UNITED
NATIONS
Economic and Social Distr.
Council GENERAL
_fl - .
E/QL 4/1989/26
26 January 1969
Original: ENGLISH
COMMISSION ON BUMM RIGHTS
Forty—fifth session
Item 12 of the provisional agenda
QUESTION OF THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDMIENTAL fl EEDOMS
IN AllY PART OF THE WORLD, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO COLONIAL
AND OTHER DEPENDENT COUNTRIES AND TEBRIItRIES
ReportonthehumanrightssituationintheIs lamicPepub licof Iran
by theSpecia lRepresentativeofIIeCon luissiononHumanRights,
Mn Reynaldo Galindo Pohl
pursuant to Contuission resolution 1988/69
CS.$9—10557 /44 10Q
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 2
CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION . 1— S
It. CONTACTS AND C(fl4UNICATIONS WITH THE GOVERNMENT
OF THE ISLAIIIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
A. Contacts with the Permanent Representatives
of the Islamic Republic of Iran
B. Written cougnunications with the Iranian
Governiuent
III . INFOBMAT ION AVAI LABL2 TO THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE .
A. Information provided by the Iranian Government .
B. Information provided by other sources
1. Oral information
2. Written information
lY. CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN ISSUES PERTAINING TO THE
LEGAL SY$TF14 APPLICABLE IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC
OF IRAX4
A. Thequestionof punishment
8.
C.
The question of the death penalty
Irregularities concerning investigation and
trial
1. Arbitraryarrests
2. Information on reasons for arrest
3. I11—treatr,tentandtorture
4. Solitaryconfinement
5. Legal aid
6. Public hearing
7. Calling of witnesses
8. Review by a higher tribunal
9. Pardon or couluutation of sentence
I). Remedies
Paragraphs Pa ge
4
6—10 4
6—8 4
9—10 5
11—21 7
11—13 7
14—21 7
14 7
15—21 8
22—57 9
25—26 10
27—36 10
37 — 52
38 — 41
42 — 43
44 — 45
46
47 — 48
49
50
51
52
12
12
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
15
53—57 15
E/cN. 4/1989/26
page 3
CONTENTS (continued)
Earagraphs Page
V. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 58 — 78 16
Annex
NAMES AND PARTICULARS OF PERSONS ALLEGEDLY EXECUTED IN THE
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IR A N DURING THE PERIOD JULY—DECEMBER 1988 22
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 4
I. INTRODUCTION
1. By its resolution 1988/69, the Conmiission on Human Rights decided to
extend the mandate of its Special Representative on the situation of human
rights and fundamental freedoms in the Islamic Republic of Iran, as contained
in its resolution 1984/54, for a further year, and requested the Special
Representative to present an interim report to the General Assembly at its
forty—third session on the ha itian rights situation in the Islamic Republic of
Iran, and a final report to the Commission at its forty—fifth session.
2. In compliance with the above mentioned resolution, the Special
Representative presented an interim report (A/43/705) to the General Assembly
and herewith submits his final report to the Cormijission.
3. The interim report described the written communications and other
contacts with the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, gave a detailed
account of oral and written information received by the Special Representative
concerning the situation of human rights in the country during the period
October 1987 to September 1988, considered certain pertinent views expressed
by the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran during the examination of
the item by the Co,raaission at its forty—fourth session and contained the
Special Representative's general observations on the Situation.
4. The final report contains a description of the contacts and discussions
which the Special Representative held with representatives of the Iranian
Government in New York on the occasion of the forty—third session of the
General Assembly, and in Geneva, as well as coimnunications addressed by the
Special Representative to the Iranian Government after the publication of the
interim report. It further contains an update of the information provided to
the Special Representative by the Iranian Government and by other sources, and
a consideration of some issues pertaining to the legal system applicable in
the Islamic Republic of Iran and related problems. The final chapter of the
report consists of general considerations and conclusions. A list of persons
allegedly executed in the Isla mic Republic of Iran during the period
July—December 1988 appears as an annex to the report.
5. This final report should be considered by the Commission as forming a
whole with the interim report presented to the General Assembly. The general
observations contained in the interim report are still valid.
II. CONTACTS AND COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF THE
ISLM1IC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
A. contacts withthe PermanentRepresentativesofthe
Islamic Republic of Iran
6. On 20 November 1988, the Special Representative had a long talk with the
Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United
Nations, Ambassador Mohaninad Ja'afar Mahallati, who was accoipanied by six
members of the Permanent Mission. The Permanent Representative indicated that
he intended to present a procedural decision under which the Iranian
Government would express its commitment to co—operate with the
Special Representative in all respects before the end of 1988, for the purpose
of carrying out his mandate, provided that a consensus with the other sponsors
E/cN. 4/1989/26
page 5
could be found in due time. On the same occasion, the difficulties faced by
the Iranian Government in implementing the resolutions of the Coiiission on
Human Rights and the General Assembly were discussed. The Permanent
Representative enphasized the root causes of the pending human rights
problems, mainly the war imposed on the Islamic Republic of Iran during the
past eight years, a p i suggested that the question of iir 1ementation skould be
viewed in relation to those root causes.
7. A second meeting took place on 29 November 1988, at which the Permanent
Representative referred to the alleged wave of executions mentioned in the
interim report and denied the allegations. He indicated that many killings
had in fact occurred on the battlefield, in the context of the war, following
the invasion of the Islamic Republic of Iran by the organization called the
National Liberation Army (NL.A). The Permanent Representative showed the
Special Representative a videotape produced by NLA, which he qualified as
political and propaganda material, indicating that films of that nature were
regularly being broadcast into the Islamic Republic of Iran from the NLA
headquarters in Iraq (see also paras. 11—13). He said that that fact in
itself discredited the information provided by that organization to the
Special Representative.
8. On 13 January 1989 . a meeting was held in Geneva between the Special
Representative and the Permanent Representative of the Is Lamic Republic of
Iran to the United Nations Of fice at Geneva, Ambassador Sirous Nasseri, who
was accompanied by two members of the Permanent Mission. In the course of the
meeting, the Permanent Representative reiterated his Government's position
that the wording of the various pertinent resolutions of the Coirimission on
Human Rights and the General Assertly remained the major obstacle to full
realization of his Government's co—operation with the Special Representative.
As long as such politically itotivated language continued to be used in
resolutions regarding the situation of human rights in his country, the
Iranian Government would find it very difficult to extend its full
co—operation. The Permanent Representative suggested that the Special
Representative might engage in some kind of a dialogue — on the occasion of
the forthcoming session of the Corrmiission on Human Rights — with both the
Iranian Government and the sponsors of a possible resolution, in order to
achieve a compromise that could be acceptable to all parties and would result
in full co—operation by the Iranian Government with the Special Representative
in the discharge of his mandate. The Permanent Representative indicated that,
since the cease—fire had been achieved in the war with Iraq, his Goverment was
in a better position to turn its attention to the questicrn of human rights.
The Special Representative pointed to the various practical measures mentioned
in his final report which the Iranian Government might wish to adopt in order
to improve the human rights situation in the country. He also referred to the
desirability of receiving detailed replies from the Government to the various
allegations which he had brought to its attention. He further raised the
possibility of a visit to the country.
B. Writtenconmiunications-with the Iranian- Government
9. On 9 January 1989, the Special Representative addressed the following
letter to the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the
United Nations Office at Geneva:
“?s you have been informed by the Centre for Human Rights, I am at
present visiting the Centre in connection with the completion of my
report to the Colrtnission on Human Rights. I am planning to stay in
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 6
Geneva until 13 January 1989 and would hope that I shall have an occasion
to meet you for a further exchange of views.
I should like to emphasize that I was particularly pleased and
encouraged by the statement made at the Third Committee of the General
Assembly by your Permanent Representative to the United Nations in
New York, Ambassador Mahalatti , who repeatedly promised that your
Government would extend to me its full co—operation in the discharge of
my mandate.
I believe that it would be very useful if we could discuss ways and
means for furthering such co—operation in concrete terms. In this
connection, I wish to reiterate my strong conviction that a visit to the
Islamic Republic of Iran, in conformity with existing practice in the
Coltission on Human Rights, would be a most significant and iir ortant
step towards such full co—operation, a conviction which I expressed
already in my letter of 24 July 1986.1?
10. On 25 January 1989, the Special Representative addressed the following
letter to the Permanent Representative of the Isla mic Republic of Iran to the
United Nations Office at Geneva:
‘I should like to inform you that, on 9 January 1989, I received, in
the framework of my mandate under Commission on Human Rigths resolution
1988/69, eight persons who claimed to have pertinent information On
certain aspects of the human rights situation in the Islamic Republic
of Iran. A sunulary of the allegations made by these persons is enclosed
herewith for your information. [ see para. 141
A sunoeary of allegations regarding in particular the right to life,
contained in various documents and letters provided to me recently by
various Other organizations and individuals concerned, is also enclosed
herewith for your information. [ see paras. 15—22 and annexi
I would greatly appreciate receiving any information or counents
that your Government may wish to provide with regard to these
allegations. I would also like to draw your attention to the fact that
the detailed replies to allegations coimnunicated to your Government on
earlier occasions, which, I was assured, were under preparation, have
still not been received.
I should also like to seize this opportunity to express my
appreciation for the useful and cordial exchange of views we had in
Geneva on 13 January 1989. 1 am looking forward to continuing our
dialogue during the forthcoming session of the Commission on Human
Rights, wiII a view to realizing the full co—operation of which I was
assured by your Government.'
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 7
III. INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE
A. Information provided- ' the Iranian Government
11. At the second talk with the Permanent Representative of the Islamic
Republic of Iran, a film on the armed activities of Iranian migr4s was
projected. The film was a compilation of NLA video films telecast from
abroad, which showed scenes of military parades, military training,
battlefields and statements by NLA leaders. The Permanent Representative
requested the special Representative to include the film anong the d uments
handed over to him by the Iranian Government. On the basis of that request a
sununary of its contents follows.
12. The compiled video films presented an important military operation that
was launched from bases located in Iraq in July 1988. Its code—name was
“Eternal Light' t , and it was qualified as a new phase of NLA”. In the course
of that operation, NM apparently penetrated at least 150 kilonetres into the
Islamic Republic of Iran. NLA claimed the capture of several military
garrisons, including those of Islamabad, Najab—2 Logistic Headquarters of
Keren, Islamabad Road, Revolutionary Guards Corps, 27th Division,
Revolutionary Corps Training, and the Beheshti Garrison. NLA also claimed to
have killed 40,000 menbers of the Iranian military forces and stated that an
those actions Know established NM credibility as a powerful, well—equipped
and trained army ... capable of tearing up the warp and woof of the r4gime and
destroying it forever ...“. After initial success, the offensive was halted
and finally repulsed.
13. One of the video films contained a public evaluation of the
“Eternal Light” operation, The audience, wearing fatigues, chanted a hymn and
shouted slogans praising the leaders.
B. Information provided by other sources
1. oral information
14. On 11 January 1989, the Special Representative conducted a series of
informal hearings in the course of which eight persons who claimed to have
pertinent information on certain aspects of the human rights situation in the
Islamic Republic of Iran made statements. Seven of them were sympathizers of
the Mojahedin organization. They were: Mr. Asghar Ahkhalaghi,
Mr. Azam Nyakan, Mr. Reza Hosseini, Mr. Amar Alnaser and Mr. Bijan Nadizadeh.
Two other persons requested that their identity should not be revealed. The
eighth person was Mr. Jalal Gandjai, a religious figure who described himself
as independent of any link with any political body. All the persons appearing
before the Special Representative alleged that one or more members of their
family had been executed in the Islamic Republic of Iran in recent nonths.
The following people were mentioned as having been executed recently:
Hamzeh Mahjoob, Mohaimnad Ahkhlaghi, Behrooz Behnamzadeh, Mr. Shukruiahi,
Syrus Sephri, Forhad Zamani, Jaber Kabi, Mohaimned Reza Naim,
Hossein Abdolvahab, Mohsen Bahrani, Hossein Nyakan, Wahid Tahsili,
Hamid Tahsili, Zahra Byjanyar, Javad Mashoof, Bijan Makvandi, Mohsen Vazin,
Said Mazaheri, &IIau,ued Kaseb Chani and Mojgan Latifi. It was alleged that
all the persons who were executed had been previously convicted and were
serving sentences for periods of various durations.
E/CN. 4/1989/26
pa ge 8
2. Written information
(a) Information regarding the right to life
15. The information received by the Special Representative since the
preparation of his interim report to the General Assembly contained in
particular alleged violations of the right to life. In his interim report
(paras. 41—49) the Special Representative referred to information he received
in September 1988 alleging that a large number of prisoners, members of
various opposition groups, had been executed during the months of July, August
and September 1988. Since that date, the Special Representative has continued
receiving persistent reports about a wave ot executions of political
prisoners. These reports were made available by various sources, including
non—governmental organizations in consultative status with the Economic and
Social Council and other bodies directly concerned by the alleged wave of
executions. In addition, the Special Representative received hundreds of
petitions and letters from private individuals around the world, including
members of parliament from Australia, France, Germany, Federal Republic of,
Ireland, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, as well
as members of the European Parliament from several countries, and trade—union
and church officials, expressing deep concern at the alLeged wave of
executions and calling for United Nations intervention to bring such
executions to a halt.
