Agha Khaleghi at Ghazvin prison (see para. 134), he stated that no such
name had been found in the staff registers of the prison or even in the civil
registers. He denied the other cases of torture described in the allegations,
although he admitted that he had no further information.
360. Regarding the allegations relating to the administration of justice, he
said that the Special Representative had seen for himself that new provisions
were in force requiring the presence of a defence counsel in all courts, the
right to appeal and to review of a sentence in second instance, and the
subtraction from a prison term of the time spent in detention before the
judgement. He denied that accused persons in Iran were pressured to make
televised confessions. He also denied that political prisoners and ordinary
prisoners were held together. Finally, he denied the existence of section 209
( Asayeshgah ) at Evin prison (see para. 161).
361. Re said that it had not been possible to find many of the names of
prisoners supplied by the Special Representative, such as Hassan Zolfaqari and
Beshar Shabibi, contained in the first memorandum sent to the Government on
2 October 1991. He stated that Ali Akbar Shalgunii was currently on parole
E/CN.4/1992 / 34
page 69
(see annex V) and that fli Ardalan was at his home owing to the fact that the
Government had favourably received the humanitarian request made on his behalf
by the Special Representative (see paras. 8, 9, 170, 171 and 173). Regarding
Mehdi Dibaj (see para. 160), he had no information at the current time.
362. He denied that prison officials in the country who had ill-treated or
abused prisoners had gone unpunished and offered to provide the
Special Representative with a list of officials implicated in such acts who
had been punished or were under investigation (see annex I II). He also denied
the allegations of poor conditions in the prisons (see para. 159) and said
that the Special Representative had personally been able to ascertain the
falseness of such allegations during his visits to Evin and Gohardasht.
363. He repeated that in his view the mandate could not be restricted to the
consideration of the situation of a few prisoners but should include human
rights violations of a mass nature, such as those suffered by the victims of
the Iraqi chemical-weapon attacks. That problem was being ignored by the
international community, several of whose members were responsible for having
supplied Iraq with the technology required to manufacture such weapons. Some
type of redress or compensation should be established for the victims and
their relatives.
364. In that context, he again raised the question of the Iranian passenger
aircraft, )drbus k-300, which had been shot down over the Strait of Hormuz on
3 July 1988 with 290 passengers aboard. He formally requested that the report
should refer to the case of that aircraft and reflect the information that the
victims' relatives were prepared to supply and that the Special Representative
should take a position on the matter. It would also be appropriate to grant
compensation to the victims' families. Regrettably, some countries did not
consider the life of an Iranian to be as valuable as the life of one of their
own nationals.
365. Refugees constituted an immense problem for Iran. International aid had
been very small in comparison with the magnitude of the problem, and the
Government had met some very high costs while at the same time having to cope
with the reconstruction of its cities and property damage during the war
imposed on it. The problem of the refugees was a problem of the international
community, despite which it was basically the Government of Iran that had had
to assume the costs and responsibilities.
366. He said that the main problem affecting the enjoyment of human rights in
Iran related to economic and social rights, the enjoyment of which had been
jeopardized by the enormous costs of rebuilding the country, the economic
burden of the millions of refugees and the hostile international environment.
The economic embargo still being applied by a few powers was depriving his
people of their right to development, which would provide them with the
standard of living they deserved for their work and efforts. The hostile
economic environment had deprived the Iranian people of the enjoyment of
important social, economic and cultural rights, and that situation should be
looked into by the international organizations.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 70
367. He noted that the Government had carried out each and every one of the
recommendations made by the Special Representative in his previous report to
the Commission on Human Rights (E/CW.41199l/35, para. 494). One very positive
step had been the permission granted by his Government to the International
Committee of the Red Cross to make regular prison visits from January 1992
onwards, a measure which other Governments were not prepared to accept. He
regretted the fact that the Government had not been able to exercise clemency
and the right of pardon as broadly as it had wished in order to reduce
drastically the application of the death penalty, since it was faced with
veritable organized gangs of drug traffickers who were causing a great number
of deaths and committing other acts of violence. There was complete freedom
of the press in his country, the four main daily newspapers regularly
published criticisms of the Government, at least one review had a position
that was totally opposed to the Government's policies and satirical
publications were even distributed. Finally, he said that the Special
Representative should limit himself to verifying compliance with the
recommendations made in his previous report to the Commission on Human Rights
and not take a stand on whether or not the mandate should continue. If the
Special Representative did take a position on that issue, the Iranian
Government would not continue its attitude of full cooperation.
36$. Before concluding his discussion with Ambassador Nasseri, the Special
Representative said that he had just received a complaint to the effect that
one of the persons with whom he had talked during his first visit to the
country, Kalani Mehrdad, son of Xli Akbar, domiciled in Narmak, 46 Metri,
Charghi, No. 40 had been detained after the meeting and was still in prison at
Bandar Langu . He recalled that Commission on Human Rights
resolution 1991/70, adopted on 6 March 1991, urged Governments to refrain from
all acts of intimidation or reprisal against private individuals and groups
who sought to cooperate with the United Nations or to avail themselves of
procedures established under United Nations auspices. Ambassador Nasseri
promised to investigate the case and transmit his findings to the
Special Representative.
IV. CONSXDERATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS
A. Interpretation of the mandate
369. On 7 March 1991, the Commission on Human Rights adopted, without a vote,
resolution 1991/82 on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of
Iran. That consensus resolution had been obtained with the active
participation and approval of the Iranian Government. Since the language of
that consensus resolution was a departure from earlier formulas extending the
mandate annually, the new language gave rise to an interpretation by the
Iranian Government that differed from the Special Representative's
interpretation.
370. In particular, the resolution did not explicitly mention the renewal of
the mandate, omitted specific criticisms of the Iranian Government for alleged
violations of human rights and made no reference to a third visit. However,
it did urge the Government to comply with international instruments on human
rights, in particular the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights. The resolution specified three activities of the Special
EICN • 4/1992 / 34
page 71
Representative: contacts with the Government, cooperation with the Government
and the submission of a report focusing on compliance with the recommendations
contained in his immediately previous report (E/CN.4/1991/35, para. 494). The
resolution also referred to the possibility of discontinuing the mandate if
further progress was achieved regarding the Special Representative's
recommendations (resolution 1991/82, para. 8).
371. The scope of the above—mentioned resolution was discussed with the
representatives of the Iranian Government. OEe position taken by the
representatives was that the mandate had substantially terminated and that a
procedure had been adopted to discontinue it in an orderly way. In their
view, it was a question of preparing the ground for the formal termination of
international monitoring in 1992, and the activities of the Special
Representative had therefore been reduced.
372. Thus in their view the activities of the Special Representative should
basically focus on the three above-mentioned points: contacts, cooperation
and a report on compliance with the recommendations contained in the final
report of 1991 (E/CN.4/1991/35, para. 494). The Special Representative's
activities were limited to claims and allegations affecting individuals during
1991, since no mention was made of earlier years, nor was it explicitly stated
that the mandate was to be extended along the lines established in 1984. On
the other hand, the Special Representative was to consider two new topics:
problems relating to refugees and displaced persons and the victims of toxic
gases (resolution 1991/82, para. 5).
373. The Special Representative has maintained and maintains the position and
interpretation that the mandate is in force in its entirety, i.e. within its
original terms of reference, despite the fact that no formal mention was made
of its extension. The language of resolution 1991/82 is instructive in this
respect. It stipulates that the Special Representative should maintain his
contacts and cooperation with the Government of Iran and report on further
progress “on the basis of his mandate pursuant to Commission on Human Rights
resolution 1984/54 of 14 March 1984” (para. 7). Furthermore, when the
resolution states that the report will be considered with a view to
discontinuing the mandate (para. 8) , that expression implies that the mandate
is still in force. Similarly, when the Commission states that the situation
of displaced persons and refugees as well as victims of chemical weapons
“could fall within the mandate of the Special Representative”, that implies
that the mandate continues.
374. The three specific activities that the resolution sets for the
Special Representative do not exclude other activities falling within his
mandate. The preparation of a report aimed at determining the extent to which
the recommendations of the previous report are being fulfilled by the Iranian
Government requires the Special Representative to continue receiving
information on acts that might constitute human rights violations, not only in
1991, but also in previous years, which for various reasons has come in late.
375. That is also the reason for the request for official replies to the
allegations, without distinction between those relating to 1991 and those
relating to previous years, concerning which the official position is not yet
E /CN.4 / 1992/34
page 72
known. It should be mentioned that the consensus resolution states that the
Commission welcomes the intention of the Government to continue its full
cooperation with IIe Special Representative (para. 2). And full cooperation
means a visit to the country and detailed replies to allegations of human
rights violations, in accordance with the substance of earlier reports that
have requested partial cooperation to be increased to full cooperation.
316. The Iranian representatives alluded to the negotiations that led to the
consensus resolution, during which, they said, it had been understood that the
only question at issue was, the diplomatic termination of United Nations
supervision of the human rights situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran; and
that the fact that the General Assembly had not included that item on the
agenda of its forty—seventh session (1991) also tended in that direction.
With that understanding, official circles in Tehran had announced the
cessation of the mandate immediately after the Commission on Human Rights had
adopted the above—mentioned resolution.
377. The Special Representative refused to interpret resolution 1991/82 In
terms of the negotiations that had led up to it and therefore refrained from
considering any promises and understandings or misunderstandings that might
have arisen during such negotiations. In his view, it was the text of the
resolution, approved by all the representatives, that should be observed,
whereas any promises or interpretations that might have come into play during
the efforts to obtain a consensus, unless they were unequivocally reflected in
the text, were only binding on the delegations that had made or endorsed them.
378. The Iranian Government has always maintained that the political element
in the international monitoring of human rights is very large and that
decisions on the subject are therefore controlled by the good or bad state of
relations between the countries directly concerned, by cooperation or
antagonism between States and by the problems being negotiated and resolved.
The official representatives took every opportunity to request measures to
ensure the termination of international monitoring in 1992.
B. Circumstances in which this report was prepared
379. This report was intended to cover the period ending 20 December 1991.
The events leading up to this closing date are recounted in the note of
19 July 1991 from the Director of the Centre for Human Rights to all Special
Representatives and Special Rapporteurs of the Commission on Human Rights
explaining in detail the difficulties met by the Secretariat in preparing
translations of the reports and distributing them to the Commission in time in
all the official languages.
380. The Special Representative considered the practical difficulties being
encountered by the Secretariat in translating reports, the growing number of
such reports, the fact that the General Assembly did not request an interim
report for its 1991 session and the fact that distributing the report while
the Commission on Human Rights was in session left delegations very little
time to study it. In a note dated 27 June 1991, the Special Representative
accepted the 20 December 1991 deadline proposed by the Under—Secretary—General
for Human Rights. He also informed the Iranian Mission in Geneva of the
deadline.
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 73
381. However, since the visit to the country took place from 8 to 14 December,
it was physically impossible to maintain 20 December as the closing date. To
provide information on events connected with the visit and formulate
observations and conclusions taking into account the information obtained in
the field, it was necessary to extend the deadline to the first fortnight of
January 1992. The closing date would in no way deprive the Commission of
information on any events that might occur after that, because it would be set
out in a supplement, and if there was not sufficient time for that, it would
be covered in the oral introduction of the report before the plenary
Commission.
382. In September 1991, on the occasion of his visit to Geneva, the Special
Representative was notified by the Permanent Representative of the Islamic
Republic of Iran to the United Nations Office at Geneva that his Government
intended to invite the Special Representative for a third visit before the end
of 1991. That intention was confirmed by a note dated 3 December 1991
(see para. 17). Agreement was then sought on the dates for the visit. The
period of 8—14 December 1991 was finally found to be mutually acceptable.
C. Third visit to the Islamic Renublic of Iran
383. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran invited the Special
Representative to conduct in situ observations relating to the human rights
situation. The Government provided facilities for conducting the official
programme, and the Special Representative conducted a separate, non-official
programme consisting of interviews with independent individuals who provided
him with information on the subject.