16. The precise number of alleged victims of the recent wave of executions
has not been reported. The Special Representative has received more than
1,000 names (see annex), but it was alleged that there were in all probability
several thousand victims. In that connection, the Special Representative Was
informed that the Special Rapporteur on suiwnary or arbitrary executions had,
during the period from July to t ecember 1988, transmitted to the Iranian
Government allegations regarding the sununary or arbitrary execution of several
hundred persons, and sent urgent appeals regarding approximately 150 persons
said to be facing an inmiinent danger of execution.
17. Most of the alleged victims were said to be members or supporters of the
People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran, but members of other opposition
groups, such as the Tudeh Party, the Peoples Fedaiyan Organization, Rahe
Kargar and the Kornala Organization in Iranian Kurdistan, as well as at least
11 mollahs. were also said to be among the alleged victims. Many of the
people said to have been executed had been serving prison terms for several
years, while others were former prisoners who were rearrested and then
executed. It would therefore s eem unlikely that these persons could have
taken part in violent activities against the Government, such as participation
in the NLA incursion into the western part of the Islamic Republic of Iran in
July 1988. Miong those said to have been executed were several women and, in
some cases 1 several members of the same family. It was alleged that many of
those who had been serving prison sentences had had their sentences changed to
the death penalty, in contravention of article 14, paragraph 7, of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which the Islamic
Republic of Iran is a party. Many of the executions were said to have been
carried out in secret while others were reported to have occurred publicly, by
hanging or firing—s iads.
E/Q . 4/1989/26
page 9
18. Statements by several high—ranking officials were published by the
Iranian news media to the effect that members of opposition groups sI uld be
dealt with severely, but there was no official acknowledgement of the wave of
executions. Nevertheless, reports have been received acccording to which
people witnessed large numbers of bodies being buried in shallow graves in the
area of Behesht-e—zahra cemetery in Tebran, where political prisoners are
usually buried, and in other parts of the country.
(b) ThesituationoftheBaha'jcoimjjunity
19. According to information received by the Special Representative, two
members of the Saha'i conriunity were executed in November 1988 or at an
earlier date in the latter half of 1988. Their names were reported as Mr.
Binham pashai, aged 49, of Semnan, who had been imprisoned since November
1983, and Mr. Iraj Afshin, aged 55, who had been imprisoned since late 1986.
20. The number of Baha'i prisoners continued to decrease in the latter half
of 1988, and stood, as of January 1989, at 101, including four who remained
detained without charges. The sentences of a number of Baha' i prisoners have
reportedly been reduced and the conditions of detention of Some have
improved. Since February 1988 no further arrests have been reported.
21. Regarding the economic situation of members of the Baha'i coaunity, it
was reported that most of IIe Baha'is who had been dismissed from their
positions in education and government in the early 1980s continued to be
denied their jobs or the pensions to which they were entitled. In that
connection, the Special Representative received a translation of an article
published in Etelaat on 12 October 1988, containing two lists of some 50
Baha'is whose property in the Islamic Republic of Iran had been confiscated by
the authorities. The article invited the legal Muslim relatives of these
Baha'is to contact the authorities, if these Baha'is resided outside the
Islamic Republic of Iran, and it was announced that the authorities would then
consider their rights and claims. The list included names of Baha'is who Were
presumed to be dead. The Special Representative also received a translation
of a notice issued by the General Employment Office in December 1987. The
notice contained 13 names of persons who had lost their jobs in the Bank Melat
on the grounds of “belonging to the depraved Baha'i sectN.
IV. CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN ISSUES PERTAINING 10 THE L AL SYSTEM
APPLICABLE IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
22. According to official information, the Penal Code was adopted on a
temporary basis, for a trial period of five years. The Law of Hodoud and Qasas
(punishment and retribution) was enacted in 1982, and the Ta'azirat (lesser
penalties whose maximum is set forth by law and minimum by the judge) was
prormalgated in 1983. That means that the trial period has expired or is about
to expire and that the study of amendments or the preparation of a new code
may be under way or may begin shortly.
23. It may be expected that the Iranian Government will take advantage of
this occasion to consider not only the domestic experience, but the views of
international organs entrusted with the protection of human rights.
Examination of the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran
has given rise to much learned thinking which may be considered when the time
is right.
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 10
24. A representative of the Iranian Government stated at the forty—second
session of the Commission on Human Rights that the fundamental peculiarity of
the Iranian Constitution was based on the peculiarity of the Revolution,
which, in relation to other movements in contemporary Iran, was that it was
Islamic and that it had been developed from an indigenous school of thought.
It is precisely that indigenous school of thought that might turn its
attention to international obligations in order to try to build a bridge,
notwithstanding obstacles of different sorts, between the autochtonous
political novenent and the requirements of an increasingly interdependent
international corr nunity. Certainly there are sensitive points involved, but
it may be expected IIat, with creative thinking ani deep study, and taking
advantage of contributions from different quarters, a kind of model might be
developed. The revision of the penal Cc4e may provide a unique opportunity to
think again on the requests made by the competent human rights organs of the
United Nations.
A. the questionofpunisbment
25. This is a delicate question because it touches upon the traditions of a
genuinely Islamic people. None the less it is essential to examine it. In
that context, it is important to note that the sub—Congaission on prevention of
Discrimination and protection of Minorities, in resolution 1984/22,
interpreted the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (art. 5) as prohibiting
arr outation and urged Governments having such legislation or practices to take
measures to povide for other punishment consonant with article 5. Moreover,
in 1986 the Human Rights Coavaittee has interpreted the International Covenant
on Civil and litical Rights (art. 7) as prohibiting, inter alia , “corporal
punishment, including excessive chastisement as an educational or disciplinary
measure. 1/
2. The Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in
Time of War, to which the Islamic Republic of Iran is a party, prohibits
corporal punishment. The well—known and widely acclaimed article 3 co lmion to
the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 gives civilians and members of the armed
forces who have laid down their arms protected status, prescribing that they
must be treated hui anely and prohibiting outrages to personal dignity, cruel
treatment, mutilation and torture. This article sets out firmly established
standards and feelings which also cover civilians in time of peace.
B. Thequestion of thedeathpenalty
27. The International Covenant on Civil and 1itica1 Rights envisages the
application of the death penalty to the nost serious crimes only (art. 6,
para. 2): “This penalty can only be carried out pursuant to a final judgement
rendered by a cogpetent court.' It should not be in osed on persons under 18
years of age, should not be carried out on pregnant women and anyone sentenced
to death should have the right to seek pardon or coinnutation of sentence
(art. 6, paras. 4 and 5).
28. The main question relates to the meaning and scope of the term lithe nost
serious crimes”. The language of the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights suggests that a gradation of crimes is inplied: crimes,
understood in the genetic sense of acts or omissions liable to punishment;
serious crines or grave crimes; and the irost serious criuies, that is, those
which reach the greatest or highest degree of evil, harm and danger to the
society. According to the International Covenant only the nost serious crimes
are punishable by the death penalty.
E/cN. 4/1989/26
page 11
29. The term “the most serious crimes” used in the International Covenant
lacks precision and is liable to disparaging interpretations. The annotation
of the text of the International Covenants, prepared by the Secretary General
(A/2929) retained the criticism of this term stating that the concept of
• t serious crimes” differed from one country to another (Chap. IV, para. 6).
Legal definitions facilitate, but do not necessarily ensure, a uniform
interpretation. The absence of legal definitions does not diminish the
binding character of legal obligations, nor does it impede or jeopardize the
application and interpretation of the norms in question. The simple reference
in the Convention to “the irost serious crimes” indicates that, in the absence
of a coimnon and accepted legal definition, the text itself, first, and the
context, second, as stipulated in the Convention on the Law of Treaties,
should direct the application and interpretation.
30. The Human Rights Coiwaittee stated that “the expression ‘most serious
crimes' must be read restrictively to mean that the death penalty should be a
quite exceptional measure, and that, as State parties are not obliged to
abolish the death penalty totally, “they are obliged to limit its use and, in
particular, to abolish it for other than the most serious crimes.”
31. The Economic and Social Council adopted Safeguards guaranteeing
protection of the rights of those facing the aeath penalty in the annex to its
resolution 1984/50, which states that the term the most serious crimes must be
understood as meaning that their scope “sfould not go beyond intentional
crimes with lethal and other extremely grave consequences”, that the death
penalty may be imposed only when the guilt of the accused is “based upon clear
and convincing evidence leaving no room for an alternative explanation of the
facts” and that it sbould be carried out so as to inflict the minimum possible
suffering. On the other hand, the lawful application of the death penalty
ig lies coir ,liance with the guarantees of the due process of law, in
conformity with articles 6, paragraph 2, and 14 and 15 of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
32. The Law of Hodoud and Qasas punishes with the death penalty a variety of
actions aiming at the overthrow of the Government (arts. 198—200). capital
punishment is also imposed for to the following (a) “all meIIers and
supporters” who, knowing the stand of a group or association which rises in
arms against the Government, actively participate in the furthering of such
organization, even if they do not participate in the military wing (art. 198);
(b) those plotting to overthrow the Government who procure arms and explosives
to that purpose, as well as those who put means, tools and weapons at their
disposal with knowledge and intention (art. 199); and (c) anyone who, in the
plot to overthrow the Government, nominates himself for a sensitive post in
the coup-d'6tat government and whose candidature is effective in any manner in
realizing the coup d' tat (art. 200).
33. The penal provisions mentioned above do not distinguish between crimes,
serious crimes and the most serious crimes. In the absence of any distinction
it may be understood that all the actions punishable by the death penalty are
considered the most serious crimes-. The language used is extremely loose, and
consequently includes members and supporters” of violent organizations, even
though such wsupportersu have not necessarily participated in military
action. Thus, all kinds of support are punished by the death penalty. This
raises the question whether sympathizers are considered to be supporters and
whether support includes ideological support and, for exaqle, the
E/CN.4/1989/26
page 12
distribution of leaflets. There is no differentiation between substantial
support and minor support, between active support or mere opinion.
Furthermore, the use of the word “means” in article 199 of the Law of Bodoud
and Qasas, in the absence of any qualification, implies that an extremely
broad interpretation is technically admissible.
34. There is no trace in the Law of lioudad of any gradation of penalty to
accord with different degrees of participation in the offence. Criminal
methodology distinguishes between degrees of liability in the iteroriminis ,
either in terms of the offender's guilt or in terms of his supposed
dangerousness. In descending order, punishment is imposed for the same
offence on perpetrators, accomplices and accessories after the fact. In the
case of offences coimnitted by groups of persons, the maximum sentence is
generally given to some of the persons convicted and somewhat lighter
sentences to the rest of the-joint defendants.
35. The absence of these technical differentiations may result in a large
number of death penalties, and the drafters of the new Penal Code may wish to
examine technical innovations in order to reduce the offences punishable by
the highest penalty and give the judges power to choose from a broad range of
punishments in order to adapt each punishment to the particular circumstances
of the offence and the conditions of the offender.
36. In addition to technical arguments and the required coherence with the
International covenant, enlightened opinion and indigenous schools of thought
in the Islamic Republic of Iran may wish to bear in mind that there are groups
of Islamic legal scholars and practitioners who recoioeuend the abolition of the
death penalty for political crimes on the grounds that it is contrary to
Islamic law. They state that the number of crimes punishable by the death
penalty is limited. 3/
C. Irregularities-concerning investigationand trial
37. Irregularities during the investigation and trial of accused persons
sometines result from the absence of legislation in keeping with international
instruments, but more often from shortcomings in the enforcement and
supervision of existing law. It may be useful to present for the
consideration of the Iranian Government a brief catalogue of irregularities
denounced under the terms of the International Covenant on civil and Political
Rights.
1. Arbitrary arrests
38. According to recent information, the Supreme Judicial Council has issued
a directive approving the imprisonment or exile for up to two years of anyone
with a criminal record, even without evidence of further criminal acts.
39. Detention of family merrbers of persons accused of political crimes in
order to obtain information on their whereabouts appears to be a coimnon
practice. These detainees rarely go on trial, but remain in gaol for
unspecified, usually long, periods of time. An article in Etela'at on 4
August 1987 reported that 36 parents had been arrested because their sons had
not reported for military service.
E/cN. 4/1989/26
page 13
40. The practice of aetention of prisoners after the expiration of their
sentence has frequently been reported. This practice affects in particular
political prisoners, and is reported to occur mainly when, in the opinion of
the Lower echelons of authority, they are not sufficiently repentant, or are
suspected of possible continuation of political activities upon release.
Political prisoners are sometimes requested to sign a declaration undertaking
that they will no longer participate in activities against the Government. If
they fail to sign such a promise, they are remanded.
41. Arrests are apparently so numerous that some high officials have
requested the authorities to act with more moderation. A high—ranking
official was reported on 6 June 1987 to have advised security forces to be
satisfied with “the miniiraam number of arrests necessary', and to have said
that the arrested persons should be promptly charged and tried.
2. Information on reasonsfor arrest
42. the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights prescribes that
anyone who is arrested shall be informed iranediately of the reasons for his Or
her arrest and the ensuing charges (art. 9, para. 2). The Iranian
constitution contains a similar provision: In the case of arrest, charges
and supporting evidence must be coimnunicated ininediately in writing to the
prisoner and be elucidated to him” (art. 32).
43. Information received over several years incicates that these provisions
are not properly applied. Reliable witnesses have affirmed that many
prisoners remain ignorant of the charges against them for weeks and even
months, and that it is through interrogation that they sometimes learn of the
reasons for their arrest.
3. 1l1-treatment and torture
44. Reports on ill—treatment and torture continued to be received. Arrests
are said to be made in an intimidatory manner, and investigation, trial and
serving of sentence are reportedly effected under duress, hardships and
different kinds of torture. The Revolutionary Guards, some law enforcement
officers and prisons warders have been specifically accused of a variety of
biased procedures.