384. During the visit to the country, leading Iranian Government figures
emphasized the following points: (1) matters relating to refugees and
displaced persons, victims of chemical weapons and national reconstruction
owing to war damage, because they involved mass violations, were more
important than individual complaints of human rights violations; (ii)
consensus resolution 1981/82 currently under implementation was a mere
formality or a diplomatic way of discontinuing international monitoring, since
during the negotiations leading up to the resolution it had been privately
agreed that international monitoring would be ended at the forty—eighth
session of the Commission on Human Rights; and (iii) the international
position of the Islamic Republic of Iran had improved considerably over the
past two years, its policy of openness had begun to produce positive effects,
and the international economic situation, chiefly as a consequence of the war
in the Persian Gulf, had strengthened the country's geopolitical position,
with the resultant change of the hostile international environment into a
favourable one.
385. During the visit it was clear that high—ranking government officials felt
that the achievement of the five-year development plan, the completion of the
reconstruction programme and the enjoyment of social and economic rights by
the country's inhabitants depended to a large extent on the international
environment. The Special Representative would like to make the comment that
putting the house in order in the field of human rights. without playing down
individual cases and claims, is at the current time a very significant factor
in the productive development of international relations.
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 74
386. The interviews with the prisoners at Evin were especially significant.
The Director presented new regulations to the effect that the interviews had
to be held in his presence or be limited to recent aspects of the
imprisonment. The Special Representative rejected both conditions on
principle. To be productive and objective, interviews must be completely
private and cannot be restricted to specific aspects decided on by prison
officials. The Special Representative expressed concern that, if such
conditions were applied to the task about to be begun by the International
Committee of the Red Cross, they would undermine from the outset the agreement
that had been reached with that humanitarian organization.
387. Equally significant were the interviews with six prisoners in solitary
confinement at Gohardasht prison, which provided an example of conditions of
imprisonment and revealed the existence of political prisoners, which had been
denied, and the lack of a defence counsel during the investigation procedure.
D. The issue of selectivity
388. It is appropriate to make a few comments on the issue of selectivity, to
which several Iranian officials alluded during the third visit. This issue
has been used in recent years as an argument to mitigate or qualify judgements
on the human rights situation in the country.
389. The Special Representative is of the opinion that the competent
United Nations bodies have sometimes been slow in taking international
monitoring measures in respect of States which, accoring to repeated reports
provided by non—governmental organizations and the media and confirmed by
diplomatic channels, qualify for the procedures that have become customary
when human rights problems are involved. This delay has been due to a variety
of causes, which vary from case to case, and which most frequently consist of
an attempt to find alternatives, such as persuasion by diplomtic means and
pressure from public opinion, while the difficulties in obtaining a common
majority position cannot be ignored either. The participants in the process
are not experts or judges simply applying the law. Political factors
sometimes have an affect since the establishment and annual renewal of
international monitoring are decided on by vote of the States comprising the
competent bodies. And States mean political entities.
390. Once the decison is adopted, however, the procedure becomes independent
of its political background and is governed by a legal arrangement. At this
point, the human rights situation in the country monitored is evaluated not
through political criteria of what is suitable or unsuitable, advantageous or
disadvantageous, but through the logic of the law, with its variant of logic
of the law as applied to probability. In such cases the international
instruments in force are applied at the legal level, and at the practical
level, proven acts or acts of probable occurrence are used.
391. Each case must be studied and judged according to its own features and
merits, and the fact that a particular country where human rights are violated
eludes international monitoring is not a valid reason or excuse for the
country monitored to evade its international obligation to comply with the
international instruments in force. It is not for a special representative or
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 75
rapporteur of the Commission, or a representative of the Secretary—General, to
qualify, condition or moderate his views because other countries do not happen
to be under international supervision. Selectivity might be a relevant
argument in discussions for instituting mandates, but it has no significance
with regard to the monitoring of a particular country. The only relevant
factor is what is happening in each country, regarding both the laws in force
and their application.
B. Reflections on the new items in the mandate
392. The Commission on Human Rights authorized the Special Representative to
study and include in his report the questions of refugees and displaced
persons as well as the victims of chemical weapons. During the third visit,
the Special Representative received, for the first time and on two occasions,
a request that he should study the crash of the Iranian commercial aircraft in
July 1988 and was asked to hear the victims' relatives. As indicated earlier,
those persons failed to keep two appointments set up through the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs. Measures were taken to provide them with prompt access to
the UNDP offices and they were awaited far beyond the agreed time, but they
failed to arrive. A personal interview was necessary, because they would have
been able to provide replies to questions clarifying the current status of
this matter.
393. The new items have been studied and reported on with the explicit
authorization of the Commission. If it so desires, the Iranian Government
might submit the above-mentioned case to the Commission's consideration, in
order for it to dispel any misunderstandings or doubts regarding competence
and decide whether this case can be included in the mandate, together with the
two new items explicitly added to it.
394. OEe question of refugees and displaced persons has been and continues to
be a very serious problem for the Islamic Republic of Iran. According to the
investigation conducted, international assistance has been considerable, but
the expenditures of the Iranian Government have been much greater. The
Islamic Republic of Iran has opened its doors to all refugees, whether
political or economic. What is more, the country continues to be prepared to
receive more refugees, if the situation in neighbouring countries were to give
rise to mass exoduses like those of the immediate past. In the unanimous
opinion of the competent international organizations and of international
circles, Iran has conducted itself laudably in this area. The
Special Representative recommends that international assistance to Iran for
dealing with the refugee problem should continue, and that if new exoduses
occur in the region, international assistance should be greater than in the
recent past.
395. Various sources have informed the Special Representative that it has not
been possible to carry out the protection function of the Office of the
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees with regard to certain groups of
Iraqi and Afghan nationals, and even of Iranian nationals who have returned to
the country. Although the assistance function, of a primarily material
nature, has been effected with no setbacks, the protection function, which
gives an inaication of the situation of the refugees, displaced persons and
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 76
returnees, the freedom they enjoy and any mishaps that might befall them, had
been disrupted for the reason specified. Thus an urgent appeal should be made
to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran to extend full and
unreserved cooperation to make it possible for the protection tunction to be
exercised in respect of all groups of refugees without exception.
396. The problem of displaced persons, i.e., the Iranians who were forced to
abandon their homes because of the eight-year war, produced consequences that
have not yet ended. The Government said that there were still some
900,000 displaced persons who have not been able to return to the cities and
villages where they habitually reside, because reconstruction is not
completed. A few years ago, the international organizations were ill—prepared
to deal with displaced persons, and for some time vacillated with regard to
competence and physical preparedness to meet the problem. Under the pressure
of events, international humanitarian action was stepped up in specific cases,
and today attention for displaced persons is no longer outside the competence
of the international organizations. The Special Representative recommends
that the international organizations should help to resolve this problem to
the extent of their ability, boII with technical assistance and with the human
and material resources available to them.
397. The issue of the victims of chemical weapons is certainly one of the most
tragic events in the Near East in recent years. The Government drew the
Special Representative's attention to the bombings with chemical weapons which
affected both military personnel and civilians during the eight—year war.
Some 100,000 adults, young people and children, men and women, suffered the
effects of toxic gases. The Special Representative interviewed some of the
survivors, who are leading lives of suffering and uncertainty as to the
chances of recovering their health.
398. No one could fail to be moved at the horror of chemical weapons, but
emotional reactions aside, it is appropriate to examine the case from the
point of view of international law. In the opinion of the Special
Representative, the prohibition of the use of chemical weapons, contained in
the Geneva Protocol of 1925, has become a rule of - jus copens , and therefore
binds all States without exception. Thus its binding nature is not restricted
to the States parties to the Protocol but extends to all Member States of the
international community.
399. It is therefore unacceptable to invoke the fact that a particular country
has not acceded to the Protocol as an excuse or an exonerating factor. It is
an imperative prohibition from which no derogation is permitted, because it
corresponds to the moral and legal conscience of humanity.
F. The case of the assassination of Mr. Kazem Rpjayi
400. On 23 August 1991, the Sub—Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and
Protection of Minorities, adopted its resolution 1991/9, in which, inter alia
it expressed its grave concern at reports relating to political
assassinations of Iranian nationals abroad (para. 2), deplored the apparent
direct involvement In the killing of Mr. Kazem Rajavi of one or more official
Iranian services (para. 3) and requested the Special Representative to include
E/CN • 4/1992 / 34
page 77
in his next report any further information relative to IIe investigation of
this case, taking into account the verdict of the Geneva Police Tribunal
of 31 July 1991 (para. 4) regarding the accusation of insulting a foreign
State made by the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran against the
journalist Myriam Gazut Goudal.
401. The Special Representative believes it is necessary to point out that he
received no new information in 1991 relating to the investigation into IIis
case. In accordance with the express requests of the Sub—Commission, the
aforementioned judgement is included in the present report as annex X.
G. Examination of comoliance with the Special
Reoresentative ‘s recommendations
402. The Special Representative, pursuant to the request of the Commission on
Human Rights regarding progress made in 1991 in respect of human rights, asked
the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for detailed information on
each of the 15 recommendations contained in the previous report
(E/CN.4/1991/35). In this connection, it is appropriate to recall the
aide—m moire transmitted to the Permanent Representative of the Islamic
Republic of Iran to the United Nations Office at Geneva on 30 September, and
the note of 15 November 1991 (see pans. 7 and 16). Most of the official
replies were given orally during the third visit, and others were in the form
of written answers received shortly before the present report was finalized.
403. The Special Representative has, as far as possible, carried out
investigations similar to those of previous years, and in his considerations
and observations has referred to each of the 15 recommendations made at the
end of the previous report (E/CN.4/1991/35, para. 494). He will now go
through each of the aforementioned recommendations that the Commission decided
to use as a benchmark against which to judge the progress in Iran in applying
international human rights standards. The considerations and observations
deriving from the reports gathered over the year, from both inside and outside
the Islamic Republic of Iran, are inserted after each recommendation.
1. The death penalty
404. The first recommendation reads as follows:
“(a) The Government should take immediate action to reduce drastically
the application of the death penalty, and, while technical reforms are
being introduced into penal legislation, clemency and the right of pardon
should be exercised broadly'.
405. The number of executions carried out in 1991 has been checked through
official, or officially authorized, sources, such as the Tehran press, and
IRNA, the Iranian news agency. During the period 1 January — 7 December 1991
these sources reported 884 executions, and named 680 of those executed,
E/CN.4 1 1992/34
page 78
406. The names of those executed, as well as information on the places and
dates on which the executions occurred, have been gathered and scrutinized.
The crimes involved appear, in general, to relate to groups of varying size,
with individual details rarely being given. When foreigners are involved, the
nationality is usually specified.
407. During his third visit, the Special Representative referred on various
occasions to the excessively high number of executions and requested that the
number be reduced drastically. Iranian officials maintained that the
published figures for executions are grossly exaggerated, and that 85
executions had been carried out between January and 13 December 1991. A list
of persons executed was enclosed with a note of 18 December and is included as
annex IV to the present report. The Government has also given information on
acts of clemency for many prisoners, and has stated orally that 100 or
so prisoners facing the death penalty have had their sentence commuted. On
18 October 1991 the Special Representative requested more detailed information
on IIe matter.
408. Further, government officials challenged the accuracy of the information
given in the Iranian press since, according to them, newspapers publish
details of imaginary executions with the aim of dissuading potential
offenders. The Special Representative does not accept this explanation and
stands by IIe figures quoted in the Iranian press, which have been carefully
compiled throughout the year. On occasion, the accuracy of these figures has
been called into question on the grounds that the figures contained some
duplication, since the media report the sentences and then repeat the names
when the sentences are carried out. The aforementioned figures do not contain
any duplication, since names and places have been carefully registered and
collated.
409. The number of executions has increased week by week, with no sign of any
reduction. There were considerably more executions in 1991 than in 1989 and
1990. In the first six months of 1991, there were more executions recorded
than in 1989 and 1990 combined. It is, IIerefore, clear that the application
of the death sentence was not reduced drastically in 1991 as requested in the
first recommendation but, on the contrary, underwent a sharp increase.
2. Penalties which involve torture
410. The second recommendation reads as follows:
“(b) Just as the penalty of flogging is being gradually replaced by a
fine or imprisonment, consideration should be given to replacing the
penalties regarded by the international organizations as forms of
torture, including stoning and amputation”.
411. In the course of conversations with Iranian officials during his first
two visits to the country, the Special Representative received information
indicating that since some penalties condemned by international instruments
are found in the Shariah the authorities are facing a dilemma due to the
conflict between international requirements and those of national law. It has
been argued that such penalties are also applied in other Islamic countries
which adhere to traditional law.
E/ CN • 4/1992/34
page 79
412. Another argument has it that the competent United Nations bodies overlook
such penalties in Islamic countries which maintain good international
relations, hence the demand for equal treatment for all cases and situations,
without exceptions on grounds of political commitments. This forms the basis
for a renewed complaint of selectivity to the detriment of Iran. However, the
mandate on Iran is restricted to Iran and is not affected by what does or does
not take place elsewhere.
413. The Special Representative has pointed out that alternative penalties
could be introduced as a means of overcoming the problem and meeting
international requirements. This has been done, albeit to a limited degree,
with regard to the penalty of flogging. The true scope of the reform is still
uncertain. Five of the signatories of the so—called “Letter by the 90” who
were sentenced to imprisonment were also sentenced to 74 lashes. It could be
possible, Dan passu , to consider alternative penalties to replace punishment
which involves torture.
414. During the third visit to Iran, information was received that alternative
penalties are replacing flogging, although it is still used for fairly serious
offences. There have been repeated allegations of continued application of
the penalties of amputation and stoning. The Iranian media have reported that
the application of such penalties is in effect. The oral information gathered
during the third visit was categorical: under an Islamic regime it is
impossible to abolish penalties which are clearly set forth in the Shariah,
including amputation and stoning.
3. Legislative and administrative reforms to the
administration of justice
415. The third recommendation reads as follows:
“(c) The Government should be urged to initiate forthwith or to speed up
the pace of legislative and administrative reform to make national
institutions compatible with the international human rights instruments,
beginning with the introduction of technical reforms to penal legislation,
as well as to introduce remedies to make moral and economic redress
effective and to assign responsibility for abuses or excesses of power”.
416. Oral information has been received that penal legislation is being
reformed. The report of the visit lists the reforms under consideration,
including moral and economic redress in cases of ill—treatment during
detention or trial, and the inclusion of pre—trial detention in calculating
the length of a prison sentence. The technical details of possible changes
have not been specified, for example amending the classification of crimes so
that broad, general terms are replaced by very precise language: making a
distinction between degrees of responsibility as a result of different forms
of participation in crimes; and individualizing penalties.
417. In previous reports, the Special Representative explained how and why the
introduction of technical reforms would make it easier for penal legislation
to be brought into line with international instruments. The tremendous number
of executions has many causes, but they include imprecise definitions of the
E/CN • 4 / 1992 / 34
page 80
classification of crimes, and a failure to recognize degrees of participation
in crimes and thus the diversification of penalties. The Special
Representative has requested the text of draft legislation, which has not, as
yet, been forthcoming.
418. The area of moral and material redress, which is very important to
minimize the effects of judicial error or administrative abuse, is being
considered by the Islamic Consultative Assembly. As regards the inference of
responsibility for abuses committed by prison staff, a table showing nine
cases was enclosed with a written communication from the Permanent
Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations Office at
Geneva, dated 18 December 1991 (see annex III).
4. Equal treatment and equal rights for all citizens
419. The fourth recommendation reads as follows:
“(d) The Government should carefully supervise the enjoyment of equal
rights and equal treatment for all citizens, regardless of their
political opinions or their religious beliefs”.
420. This recommendation covers the situation facing persons of the Baha'i
faith, which has been monitored since the present mandate began in 1984. Over
the years, despite vicissitudes, a certain ambiguity has remained with regard
to the legal security of the Baha'is, who have often been persecuted,
sometimes imprisoned and not infrequently executed. Since 1988, there has
been no knowledge of executions of Baha'is, and there has been a considerable
fall in the number of Ba}ta'is arrested. However, other forms of harassment
and discrimination have persisted. The documentation gathered is reliable
evidence of unfair and discriminatory treatment towards Baha'is in respect of
the right to property and access to universities, businesses, employment,
public services, cemeteries and places of worship.
421. Employment is an area where discrimination was and continues to be
practised against Bahais. The majority of the 10,000 Baha'is who lost their
jobs in the 198Os are still unemployed. Retirement pensions for persons who
have served the State have not been reintroduced. Former public employees
have continued to receive demands for the return of salaries or pensions paid
in respect of previous services.
422. The Baha'is still have difficulties in obtaining permits to establish and
manage businesses of their own. They are not allowed to join agricultural
cooperatives, and are denied credit and the use of machinery usually provided
by the cooperatives.
423. Many properties confiscated from the Bahais have been auctioned off
without compensation being paid. Recently, in the city of Yazd, Baha'i
properties have been sold. Former administrative centres, now closed, are
falling into disrepair and many cemeteries have been desecrated and are no
longer in use.
E/CN.4 I 1992/34
page 81
424. Chapters I I and III of IIe present report refer to documents signed by
authorities which show that IIe Baha'is frequently face discrimination on
grounds of their beliefs. This harassment, as shown by documentary evidence,
is aimed at forcing them to recant their faith.
5. Establishment of a climate of confidence and legal certainty
425. The fifth recommendation reads as follows:
“(e) The Government should be urged to take, immediately and urgently,
effective measures to establish a climate of confidence and legal
certainty in institutions to enable citizens to express themselves
without fear or intimidation.”
426. During his first and second visits to the Islamic Republic of Iran, the
Special Representative received information that he considered to be reliable,
concerning a climate of uncertainty and insecurity, resulting from arbitrary
actions by law enforcement agents, Consequently, out of fear, the freedom of
expression and the political activities of private citizens are restricted.
The trial of 23 of the signatories of the “Letter by the 90” charged with
various crimes, in-so-far as it dealt with criticism protected by the right to
express one's thoughts freely, was an important factor in maintaining the
climate of insecurity among sectors outside official circles.
427. During his third visit to the country, the Special Representative was
able to confirm, through interviews with private persons, that legal certainty
has not improved, since the fear that any dissident activity may lead to
harassment or even criminal charges remains, as demonstrated by the case of
the 23 signatories of the “Letter by the 90”.
6. The rules of due process of law
428. The sixth recommendation reads as follows:
“(f) The Government should take care to apply the rules of due process
of law, including the notification of charges immediately after arrest,
public trials and the assistance of a defence lawyer, as well as the
prevention of ill—treatment and torture during investigation of offences
and during imprisonment, since, in addition to having suitable
legislation, care must be given to its implementation, as misuse
nullifies the best laws”.
429, In previous reports, the Special Representative, referred at length to
the rules of due process of law, and he has approached the Iranian authorities
on numerous occasions to urge that these rules be applied fully both in
national legislation and in the administration and, thus, become standard
practice in the courts, for the police and for prison wardens. Al ]. that
happens during arrest and investigation has a bearing on the due process of
law, and may have many serious or disturbing consequences for the defence and
the verdict.
E/CN • 4/1992 I 34
page 82
430. Chapters II and III of the present report refer to the fact that nine of
the signatories of the “Letter by the 90” were sentenced to prison, and five
to the additional penalty of flogging. On 24 June 1991, they were tried
in camera . The accused had no access to a defence lawyer, and officials who
carried out interrogations appeared in court as experts, but were in actual
fact witnesses for the prosecution.
431. At this stage of the criminal trial, the accusation was one of “outrage
against the power of the State, insulting Government officials, an attempt to
destabilize the Government and misinforming the population”. It must be noted
that considering this last charge as a criminal act leads easily to
restrictions on the freedom of expression, and gives members of the judiciary
an area in which they can act highly subjectively. These charges increased
legal uncertainty, because a charge of misleading the public can easily be
brought against anyone, thus making the subjective assessment of the public
official the determining factor.
432. As regards the signatories of the “Letter by the 90”, not one of the nine
who stood trial was given the opportunity to answer the charges, or present
evidence or witnesses for the defence. The court passed sentence on 25 June.
One of the accused was sentenced to six months, two of them to two years and
the rest to three years. An appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the
higher court upheld the sentences. It added further charges to those brought
in by the court of first instance but did not increase the penalties.
433. In the 1991 final report (E/CN.4/199l/35, para. 480), the
Special Representative made the following observation:
“It may generally be considered that the trial of 23 signers of the
so—called ‘Letter by the 90' is a test case for the application of the
rules of due process. International opinion concerning the investigation
and trial of the signers of the letter will be based on the principles of
criminal law applied, the evidence and its evaluation by the courts and
the application of the rules of due process.”
434. In an aide—m4moire transmitted to the Permanent Representative of the
Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations Office at Geneva
on 30 September 1991, the Special Representative requested the Iranian
Government to provide a transcript of the proceedings against the nine persons
sentenced, to determine, from the documents in the case whether the rules of
due process had been applied. The Government failed to supply these
documents, and therefore the evaluation of the case has had to be based solely
on non—official sources.
435. The indictment against the nine persons when they went before the
Revolutionary Court did not include espionage, which could have meant the
death penalty for them. However, the list of crimes charges does not
correspond to the contents of the “Letter by the 90”, which went no further
than requesting the application of the Constitution in force and criticizing
the Government's economic policy.
E/CN .4 / 1992 / 34
page 83
436. There is information concerning the beating and ill—treatment of some of
the signatories of the open letter who the Special Representative wanted, but
was not allowed, to interview during his second visit to Iran. Furthermore,
the trial was held in secret, allegedly for reasons of State security.
Objectively, it is difficult to see how State security could have been
jeopardized by a public trial, in particular since the charge of espionage had
been dropped. The absence of a defence lawyer, the in camera trial and the
fact that the accused were denied the possibility of personally and directly
refuting the charges laid against them infringe the rules of due process of
law. In this context, the Special Representative believes that the rules of
due process of law were not observed in this case which was seen as a test
case.
437. On 1 October 1991 the Special Representative, having received news that
Mr. Ali Ardalan, one of the nine persons sentenced, was seriously ill in
prison and that there were fears for his life, approached the Minister for
Foreign Affairs, Mr. Mi Akbar Velayati, to ask him to intervene on
humanitarian grounds and have Mr. Ali Ardalan transferred to a hospital (see
paras. 8 and 9). A favourable reply was soon forthcoming and Mr. Ardalan was
moved to a hospital. He is currently convalescing at home. The
Special Representative is grateful to Mr. Ve].ayati for his cooperation.
438. An official communication has been received regarding new legislation on
the mandatory presence of an attorney in all courts including military,
revolutiona4' and ecclesiastical courts, and the annulment of proceedings at
which the defence is not present (see para. 15). The Council of Guardians
objected to the legislation believing it to be contrary to the principles of
Isla mic law and the Constitution, but the Council for the Determination of
Exigencies of the State deemed it constitutional, which removed any obstacles
in the way of its implementation.
439. According to reports received, this legislation covers solely the
adversary stage of the judicial process but does not go as f at as the
investigation process, i.e. concerns only the plenary or oral proceedings, not
the examination or pro-trial proceedings. Defence counsel is essential from
the moment of arrest and throughout the investigation, because during that
stage the elements of proof are established and the nature of the adversary
proceedings is determined.
440. The Special Representative is unable to state whether the aforementioned
legislation guarantees the right of defence as laid down in international
instruments. The term used in the legislation is vakil (attorney) which in
Islamic law is a person of Islamic faith with the honesty and good judgement
needed to represent another person in court. International instruments demand
the assistance of a qualified lawyer, i.e., someone who has studied law in
depth, has made law his or her occupation and is legally authorized to
represent his or her client in court. Accordingly, the assistance of persons
without professional or specialized qualifications, does not meet the
requirements of international instruments. The term which may cover this
requirement is vakil-e-dadpostari , which is equivalent to an attorney—at—law.