45. The existence of torture has been officialy denied although indications
of hardships during the first years of the Revolution have been alluded to.
In an interview published by Die Welt on 10 August 1987, a very high
government official stated: “there may have been hardships in interrogation in
the early phase of the Revolution , and continued, “there is no torture in our
Islamic Republic.... because it is forbidden by our constitution”, and ‘anyone
using torture during interrogation is punished himself”. According to this
statement, torture or ill—treatment are not condoned by the higher circles of
power. This being the case, those circles may wish to undertake a thorough
and impartial investigation of the reiterated charges conmiunicated by the
United Nations during the past few years.
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 14
4. solitary confinement
46. Former prisoners have complained of inconinunicado or solitary
confinement, not as a disciplinary measure to punish misdemeanors related to
the prison r gime, but as part of a method of obtaining confessions or
information. According to witnesses with personal experience, the r rale a l a
mental healtti of the prisoners suffer on account of this treatment.
S. Legalaid
47. The Iranian Constitution provides for legal aid: “in all the courts, the
parties to the case have IIe right to choose their own lawyer aia, if a person
cannot afford to secure legal counsel, it must be proviied for through legal
aid'. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states that
everyone shall have adequate time and facilities to prepare his defence and to
coninunicate with counsel of his own choosing, ala to have legal assistaite, in
any case where the interests of justice so require, without payment in case of
need (art. 14, para. 3 (b) and (d)).
48. According to oral and written information received, political detainees
have no opportunity to prepare their defence or coimnunicate with a legal
counsel, nor do they receive legal assistance, Usually they are alone during
the trial, which generally takes a few minutes and finishes before the
defendants realize what is happening.
6. Publichearing
49. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights entitles
defendants to a fair ala public hearing by a competent, independent ala
impartial tribunal established by law, Only reasons of morals, public order
or national security, or the interests of private parties, permit exclusion of
the public and the press from the hearings (art. 14, para. 1). None the less,
hearings concerning political defendants are usually held in the sole presence
of judges and security officers, and without a lawyer, family members, the
public or the press.
7. calling of• witnesses
50. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights prescribes, as a
guarantee of a fair trial, the examination of witnesses against the defendant
and the attendance, under the same conditions, of witnesses on his behalf
(art. 14, para. 3 (e)). According to the information collected, judges
usually rely more on confessions than on testimony, and officers in charge of
the investigation try to obtain the defendants' confessions, by whatever means
they consider appropriate. Defendants are not permitted to call witnesses in
their own defence or to examine witnesses for the prosecution.
8. Review bra higher tribunal
51. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states that
everyone convicted of a crime shall have the right to have his conviction and
sentence reviewed by a higher tribunal (art. 14(5)). The review of death
sentences by the Supreme Judicial Council has been introduced recently. This
revision is pertinent and in line with the International Covenants. None the
less, it needs improve ment since, for the time being, the convicted person has
no right to present statements with respect to his trial ala conviction.
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 15
9. Pardonorcorr,mutation of sentence
52. The International covenant of Civial and Political Rights states that
every person condemned to death is entitled to seek pardon or corlifiutatiOn of
sentence (art. 6, pan. 4). According to reliable information, there is no
such recourse under Iranian legislation.
I ). Remedies
53. In the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
States parties solennly undertake to adopt such legislative or oIIer measures
as may be necessary to give effect to the rights recognized in the Covenant
(art. 2, pan. 2). Insufficient legislation or flaws in application may be
found in any country, and no country is iirmzune to abuse of power. On the
understanding IIat some violations of human rights nay occur everywhere, IIe
question of judicial remedies is an important one. Every State party to the
International covenant on Civil and Political Rights is required to establish
a legal and administrative system that ensures compliance with international
obligations. Problems concerning human rights may be subject to an iunediate
and equitable remedy.
54. Each State party to the International covenant on Civil and Political
Rights undertakes to ensure that any person wlr,se rights are violated shall
have an effective remedy “notwiIIstanding that the violation has been
corrmiitted by persons acting in an official capacity (art. 2, para. 3 (a)).
Every person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by
competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, and to develop
the possibilities of judicial remedy (art. 2. para. 3 (b)). Every person
shall be ensured that the authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted
(art. 2, para. 3 (cfl. In case of unlawful arrest or detention anyone shall
have an enforceable right to compesention” (art. 9, para. 5).
55. The Islamic Republic of Iran has officially informed the Human Rights
ConwUttee, in its initial report (CCPR/C/l/Add. 58) of basic laws and
regulations IIat have been adopted in order to guarantee human rights a lt
fundamental freedoms. This report mentioned the following laws: (a) the State
General Inspection Act, which enables the judiciary, on the basis of article
174 of the Constitution, “to investigate, in its continuous and extraordinary
inspections, any discord or offence coiraitted by civil and military organs and
all the Revolutionary institutions, and to pursue the matter through legal
channels until the attainment of the full results'; I I) the Administrative
court of Justice Act, which empowers the Court, on the basis of article 173 of
the Constitution “to investigate litigations, conQlaints and protests of IIe
public against government officials, units or regulations 0 , and enables any
individual to lodge a corplaint against any injustice or oppression coumiitted
by government officials. Furthermore, the review of death sentences by the
Supreme Judicial council has been introduced recently. These laws provide
remedies, but, at present, for reasons which are not easy to determine, it
appears that the action of government agencies in this field has not been
sufficiently effective. To date there is no known case of punishment of a
government official for abuse of power nor of compensation for arbitrary
arrest. Citizens need to be assured that complaints against government
agencies or officials will not be construed as destabilizing acts.
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 16
56. under these conditions, it aeems that definite and decisive action way
come from the highest spheres of power, through the adoption of a determined
policy and cori rehensive plannir4 for the enactment of appropriate legislation
and the administration of such legislation. Political leaders have started to
advise government agercies on huitianitarian treatment of prisoners. In that
context, it is pertinent to note that a high—ranking official was quoted by
Keyhan on 16 August 1987 as stating that prisoners should be well—treated and
not harmed and insulted, and thfl those who had suffered ill—treatment should
be compensated. Addressing the supreme Judicial Courcil, the same official
stated, as reported by Keyhan in July 1987, that “if the rights of the people
are safeguarded by the State judicial apparatus, then the r gime can be
a j' st t& iLoeQ', ariA t .&t “it •.it Ca ? ' th2. % O fl t )6t ,tt f e. 3'&&ICLtl
example in the world, then other countries will imitate us”.
57. Examining the compliance of State parties with the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights, tpe Human Rights Conmittee stated that it was
not sufficient to prohibit torture, and inhuman or degrading treatment or
punisinent or to make it a crime. States must ensure an effective protection
through sane machinery of control”, and, “complaints about ill—treatment must
be investigated effectively by competent authorities. Those found guilty must
be held responsible, and the alleged victims must themselves have effective
remedies at their disposal, including the right to obtain coipensation.” 4/
V. GENERAL COUSIDERATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
58. The observations formulated by the Iranian Government on the final report
of 1988 (E/CN.4/l988/24) and on the draft resolution, subsequently adopted by
the Ccnoenission on Human Rights, oontained ir ortant views that were analysed
in the interim report (A/43/705, paras. 52—63). In that document, the Special
Representative considered IIat, flthough, in some respects, insufficient
progress had been achieved to maKe the Iranian position convergent with the
demands of binding international instruments, several positive approaches ar
opinions had made those observaUofls useful, promising and conducive to a
better understanding of views, wflch was a prerequisite for the inprovenent of
the human rights situation.
59. In the interim report. the special Representative expressed full
conformity with the principle of fairness, objectivity and non—selectivity
regarding the international system of human tights, as expressed in the
coimuents made by the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran
during IIe consideration of the item at the forty—fourth session of IIe
Cormuission on Human Rights. ‘r qo approaches seemed essential to ensure the
fair use of that principle: first, the meticulous exclusion of political
objectives, and second, the strictest adherence to the universally recognized
protection of the inherent right of all human beings, irrespective of
nationality, race, religion, political affiliation or sex. OEat principle
should regulate all studies, activities and recormuendations regarding human
rights.
60. Anong the statements of the iranian Government, the following deserves to
be highlighted: “matters raised by the Special Representative may still be
is OEtttCe . t%tst*S4 IIt t tS W SV S k* L% t kiu ti , st%mtw
from the [ injcompatibility between Islamic and international Law”.
Furthermore, the Iranian Government indicated — and this may be the crucial
point of that statement — its readiness to seek a practical approach to the
E/cN. 4/1989/26
page 17
pending problems, a kind of modusoperandi purposely designed to attain
specific results. As a matter of fact, provisionally setting aside questions
of doctrine and philosophy, as happened during the adoption of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, may facilitate IIe convergence between national
and international human rights systems. Notwithstanding the importance of
beliefs arid concepts in IIe world and society, what is needed first and
foremost is compliance with international standards. The position of the
Iranian Government, properly developed, may determine practical goals,
establishing a scale of priorities and a timetable for their attainment, that
is, for the formul.ation of a complete plan of action.
61. Another interesting point was the assertion that the Iranian Government
was ready to extend full co—operation to the competent organs of the United
Nations. This assertion was, however, qualified by the indication of two
obstacles: one concerning the language of the resolution of the Coiwnission on
Human Rights and the other the sources of information used for the preparation
of reports. Adopting a pragmatic approach, and in order to facilitate the
progress of the current exercise, which is moving slowly but steadily, it
might be considered a viable option to engage in a certain kind of dialogue
and negotiation that could mainly be an exercise of persuasion, undertaken by
the parties concerned. Instead of waiting for a change of circumstances and
dispositions, some concerted contribution to such a change might be made .
within a nodusoperandi , in which for example, a distinction could be drawn
between what is essential and what is not, the abstract and the concrete, and
areas where concessions can and cannot be made. The Special Representative
expresses his willingness to engage in such an exercise.
62. The Special Representative expresses appreciation for the co—operation
that the Iranian Government has extended to him so far and reiterates his
expectation of full co—operation in the near future, as repeatedly requested
by the General Assembly and the Commission on Human Rights. The Special
Representative reaffirms his belief that the agreement on some important
issues recently reached with the Iranian Government constitutes a step forward
in the discharge of his mandate, arid that recognition of the co—operative
nature of the surveillarre of human rights by the United Nations, together
with a pragmatic approach to pending problems, may lead to a gradual
improvement of the current human rights situation along the lines requested by
the competent organs of the United Nations.
63. previous reports noted the coexistence of two complementary levels or
structures concerning human rights, the normative and the administrative. The
normative structure is formed by both international instruments and municipal
law, the latter adapted to the former in order to constitute a harmonious
legal body. It is up to each State party to the Charter of the United Nations
and IIe International Covenants on Human Rights to take legislative and
administrative measures to ensure the enjoyment of human rights. The
obligation to investigate possible violations and eventually to redress them
stems from the obligation concerning the protection of human rights . This
obligation flows normally and necessarily from the agreed goals, as it is
understood that those agreeing on the ends also agree to provide the means
needed for their attainment. The refusal to provide the n ans for
effectiveness would render the agreed goals meaningless and would constitute
an infringen nt of IIe fundamental principle of good faith in international
relations.
Z/Q4. 4/1989/26
page 18
64. As the trial period for the penal Code has expired or is about to expire,
the Iranian Government has a golden opportunity to co—ordinate that Code with
international instrunents on human rights, Shortcomings regarding fair trial
may be remedied, punishment may be graduated to fit the crime, the death
penalty may be restricted to the rrost serious crimes, provisions on political
crimes may be developed in a more sophisticated way, and punishments
considered to constitute torture may be replaced by others that are Lore in
conformity with international standards. This may be the opportunity to
exempt juvenile offenders under the age of 18 from the death penalty .
65. The Special Representative voices his concern with respect to the
apparent flaws in the legal system, and in particular: (a) frequent
irregularities regarding fair trial, such as the absence of prompt information
of detainees regarding the charges against them, legal aid, presentation of
witnesses and public hearings; (b) the large number of arrests and the
intimidatory gannet in which they are carried out; (c) poor conditions of
imprisonment, such as overcrowding, prohibition of regular visits by family
members and friends and sometimes inoonrnunicado or solitary confinement.
66. Reiterated and concurrent reports on ill—treatment and torture during
investigation, trial and izr risonment continued to be received during the
period under consideration. Oral information provided by first—hand witnesses
and victims was pathetic and noving. The statements of witnesses convinced
the Special Representative that the treatment of political prisoners in some
Iranian prisons was inconsistent with international standards. As stated
before, international obligations imply a duty to investigate complaints and
ensure redress. The alleged facts, as described, are sufficient in nunter and
nature to arouse suspicion that al]. is perhaps not as it should be, and
therefore full and proufl investigation and redress are required.
67. During the period under consideration, executions were reported to have
been carried out in secret, apparently in order to avoid an uproar in the
media and international public opinion. The trend over the past two years
towards a steady reduction i t t the number of executions was abruptedly
interrupted during the months of July , August and September 1988, when a wave
of sunmiary executions took place following the invasion of the Islamic
Republic of Iran by an irregular army. These events prompted the Special
Rapporteur on sulmiary and arbitrary executions to resort to the urgent appeal
procedure in an effort to put an end to the anomalous situation. The Special
Representative shared the concern of the Special Raptorteur and supported his
action.