E/CN.4/ 1992/34
page 84
441. Xt emerged from the interviews in Tehran that the provision of the new
legislation on the defence of the accused, under which proceedings conducted
without the assistance of a defence lawyer are considered null and void will
not apply to trials which took place before the new legislation came into
force. However, the mandatory assistance of counsel is provided for in the
Constitution, and it could therefore be argued that the application of
constitutional precepts is conditioned by or subordinate to the promulgation
of implementing legislation. This would make many constitutional precepts
nothing more than a mere declaration of intent, instead of higher and
mandatory legislation.
442. A doctrine which was more in harmony with the sense, function and spirit
of the fundamental law, would apply constitutional precepts even when
implementing legislation did not exist. Therefore, the application of such
precepts would not depend on whether or not the legislature promulgates the
implementing legislation but would be vested in public officials who have
either judicial or administrative jurisdiction. In the modez n State the
constitutional system invariably has competent bodies for the direct and
immediate application of constitutional precepts.
443. Thus, the higher court would be able to quash sentences handed down in
trials that had taken place without a defence counsel before the new Act had
come into force. Other more controversial technical solutions could also be
adopted: the case file could simply be returned to the lower court in order
for the court to comply with that essential requirement for a criminal trial
to be valid; or alternatively the widely accepted distinction between absolute
nullity and nullity (as distinct from nullity of substance could be invoked).
No judgement or criminal sentence handed down in the absence of a defence
counsel should be recognized as definitive and lawful grounds for a
declaration of guilt.
7. Agreement with the International Committee of the Red Cross
for prison visits
444. The seventh recommendation is as follows:
“(g) A specific agreement should be concluded soon with the International
Committee of the Red Cross so that prison visits may be carried out
regularly and without exception:”
445. At the beginning of 1990, during the first visit to Iran, the Iranian
Government responded favourably to the steps taken by the Special
Representative to obtain permission for the International Committee of the
Red Cross to visit prisons, and shortly afterwards it was announced that the
relevant negotiations had begun. Finally, on 21 November 1991, the Government
and ICRC signed an agreement authorizing prison visits on the terms usually
specified by the agreements between ICRC and various States , The agreements
entered into by ICRC contain a number of clauses that must be strictly
complied with, as they concern the fundamental principles of its humanitarian
action. Those principles are: the right to visit all prisons without
E/CN.4/ 1992/34
page 85
exception; private interviews with any category of prisoner, who may be freely
chosen; periodic visits to prisons and repeat visits with the same prisoners,
at the discretion of ICRC. In addition, ICRC reports are strictly
confidential.
446. In the view of IIe Special Representative, agreements that constitute
part of international monitoring of human rights possess special features
attributable to their origin and their objective, i.e. to their very nature.
They are governed by the principle of good faith, which requires strict
compliance with promises freely made, and which applies to international
action and agreements without exception. The agreements are a tangible and
specific form of general obligation contained in current international
instruments which the international community promotes and safeguards by means
of its competent bodies. Consequently, they may neither be amended, suspended
nor cancelled ad libitum by countries that have entered into commitments as a
result of them. The agreements, together with any others drawn up and signed
within the framework of international human rights monitoring, may only be
amended, suspended or cancelled when the causes that gave rise to them have
disappeared, and with the consent of theparties.
8. The right of association
447. The eighth recommendation is as follows:
“(h) The legal functioning of independent organizations should be
authorized, including political organizations and organizations
that seek to defend human rights”.
448. During his third visit to Iran, the Special Representative noted that the
situation with regard to the right of association had remained unchanged since
his second visit. Some associations had been authorized, but other fringe
groups had still not been legally authorized. The Freedom Movement and the
Association for the Defence of the Freedom and Sovereignty of the Iranian
Nation, mentioned in previous reports, were in a delicate position, as many of
their members had signed the so—called “Letter by the 90”; 23 of them were
charged and finally 5 who refused to confess were sentenced (see
paras. 167—170) to prison and to flogging and four others to prison. The
Freedom Movement has recently submitted a further request to be legalized,
which, according to the competent officials, could be decided upon in the
coming months.
449. The Lawyers' Association is in the same position as described in previous
reports by the Special Representative. Lawyers belong to the Association and
pay their dues but the authorities appoint the Association's leaders (see
chapter III and annex v i i ). The Medical Association has not yet been able to
regularize its situation, although elections to its governing bodies had been
held a few months previously,
E/CN.4/l992/34
page 86
9. Abolition of prior examination of books
and forms of artistic creation
450. The ninth recommendation is as follows:
“(i) The prior examination of books and forms of artistic creation in
general should end”.
451. In respect of this recommendation, the Special Representative has been
informed that artistic creations are no longer subject to strict censorship,
although authors remain liable for their works. Books no longer require prior
authorization, but authors are still liable if they disregard mandatory
literary principles. Consequently, artists and writers are subject to a form
of self—censorship. Although there has been a change in form, IIe substantive
restrictions remain in force.
10. Freedom of information and guarantees
for journalists
452. The relevant recommendation is as follows:
“(j) Measures should be adopted to guarantee genuine freedom for the
media and journalists should enjoy full guarantees for their professional
activities”.
453. With regard to freedom for the media and guarantees for journalists, the
Special Representative was provided with on-the-spot information during his
previous visits. Chapter III of this report refers to the prevailing feeling
among Iranian writers, journalists and artists that they are expected to
practise self—censorship. Information from official sources concerned the
issue of the subsidized price of imported paper, which was criticized in the
previous report as a potential means of political manipulation. Although the
price of freely imported paper is currently only twice that of subsidized
paper, the situation can still be used as a means of persuasion or of exerting
pressure, although it has become less powerful as the differential between the
price of freely imported paper and that of subsidized paper used to be 10 or
more to one (see chapter III above).
11. Compensation to persons or families affected by
violations of human rights
454. In this recommendation, a request was made to the Government of the
Islamic Republic of Iran that ‘(k) compensation should be granted to persons
affected by violations of human rights or to members of their families”.
455. The Special Representative was informed that the new penal law bill
provides for moral and material compensation. No information is available as
to when it will become law and come into force, nor are its actual contents
known, as no copy of the bill has been received. Nor has any information been
received concerning any specific case in which compensation has been paid to
any person affected by human rights violations.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 87
12. Specific instructions to officials and
employees to observe human rights
456. This recommendation is as follows:
“(1) Officials, employees and agents should be instructed specifically
to apply laws and administrative decisions forthwith and to maintain
direct contacts in police and judicial matters: they should be informed
that they have an obligation to conform in IIeir behaviour to
international principles and standards on human rights and to refrain,
inter alia , from taking initiatives that are outside their legal powers
and that IIey must avoid any action which may be regarded as intimidatory
and which may create doubts about the normal operations of the
institutions.”
457. No information has been received of any instructions that correspond to
this recommendation. The issue of human rights was the subject of three
seminars in Tehran and has been raised in the media and in statements by
officials, with special attention to differences between the Islamic
interpretation of human rights and human rights as they appear in the
international instruments, which are attributed to the Judaeo-Christian
tradition.
458. Thanks to the activities of the United Nations, public opinion is
nowadays more familiar with international human rights doctrine and practice
than in the past, although they are subject to criticism. However,
theoretical and practical guidance for officials and agents, principally the
police and the judiciary, as well as prison officials, remains essential and
there is no indication that any direct action has been taken in this respect
by the Government of Iran.
13. Bringing to trial agents and officials
guilty of human rights violations
459. The relevant recommendation is as follows:
“(m) The investigation of the allegations transmitted to the Government
should be pursued and, as a practical outcome of the investigations,
agents or officials who have taken extra—legal initiatives or violated
human rights should be brought to trial.”
460. The Government provided the Special Representative with a list of
nine cases of violations of the human rights of prisoners by prison personnel
(see annex III).
461. However, no information has been received regarding investigations that
might have led to the determination of responsibility for extra—legal
initiatives or violation of human rights by other officials and agents. In
the past, official reports were made concerning judges dismissed for
misapplication of the law, and in one case the Special Representative was
given a copy of the file.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 88
14. Extension Qf measures of clemency
462. The recommendation is as follows;
“(n) Measures of clemency for persons convicted of various of fences
should continue to be granted and should be extended in scope,
particularly in the case of persons sentenced to capital punishment and
for persons sentenced for political offences.”
463. In 1991, the Government of Iran officially reported on measures of
clemency granted in connection with the following events: the anniversary of
the victory of the Islamic revolution (release of 9,863 prisoners), the
anniversary of the establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran (release or
commutation of the sentences of 124 prisoners) and the anniversary of the
birth of the Prophet. The measures of clemency adopted in connection with the
anniversary of the birth of the Prophet concerned 702 prisoners, convicted by
the ordinary, revolutionary or military courts or by special courts for the
clergy. The prisoners were released or had their penalties reduced. In a
note dated 18 October 1991, the Special Representative requested more detailed
information in order to determine, inter alia , the name and number of persons
sentenced to death whose sentence had been commuted. The Government has also
reported that remissions have been granted to recruits whose period of
conscription had been extended as punishment after conviction for refusal to
perform military service. The measures of clemency were proposed by the Head
of the Judiciary, Ayatollah Mohammad Yazdi, and approved by the leader of the
Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Seyed Mi Khamenei.
464. The request for more detailed information concerned the following
points: a complete list of the names of beneficiaries, with the date and
nature of their sentence, the charges against them, the court which handed
down the sentence and the nature of the measure of clemency in each case. At
the time of writing the report, no reply to the request had been received.
15. Dissemination of human rights
465. The fifteenth recommendation is as follows:
‘(o) The human rights teaching programme should go ahead, as far as
possible with the technical assistance of the United Nations Centre for
Human Rights”.
466. The Department of Political and International Studies of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs planned and organized the third seminar on human rights which
was held in Tehran from 9 to 12 September 1991. The Special Representative
was invited, but was unable to attend because of a number of prior commitments.
467. The general theme of the seminar was fundamental human rights issues, in
particular the following: (1) the politico—philosophical focus of human
rights: (2) analysis of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and of
Western attitudes; (3) human rights under Islam; (4) conceptual, philosophical
and political foundations of the Universal Declaration and of other
E/CN.4/ 1992/34
page 89
international legal instruments; (5) historical study of human rights; and
(6) comparative study of the Islamic Declaration of Human Rights and the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. At the opening and closing meetings,
high government officials and experts set out IIe Islamic concept of human
rights and addressed discrepancies between that concept and the current
international system.
468. A dialogue took place between Iranian specialists and specialists from
Western countries, as well as professors from several Islamic countries.
Particular attention was focused on IIe Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
which the majority of Iranian specialists and specialists from other Islamic
countries described as exclusively reflecting Western ideas and values and as
excluding the values of other cultures, in particular those of Islam. The
statements and discussions were of a fairly general nature and bore on
normative aspects. Little reference was made to questions of implementation,
apparently because most of the participants in the seminar were more
interested in changing current international rules than in implementing them.
469. Several Iranian specialists argued that the Islamic concept of human
rights was superior to the system contained in the Universal Declaration and
in the International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights and on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights. The matter was not discussed in depth, and as a
result no analysis was made of the discrepancies between the respective
concepts or of their values. A number of participants were categorically
opposed to the death penalty, and no small number expressed their concern
about the human rights situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
470. In connection with the third international seminar, the Iranian press and
radio highlighted the main topics outlined and discussed, and a number of
human rights issues were publicized. OEe same terms are frequently
interpreted differently. No explanation was given of the philosophical and
legal grounds for criticizing the Universal Declaration and asserting the
superiority of the Islamic interpretation. Nor was any explanation given for
the desire of some countries to depart from universal rules they had freely
accepted and whose observance was advocated by public opinion throughout the
world, on philosophical, moral, political and essentially legal grounds.
471. The seminar was the third of a series. Through a variety of activities
designed to promote human rights, both in official and private spheres, it
seems to have opened the way for debate and dissemination, which by their very
nature are beneficial. Although observance of human rights is ensured by the
law and by the administration, widespread knowledge and conviction are also an
important factor. Human rights must first and foremost take root in peoples
minds and are enjoyed to the full when they have permeated the collective
consciousness and when citizens have adopted them as a creed, the creed of a
new international world.
V. CONCLUSIONS
472. The conclusions relating to the new topics covered by the mandate appear
in chapter IV of this report, which is devoted to considerations and
observations. In accordance with Commission on Human Rights
resolution 1991/82, the focal point of the renewed mandate has been alleged
ZJL<, /l992/34
page 90
violations of human rights affecting individuals, regardless of whether they
are members of organizations or of political or religious minorities. Despite
their importance, the new topics have not supplanted those examined since
international monitoring began in 1984.
473. International monitoring concerns commitments in the sphere of human
rights freely entered into and agreed upon by IIe Islamic Republic of Iran,
and admits no degree of qualification or of subordination to other concepts
seeking to establish themselves within the international community. As long
as international law is in force, it must be complied with, although this
naturally does not exclude the possibility of reform.
474. On the basis of the considerations and observations contained in
chaptec IV, it may be asserted that in 1991 the Islamic Republic of Iran made
no appreciable progress towards improved compliance with human rights in
accordance with the current international instruments.
475. The status quo ante has predominated as far as respect for human rights
is concerned. Statements of intent have been made concerning observance and
the elaboration of legislative reforms, together with promises, although for
the time being those intentions and promises have not been carried out to a
sufficiently significant extent to ensure normal observance of human rights.
The signing of an agreement to allow the International Committee of the
Red Cross to visit prisons as from January 1992 is a positive step; it is to
be hoped that this agreement will remain in force as long as is necessary, and
shall apply in full, without any exceptions.
476. Attention should be drawn to the following aspects, which represent the
areas of greatest weakness regarding human rights in Iran : manifestly
t ces ive use of the death penalty; the lack of the guarantees of due process
of law; discrimination against certain groups of citizens on account of their
religious beliefs, specifically the Baha'is; the absence of independent
associations and of a climate of legal certainty and guarantees for the
expression of literary and artistic thought and creativity.
477. As regards the death penalty, the number of executions in 1991 was
considerably higher than in the previous two years. Due process of law was
not observed in the case of the sentences against nine of the signatories of
the Letter by the 90 who refused to make a public confession, and which was
highlighted as a test case for the effectiveness of due process of law. No
association independent from the regime has been authorized, and the Lawyers'
Association remains under official control.
478. In the circumstances described, the Special Representative is of the
opinion that international monitoring of the situation of human rights and
fundamental freedoms in the Islamic Republic of Iran should continue, and that
the Government of Iran should once again be urgently called upon to comply
with international human rights standards, without any exception and any
conditions, qualifications and modifications deriving from highly specific
cultural concepts.
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 91
Annex I
OFFICIAL PROGRM4ME OF THE THIRD VISIT OF THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE
TO THE ISL A MIC REPUBLIC OF IRAR (8-14 DECEMBER 1991)
Sunday . 8 December 1991
03.25 Arrival at Tehran airport. Welcome by Mr. Hosseini, Director of the
Department for Human Rights and International Social Affairs
(Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
15.30 Meeting with H.E. Mr. Besharaty, First Deputy to the Minister of
Foreign Affairs
16.30 Meeting with H.E. Mr. S. Nasseri, Ambassador, Permanent
Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations
Office at Geneva
Monday. 9 December 1991
09.00 Meeting at the Ministry of the Interior, with H.E. Mr. Atrian—Far,
Political Deputy to the Minister of the Interior,
H.E. General Sayfollahi, Chief of Anti—Drug Headquarters.
Mr. Hosseini, Director General of the Ministry of the Interior,
Mr. Mobalegh, responsible official for political parties and
elections, and H.E. Mr. Zargar
12.30 Luncheon given by H.E. Mr. Atrian-Far
15.00 Meeting with H.E. Hojatoleslam Shoshtary, Minister of Justice
17.30 Meeting with H.E. Hojatoleslam Mohagheghe Damad, Inspector-General
Tuesday. 10 December 1991
08.30 Visit to Evin prison and meeting with prisoners
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 92
Wednesday, 11 December 1991
09.00 Meeting with H.E. Dr. ?ticrpour, Deputy to the Chief of Judiciary,
and participation in a round—tz ble discussion with several
high—ranking legal officlfls
11.00 Meeting with Mr. Adeli, Gc,srernor of the Central Bank
12.00 Meeting with Mr. Mousavi, t irector-General for the press at the
Ministry of Islamic Guidan e
12.30 Luncheon given by L.L. Mr. B sharati, First Deputy to the Minister
of Foreign Affairs
15.00 Meeting with UNRCR Tehran
17.00 Meeting at the Institut e for Chemical War Victims with Dr. Forutan,
Revolutionary Guards Corps; Dr. /oeir Esmail Saghafi, Command
Headquarters of the Chief of the Armed Forces, and Mr. Sadr,
Director General for International Affairs of the Red Crescent
Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Thurspay, 12 December 1991
09.00 Visit and meeting with prisoners at Gohardasht prison
17.00 Meeting with Iranian non-governmental organizations
Friday, 13 December 1991
08.00 Meeting with Mr. Hojatoleslain Zargar, Special Prosecutor for
Narcotic Drugs
10.00 Meeting with H.E. Mr. S. Nasseri, Mnbassador, Permanent
Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations
Office at Geneva
13.00 Luncheon given by H.E, Mr. S. Nasseri
19.00 Meeting with Iranian non—governmental organizations
Saturday . 14 Decembtr 1991
02.50 Departure for Geneva
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 93
Annex II
1. INITIAL LIST OF PRISONERS IN EVIN PRISON, WHOM THE
SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE REQUESTED TO INTERVIEW
(Handed to the Iranian authorities on 8 December 1991 in Tehran)
Out of the 30 persons included in this list, the Special Representative
could meet 12 (their names are underlined). OEe reasons given by the
authorities for not being able to present the remaining 18 persons are
indicated in the following table
Names Reasons given by the authorities for not
being able to present the prisoners to the
Special Representative
Szimkus, Helmut
Bowden, John Under investigation
Pasha or Basha, Ibrahim Under investigation for crime committed
inside the prison
Dr. Bapha'i
Agahv. Babman
Kamrani. 7&mir Houshang
Fathi . Vazir
Mithagi, Bihnam .
Mohainmadi, Malakeli On leave
Shetabi, Hossein Not in Evin prison
Kavvan Khalajabadi
Sedaghat. A u
Sedaghat, Sakineb On leave since 22 September 1990
Amiri-Biavand. Jainshid
Ainjadi—Bigvand, Hoosang Under investigation
Kianouri, Noureddin (No longer in Evin prison, under house arrest)
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 94
Names Reasons given by the authorities for not
being able to present the prisoners to the
Special Representative
Feirouz, Meriam (No longer in Evin prison, under house arrest)
Hoseini—Yazdi, Ibrahim Released on 15 April 1991
Dibaj, Mehdi Not in Evin prison
Shalgunii, Mi, Akbar On leave 9 February 1991. (Sentenced to
15 years. free pending decision on request
for pardon)
On leave
On leave
Bazargan, Abdol Mi
Davaran, Habib
Mansourian. Khossro
Movahed, Nezamedine On leave
Sabaphian, Hashem
Shahshahani. Shams
Tavassoli. Hpjati, Mohammpd
Zarrinehbaf, Akbar On leave
Amouyi, Farzaneh Being treated at hospital on day of visit
Sabetjahrowi, Faezeh Released 3 years ago
E/CN • 4/1992/34
page 95
2. ADDITIONAL LIST OF PRISONERS IN EVIN PRISON, WHOM
THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE REQUESTED TO INTERVIEW
(Handed to the Iranian authorities on 10 December 1991 at Evin prison)
Out of the seven persons included in this list, the Special
Representative was able to meet one (name underlined). The reasons given by
the authorities for not been able to present the remaining six persons are
indicated in the following table:
Names Reasons given by the authorities for not
being able to present the prisoners to the
Special Representative
Entezam . Amir
Dashtgerd, Hossein Under investigation
Rahim Bakhtiari, Mohammed Under investigation
Javian, Farhad Not in Evin prison
hfshari-Rad, Morteza Not in Evin prison
Dalanpour, Hagi Not in Evin prison
Shaken, Mansour Not in Evin prison
3. LIST OF PRISONERS IN GORARDASHT PRISON, WHOM THE
SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE REQUESTED TO INTERVIEW
(Handed to the Iranian authorities on 12 December 1991
at Gohardasht prison)
Names Reasons given by the authorities for not
being able to present the prisoners to the
Special Representative
4ohammadi, Reza Not identified
6ithaqi, Bakhshu'llah Not in Gohardasht
E/CN ,4/1992 134
page 96
Annex III
LIST OF VIOLATIONS CONMITTED BY THE PERSONNEL OF PRISONS IN CONNECTION WITR PRISONERS
(Provided by the Government on 18 December 1991)
Type of crime Particulars of Particulars Nmnber of Judicial Judicial
committed conplainant of accused judicial file authority decision
Insult, Prisoner Draftee 43/105/644/4 Bakhtarian's Under
aggressiveness Reza Yousefi Jamal Saydi Military investigation
and Prosecutor's
inquisitive ness Office
; Assault/beating Prisoners 1. Abolhasan 1—2/3/5228/63 Tehran's Islamic Non—prosecution
of prisoners Mehrabi Revolution
1. Ebrahim Prosecutor's
Ghanbari 2. Asghar Office
Jahedpour
2. Shabanali
Ohanbari 3. Alireza
Nejadpazho
Assault leading Prisoner Draftee B/5/ll/12/70 Ears' Public Setting bail at
to injury to Behrouz Aghajari Icamal Mahdavi Prosecutor's 1 million rials
prisoners Of fice
Assault/beating Chabbahar First Lieutenant 990/11/55/70 Sistan of Verdict for
of a number of prisoners Abdullab Baluchestan's hail
prisoners Noorizehi Military
. Prosecutor's
Office I
Assault leading Prisoner 1. Fatolah 40/4136/70 Kurdistan's Verdict for
to injury Abasali Rahmani ! Military hail
Eshkevadi Prosecutor's
2. Morteza Poria Office
3. Eysa Kousar
Failing to send Prisoner 1.. Ebrahim A/36/l 0216 Tebran's Under
the prisoner to Naser Chorbani Khalaj Military investigation
court on tine . Prosecutor's
2. Ycusef Zarini Office
3. Rezagholi
Razian
Indecent Organization Draftee 43/l08/H/2208 Rhozestan's Under
relation with of prisons Mohamnad P Military investigation
prisoners Daryabaygi Prosecutor's I
. . Office
Embezzlenent Organization ! Draftee I 43/106/14/2197 “ “
of family of of prisons Abdolnajid
prisoners . Eassiri .