68. The global denial of the wave of executions which allegedly took place
from July to September of last year and, according to recent information,
continued in October, Noventer and DeceIIer 1988, is not sufficient to dismiss
the allegations as unfounded, within the framework of normal procedures for
the international ironitoring of human rights, concrete allegations slould be
refuted in concrete terms, therefore circumstantiated replies are needed to
clarify the facts. There is no doubt that an invasion of Iranian territory
was undertaken by rebel Iranian groups in July 1988, and that bloody battles
ensued in towns and villages along the border with Iraq. None the less the
allegations received from several sources, including non—governmental
organizations, and reported in the media, referred to sunnuary executions in
places that were not affected by military operations. Many allegations
contained names, places and dates of supposed executions, and some of them
E/CN.4/1989/ 2 6
page 19
referred to persons arrested long before those events had taken place and to
former prisoners who were rearrested. These allegations deserve to be the
subject of detailed investigation and information from the Government
corcerned, in conformity with international practice. In particular, it may
be expected that the application of the norms on fair trial with respect to
each case should be investigated and the results of that investigation
reported.
69. Independently of the Lotivations behind suninary executions, and even on
the assumption of compliance with the penal norms in force with respect to the
application of capital punishment, suJr rtary executions suggest per Se that
there are flaws or loopholes in the normative system for a fair trial.
Sunmiary executions do not Provide enough time to prepare the defence of the
accused or to present proof, still less do they allow for the examination of
such proof beyond reasonable doubt. Whenever there is a sununary execution the
preliminary presumption is that the norms for a fair trial have been
disregarded or do not exist, Certainly this preliminary presumption may be
dispelled if it is demonstrated that the norms for a fair trial have been duly
applied. The preliminary presumption referred to is one of IIe specific
reasons for the particular interest of the international coimnunity regarding
suninary executions, reflected, inter-alia , in the continuous ncnitoring of
such events by a special rapporteur.
70. The number of political prisoners is another matter of concern. Even on
the basis of official figures, the number is high and has moved high—ranking
of ficers to demand noderated zeal in the application of security means aired
at preserving order and Peace. It seems that there is sane veracity in the
allegations that persons may be gaoled on the basis of mere suspicion of
misdoing or on account of adverse political opinions or political criticism.
In other words, it seelis that there are indeed a number of prisoners of
conscience.
71. the situation of the Baha'is continued to be uncertain. Two meirbers of
the Baha'i coitinunity were reportedly executed in November 1988. AlthOugh the
number of prisoners diminished to around 100 and no new arrests have been
reported since February 1988, there were proofs of harassment and persecution
of those who remained free. Copies of official documents and advertisements
in local newspapers confirmed that the Baha'is continued to be denied access
to universities as well as en loyment. Their frozen or confiscated property
has not been returned to them and their coimnercial licences were removed or
refused, depriving them of their means of livelihood. Concurrent reports
indicated that they were incessantly advised that all hardships would cease as
soon as they recanted their faith.
72. It is not advisable to dismiss any allegation on the nere ground of the
supposed political bias of the source collecting the information. The
collecting or intermediary source may be distinguished from the direct
source. As explained in previous reports, the Special Representative is
primarily interested in individual cases, because the rights enshrined in the
International Covenant on Civil and political Rights are individual rights.
Certainly in evaluating evidence, information collected by independent sources
may, in principle, have more weight than that from compromised ones. In the
cases under consideration, the information was provided by various sources,
such as witnesses with personal experience of the facts, Iranian newspapers,
media from several countries and non—governmental organizations, and they
broadly corroborated each other.
E/(2N. 4/198W26
page 20
73. when introducing his interim report to the Third Coirinittee, the Special
Representative stated that recent political events in the region of the
Persian Gulf could have a positive incidence on the general atriosphere and be
conducive to increasing respect for the effective observance of human rights
in conformity with international requirements and standards. The introduction
highlighted the expectations stemming from the cease—fire between Iraq and the
Is lamic Republic of Iran and welcomed that development. In fact, the
cease—fire was one of the most celebrated international achievements in 1988
and sbould constitute the first step towards a stable and just peace. The
Special Representative again ecpresses his immense satisfaction and deep
appreciation for that development which has rightly been acclaimed by the
international coiauunity. The Special Representative also expects that, under
the new circumstances, the Iranian Government will soon turn its positive
attention to pending human rights problems, as indicated in the official
statement made by its Permanent Representative to the United Nations.
74. It seems that, in order to improve the human rights situation, at both
the legislative and administrative levels, a firm, consistent and enforceable
policy adopted by the highest authorities may be necessary. As an important
part of that policy, investigation of abuse of power at all levels of the
administration and in particular at the level of law enforcement units would
have to be undertaken as a matter of urgency and priority, punishing violators
and compensating victims. Now that the Iranian Government is in a position to
turn its attention to human rights, these grievances may find timely and
pertinent relief.
75. The Special Representative continues to believe that the Islamic Republic
of Iran might benefit from the establishment of a national commission on human
rights, Such a body could be eomposed of independent, competent and
representative personalities, with full guarantees Eor travelling ,
contnunications inside and Outside the country, collection of information,
visits to prisons and prisoners, access to the authorities, exposure to the
media and guaranteed exercise Of independent functions.
76. The Iranian Government may wish to consider the establishment of a
progranune of information on hu ian rights for law enforcement personnel and
take advantage of the technical assistance provided by the Centre for Human
Rights of the United Nations.
77. In order to solve the pending problems regarding the resolutions of the
competent organs of the United Nations the Special Representative considers it
timely and appropriate to plead with the Government of IIe Islamic Republic of
Iran, as a matter of urgency, to take measures such as the following: (a) to
extend full co—operation to the Special Representative for a total fulfilment
of his mandate, including a visit to the country; (b) to investigate all
allegations of human rights violations and to report in detail on the result
of such investigations; (c) to take legislative and administrative steps to
ensure fair trials; (a) to ensure that the prison r gime conforms to
international standards and that prisoners are not subjected to unjustified or
unnecessary hardships; (e) to suppress ill—treatment and torture, during both
investigation and imprisonment ; (f) to limit use of the death penalty strictly
to the nost serious crir s, to exempt from the death penalty those under
18 years of age and to replace punishments involving torture by punishments
compatible with international standards ; and (g) to ensure that a firm policy
of compliance with international instruments on human rights is adopted and
enforced by the highest competent officials.
E/cN. 4/1989/26
page 23.
78. In consclusion, the basic pattern of the human rights situation of the
past few years still prevails, with its essential features, but with changes
here and there. The Special Representative maintains his belief that acts
persist in the Islamic Republic of Iran that are inconsistent with
international instruments on human rights, and that the prevailing situation
in that country justifies international concern, study and constant rronitoting
by the United Nations and its specialized organs such as the Commission Ofl
Human Rights.
Notes
1/ official 1 ecords of the General Assembly, Thirty—seventh Session,
Supplement No. 40 (A/37/40), annex V 1 general comment 7 (16), para. 2.
V Ibid. , general comment 6 (16), paras. 6 and 7.
V Les-droits-de l'honne-en-Islara , International commission of Jurists,
University of Kuweit and Arab Lawyers Union, Report of an international
syn osium held in Kuweit, December 1980, chap. I I, recommendation 36.
j / Official Records of the General Assembjy, Thirty—seventh Session;
Stpp leiSnt No. 40 (A/37/40), annex V . general conunent 7 (16), para. 1.
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 22
Annex
NAMES AND PARTICULARS OF PERSONS ALLEGEDLY EXECUTED IN THE
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN WRING THE PERIOD JULY-DECEMBER 1988
Name Forename Date P lace
ABBASSI A u 12.88 Babol
ABDI Mohazwnad Esmaeil 12.88 Babol
BDOLHOSSEINI Mohsen 11.88 Tebran
ABDOLI KANALI Majid 9.88 Tabriz
ABDOLLABI 11.88 Tehran
ABDOLWII Amir 9.88 Tebran
ABDOLLAHI Abo lhassan 9.88 Tebran
ABDOLVAGHAB 9.86 Tebran
ABEDI t4ostafa 11.88 Anzali
A EDI Abbass 11.88
ADAD—AVAZ Es aat 11.88 Shiraz
ADAB—AVAZ Fatemeh 11.88 Shiraz
ADAB—AVAZ Hossein 11.88 Sbiraz
ADIBI Sjrus 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
M EA l Abo lghassem
AFSHAR 12.88 isfahan
AFSHAR 12.88 Karaj
AESHARLU Afaad 10.88 Tebran (Evin)
AGAE 11.88 Mashhad
AGHA HOSSEINI Reza 9.88 Tebran
AGHAEI Majid 11.86 Bebbahan
AGHAEIAX I Farab 9.88 Tehrafl
AGHAYAN 12.88
AGHAYAN lIIio laziz 12.88 Larestan
AGHVAMI 12.88
AGHVAMI Mehdi Mohammed 9.88 Tehrafl
AEMAD-ZADEH Rezwan
ABMADDI -NAWARA All
ANMADI Ashraf 11.86 Tehran
XdIMADI Fariba 6. 6.88 Isfahan
AMMADI Moha,maad 6. 8.88 Isfahan
ABMADI Hushang 11.88 Hamedan
AHMADI Asieh 9.88 Tehran
AHMADI—NAWARA Me zgin
AMMADZADEH Esma'i i 12.88 Bushehr
AUSANI Davood 11.88 Tehran
?I IU3ARI Mabmood 11.88 Kermanshab
AKBARI Feizo l lah 12.88 Gorgan
AKBARI NAMDAR Gho lam Reza 9.86 Tabriz
AEBARIAN A o1saheb 11.88 Behbahan
AKBARISEFAT Ebrahim 12.88 Karaj
AKBARZAD YOSSEFI Mohaggued Hossein 10.88 Tabriz
E/CN. 4/19b9,2 :
page 23
Name Forename Date place
AKHLAGHI Seyed Mohaiwnad 11.88 Tehran (Evin )
AIQILAGHI Asghar 9.88 Busheht
AL—E-TAHA 11.88
PdAEI—KBASTU Masoud 10.88 Tehran
ALAV I Reza 11.88 Bushehr
ALAVI Reza 12.88 Bushehr
AL l— POO R Hassan 12.88 Shiraz
AL l—POOR Ijossein 12.88 Shiraz
M.IZADEH All 11.88 Babol
ALUKI Ghassem 29.10.88 Tehran (Evin)
ANIN—OL—1UL.IEH Shams 9.88 Tehran (Evin)
AL4IN—OO—DQLEH Shamsi 3. 6.88 Tehran
AMIt4I Masumeb 11.88 Kermanshah
A ICINI—KHAK Masha llah 12.88 Bushehr
AMIRI tthsen 9.88 Arak
AhIIRZ AD I
AMJADI Aidolnasser 12.88 Karaj
AM ZEGAR Reza 1.11.88 Shiraz
MAGHI Majid 9.88 Tebran (Evin )
ABAGHI Bebzad 12.88 Tehran (Evin)
ARBAB TEHRMJI Ghassem 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
ARDALAN 12.88 Hamedan
APDEBIZ,I Mehrdad 9.88 Tehran
A RI AN Mabmud 11.88 Gorgarz
ARIAN Heshmatollab 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
AS ARI 9.88 Karaj
ASADI Nader 11.88 Isfahan
ASA DI A u 12.88 Mashhad
ASGAB -K HANI Majid 9.88 Tebran
ASGAR—S I IABI Zabra 17.11.88 Tehran
ASGARI Abmad 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
ASGABI Aid Reza 10.88 Tehran (Evin)
ASGARI Mansur 11.88 Haoeedan
ASGARI All Reza 11.88 Tehran (gym)
ASGART A u Reza 10.88 Tehran
ASGARIPOOR 9.88 Gorgan
ASGARI—ZADEH Mabmud 11.88 Tehran
ASGEAR—NE OED Esnaei l 9.88 Langarood
ASGLMR-ZADEL Mabmud 11.68 Mzali
ASGHAR—Z I4DEH Farid 12.88 Tehran
ASGEARIPO UR 9.88 Gorgan
ASHRAFI Mohaimaad 12.88
AS HTARI Mehrdad 10.88 Karaj
ASLANI Majid 9.88 Mianeh
ASNA—IiSHARI Akbar 7.11.88 Isfahan
ASQARZADEH vahid 9.88 Tehran
ASSADI—ZADEH 11.88 Tabriz
ASSADPO(JR Jalal 11.88 Tehran
ASSIAZANI EIIOSCO 10.68 Tabriz
ATIGHER— cHI Kama l 25.11.68 zanjan
ATIK Golali
ATTAB-ZADEH Behruz 11.88 Tehran
AYATOLLA—ZADEH Razieh 1.11.88 Tehran
AZAD Mazaher 11.88 Anzali
AZADME HR Safdar 9.88 Karaj
E/Qq. 4/1989/26
page 24
Name rorename Date P lace
AZALI Reza 8.88 Tebran (Evin)
AZAMI Uushang 11.88 Isfahan
AZANI Abdo lrazagh 7.12.88 Shiraz
AZAR k lokhtar 11.88 Shiraz
AZIM—ZaD EB Mehdi 9.88 Tehran
AZMUDEH Mi Reza 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
AZMUDEH LEKAMI Fakhri 12.86 Rasi t
MBA SAB B Biok 8.88 Tebran (Evin)
BABAEI 11.88 Kerman shab
BABA I Beheshteh 11.88 Rasht
BABAKHANI Hasan
BABA1 (H1 NI Hushang 8.88 Tehran
BA B E l Masoud 11.88 Anzali
BA RI Saeid 11.88 Anzali
BABRI Farzan 11.88 Anzali
BABRI Iraj 11.88 Anzali
BADIE I 10.68 Nashad
BADRI Nasser 3.11.88 Oru'nieh
B AGHA I Faribotz .
BAGHER—Z A DE H . Tahereh 10.88 Mashad
BAGHERX Zenab . 11.88 Ahwaz
Ebrahim 11.88 Mashhad
BAGNERI . . Mi 11.88 Anzali
BAGHERI Javad 11.88 Kermanshah
8AGHERI Parvin 12.88 Ahwaz
B AGHERI . 12.88 tIIwaz
BAGHERI TAVA Nezhat 10.88
BAGHI . haiwaad 7.88 Ehoram—Abad
BAHADOR . . Soheila 9.88 Pebran
BAHADORI Ebrahim 12.88 Shiraz
BANMAN-ABADX
BAHNAN—ABADI ,
BAHRA MI 9.88 Pehran (Evin)
11.88 Tehran
BAKUSHI . Majid 9.88 Hamedan
BAKHT—AVM 11.88
BALA'I Taber 12.88
BANANI Abdoihossein 11.88 Tebran
BANI AMERI ahim 9.88 Kataj
BANI JANGALU Abmad 3.11.88 Orunileb
BANI—ANERIMi Reza 9.88 Kataj
BANIRI A b dol—Sattar 9.88 Isfahan
BAQA'I Shahin 11.88 Shiraz
BAQE,RZADEE Nasrin 10.88 Tehran
BARADARAN 12.88 Quchan
BARANI Mehrdad 9.88 Boroojerd
BARABI Shamsi 11.88 Mashhad
BAMPI Mohsen 9.88 Mashhad
8ARATI jtaba 9.88 Mashhad
BARAZANDEH Masumeh 9.88 Gachsaran
BARZ—ABADI 9.88 Tebran (Evin)
BAYAT 9.88 Arak
BAZARGAN Beghar . Tebrari
BAZARGANI 10.88 Kermanshah
BAZZAZ Tal ier 9.88 Tehran
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 25
Name Forename Date place
BEEBOODI A u Akbar 9.88 Rasht
BEHESHTI Hu n 10.88 Tehran
BEHNAN—ZADEH Behruz 10.88 Tehran
BEUZADI Manouchehr
BEUZADI Mostafa 10.88 Tehran
BEIK -ALI A u Ajcbar 6. 8.88 Tebran (Evin)
BIABA1 AKI Behnam 9.88 Seaman
BIDARIAN Bahram 12.88 Karaj
BIDGOLI Mohsen
BIGDELI Mehrdad 11.88 Labijan
BIGDEL.I Mehrdad 11.88 Lahijan
BIJAN—YAR Zahra 11.88 Karaj
(Gohardasht)
BIJANI Akbar 9.88 Karaj
BIK—MOjff 1 MADI Noharwi ad Reza 9.88 Tebran
BIKU—EQBAL Fatemeh—Zahra 12.88 Tebran
BQO—INX Kameran 11.88 Tebran
B OO— t N t Kjctctars 11.88 Tehrafl
BOODAGHI Nosratol lab 11.68 Hamedan
BORDBAR 12.88 Fassa
BOSTARX Ghassem 10.88 Arak
BOZORG RASHID Manuchehr 11.88 Karaj
BOZQRG—BASHAR Manuchehr 8.89 Lahijan
BU SH EH E I A u 16.12.88 Tehran (Evin)
B(JZAR—Jc* IEI3RI Hashem 25. 11.08 Tehran (Evin)
CHAHA —BASHLU Yazdan 9.88 Tebran
CHAHMDAH CHERIK Cholam 9.88 Cact i—Saran
CHAMAN Behzad 11.88 Rasht
CaANGIZI Fariba 12.88 Shiraz
CREHRI Zabihoflab 9.88 Karaj
CHENARI Aoeir 12.88 Tehran
CH 1 AGHI Rabman 9.88 Tehran
cHGHRI Sobbatolla 9.88 Karaj
CBOOBDM 11.88 Tel -iran
CHUB IYAN Kurosh 12.88 Tehran (Evin)
DABB ACH MohaimBad 30. 7.88 Khorrata Abad
DADGAR Farzad
DALIRI 11.88 Raslit
DAL.IRI Massoud 9.88 Tehrafl
DANAEI Mohanaad Ebrahim 9.88 Seaman
DANESH Abiliad
DANIALI Sa'id 12.88 Tetiran
DAR—AFARI Reza 9.88 Lahijan
DARABI Masoud 11.88 Gorgan
DARIABARI 9.88 Tehran (Evin)
DARYARI Mebdi 9.88 Fassa
DARYEKBAl DI Assado l lah
DAVOOD-ZADEB 11.88 Rasht
DAVOODI Hossein 11.88 Babel
DAV00 0I Moharilnad—Taqi 9.88 Tehran
DEGARAN Behrooz 12.88 t4ashad
DEHNADI Abmad 11.88 Tehran
DEHNADI fladi 9.88 Tehran
DELKASH Faramarz 9.88 Karaj
DERAKHSHANI—NIA Mehri 11.88 Tehrafl
E/ . 4/1989/26
page 26
Name Forename Date Place
DEzFuLr y Ramin 7. 10.88 Tebran
DIA 1 AT Chassetifi 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
DI?.RI 12.88 Fassa
WLAT—ABADI 11.88 Sabzevar
DOLAT—ABADI 11.88 Sabzevar
IAT—A 13ADI 11.88 Sabvezar
DOLATI NODEH Ramazan liii 12.88 Gorgan
DOLATI WDEII Ghaflbar 12.88 Gorgan
DtXST—MDU1&t(&Ot Ramid 10.88 Semnan
WROOD MobaIwaad 11.08 Karaj
EBBAHIM—POOR All Akbar 25.10.88 Gorgan
EBRAHIMI 11.88 Shabrood
EBRAHIMI Sadigheb 11.88 Shiraz
EBRAHIMI flassan 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
EBRAHIMI A u 2.12.88 tebran (Evin )
EBRAHIMI Siamak 11.88 Karaj
EBRAHIMI 10.88 Isfahan
EBRAHIMI 12.88 Fassa
EBRAHIMI garuid 12.88
EBRAHIMI ijadi 12.88
EBRAHIMI GUDARZI Azizolla 10.88 Boroujerd
EDAIJAT }Josein 9.88 Tebran
EDAREH 11.88 Shiraz
EDAREH 11.88 Shiraz
EFTEKHARI Hohaimi ad Reza 10.88 Tehran
EGHBALI NIkMIN Nemat 9.88 Karaj
(Chezelhesar)
E INOL — YAG HIN Zohreh 13.12.88 Tehran (Evin)
EIVAZ—ZADEH 25. 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
EIVAZ—ZADEB 25.11.88 Tehran (Evin)
EKHTIARI 11.88 Kerend
EKRAMI Beza 10.88 Zanjan
EKRAMI pshinad 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
EKZIA Mina 10.88 Tehran (Evin)
EMMiI $eyed Taher 9.88 Tehran
EMP.D1 CHASHMI Seyed Rojatollah 12.88 GhaeTR—Shahr
I4ehrdad 11.88 Tebran
E W4I Saeid 11.88 Tebran
EMAMI aeid 10.88 Tehran (Evin)
EMAMI Akbar 6. 8.88 Isfahan
EMA}4I i4ohauinad 10.88 Tehran (Evin)
ENT EZARI Mina 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
ENTEZARI j2arshia 9.88 Tehran
ESFANDIARI flrshad 9.88 Tehran
ESFANDIARI Mostafa 9.88 Tehran
ESKANDAR TAZKIEHEI Mitra 12.88 Tehran
ESKANDARI yariborz 10.88 iIIwaz
ESMAEIL—ZADEH I aSu1 10.88 Tehran
ESMAEIL.I 11.88 Kermanshah
ESMABILI Saber 9.86 Tehran
ESL lAEILIAN 12.88 Isfahan
ESMAIL— ZADEH tzahmat
ESMAIL—ZADER Oadi'e
ESSMAEIL—ZArJEH assan 11.88 Babolsar
ETRAK Farrokh—Zad 8.88 Isfahan
E/0L4/1989/26
page 27
Name Forename Date Place
ETRAK Farhad 8.88 Tehran (Evin)
FADAEI Ashraf 9.88 Tebran (Evin)
FADAEI—NIA Farhang 1. 8.88 Ahwaz
FAICHAR 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
FM 1 ABATI Zahra 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
FALLAH Sirus 12.88 Pwiol
FAIJLAB Reza 11.88 Tehran
FANI Mehrdad 11.88 Tehran
FARAHaAND Mohainnad 23.11.88 Shiraz
FARARMAND Gila 12.88 Shiraz
FM A3—PWR Sijan 13.12.88 Shiraz
FARA.YI Mabmud 10.88 Varamin
FA1 A JI t4abmud 10.88 Tehran (Evin)
FARIAD—ABADI Hassan 9.88 Tabriz
FARIDI Mussa 11.88 Semnan
FARIG HI Sosan
FARJAD—AZAD Mehrdad
FATEMI Hossein 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
FATEMI $eyed Mohirgiiad 9.88 Behbahan
PATH—AL l Nayereb 9.88 Tebran
FAOE I Avaz 10.88 Varamifl
FATW [ Mussa 9.88 Rudsar
FATHI Abbass 12.88 Tebran
FATHI Vazir 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
FATHI Hossein 9.88 Tehran
FATHOLLAHI Hojatolla 8.88 Kermanshah
FATTAMI aa la l 11.88 Tehran
FAYAZPOUR Reza 19.11.88 Rhoram—Abad
FEIZ Shahriar 9.88 Tebran
FEIZ—ABADI Hassan 11.88 Tehran
FEIZ—MADI S ssein 11.88 Tebran
FEIZ—P.BADI Z lohaum iad 12.88 Sabzevar
FIRUZI Abbass 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
FORGEANIAN Hassan 11.88 Bandar Abbass
FORMGAH Majid 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
tRUZAt4DEH Said 10.88 liafshejan
Shahr—Kord
FREYDOOWI Mebdi 11.88 Karaj
GARMrnJDI l4anuchehr 10.88 Arak
GRADIANI Madam 9.88 Tehran
G HADIANI MOjt4ba 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
GHADLANI Siamak 9.88 Tebran
GRADIRI 9.88 Tabrjz
GHAFPARI Saeid 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
G HAFOUR I A u 9.88
GHAFOtJRI Reza 9.88
GHAEAR—POOR 12.88 AJT I0 I
GHAHREMA}II 11.88 Mashhad
GRAUREMANI Bijan 12.88 Ahwaz
GHALA—VAND Javad 12.88 Ahwaz
GUALAM—BOR Rossein 10.88 Tehran (Evin)
GHALAMBOR ifiosse in
GHANBARI Babman
GRANBARI Hushang 11.88
GHANBARI Shahnaz 10.88 Masjed Soleiwian
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 28
Name Forena me Date Place
GHANBARI Hushang 11.88 Kerman
GRANOHARI Manuchebr 11.80
GHANDI sassan
GHANIMATI Mojtaba 10.68 Te l -iran (Evin)
GHAWIMATI—OL—Kt RIZI s i m m 11.88 Tebran
GHASHGIIAEI t4orad 11.80 Tehran (Evin)
GHASHGMAEINq Asghar 11.88 Tehrafl
GHASRGHAEIAN Reza 11.88 Tebran
GHASSEMI 3.11.88 Orumieb
CHASSEMI All Reza 10.88 Arak
GH/ SSEMI sa l man 10.88 Tabriz
GHASSEMI Ramin 23.10.88 Rasht
G I IASSEMI 12.88 Tehran
CHAVAMI Taher
CHAZI TIBATABASI Masoud 10.88 Tebran (Evin)
GHIASVAND Seyfo llab
GHOSADIAN Hamid 11.88 Tehran
CHOBADIAN 11.88 Tebran
GHOBADXAN 11.88 Tebran
GHOLPsMI 30. 7.88 Salmnas
GHOLAMI 11.88 Orumieh
GUOLP 4 MI A l -i 9.88 Tebran
GHOLAMI cHWHKI samad 9.88 Tabriz
GHOLI—POOR 11.88 Ghaem—Shahr
GHOLI—POJR Mabmud 9.88 Zanjan
GHOMIAN Bebrooz 9.88 Tehran
GHORBAt4I Ahinad 3.11.88 Orumieb
GHORZISHI Mahin 9.88 Tebran
GHOREYSHI Davo ud
GHOSSI Yassin 11.88 Bandar ?bbass
GOLABI Mahfl100d 8. 1.88 Isfahan
GOLBARG Babran 9.88 Karaj
GOLC}IIAN Mohaomiad 11.88 Ghaem-.Shahr
GOLCHIN A U 11.88
COLCHTN Khadijeh 11.88 Karaj
GOUOHMNADi 10.88 Hafshejan
Shahr—Kord
GOLPYGANI Mohaiwnad 11.68 Semnan
G DARZ I Minu 23.11.88 Shiraz
GOODARZI ShakIIaz 23.11.88 Shiraz
GORGIN Yossef 11.88 Gorgan
GORJ AN I
GORJI Khosro 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
C O R a l—N r A Javad 11.88 Bandar (Anzali)
GRA I 4I 12.88 Isfahan
GiJDARZI Kiomars 10.88 Arak
GURAN nadi 9.88 Karaj
HABIB—RAD 9.88 Tebran (Evin)
HADI—PWR Seyed Hamid 9.88 Abwaz
(Shamosodin)
HADIAN Hamid Reza 10.88 Tebran (Evin)
RA]X [ KNANLU Amir Husang 9.88 Tehrafl
HAGH-BAOEN Gho larn
HAGH—SHENASS Abbass 11.88 Shiraz
HAGHI MANIE Hamid 10.88 Tabriz
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 29
Name Forename Date P lace