Having indecent Organization Draftee 1 (21 E Mazadaran RLS 20,000
relation with of prisons Hossein Taghavi 171/20/1185/70 Military pecuniary
female quarter Prosecutor's ! punishment
Office ! of unfixed
punishment
E/CN.4/1992 / 34
page 97
Annex IV
LIST OF PERSONS (AND THE CRIMES THEY COMMITTED) EXECUTED
DURING 1991 AFTER DUE JUDICIAL PROCEDURES
( Provided by the Government on 18 December 1991)
Name Crimes committed
Abmad Asghari Distribution of arms in 16 cases of armed
robbery, murdering 6 persons
Yacoub Mi Karimi Forgery of foreign currencies, participation in
7 cases of armed robbery, 2 counts of murder
Mohainmad Kasim Chasemi An Afghan citizen who participated in 6 cases
. of armed robbery
Gholam Mazrat Atai An Afghan citizen wiII 5 cases of armed robbery
and 1 case of murder
Gho l Mohammad Sekhavati An Afghan citizen with 12 cases of armed
robbery and 3 cases of murder
Gholain Momeni An Afghan citizen with 10 cases of armed
robbery and 1 case of murder
Isa Barabouee Looting a village, murdering 10 persons and
injuring 35 residents of the village
Mohaminad Mi Shakib Causing insecurity, murdering 2 persons and
carrying 200 kg of opium
Heyder Hashem—Zehi Murderer of 2 persons
Hazrat Tajik Assaulted law—enforcement agents with deadly
weapons and murdering 5 persons
Soleyman Akhshani Transaction of 2 kg of heroin and morphine
Abd-Allah Mazarhi Transaction of 150 kg of hashish and heroin
Abd—Al Chafar Abashi Possession and distribution of 1 kg of heroin
Mohammad-Vali Barahoui Transaction of 200 kg of opium
Malek Hosein-Zadeh Possession and transaction of 6 kg of heroin
and 25 kg of opium
Bosein Alkton Possession and distribution of 10 kg of opium
and 2 kg of heroin
El CN.4 / 1992 / 34
page 98
Name Crimes committed
Abd—Allah Yalad Mohammad An Afghan citizen involved with transaction of
25 kg of heroin
Mohammad Davoudi Transaction of 8 kg of opium, morphine and
heroin
Khodadad Ali-Jani Transaction of 10 kg of heroin
Mehdi Meshkat Possession of 150 kg of heroin
Hosein Mabmad-Arya Possession and distribution of 20 kg of heroin
and morphine
Nazar Defa—Nia Possession and transaction of 1 kg of heroin
and 10 kg of opium
Delmorad Hooti ) Assaulting law-enforcement agents with deadly
) weapons on various occasions and murdering
Majid Balouchi ) 17 agents and possession of 20 kg of heroin and
) 780 kg of opium
Halouk (Khaleghdad) Balouchi )
Shokr—Allah Beighi Possession of 12 kg of heroin and 250 kg of
opium
Mangool Naseri An Afghan citizen with possession of 12 kg of
heroin and 250 kg of opium
Seyed Mohammad Chasemi Possession of 12 kg of heroin and 250 kg of
opium
Sahereh Barakouee Distribution of 1 kg of opium and 13 kg of
heroin
Chasem Nikravesh Transaction of 630 kg of opium and 125 kg of
heroin and 50 weapons
Ebrahim Kazemian Transaction of 30 kg of hashish, 17 kg of
heroin and 120 kg of opium
Mohammad Nir—Kiani Transaction of 16 kg of heroin and 200 kg of
morphine
Reza Pir—Mojdehi Possession and distribution of 2 kg of heroin
and 50 kg of opium
Ahinad Mirzaei Transaction of 50 kg of opium and 2.5 kg of
heroin
Zahra Kazem Zadeh Possession of 3 kg of heroin
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 99
Name
Homayaoun Rezal
Ali-Rhan }4azaher-Zehi
Ramazan-Al I Dehghan-Moghadarn
Mehdi Atash—Afrouz
Mohammad Neyestani
Rasoul Narduel
Haj i-Mohamad Ask-Zohi
Majid Noor-Zehi
Aziz-Allah Ghorghige
Younes Saeedi-Nejad
Rajab-Ali Rahnama
Khoda-Morad Borji.
Esmael Tavakol
Yad-Allah Kamal -Afdini
Melahat Tara—Najad
Faraj—Allah Menbari
Shapour Sharrati
Sharyar Asadi -Moghadam
Khaled Banafsh
Ayoub Zandi
Ebrahim Mousa
Senan Hakimi
Crimes committed
Transaction of 1 kg of heroin
Possession of 4 kg of heroin and 10 kg of opium
Transaction of 15 kg of heroin
Possession of 15 kg of heroin and 30 kg of opium
Transaction of 43 kg of heroin
Possession and distribution of 3 kg of heroin
Possession of 1 kg of heroin
Transaction of 500 kg of heroin
Transaction of 150 kg of heroin
Transaction of 95 kg of opium and heroin
Distribution of 40 kg of heroin
Possession and distribution of 13 kg of heroin
Transaction of 100 kg of opium and morphine
Possession and distribution of 106 kg of opium
and heroin
Possession of 300 kg of hashish, heroin and
183 kg of opium
Assault with deadly weapons and murdering
5 persons, with 10 cases of hostage—taking and
kidnapping
Assaulted law—enforcement agents and a murder
Assaulted law—enforcement agents with deadly
weapons and exploding a minibus
Assaulted law-enforcement agents with deadly
weapQns, espionage and murdering 1 person
Assaulted law-enforcement agents and 2 counts
of murder
Assault with deadly weapons, 2 counts of murder
One count of murder, 2 cases of kidnapping
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 100
Crimes committed
Stabbing a pregnant woman to death and injuring
2 other persons
Murdering a 3-year-old boy and a man
Murdering a man and a 3-year—old child
Possession and transaction of 10 kg of heroin
An Afghan citizen in possession of 200 kg of
heroin and transaction of 2 kg of morphine
Transaction of 1 kg of heroin
Possession of 100 kg of opium
Transaction of 1 kg of heroin and morphine
Transaction of 20 kg of opium and murdering
5 persons
Transaction of 10 kg of hashish and 5 cases of
armed kidnapping
Transaction of 2 kg of heroin and murdering
2 law—enforcement agents
Transaction of 10 kg of opium
Transaction and distribution of 10 kg of opium
Possession and distribution of kg of heroin
Possession and distribution of 6 kg of opium
and heroin
Possession and distribution of
Armed assaults, transaction of
Possession of more than 100 kg
heroin
Transaction of 56 kg of opium and 500 g of
heroin
Transaction of 2 kg of heroin and 10 kg of
hashish
Name
Hasan Gholi-Zadeh
Mobmoud-Reza Mabmoud Monfared
Syavash Ali-Mirzai
Mohamad Saeedi
Fazi-Allat Pash
Gho rban-Al i Karimi
Reza Yousaf I
Aman-Allah Banou Far
Mohamad-Ali Shahraki
Rajab Pour-All
MuTiad l4miri
Abol Ghasem Hasanzadeh
Nader Shoeibi
Abbas Nashi
Rabmat Ravan
Gholam—Reza AM
Mohsen Seif—Allahi
Hakim Mokri
Asgher Ghantari
Nosrat—Allah Soleymani
3 kg of heroin
500 g of heroin
of opium and
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 101
Name Crimes committeti
Seyed Ali—Akbar Ggazu-Askar Transaction of 3 kg of heroin
Abd-k1-Raouf Mazareu Possession and distribution of 1 kg of heroin
Hatam Zaughi Darestani Transaction of 75 kg of opium and heroin
Rahim Rahmati Transaction of 150 kg of heroin and possession
of 20 kg of opium
.Jomeh Seifi Transaction of 50 kg of heroin
Pa liz Khodavardi Transaction of 15 kg of heroin and 45 kg of
opium
Euymohamad Dastegari Transaction of 15 kg of heroin
Ali-Mohamad Davari Transaction of 1 kg and 30 kg of hashish
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 102
Annex V
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION RELATING TO THE LIST OF PRISONERS HANDED
TO THE IRANIAN AUTHORITIES ON 8 DECEMBER 1991 IN TEHRAN
The Special Representative requested to receive
information on the fate or whereabouts of the prisoners listed below. By
letter dated 18 December 1991, the Government provided the following replies:
Name Reference*
Szimkus, Belmut 4
Bowden, John 5
Pasha or Basha Ibrahim 5
Dr. Bagha'i 4
Agahy, Babman 4
Ashraf, Ardeshear 1
Bastan, Ahmad 1
Dorudiahi, Nahid 1
Halceamy, Kyanoosh 1
Kamrani, Mir Houshang I
Barati, Farzad I
Borzui, Baghir 1
Fathi, Vazir 4
Khalajabadi, Kayvan 4
Mansouri, Alcbar 2 (On leave since 15 May 1991)
Mithaqi, Bihnain 4
* 1. Not identified, more information needed.
2. On leave.
3. Released.
4. Visited by the Special Representative.
5. Still in prison.
6. Living outside prison under house arrest.
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 103
Name Reference*
Mohanunadi, Malakeh 2
Mottahedine, Mabmoud 1 !
Pirasanan, Fathollab .2 (On leave since 25 Ju ly 1989)
Razaghi, Mehrdad 1
Shetabi, Hossein 1
Youssef, Haidar 1
Zaboli, Abbas 1
Ziaiha, J.li 1
Mozatar, Davoud 1
Sedaghat, Mi 4
Sedaghat, Sakineh 2 (On leave since 22 September 1990)
lsmiri-Bigvand, Jamshid 4
Amjadi-Bigvand, Hoosang S
Kianouri, Noureddin 6 (Living outside prison with his
wife under house arrest)
Feirouz, Meriaxn 6 (Living outside prison with her
husband under house arrest)
Mir Rahimi, Davoud 1
Mrs. Zarnani 1
Mr. Jafarpour 1
Rohdaki, Abmad 3 (Released on 19 March 1988)
Giassi, Khali]. 3 (Released on 25 November 1939)
Axninal Reaya, Mohainmad 1
Dr. Assadi 1
Naghizadeh, Norouz 1
Khosroshani—Baradaran, Monir 1
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 104
Name Reference*
Abmadian, Farasnarz 1
Hoseini—Yazdi, Ibrahim 3 (Released on 15 April 1991)
Taghi Rahimpour . Mohammad 1
Barariy, Nasser 1
Felahati, Zahra 1
Dibaj, Mehdi 1
Shalgunii, All, Akbar 1 (On leave since 9 February 1991)
Bazargan, Abdol All 2
Davaran, Habib 2
Mansourian, Khossro 4
Movahed, Nezainedine 2
Sabaghian, Hashem 4
Shahshahani, Shams 2
Tavassoli Hojati, Mohainmad 4
Zarrinebbaf, Akbar 2
Mohammadi, Reza 1
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 105
Annex VI
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION RELATING TO THE LIST OF FEMALE
PRISONERS PRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL. REPRESENTATIVE BY
MEMORAMDUM DATED 2 OCTOBER 1991
Name Reference*
AlIIbari—Azad, Kamelia 2
Aligholi, Shokoufeh 3
Alimollanladi, Soraya 3
Baghai, Katayoun 2
Beiromvand, Akram 1
Darzi, Manijeb 2 (On leave since 8 May 1991)
Dodeir, Om kolsoum 2 (On leave since 16 August 1990)
Eshraghi, Fatemeh 1
Farahzadi, Zahra 2 (On leave since 25 June 1991)
Fardbar, Zoya 6
Fazeli, Akhtar 2
Fazlollahi, Mina 2 (On leave since 7 May 1991)
Gashtasbi, Tahmineh 2 (On leave since 19 March 1991)
Ghafari, Mahin 2
Ghanavati, Zeinab 1
Ghazimoradi, Maryam 2 (On leave since 15 May 1991)
Hadjinasrollah, Masoumeh 2
Hadjinadjafi, Fatenteli 2
* 1. Not identified, more information needed.