HAGH IGHAT-4 U Hossein 3. 8.88 Teh ran
HAGHIGMI Monazar 9.88 Tebran (Evin)
I3AGH IGNIIN Mi Naghi 11.88 Rasht
NM SAMADI Mi Reza 12.88 Tebran
HAJI ALT Mahbubeb 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
HAJI ISFANA I JARRc*1I 12.88 Shi.raz
HAJI ISFARANI JAHROMI 12.88 Shiraz
HAJI ISFAUAfrI JABR 4I 12.88 Shiraz
HMI ISFABANI JA RROMI 12.88 Shiraz
HAJI MOHANMADI Habib 12.88 Babol
HAJI MOHAI4MADI Hazaher 12.88 Babol
HMIAX4 Liii 9.88 Tebran
BAJIZADEH Leila (Sediqeh) 9.88 Tebran
RAKOE II Shabriar 11.88 Tehran
HAKIMI t j, o 12.88 Shiraz
HANEDARI Farhad 8.88 Kerend
HAMID—ZADEN 11.88 rehran (Evin)
Fereshteh 9.88 Tebran
HA14 1D 1 Sohei la 9.88 Tehran
3.11.88 Oruinieh
HANJ NEJAD M.i 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
HANZEH LUIAN Mohaninad 9.88 Arak
HAQVERDI All 9.88 Tebran
HARIRI Abmad 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
HAR m Jafar 26.11.88 Tehran
HARIRI Mansur 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
HARIRI Mohsen 11.88 Rasht
HARIRI Yagnoob 11.88 Zanjan
HABIRI Masoud 12.88 Mashhad
HARIRI Masoud 10.88 Tehran
HARIRTAN Hamid 11.88 Rasht
HARIRIAN Hamid 10.88 Tebran (Evin)
HASHEMI Jafar (Hadi) 8.88 Masbad
}JASHEMI Jamshid 9.88 Isfaban
HASHEMIAN Nina 10.88 Kermanshah
HASHEMIAN Abo lfaz l 9.88 Qazyin
EASIU -PAR Nebd I
HASSAN ABADI t4ehdi 9.88 Mashhad
HASSA2 1t-ZADSH Chassem 9.88 Langarood
HASSANI Davood 9.38 Tehran (Evin)
HASSM4I Mohannad 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
HASSM 1I Mohamaa Taghi 9.88 Tebran
BASSANI PAR Mehdi 11.88 Tehran
HASSANI—ZADEjI Eandd Reza 12.88 Tehran
HATAMI Hedayotta lah
HhTAMI Amir 9.88 Tebran
HAVARESHIAN Ghodsi 12.88 Tehran
HAYDA3I Zafar
HAZAL—UJ Mohannad 10.88 Arak
BE1DASD ST iamed 12.88 Tehrari
HEIDARI 31. 7.88 Mashad
HEIDARI Mebdi 9.88 Karaj
HE IDARI Mohaninad 9.88 $hiraz
HEIDARI Seifollab 11.88 Ahwaz
HEID IiRI 11.88 Mnol
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 30
Name Forename Date Place
HEIDARX—NEJAD Karim 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
HEJAZI Seyed Reza 11.88 Babolsar
HEHMATI 9.88 Semnan
HEMMATI 9.88 Seninan
HEMMATI Aghdass 11.88 Tehran
HEMMATI 11.88 Teliran
HESSAZ4I Seifo l lah 8.88 Ahwaz
HESSAMI Seifo l lah 11.88 Ahwaz
HOMAYON Parviz 10.88 Zanjan
Ha4AYOONI—RAD Najid 9.88 Qazvin
HcOSRMAND Anin 11.88 Shiraz
HOE Mabmood 12.88 Ramsar
I SEINI Hassan 12.88 Bushehr
HOSEINI Nasrollab 9.88 Karaj
I IDSEINPOOR Qo lam 12.88 Bushehr
HOS$EIN—ZADEH blanuchebt 11.88 Sebbahan
HOSSEINI Parviz 9.88 Gach—Saran
HOSSEINI Habib 10.88 Tehran
LESSE INI Mohanujad Hossein 9.88 Tehran (Evin)
HOSSEINI Seyed EsmaeU. 9.88 Tehran
BDSSEINPOUR shafi
MuSHI Mabmud 14. 9.88 Tabriz
HUSHMAND Jafar 1.1.88 Tebran
I GEHE I k4ostafa 9.88 Tehran
IMANI LWDSH—KHU Majid 11.88 Lahijan
INAGNI Yar—Aba*ad 9.88
ISLI IMBUL—cuI Hainid 11.88 Mashhad
ISLA I4I Parab 11.88 11am
JABBARI Freydoon 25.11.88 Zanjan
JABBARIAN 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
JABBARIAN 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
JAFFA I 10.88 Mashad
JAFFA RI Moharani Mi 11.88 Rasht
JAHAN—BAXHSH Ebrahim 11.88 Behbahan
JABfl4I 9.88 Tebran
JALALI Hasan
11.88 Zanjan
JALALI Kheiro l lah 9.88 Tehran
JALA L I Karin 12.88 Tehran
JALALIAN 12.88 Qazv n
JALALIAN A u 11.88 Hagedan
JALILI 9.88 Lahijan
JAMAL ! Mobsen 9.88 Shahrood
OEMS BID I Faramarz 9.88 Tebran
JANG—ZADEH Mab lnood 9.88 Tehran
JARAF—ZADEH Mabmud 29. 7.88 Khoy
JAVAN Mohauraad 9.88 Teran
JAVAN SHOJAA Chassem Tehran (Evin)
JAVANI Akbar 12.88 Gohardasht
JAVIDFAR 3a ar
JAVIDNIA Mas'ood 9.88 Karaj
JAZAIQI 9.88 ‘rebran
JER Farhad 12.80 Tehran
JESTAN Robert 9.88 Tehran
JODAT Hossein
E/04. 4/1989/26
page 31
Name Forename Date Place
KABIR—ROSSEINI Amir Afshar 9.88 Tehran (Evin)
KABRIZI Syrous 9.88 Karaj
KAKA—SOLTANI Feizo llah 12.38 Noshahr
KALA 1 AKI Kamal 12.88 Tebran (Evin)
KALANTA R I Hamea 9.88 Karaj
KA}4AL 1 Mojgan 9.88 Tebran
Sedigheb 12.88 Tebtan (Evin)
KN4ERANI MIHANI Rushang 11.88 Kerman
KANI 12.88 tebran (Evin)
KARANI Jamshid 6.12.88 Skiiraz
KABBALEX PJObass 16.12 88 Tebran ( vin)
KARIMI Shahriar 9.88 Tehrafl
Kfll.IMI Mansur 12.88 Shahr—e—Kord
KARIMI Sadegh 9.88 Tehran
KARIMIAN 29.11.88 Tebran
KAR IMIAN 29.11.88 Tehran
KARIMIAN 11.88 pehran
KARIMIAN 11.88 Pehran
KASEBN Morteza 9.88 Semnan
KASHANI Ghojain Reza 9.88 Arak
KASHANI Kiooears 9.88 Karaj
KASLIANI PLGUDI%M Gl o1am Reza 9.88 Tehrarl
KASSEU GNA E haninad 11.88 Astaneh—P.shr
Afieh
KAYHANI Farangis 9.88 Tehrafl
KAYKAVUS SI Farideb 9.88 Ahwaz
KAYKUAM Samad 12.88 Shiraz
KAYVA Iq—FAR oamshid 11.88 Tehran
KAYVAM Farangis 25.11.88 Tehran
KAZAZ I Hassan 9.88 Tehran
KAZEMIZADEH Mobsen 12.88 Nashhad
KEBRITI Hamid Reza 11.88 Tehran
KEIKAVUSSI Nahid 12.88 Ahwaz
KERAMATI Mohan mnad 9.88 Tehran
KESHAVARZ 9.88 Gach—Saran
KESHAVARZ Gholam Hassan 9.88 Shiraz
KESHAVARZ 11.88 Karaj
( Cheze lhesar)
KEl FAR Hassan 10.88 Tehran
KEYVANI Iraj 10.88 Hafshejan
Shahr—Kord
EJIADEMI Majid 10.88 Isfahan
KHAKSAR Abbas 9.88 Karaj
KHAKSAR Fosieh 9.88 Kermanshah
KNALM A u 9.88 Qazvin
KHALEGHI Hassan 9.88 Tebran
KHALF I Mobsen 9.88 Tebran
KHAI4ENEH KhoSrO 11.88 Tebran
KuANi4OHN 4ADI Mohanvrtad 11.88 Kermanshah
KHAS 1OU Massoud Afla'i 11.88
KUAT I D I
KHATIBI 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
KHATIBI flamid 9.88 Tebran
KHEYRIEM S FAEI Simm 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
KHODA DADI Bebnam 12.88 Babol
KHODA-PARAST
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 32
Name Forename Date Place
KHODhPABASTI Hosein 8.88 Chaloos
KHQLD 1 Wosrat 11.88 Pebran
KHONSARI Hassan 10.88 Tebran
KH A—BARKS I1T Sobrab 9.88 Karaj
KH SH GOFTI R Hussein 9.88 Tebran
KUORRAMI Noor—od—din 11.88 11am
KHORSANDX Saeid 9.88 Kermanshah
KNORSHID—VA SH Abbass 11.88 Hamedan
KH OSH—SALIG 1 IEH Ma liheh 11.88 Anzali
KHOSHBIJEI Saiedeh 11.88 Shiraz
KHOSHBUE I Siavash 11.88 Shiraz
KHOSEB(JEI Susan 11.88 Shiraz
KIESRAVANI Mehdi 11.88 Tebran
KHOSBAVAEI Mebdi 11.88 Busbehr
KIESRAVI bait 9.88 Tebran
1(HOS1 J MADI Abbass 11.88 Tebran
KHOSRO ABAD X Mansureb 11.88 Tebran
KHOSI D MADI Tayebbeh 11.88 Tehran
XHOSRQ—ABADX Abbass 6.11.88 Tehran
K13G ROVh 1 1 9.66 Tehian
KIA Z Jcbar 11.88 Kord—kul
K IA— A I IM AD I Ezzato l la 9.88 Kordkuy
KIA—AHMADI Vahid 9.88 Gorgan
KIA—MMADI Vajio lla 9.88 Gorgan
KIAEI Mabbubeb 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
KlAN— POOR 12.88 Shiraz
KIANI 12.88 Tebran (Evin)
KOLAI I—GH OCHX Rabmat
1 (00HZ Abbass A u 12.88 Tabriz
ROOHSARI Moharmuad A u 11.88 Mashhad
KORD—JAZI Esmaeil (Behzad) ii.ii.aa sari
KORD—ROSTM II Mohaagnad Reza 9.88 Tebran (Evin)
KUHI 30. 7.88 Salmas
LARI LAVASANI Masoud 9.88 Tebran
IJ SHGPjRX Jafar 12.88 Mashhad
LATIF—POOR 12.88 Shiraz
LATIFI Mojgan 10.88 Tehran
LOLAEI Majid 12.88 Shira
WRAKI Rahman 10.88 Ahwaz
12.8 tetahart
MAABOODI Ezzat 11.88 Tebran
M .DIBEIGI Behzad 9.88 Karaj
MAHIGIR Hossein 10.88 Arak
MAHOE3ANI Jafar 9.88 Sari
MAHJUB Hamzeh 10.88 Rudsar
ffl IAHMOODI Gholam A u 12.88 Shiraz
MAHM000I Abmad 9,88 Tehran
MAHM 000I—FAR 11.88 Kermansbah
PANAHANDEH lt,88 Kermanshah
ROODARI 11.88 Kermanshah
KAFFASH—POOR 11.88 Kermanshah
HUSHANGI 11.88 Kermanshah
FALLANIK 11.88 Kerraanshah
FARAJ—POOR 11.88 Kermanshah
ABEDI Kazem 11.88
E/CL 4/1989/26
page 33
Name Forename Date Place
MP.HMUDI Abdo l—Ahad 3.11.88 Tehran (Evin)
MAUMUDI Sasan 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
MAUMUDI Nabjuud 10.88 Ramedan
MAJANI A o1 Rasul 15.11.88 Tehran (Evin)
MAJAZI Mohatioead Reza 9.88 Tehran
MAJD—ABADI Reza 10.88 Arak
MAJDI Asghar 11.86 Tehran
MAJNUN MOHM4MADI Asghar 11.88 Tel-iran (Evin)
MAZIANI Gbolam Reza 12.88 Dezfu i
MALEKI Assad 9.88 Karaj
MAI EKI Sbaa 11ah 11.88 Kermanshah
MALEKI 12.86
MALEKUTI Mansur 6. 8.88 Istahan
MANSOURI Nasser 9.66 Tebran
MANSURI 11.88 Mashhad
MAl SURI 12.88 Shiraz
MANSURIAN Kama l—o—din 23.11.88 Shiraz
MA RAN U I
MARA}IDI Majid 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
MARDFAR Soleiman 12.68 Te l-iran
MARDOMI Jairishid 9.88 Tabriz
MASHHADI EBRABIM Hossein 11.88 Karaj
(Go hardasht)
MARIVANI Mehrdad 11.88 Tebran
MASHOUF Majid 9.68 Tehran
M ASOUD I Masoud 25.11.88 Zanjan
MASSIIiA LANGAROODI Manijeh 10.88 Langarood
MASSIBI Parviz 9.88 Gach—Saran
MASSIM Parviz 9.88 Shiraz
MASUMI Raid Reza 8.68 Borujerd
MASUMI Hassan 9.88 Te l - iran
MAZAHER Ebrahim 12.88 Tehran
MAZAJIERI Saeid 30.10.88 Isfahan
MAZRUEI 9.88 Rasht
MEHO I—ZADEB 10.88 Rudsar
MEBDI—ZADEB Farhad 11.88 Tebran
MEHRABI &hsen 10.88 Gorgan
I4EHRPANAH Mashalab
MEMAR Akbar 11.88 Shiraz
MIR BAGHERI Seyed Esmaeil 21.11.88 Tehran (Evin)
MIR JAFARI Farshad 11.88 Tehrafl (Evin)
M IR—ESMARLI Zohreh 11.68 Tebran
MIR—KARIMI Reza 11.88 Gorgan
MIR—MOHAMMADI Sayed Morteza 11.88 Pehran
MIR—MOHAfl IAD I Seyed Aghil 12.88 Tehrafl
MIR—MOHAMMADI Mehdi LQ.88 Tehran (Evin)
MIR—MORADI Monireh 12.88 Ahwaz
MIR—SEYEDI Hamid 12.88 Tehran (Evin)
MIRAB—ZADEB Mobsen 11.68 Tehran (Evin)
MIRHADI Siamak 11.88 Gorgan
MIRHADIAN Kiooroars 9.88 Tehran
MIRZA—MOHA iMADI Mirza Mohaumiad 11.88 Arak
MIRZA—ZADEH 11.88 Tebran
MIRZADE}I 9.88 Karaj
MIRZAEI Hossejn 8.88 Tehran
E/CN. 4/1989/26
page 34
Name Forename Date Place
MIRZAEI Mostafa 27.10.88 Tebran
MIRZAEI Shahnaz 9.88 Hamedan
MIRZAEI Maswneh 11.88 Tebran
MIRZAEI Reza 11.88 Tehran
NXRZAEI Zahra 12.88 Ahwaz
MIZPNI Faradjollah
MOADAS Hassan 12.88 Estehbanat
MOBARAKI TEHRAN All 11.88 Tebran
tODP Rt LSSI 11.88 tstat av at
MOEIN 9.88 Tebran
M OE IN I Parvin 9.88
MOE INI 12.80 Shiraz
MOEZZI liassan 10.08 Tabriz
MOGADDAM Kiotoars 11.68 Kermanshah
MOGHADDAM Nazar 10.88 iIIorram Abad
MOGNBELI Farshid (Farid) 1.12.88 Tebran (Evin)
MOGIWI CHAGNER VMJD Parvin 9.88 Khoram—OEad
MOHAJER Keywan
MOHAJER Hamid Reza 9.88 Tehran (Evin)
MOHAMADI Mokhtar
MQIWtAD TA llER NAJJAR Saeed 13.12.80 Tehran (Evin)
MOUMIMAD—WEJAD Jamal. 10.88 Ahwaz
MOHAfl AD—ZADEli Raf at
MOHAMM?,D—ZP,DEH ,3auia l 11.66 Ramhormoz
MOHM IMADI hbdo lhagh
MOHAfflIMADI 9.88
MOHAMMADI Shahnaz 9.88
MOIiAt4MADI Mariam 8.11. 88 Tehran
MORM4MADI Moharwnad Reza 8.11.88 Tebran
MORAIQ4ADI Yaghoob 16.12.88 Tebran (Evin)
MOHAMMADI Gholam Reza 12.08
MOHANMADI Mob sen 11.88 Isfahan
MOHAMMADI ZADEH 11.88 Kermanshah
MOHAMMADIAN Nader 6. 8.88 isfak an
MOIWIMADIVAR Mehri 9.68 Tebran
MOHAW4ADZADEH Saber
MOHARRAMI Kazem 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
MOHEBIA1 Mina 7.88 Tehran
MOHEBIAN MinOo 7.88 Tebrart
MOHRCHIN Emran 9.88 Pehran
MO I ISEWI Mobsen 11.88 Behbahan
MOJAHEDNIA Mas'ood 9.88 Karaj
MOJAVER AGHILI Bossein 11.88 Kord—Kui
t4OKHTAR—ZPiDEU Soheila 10.88 Karaj
(Gohardasht)
NOKYAWDI Bfjan 10.88 Ahwaz
MOLKI Saeid 1.11.88 Shiraz
MOLLA—ABBASS ISFAHANI Masoud 12.88 Tebran
MONEM 9.88 Tehcat
MOODARESS KNIALI Mendi 13.12.88 Tebran (Evin)
MOQBELI MasOo d 12.88 Tehran
MORADI Ghavam 23.11.88 Shiraz
MORIDI Manzar 9.88 Tehran
MOROVAJ Mohatroead 11.88 Tetttafl
MOROVATI t4ohaxwaed Mabi 27. 7.88 Tebran
E/CN.4/1989/26
page 35
Name Forename Date Place
MORTp , AVI 9.88 Rasht
MO S AV A I Gu ild 24.11.88 Gorgan
MOSAVAT Mobsen 12.86 Bushehr
MOSLEHI Mansureh 11.88 Tebran
MOSL 4I Abbass 8.88 Qazvin
MO INdED Fereshteh 11.88 Rasht
MOTTAGHI—TALAB Arair 11.88 Rasht
MOTTAGHI—TALM Basbid 11.88 Rasht
MOUSAVI Ashraf 9.88 Tebran
MOVN IEDI Masoud 9.88 Arak
MUSSA—POOR Babman 3. 8.88 Tebran
MUSSAVI 10.88 Arak
MUSSAVI Mabmud 11.88 Shakir—KOrd
NADERI Hossein
NADERI Abdollaffi 11.88 11am
NADIMI Javad 9.88 Karaj
NAEIM t haninad Reza 10.88 Tebran
NAFISSI Shahtiar 11.88 Tehran
NAFTI 9.88 Takistan
NAGHI—NEJAD Mojtaba 11.88 Tehran
NAGHI—PWR Gholara—Reza 10.88 Mashhad
NAJAF—ABADI Faterueb 9.88 Tehran
NA.JAFI 9.88 Kerend
N I4JAFI Mahtaj 9.88 Kerend
NAJAFUBADI FaIIo l lah Oraid 11.86
Abmad 11.88 Tebran
NAI4AJ( IM liassan 9.88 Arak
NAf4DAR Farah 11.88 Arak
NA IDAR Hossein 25. 9.88 Arak
NA}4DARI Shabrokh 11.88 Masjed—Soleiman
NAMVAR Self—co—din 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
NPQOI Moha waed Bafj 9.88 Tehran
NASERI Manuchehr 9.88 Tebran
NASRI drat 9.88 Tehran
NASSAJ MaFmjud 10.88 Mashhad
NPJSSERI flavood 11.88 Tehran
NASSIR
NASSIR—MG I-IADAM Saba 6.11.88 jIIoram—Abad
NAZARI Hamzeh 11.88 Rasht
NAZEMI A u (Yadollab) 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
NAZIRt KhosrO 10.88 Karaj
(Gheze lhe sat)
NEJAT Seyed Hossein 12.88 Tebran
NE I 4A T—BAKUSH 12.88 Isfahan
NEZAN—ZA DEB 9.88 Shiraz
NEZN4PASAND Hassan 12.88 Karaj
NIAKAN Hossein 12.88 Tehran
NIK—KAR Mohannad 11.88 Tehran
NIK—KHAH FiroOz 9.88 Zanjan
NIK—P R Homayoon 3. 8.88 Tebran
NIKHAM A u 23.11.88 Shiraz
NIKKHAH Alt 12.88
NIKPOUR All Asghar 9.88 Shiraz
NIKUPOOR DEIL iMI A u Asghar 12.88 Shiraz
NILGHAZ fIIelrol lah 9.88 Tebran
E/cN. 4/1989/26
page 36
Name Forename Date Place
NIROOMAND Hajuid 11.68 Kazeroon
NOBARI 12.88 Borujero
NOOR Mahnaz 10.88 Tebran (Evin)
NOOfl Ghodratollah 11.88 Tehran
NOORI Jalal 11.88 Karaj
(Che ze the sar)
NOQRI Moha lM ad 10.88 Tehran (Evin)
NOORI Sbahrokh 11.88 ltrak
NOQfl Mahnaz 11.88 Tehran
NOORI Mmad 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
NOORI Mel 9.88 Tehran
NOORI All 9.88 Tebran
NOPARVAR Moha!&aad 11.88 Gorgan
NOROOZI Esmaei l 10.88 Tebran
NOROOZI Kazem 10.88 Tehran
NORT JZI Nasser 11.88 Tehran
NOSRATI Farzin 11.88 Karaj
(Gohardasht)
NOSRA'fI Farzin 12.88 ehran (Evin)
NURBAKHSH 10.88 Tebran
OMIDI 12.86 Fassa
c* IUMI Fariba 13.12.88 Tehran (Evin)
ONSORI Zahra 12.88 Ahwaz
PAHLEVAN NESHAN ltstafa 9.88 Tebran
PAMLEVAN NESHAN Mebdi 9.88 Tehran
PAKBAZ 9.88 tehran
Ffl4ABI Mehrdad 9.68
PANJEESHAHI 9.3.88 Tehran
PARISUZ 11.88 semnan
PARSA Mobaritaa 11.88 Behbahan
PASHA Mohanauad 10.88 Tebran
PEGEMAN ribbanruad A u 11.86 Karaj
(Gohardasht)
PIRI Mobsen 10.88 Arak
PIRNEJAD Husbang 3.11.68 Orumieb
PIR%JZRAN Safar All 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
PU L—CHI Z lah inud 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
POOR—HASHEM Abinad 10.88 Rasht
P R—MIRZA Aria 12.88 Karaj
POOR—NASSIR Saber 11.88 Anzali
P R-NOROOZ Behzad 9.88 Karaj
(Gohardasht)
POORRAZI 11.88 Mashhad
POOR—SALEHI Abbass 11.88 Tetiran (Evin)
POOR—SARPOLI Reza 10.88 Rudsar
P STINCHI 12.88 Quchan
PUROLHOSSEflI zia—O—Din 9.88 Shiraz
QAHREMARI Mo stafa 9.88 Tebran
QANREMANI b lorteza 9.88 Tebran
QAJPIR Mohaumiad All 25. 11.88 Tebran
QOLANI Parvin 9.88 Tehrafl
QQL NI Nayyer 9.88 Karaj
QOREISHI Moharmoad 9.88 Tehran
QOREISHI Mobsen 9.88 Tehran
QOREISHI Seyyed—Abrnad 9.88 Tehran
E/2i. 4/19 9/
page 37
Name Forename Date Place
RADJAIMAND Mohaimiad
RAT 4ANESH Asghar 9.88 Karaj
RADMANESH Hoiria 9.88 Ahhwaz
RAnt aahram 9.68 ‘rehran
RAEBARI Cholam 11.88 Shiraz
RAHBMtI Mehrdad 12.88 Fassa
RAHI &stafa 11.88 Tehran
RAHIM—ZADEL Mojtaba 10.88 Isfahan
RA I IIMI 30. 7.88 Salmas
RAHIMI Abmad 3.11.88 Salmas
RAHIMI 12.88 Fassa
RAHIMI Hassan 10.88 Karaj
PJIJ(AN 9.88 Tehran
RABMANIAN Madam 12.88 Shiraz
RA1 It4ATI Abdol Rahinan 11.88 Karaj
RAHMATI Abotfateb 22.11.88 Karaj
RAHMATI/3N 10.88 Arak
RAJABI Moharronad—Ebrahimi 11.8.88 Tebran
RAJABI NEJAD Nasrin 11.88 11am
aAJAEI Alj Reza 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
RAJAVI ?bnir 11.88 Tehran
RAJAVI }bssein 11.88 Hamedan
RAMESH 29.10.88 Jun01
RAMEZANI—FAR Foruzan 11.88 Tehran
RANJBAR 9.88 Lahijan
RASBID Abbass 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
RASBIDI Nobsen 9.88 Tebran (Evin)
RASHIDI Al l 9.88 Tebran (Evin)
RASHIDI Sirus 11.88 Shjraz
RASHTIAN Masoud 11.88 Tehran
RASWLI Saeid 12.88 Tebran
RASULI Nasrjn 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
RA VA E O I teynour
RAZAVI Seyed Al-miad 14.11.88 Iasjid Soleiruan
RAZAVI 12.88 Shiraz
RAZBAN Farjdeh 19. 8.88 Tebran
RAZMDIDEB Asef
RAZZAQI . Mehrdad 11.88 Tehran
RAZZ Q I Malishid (Hossein) 11.88 Tehran
REIHANI Abbass 11.88 Gorgan
REIHANI Atnnad 11.88 Hamedan
RZZA'I 9.88 Tebran
REZAPOOR lIImad 11.88 Tebran
REZAEI Akbar 9.88 Is ahan
REZAEI usef 11.88 Karaj
(Gohardasht)
REZABI 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
REZ EI 12.88 Shiraz
REZAEI Madereh 12.68 Ahwaz
REZMI Mahmood 9.88 Te l- iran
REZAEI JAUROMI Manuchehr 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
REZVANI Majid 11.88 Te l-iran (Evin)
RIAZI Hamid 9.88 Mashhad
RIZEH—VAt4Dt Rakimeb 11.88 11am
ROBAT—SPR?USR t4ohairaaad 9.88 t4ashhad
E/Q . 4/1989/26
page 38
Foxenaoee flate P lace
ROOL-PARVAR Asad 9.88 Tehran
ROOZBAHANI
ROOZBE hI NI Majid 9.88 Tebrart
RO S H AN ZADEN
ROS HDIAN Nassoud 11.88 Gorgan
ROSTAMI 10.88 Masjed Soleiman
RiJflQLLAB—ZADEH Mebdi 11.88 Babolsar
RUZEAHANI Mobsen 11.88 Gorgan
SW ADATMAND Psrsa lan
SABAH Nader
SABER BACHEN—MIR Nasser 8.88 Tebran (Evin)
SABET BAFTP.R Masoud 6. 8.88 Tehran (Evin)
SABET RAFTAR Reza 6. 8.88 Tebran (Evin)
SABETI Kazem 25.11.88 Tebran (Evin)
SABETI Reza 25.11. 88 Tebran (Evin)
SABRI Nader 9.88 Tabriz
SABURI Ezzeddjn 11.88 Amok
SADEGHI Sasan 26.10.88 Tebran (Evin)
Babm ark 9.88 Kamedap.