2. On leave.
3. Released.
4. Visited by the Special Representative.
5. Still in prison.
6. No governmental reply.
E/CU.4/1992/34
page 106
Name Reference*
Ipakchi, Homa 2
Xaabinejad, Souri 2
Kamrouz-e-khodayar, ?4ehrnaz 1
Khodajou, Nahid 1
Golrokh, Ladan 2
Mahdavi, Shahrzad 2
Moghimi, Mebrafagh 2
Naseri, Minoo 2
Nasiri, Ghadamkheir 2
Nava, Robab 2 (On leave since October 1990)
Nodinian, Nasrin 1
Noun, Maryam 2 (On leave since June 1990)
Rabmani, Mohtaram 3 (Released on 18 May 1991)
Rahmanizadeh. Anahita 2 (On leave since 28 April 1991)
Radji, Farzaneh 2 (On leave since 20 March 1991)
Raniezani, Mehrangiz 3 (Released in October 1988)
Salahi, Mehni 2 (On leave since 20 December 1990)
Salehi, Simm 3 (Released on 22 May 1991)
Salimi-badr, Nasrin 2
Samadi, Taheneh 3 (Released on 26 July 1991)
Samiei, Shahin 1
Seiedali, Nayereh 2
Sepehri—Rahnama, Maryarnbanou 1
Shahrokhi, Nasrin 2
Soleimani, Farkhondeh 1
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 107
Name Referen ce*
Tahami, )6itra 2
Talebi, Shahia 2
Talebi, Zeinab 3 (Released on 26 April 1991)
Taman, Ashraf 1
Tofanian, Bahareh 2
Tofighi, Mahin 2
Torshizian, Parivash 2
Vasighi, Sakineb 2
Fayaz, Firouzeh 1
Amouyi, Farzaneh 5 (In Hospital)
Sabetjabrowi, Faezeh 2
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 108
Annex VII
ACT CONCERNING THE REFORM OF LAWYERS' ASSOCIATIONS OF THE
MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Article 1 . A Reform Council composed of six lawyers of the Ministry
and of three judges is hereby appointed for a period of one year by the
President of the Judiciary in order to reform the lawyers' associations of
the Ministry of Justice of the Islamic Republic of Iran. With a view to
accelerating the procedure, the Council shall be divided into three
independent chambers, each composed of two lawyers and a judge. The
Chairman of the first chamber shall also serve as the Administrative
Chairman of all three chambers.
Note 1 . The Council shall prepare, within a period of one month, a
set of rules (statutes) concerning procedure, the convening of meetings
and the procedure for the preparation of judgements, and shall submit that
text for the approval of the President of the Judiciary.
Note 2 . During the period preceding the implementation of the
present Act, elections to the administrative boards of lawyers'
associations shall be suspended; they shall be resumed after the
implementation of the Act.
Article 2 . All Ministries, organizations, organs and public
institutions of the Islamic Republic of Iran are required to communicate
any information they may be requested to transmit within the time limits
laid down by the Council.
Article 3 . Lawyers shall have the right to attend the hearings which
concern them, and may speak in their own defence or submit statements in
defence.
Article 4 . Cases of refusal decreed by IIe examining judge shall
have the force of law and shall be notified to the other chambers of the
Council.
Article 5 . A barrister shall be permanently struck off the rolls in
the following cases:
(a) Occupancy of posts under the previous regime:
(i) Ministers and vice—Ministers: members of Parliament or
members of the Senate after the month of Khordad 1342,
ambassadors and provincial governors after the month of
Ehordad 1342, members of the Parliament of Founders.
(ii) Agents and infor mers of Savak.
(iii) Secretaries of the “Rastakhiz” party, now dissolved, at or
above the level of provinces and major cities.
E/CN • 4 / 1992/34
page 109
(iv) Members of Masonic or related organizations or of
organizations connected with Zionism.
Cv) Persons having contributed towards the consolidation of IIe
previous regime.
(vi) Persons having utilized the means of the barristers'
association in order to promote IIe objectives of the
Rastakhiz party and of the previous regime.
(b) Persons who have been definitively convicted of one of the
following crimes:
(i) Participation in rebellions against the Islamic Republic or
active support of illegal groups.
(ii) Membership of espionage organizations on behalf of foreign
powers, before or since the Islamic Revolution.
(iii) Participation in foreign military forces against the
Islamic Republic or divulgation of State secrets or
confidential documents.
(iv) Smuggling, extortion, embezzlement, fraud, theft, forgery,
indecency or consumption of alcohol.
(c) Persons who fit into one of the following categories:
(i) Immoral behaviour.
(ii) Addiction to drugs or alcohol.
(iii) Acts or forms of behaviour contrary to the ethics and
morality of the legal profession.
(iv) Membership of pernicious sects or organizations based on
the denial of sacred religions.
(v) Membership or support of illegal organizations after they
have been declared illegal.
Article 6 . A barrister who has been struck off the rolls may appeal
against the decision within 10 days of its adoption to the Supreme
Disciplinary Court of Justice. Pending the decision of that court, the
barrister shall not have the right to exercise his profession.
E/ CN.4/1992 / 34
page 110
Note . The Supreme Disciplinary Court of Justice shall adopt each
appeal within a period of three months and shall adopt a final decision.
Article 7 . The present Act shall enter into force on 16 17/1370.
The present Act, which comprises seven articles and three notes, was
adopted by Parliament in public session on 16/7/1370 and by the Council of
Guardians on 16/7/1370.
( Siqned ) Mehdi Karroubi
Speaker of Parliament
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 111
Annex VIII
LETTER DATED 18 DECEMBER 1991 FROM TEE DIRECTOR OF TEE DEPARTMENT
FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL AFFAIRS OF THE MINISTRY
OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN ADDRESSED TO
THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE
Terrorism as a form of violence, organized for political purposes is not
a new phenomenon and has always been considered a gross violation of human
rights. One emanation of this phenomenon is the physical elimination of the
nation's popular leaders by resorting to armed violence, and creating horror
and insecurity among the people by blind killings of innocent people on the
streets.
In spite of the fact that the Islamic Republic of Iran has been a victim
of such an ominous phenomenon, the international community has unfairly and
regrettably had a negligent eye towards this situation.
By resorting to different abhorrent methods, terrorist groups, since the
very beginning of the victory of the Islamic Revolution assassinated various
categories of people; from students, teachers, shopkeepers and simple workers
to members of the army and the Islamic Revolution Guardians Corp at any rank
and level, high—ranking officials of the country, namely the President, the
Prime Minister, the Head of the Supreme Court and a number of ministers. For
instance responsibility for the bomb blasts in the Prime Minister's office on
28 June 1981, and in the “Jomhouri Islami Party” headquarters on
30 August 1981 was admitted by the so-called “Peoples Mujahedin Khalq
Organization”. According to one of the reports published by this terrorist
organization, the number of innocent people assassinated merely because of
their pro—Revolution attitude amounts to more than 50,000.
The number provided by the said organization well illustrates the extent
of terrorist activities of this group. On the other hand, based on strong
evidence after the commencement of the imposed war, in order to enjoy the
support ever more of the aliens the armed terrorist groups took the role of
the enemy's fifth column, spying in the sensitive military installations and
political economic institutions for the aggressor regime of Iraq.
War at the frontiers, alongside with the prevalence of an atmosphere of
social insecurity as the consequence of illegal activities and armed violence
by the groups opposing the Government, led to the emergence of a critical
situation in the country.
Following their terrorist actions, in order to attract foreign support,
these groups took refuge in Iraq and in some Western countries. Based on the
internal jurisdiction authority, in persecuting the anti-humane and immoral
crimes of this group, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran asked the
concerned countries for the extradition of the criminals. Regrettably, these
requests of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran did not receive an
affirmative response.
E/CN.4/l992/34
page 112
This double standard in approach to the question of terrorism by some
specific Western countries demonstrated their favoured political treatment
towards grave violation of human rights by terrorist groups. As a consequence
of this notorious Baghdad—based terrorist group, following the defeat of the
Iraqi armed forces in the course of the Persian Gulf Crisis, this so—called
“People's Mujahedin Khalq Organization” effectively contributed their share
as mercenaries with the Iraqi army, repressing the uprising of Iraqi people.
Such brutal crimes have been reflected in clear wording by Amnesty
International in its report of June 1991 which reads as follows:
“A number of (Iraqi) refugees who were interviewed also stated,
however, that other Arab nationals and members of the Iranian opposition
group, the People's Mujahedin Organization of Iran, had also taken part
in carrying out extrajudicial killings alongside the Iraqi forces.”
You, Sir, as the Special Representative of the Commission on Human Rights
on the Situation of Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran have followed
closely the realities of the situation and certainly you are aware of the fact
that most of the difficulties which Iran faces vis-4—vis human rights,
directly or indirectly, emanates from the activities of the terrorist groups.
As is clear from the resolutions of the United Nations all Governments and
member States are duty bound to prevent the members of the terrorist groups
using the territory of a State for their activities. It is therefore
necessary that you recommend in your report to IIe Commission on Human Rights
to States concerned not to put any facilities at the disposal of the terrorist
groups.
Accept, Sir, the assurances of my highest consideration.
Hamid Reza HOSSEINI
Director of the Department for Human Rights
and International Social Affairs,
Ministry for Foreign Affairs
Islamic Republic of Iran
E/CN .4/1992/34
page 113
Annex IX
LETTER DATED 18 DECEMBER 1991 FROM THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT
FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AN]) INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL AFFAIRS OF THE MINISTRY
OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN ADDRESSED TO
THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE
The role of deyelooment in the Dromotion of human rights
Professor Galindo Pohl
Special Representative of the Human Rights Commission
Respect for human rights together with maintenance of peace and security
and economic development are among the major goals set forth in the Charter of
the United Nations. As the era of decolonization ended, the United Nations
began to focus its attention on economic development, thus respect for human
rights gained more momentum. Bearing in mind that economic development
without respect for human rights will be devoid of its real content, it is an
absolute necessity to consider the question of economic development and
respect for human rights as two inseparable elements closely interrelated with
each other. In other words, a balanced and coordinated economic development
must be coupled with social progress, achievement of higher standard of
living, and respect for human rights and basic freedoms. Therefore, any
impediment in the way of economic development will bring about difficulties
and shortcomings in the materialization of human rights.
The Iraqi invasion of the Islamic Republic of Iran, imposition of
economic sanctions upon our country by some Western States, influx of foreign
refugees to Iran as a result of several crises in the Middle East region have
been the most important factors hindering the realization of economic and
social development in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
1. War and development
The massive invasion by the Iraqi army of the Islamic Republic of Iran on
22 September 1991 — in his recent report No. 5/23273, to the Security Council,
dated 9 December 1991, the Secretary—General, invoking the principle of
non—resort to force, confirmed the violation of the territorial integrity of
one member State by another - stopped all development plans in the country and
inflicted huge economic, political, and social damage as well as human
casualties. The extensive damage as a result of this aggression caused
indisputable negative impacts on the promotion of human rights.
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 114
(a) The economic dimension
According to calculations, the amount of damage sustained by various
economic sectors is as follows (in million Rials):
Agriculture 15 957 332
Mines 59 200
Industry 2 378 719
Oil 20 799 530
Power, Gas, and Water 2 938 657
Buildings 202 333
Services 22 827 861
Total 65 353 739
The cuts in development allocations to be used for defence purposes and
the need to control the production and distribution system during the war in
order to prevent social disorders and meet the basic requirements of the
people undermined the Government's capability to implement development plans.
(b) Political and social dimensions
The state of war and lack of political and social security in the country
due to espionage and terrorist activities by the fifth column and political
groups dependent on foreigners, led to the adoption of special measures
required for a wartime situation, and limitations on political and social
activities.
(c) Human casualties
One hundred and twenty thousand martyrs and many more injured in the
battlefields together with the victims of chemical attacks, aerial bombings,
and [ missile attacks on] cities and civilian targets are the product of eight
years of uninterrupted aggression by the Iraqi army and violation of Iran 's
territorial integrity. Moreover, about 2,100,000 people in the war—stricken
areas became homeless, and 35 major cities and hundreds of villages were
destroyed by the Iraqi war machine. These are the odds of a war that gravely
affected the promotion of human rights.
2. Economic sanctions and development
Imposition of economic sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran,
arising from the political designs of the United States and some Western
countries, and its continuation until now, has left behind unfavourable
consequences on economic and social development. Inaccessibility to raw
materials and technical equipment for productive units and service sectors
gave rise to inflation and created a lot of difficulties in different economic
sectors of the country.
Such economic sanctions on the part of Western countries indicate a
contradiction between their words and deeds. These countries always claim
that they advocate free trade. They officially announce in the international
fora that there is a direct relationship between economic and social
E/CN.4/1992/34
page 115
development, and promotion of human rights. OEey introduce human rights as a
major factor in their policies towards their aid plans for development.
Continuation of economic sanctions that even include chemical substances and
medicines required for laboratories also blocked the implementation of
envisaged development plans in the Islamic Republic of Iran, thus creating an
unfavourable situation that undermined respect for and full observation of
human rights.