SADEGHI Mohairtaad Reza 12.88 Tebran (Evin)
SADEGHI Vahid 11.88 Tehran
SADEGHI Mohajrtnad Reza 9.88 Samandaj
SADEGHI Moharmuad 11.88 Tehran
SADEQI Al l 9.88 Karaj
SAEIDI NEJAD Vahid 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
SAEIDI—FAR Shahin 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
SAFA Mohanrified Sadegh 11.88 Tabriz
SAFAEI Mohaiwnad 9.88 Tehran
SAFARI Ahmad 11.88 Semnan
SAFAVI Hamid 1.11.88 Karaj
SAFAVI Jafar 9.88 Tehran
SAFAVIEH Sakineh 9.88 Tehran
SAF DARI Abbass 11.88 Mashhad
SAFDARI 12.88 Quchan
SAFFARI 11.88 Estahbanat
SAGHERI Marjam 11.88 Tebran
SAGHI Haruid 11.88 Tabrjz
SAHRA—GARD Ebrahim 11.88 Isfahan
(ansur 7.12.88 Shirai
SARHAtI Assad 7.12.88 Shiraz
SAKHA I Esmaei l 1.12.88 Shiraz
SALA I—VARZI MaFinaz 3.12.88 Shiraz
SALEHI Fariborz
SALEHI Babak 11.88 Tehran
sAr E H i 12.88 Tehran (Evin)
SALEHI—ZADEB Saivosh 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
SALIMI Parviz 9.88 Tebran (Evin)
SAL.JOOGHI Rasul 3.11.88 Qrumieh
SALLEH—DAR 12.88 Khorram Abad
SAMANDAR Mahinud 9.88 Tehran (Evin)
SAMANI 11.88 Shiraz
SANANI 9.88 Shiraz
SAMI Shahin 11.88 Anzali
SM4IMI Mansur 9.88 Karaj
SANA—BAI
E/C2 . 4/1989/26
page 39
Name Forename Date place
SANAT—FAR Kazem 9.88 Tehran (Evin)
SANJABI Shahriar 11.88 Kermanshab
SANJARIAN Esiriaeil 12.88 Rasht
SARABI Mehrdad 11.88 Tehran
SARKARDEH Hoijat 12.88 Tehtan
SARRAFPOUR Hassan
SATMIAN Pair 9.88 Tehrari
SAVAfl Hessam—oo—djn 12.88 Karaj
(Gohardasht)
SAYY1 R Zokireb 16.12.88 Tetkran (Evin)
Fategteh 16.12.88 Tehran (Evin)
SAYAD-POOR Reza 3. 7.88 Kobram Abad
SAYAbI 6. 8.88 Isfahar .
SEDAQAT Taqi 3.12.88 Tebran
SEDIGH 9.88 Raoesar
SEFATIIsN Hossein 9.88 Ramsar
SEIFAN Ghassem 11.08 Karaj
(Gohardasht)
SERESHTEH A I d 12.88
SETUDEH Tahmineh 10.88
SEYEO ABI4ADI Babman 3. 8.88 Tebran
SEYEO A} 4ADI Mohajiunad 3. 8.88 Tehtan
SEYEDI Si m m 11.11.88 Tebran (Evin)
SEYEDIAN Seyed Ahmad 12.88 Tebran (Evin)
SEYEDIAN Seyed Abmad 12.88 TeI-zran
SEYYED—M I4ADI Seyyed—Mohsen 9.88 Tehran
SHABAN—ZADEH 9.88 Roodsar
SHABANI 11.88 Tebran
SHABANI 11.88 Tebran
SKABANI J bbar 12.88 Tebran
SHADIAN Abdo lrasu l 11.88 Behbahan
SHMIEI 12.88 Mashhad
SHAH—jQ RIMI Mohaimnad 11.88 Tebran
SHAB—MORADI Ezzatto l lah 11.88 Kermanshah
SHAN—VERDI S ejd 12.88 Arak
SBAliBA ZZADEB fr di 10.88 Rudsar
SHA I IBAZI A U 10.88 Rudsar
SHANBAZI Sbahbaz 10.88 Rudsar
SHARI D vood 9.88 Semnan
SHA LlO T 12.88 Tehran (Evin)
SHAIfi IIRI 10.88 Tehran (Evin)
ARJNANDI 9.88 Qazvin
SBAHRBANI RE za 11.88 Anzali
SHARROODI Mohsen 9.88 Tehran
SHARERI 8 bjnan 3.11.88 Oruinieb
SHAKERI Akbar 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
SHAMS 11.88 Tebran
5HA1 18—ABADI blajid 10.88 Tehran (Evin)
SMAMSI Rahini
SHARIAT 10.88 Mashhad
SHARIAT HC )ssein 10.88 1ashhad
SHAR IAT Jemshid 11.88 Karaj
SHARIATI Gholaru Reza 12.88 Tehran
SHARIATI Reza 9.88 Langarood
SHARIF 9.88 Sari
E/Q . 4/1989/26
page 40
Name Forename Date Place
SHARIF Nassan 9.88 Sari
SIJARIF Abmad 9.88 Gachearan
SHARIF—ABADI 11.88 Kazeroon
SHARIF—ABADI X.bbaiwnad Said 11.88 Kazeroon
SHARIFI 29.10.86 juuol
SHARIFI Zahra 9.88 Hamedan
SHARIFI Parviz 7. 8.88
SHARIFI Changiz 12.88 Tebran (Evin)
SHARIFI Farhad 9.88 Tebran
SHARIFIAN Karam—Aid 9.86 Karaj
SHAXAN—FAR Homayoon 11.88 Mashhad
SHEMIRANI 9.88 Bafshejan
Shahr—KOrd
SHIR— flEKHARI Mo hammed Reza 9.88 tehran
SHIRANI Mansureh 6. 8.88 Isfahan
SHIRAZI (Fatimeb)
SHIRAZI Tayyebeh 12.88 Lahijan
SHIRIN—BAKHSHXAN Reza 12.88 Anzali
SHOHADAEI Behzad 9.88 Sari
SHOKIRI 11.88 Ghaem—Shahr
SHOKIRI Peyman 3.11. 88 Orumieb
SHOKUHI 9.88 Karaj
SISAKHTX Abdoirasul 11.88 Tehrari
SOLEIMAN Sa'id 9.88 Tehrafl
SOLEIMA2J I Yaghoubh 9.88 tlashhad
SOLEIMANI Reza 1.11.88 Shiraz
SOLTANI 9.88 Tehran
sor TANx Mi 16.11.88 Karaj
(Gohardasht)
SOLTANI Farhad 12.88 Tehran (Evin)
SORBI Nozbgan 11.88 Tehran
SORURI Majid 11.88 Sehbahan
TAB Mi 12.88 Qazvin
TA BA E I
TABARESSI Shahrokh 11.88 Rasht
TABRI Z I
TAGHAVI Mousa 9.88 Gachsaran
TAHERI Haoeid 11.88 Karaj
TAJIERI Mansur 29.10.88 Varamin
TAHERI—ZAJ)EH 9.88 Tehran
TAJD&h$SAIAN 11.88 Tehran
TAH I IASSI 9.88 Tebran
TAMSILI 9.88 Tehran
TAHSILI 9.88 Tehran
TM—GMDAN 11.68 Kermanshah
TMADOO Jafar 9.88 Tehrafl
TALABIAN 11.68 Mashhad
TALEBI Mohairtnad 9.88 Tehran
TALE HANI Maj id 3. 8.88 Tebran
TALEGHANI Hamid 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
TALESH—SHARIFI Davood 12.88 Tehran
TARAVAT Hossein 11.88 Rasht
TASHA'YOUD All 3.12.88 Tehran
TASHAROFI Mohairg ad 11.88 Semnan
TAVAKKOLI 12.88 Tebran
E/cN. 4/1989/2b
page 41
Name Forename Date Place
TAVAXOL Ebrahim 30. 7.88 Ki-joram Abad
TAVAKOLI Mariam 11.88 L araj
TAVA 1 A Pbbass 9.88 Tebran
TAV7 SSOt .IAN Foad 1 1.88
TAVOSSI Faranak 11.88 Rasht
TAWRIWAR Rahrnat
TAYMtEH 12.88 Isfahan
TAYEBI Asadoijab 11.88 Karaj
TAYYMEH ifiosein 12.88 Isfahan
TEHRA1 KAABI Jaber 11.88 Abwaz
TEHRAE-TASH Homa 9.88 Tehran
PEIF4LJRI l4ajid 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
TEIMURI b hsen 11.88 Tehran (Evin)
TIORI Saeid 11.88 Tehran
TIRI tbsen 9.88 Tehran
T 4 Jafar 9.88 Karaj
TORABI Navic 12.89 Hamedan
TORASI 12.88
TORABI 12.88
TORASI Javad 11.88 Harifiedan
2ORK—POOR Gholain Reza 10.88 Isfahan
TVRKI KOOHANESTANI Akbar 2.12.88 Isfahan
TUTUNCHIAN hanoead A u 8.88 Tehran
VAEZI Taher 9.88 Zanjan
VAfl I—Z ADEH Farab Tehran (Evin)
VAHAB—ZADEH A u 9.88 Tehran
VAHEDI Fakhri 11.88 Karaj
VAKHSNURI Asghar 11.88 Anzali
VAKILI Farhad
VAL iX—VAND Vahid 10.68 Masjed Soleiman
VALID Moharrgnad 20.11.88 Gachsaran
VARASTEH Asghar 9.88 Kermanshah
VATIII—DOOST Shayesteh 11.88 Anzali
VAZIN Mohsen 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
VAZIRI A uireza 9.88
VOSSUGRIAN Mebdi 10.99 Tehran (Evin)
YADEGARI Jahangir 8.88 Kerend
YAR—ABMADI Hushang 4.8.88 Tehran
YAVARI Kianush 11.88 Anzali
YAZDAN—PANAH All Akbar 9.88 Tebran
OEZDANI Morteza 11.88 Gorgan
OEZDANI Mehdi 11.88 Rasht
YAZDANIAN Morteza 9.88 Tebran
YEGANEGI Hadi 9.88 Sari
YEGANEB MUSSAVI Tahereb 11.88 Karaj
YEKKEM Qolanreza 9.88 Tebran
YOOSEFI 12.88 Shiraz
YOOSEFI Changiz 9.88 Tehran
YOOSEFNE ,OED Siroos 9.88 Tebran
YQOSSEFI Heidar 28. 7.88 Tebran
YUSEF—NEJAD M ARAKI Moba irn ad 1.11.88 Shiraz
YtJSSEFI Dariush 11.88 Masjed Soleiman
ZACHER Amin
ZA BIROL—ESLAM—ZADEB Seyed Mehdi 12.88 Tehran
ZAHRAEI Abo lghassem 12.88 Tebran
E/Q . 4/1989/26
page 42
Name Forename Date Place
ZAHRAEI—MOGHADN4 Kiomars 9.88 Karaj
ZAXAEI Reza 11.88 Tehran
ZAKI Babram 11.88
ZAKI Mina 11.88
ZAND ARIA Babram 9.88 Karaj
ZMIGANEH Hassan 9.68 Kermanshab
ZN JANI 3.11.88 Orumieh
ZA1UAN IZADEH 30. 7.88 Salinas
ZARE Najaf 10.88 Bu$heklr
ZARE Haji 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
ZARE'I Ebrahim 9.88 Tehran
ZAREE Ezzato l. lah
ZAREB Riomars 12.88 Shiraz
ZARE H Rahmato l lah 12.88 Shiraz
ZAREX Fatemeh 4.12.88 $hiraz
ZARGAR Sepideh 12.88 rebran (Evin)
2ARGA1U 2J Issa 11.88 Kord Kuy
ZARIN—GEALAM Ali—Reza 11.88 Tebran (Evin)
ZARRIN GHALPM Nasser 12.88 Karaj
(Ghezejhesar)
ZAVVAREI K loomars 12.88 Tebran
ZIA 12.88 Quchan
ZIADI MIRZAEI Elaheb 12.88 Tehran
ZOLFAQRP.RI 9.88 Semnan
ZOLGHADR Esmail.
Zc 1ORQD MA Iraj 9.88 Tebran