3. Regional crises and development
The Middle East region, particularly the Persian Gulf, has always been a
hotbed of developments and tensions. The geographical situation of Iran, and
the appearance of certain crises in Afghanistan, Iraq and Kuwait during the
past recent years, have forced us to host millions of refugees and foreign
nationals. The presence of these refugees, apart from social, political,
security and health problems, has created a heavy economic burden for the
country. In spite of insufficient international aid, the Islamic Republic of
Iran, on the basis of Islamic values and its humanitarian commitments,
continues to help and meet the largest part of the refugees requirements.
It must be mentioned that detailed information concerning the economic,
political and social situation of the Islamic Republic of Iran, as well as the
envisaged economic and social development of the country, was provided during
your meetings with Mr. Adeli, Governor of the Central Bank and officials of
the Ministry of Interior.
Conclusion
With due regard to the aforementioned points, it is obvious that in
dealing with the question of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, the
unquestionable role of economic development should not be overlooked, and that
without sustained development all individuals and citizens of the Islamic
Republic of Iran will remain deprived of their natural rights. Therefore we
expect you to take this important question into account and call for the
removal of all existing obstacles in the way of development in the Islamic
Republic of Iran, thereby helping the qualitative promotion of human rights
for all people. An all-out, responsible, and impartial examination of human
rights in Iran requires that the important question of economic development
should be dealt with equally and together with other matters to be raised in
your reports.
Hamid Reza HOSSEINI
Director of the Department for Human Rights
and Social International. Affairs
EICN.4/1992 134
page 116
Annex X
THE LEGISLATURE
POLICE TRIBUNAL
Chamber 3 President: Mrs. Mantrini
Judges: Mr. Berta
Mr. Droze
Clerk of the
Court: Mrs. Menetrey—Lugeon
JUDGEMENT OF THE POLICE TRIBUNAL
31 July 1991
Case No. TP/3 P128461/90
Procurator—General
THE GOVERNMENT OF IRAN, claimant for criminal indemnification,
versus
Myriarn GAZUT GOUDAL.
Reference is made to the covering letter of 23 April 1991.
WHEREAS Myriam Gazut Goudal is accused of having, at Geneva in 1990,
publicly insulted a foreign State within the meaning of article 296 of the
Swiss Penal Code.
In particular, she is charged with having written and published in the
newspaper La Suisse of 26 April 1990 an article reporting a press conference
which followed the assassination at Coppet on 24 April 1990 of
Mr. Kazem Radjavi, a political opponent of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
It is claimed that the accused repeated allegations to the effect that
the crime had been committed upon the orders of the President of the Islamic
Republic of Iran and carried out with the assistance and supervision of the
Ambassador of Iran to Switzerland and of the Ambassador of Iran to the
United Nations at Geneva.
WHEREAS in its judgement of 17 May 1991 the Tribunal had already ruled
that the charge of insult to a foreign State within the meaning of article 296
of the Swiss Penal Code was established in the present case.
In the same judgement, the Tribunal, applying, by analogy, article 173,
chapter 2, of the Swiss Penal Code, ruled that the accused could prove the
truth of the allegation or else prove her good faith.
E/CN.4/l992/34
page 117
Under IIe same provision, the accused shall not incur any penalty if she
can prove that the allegations disseminated by her are in conformity with the
truth or that she had sound reason for considering IIem to be true.
In the case in point, Myriam Gazut Goudal received preliminary
authorization to demonstrate that the accusations made at the press conference
by Mr. Kazem Radjavis broIIer corresponded to the facts.
OEe Tribunal will recall that, according to case law, anyone accusing an
individual of having committed an offence must, in order to prove the truth of
the allegation, be able in principle to invoke a finding of guilt (ATF 106 IV
p. 115 ff; JT 1981 IV p. 104 ff).
This is not so in the case under consideration.
The criminal proceedings conducted by the criminal courts of the Canton
of Vaud following the assassination of Mr. Kazem Radjavi are not closed.
Obviously, therefore, it cannot be legally sustained that the accused was
merely stating the truth when she accused the President of the Islamic
Republic of Iran of being responsible for the crime.
In the absence of a finding of guilt by a judicial authority, such an
accusation, which moreover is an extremely serious one, cannot be deemed true.
In this connection, the Tribunal will note that the press release which
the Investigating Judge of the Canton of Vaud issued on 22 June 1990 and which
has been added to the file is not tantamount to a judgement. .
While it gives some information as to the possible perpetrators of the
crime, the press release does not, contrary to what was stated in the
offending article, mention the existence of a direct order given by the
President of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
The Tribunal will thus consider that Myriam Gazut Goudal has failed to
provide proof of truth. .
Under the law, even if the accused tails to prove the truthfulness of the
allegations, he will not incur any penalty if he can at least prove that he
had serious grounds to hold them in good faith to be true.
Such proof can only be based on facts and circumstances known to the
writer at the time when the offending allegations were made and not on facts
or circumstances occurring after the allegations (AFT 107 IV p. 34).
OEe author provides evidence of good faith if he establishes that he
believed in the truth of the allegations after having conscientiously done all
he could be expected to do in order to ascertain that the information was
well-founded (ATF 85 IV p. 184).
OEus the question that should be considered is whether the author
complied with the obligation of prudence generally incumbent on anyone who
casts a slur upon the honour of another person.
E/CN.4/ 1992/34
page 118
The Federal Court requires particular prudence from those whose
allegations are widely disseminated through the press.
In the view of the Federal Court, wide dissemination coupled with the
suggestive power inherent in a printed text increases the gravity of the slur.
Requirements as to the observance of the duty of verification must
therefore be particularly stringent in such cases (ATF 104 IV p. 16;
Penis Barrelet, Droit Suisse des Mass Media , 2nd ed., p. 143, and previously
cited references).
For those who transmit their views IIrough the press, the duty to respect
the truth involves an obligation to make a scrupulous check of the opinions he
expresses.
When a journalist repeats statements made by a third party, he must
exercise particular prudence if he is unaware of that third party's reputation
and standing or if it is clearly evident that the information is based only on
assumptions (ATF 105 IV p. 119; Denis Barrelet, op. cit., p. 143).
In the case under consideration, it is obvious that the mere fact of
placing the statements of Mr. Kazem Radjavi's brother in quotation marks did
not relieve Mrs. Myrisin Gazut Goudal of the duty to check the reliability of
IIe information.
The continuing existence of that duty is all the more evident as the
action here amounted to no more and no less than an open accusation naming
certain individuals as being IIe indirect perpetrators of a crime.
The fact that the newspaper La Suisse had only limited time to carry out
the necessary verifications does not in itself constitute an adequate excuse
in view of the seriousness of the allegations,
The Tribunal thus deems that the author of the article cannot claim to
have discharged the obligation of prudence by the sole fact of having tried
unsuccessfully to reach the diplomatic and consular authorities of the Islamic
Republic of Iran in Switzerland by telephone.
On the other hand, the Tribunal will take into consideration the fact
that the accused was influenced by the reputation and activities of the
Radjavi family, as well as by various reports of international bodies
concerning clashes between the authorities and opposition movements, in
particular those which have taken up arms inside Iran (see the statements of
various witnesses concerning the Hojahedin, and in particular the statements
of the witnesses Alavi and Asgari-Zadeh).
Mrs. Myriam Gazut Goudal was well aware that members of the Radjavi
family are known opponents of the regime in power in Iran.
Mr. Kazem Radjavi was closely associated with the Mojabedin, a group
engaged in struggle against the authorities in Iran.
In fact, Mr. Kazem Radjavi's brother was the Mojahedin's leader.
E/CN.4/l992/34
page 119
Mrs. Myriam Gazut Goudal was aware, in particular through
Mrs. Claudine Rey, that Mr. Kazem Radjavi had in the past received threats in
connection with his activities at the United Nations.
Mrs. Myriain Gazut Goudal, who, according to her statements, has made
several studies of the current situation in Iran, was thus aware of the strong
tensions existing between opposition groups — and, in particular, the
Mojahedin — and the authorities.
This is amply demonstrated by the files available to her while writing
the article.
She was in possession Qf press articles on the Iranian question going
back to 1979, and she personally had written articles about Iran.
Lastly, in view of the reports prepared on the situation, in particular
by organs of the United Nations and by Amnesty International,
Mrs. Myriam Gazut Goudal could have believed subjectively that
Mr. Kazem Radjavi had indeed fallen victim to those tensions and violent
confrontations.
As stated in its judgement of 17 May 1991, the Tribunal considers that it
was of public interest for the general public to be informed of all the
consequences caused by the serious crime which was committed in our country on
24 April 1990, unquestionably to the great concern of the population.
Furthermore, the public interest attaching to the dissemination of the
information is also covered by the freedom of the press, as enshrined in the
Federal Constitution (see Barrelet, op. cit. p. 343), as well as by the
European Convention on Human Rights.
Article 10 of that Convention expressly sets forth the right to impart
and receive information.
The statements made by the Radjavi family at the press conference which
followed the assassination of Kazem Radjavi were of an extremely serious
nature.
The Tribunal will recall, moreover, that in the present instance it is
not called upon to judge whether those public declarations were well-founded,
but only to determine whether the attitude of the journalist who, like other
members of her profession, reproduced them, is reprehensible from a penal
point of view.
Notwithstanding their extreme nature and despite the doubts that may
legitimately be entertained on their score, the Tribunal will concede that, in
view of the circumstances recalled above, those statements did not appear to
Mrs. Myriam Gazut Goudal to be manifestly unwarranted.
The Tribunal will thus concede that, from a purely subjective point of
view, Mrs. Myriatu Gazut Goudal had reason to believe in good faith that the
information given at the press conference was sufficiently credible to be
E/CN.4 / 1992 / 34
page 120
reproduced in the daily La Suisse on the same grounds as the Iranian
authorities' denial which was published in a later issue of the same paper.
For those reasons, the Tribunal will judge that, in view of all the
circumstances, Mrs. Myriam Gazut Goudal has proved her good faith and will
therefore acquit her.
With regard to costs, article 97, paragraph 2 of the Geneva Code of
Criminal Procedure, which provides that in the event of acquittal tEe State
costs as well as those of the accused shall be chargeable to the claimant for
criminal indemnification, will be applied.
The Tribunal will, furthermore, sentence the Islamic Republic of Iran to
pay a portion of the lawyers' fees incurred by Mrs. Myriam Gazut Goudal, the
amount being determined by reference to article 12 of the Rules on costs and
expenditures arising from criminal proceedings, bearing in mind the complex
nature of the case, the duration of the procedure and the fullness of the
debates.
For these reasons
With reference to articles 1 ff. and, in particular, 173, ch. 2, and 296,
Swiss Penal Code; 55, Federal Constitution; 10, European Convention on Human
Rights; and 97, 219 ff, Geneva Code of Criminal Procedure.
The Tribunal
giving judgement by the adversary method,
ACQUITS Myriam Gazut Goudal of the charge of having insulted a foreign
State within the meaning of article 296 of the Swiss Penal Code in connection
with the article published on 26 April 1990 in the newspaper La Suisse ;
Sentences the Islamic Republic of Iran to pay a portion of
Mrs. Myriam Gazut Goudal's legal fees in the amount of SwF 5,000;
Sentences the Islamic Republic of Iran to pay procedural costs amounting
to SwF 2,984, in which shall be included an adjudication fee of SwF 500;
Orders the present judgement to be communicated to the Department of the
Federal Public Prosecutor for the attention of the Swiss Federal Council.
E/CN. 4/1992/34
page 121
Notice to IIe accused; Myriam Gazut Goudal
OEe undersigned has received a true copy of the present judgement.
Geneva, 31 July 1991 Signature:
Notice to the claimant for criminal indemnification: Islamic Republic of Iran
The undersigned has received a true copy of the present judgement.
Geneva, 31 July 1991 Signature:
Notice to the Public Prosecutor
The undersigned has received a true copy of the present judgement.
Geneva, ... Signature:
