Aadel Collection

Most Shameful Sham Trial of 30 Years

          
          Most Shaniefial Sham Trial of 30 Years - Iran Press Watch http://www.iratçresswatcltorg'post/4937
          I LANGUAGES
          Previous:
          Deadly Fatwa:
          Iran's 1988
          Massacre
          LIT Email to a friend
          Iran Press Watch
          Documenting the Persecution of the Bahcz'i Community in Iran RSS FEED EMAIL UPDATES TWITTER
          HOME / ARTICLES / FEATURED POSTS / MEDIA / COMMENTS / TOPICS
          Most Shameful Sham Trial of 30 Years
          Roozonline-August 27th, 2009
          Editor's Note: Iran has a long and sad history of creating
          show-trials for the public consumption, though it appears
          that even the most gullible Iranians are no longer buying
          these show-trials and seeing through the sham and
          charade created by unscrupulous authorities. Roozonline
          has reported on the latest session of one of such
          show-trials and that reports appears below for the benefit
          of our readers.
          By Roozonline
          The fourth trial session of political activists and journalists
          opposed to the June 12 disputed presidential election was ________
          held yesterday at branch 15 of the Revolutionary Court in Tehran. Instead of defending
          themselves, the detainee activists were forced to testify against themselves and their
          colleagues while also expressing satisfaction with the treatment they had received from
          interrogators and prison guards.
          And as in the three previous trials, only reporters from pro-government media outlets
          were allowed to cover the proceedings, which were presided over by Judge Salavati and
          held in absence of local and foreign reporters. Fars news agency published the entire text
          of the indictment only a few minutes after it was read by the prosecutor. Meanwhile,
          1 1
          Next:
          Montazeri
          Condemns Iranian
          Regime
          Post on Facebook
          Print this Page Print this
          Page
          1 of6
          9/17/2009 5:06 PM
        
          
          Most Shaniefial Sham Trial of 30 Years - Iran Press Watch http://www .iratcresswatch .org /post /4937
          families of the detained political activists were not allowed to attend the so-called public
          trial session.
          Saeed Hajjarian, Behzad Nabavi, Mohsen Mirdamadi, Saeed Laylaz, Ahmad Zeidabadi,
          Mohsen Safaei-Farahani, Feizollah Arabsorkhi, Abdollah Ramezanzadeh, Mohsen
          Aminzadeh, Mostafa Tajzadeh, Saeed Shariati, Keyan Tajbakhsh, Ali Tajernia, Sadegh
          Norouzi, Shahab Tabatabaei, Hedayat Aghaei, Masoud Bastani, Hamzeh Ghalebi,
          Moham mad Ghouchani and Moham mad Reza Jalaeipour were the defendants in
          yesterday's trial session.
          Saeed Hajjarian and Saeed Shariati Resign from Mosharekat Party
          Yesterday, a text allegedly authored by Saeed Hajjarian, the prominent architect of the
          reform movement who has a speech disability caused by a young Basiji assasin's bullet
          that struck his head in 2000, was read by Saeed Shariati, a member of the Mosharekat
          [ Participation] Party. According to the text, which was read after the prosecutor's
          representative called for maximum punishment, Hajjarian, one of the founders of the
          Mosharekat Party, “resigned” from the party and “apologized” to the people.
          Among the charges raised yesterday against Saeed Hajjarian by the prosecutor's
          representative were acting against national security, fraud and cheating in elections,
          conspiracy with foreign elements, undermining of legal government, cooperating with
          anti-revolutionary Farsi and English networks, insulting the supreme leader and other
          officials. Additionally, participating in illegal gatherings, causing disruption, publishing
          fraudulent letters, libel and slander against officials, negotiating with John Caine, “the
          most influential British political theorist of Eastern European disintegration,” and
          communicating with a member of the Soros Foundation were among this senior
          Mosharekat Party figure's charges. The prosecutor's representative also revealed
          yesterday that Hajjarian's charges emanated from his research and reporting on the
          Islamic Passdaran Revolutionary Guards Corps' (IRGC) Sarallah Brigade.
          In the text allegedly authored by Hajjarian, he accused himself of “providing faulty
          2 of 6 9/17/2009 5:06 PM
        
          
          Most Shaniefial Sham Trial of 30 Years - Iran Press Watch http://www .iratcresswatch .org /post /4937
          analyses” and, apologizing to the Iranian people, noted that he investigated the essential
          causes underlying his analyses in the past ten or fifteen years, the result of which is
          discussed in his confession letter.
          In the text allegedly authored by Hajjarian, he first discussed his background in political
          theory, and then criticized Max Weber's theories and dismissed them as irrelevant to
          Iran's present condition.
          Hajjarian then criticized higher education officials for not preventing students from
          accessing and studying foreign academic textbooks, concluding that the teaching of liberal
          arts theories in Iranian universities was one of the causes of recent disturbances and
          destruction of public property.
          Other Defendants' Confessions
          Another Mosharekat Party member who has been detained since the election, Saeed
          Shariati, also resigned from Mosharekat Party. Noting that he was treated kindly, he
          apologized to ayatollah Khamenei for hurting and insulting him and expressed his shame
          and guilt.
          Hedayatollah Aghaei, a member of the Kargozaran Sazandegi [ Servants of Construction]
          Party also said at yesterday's sessions, “I declare that no one can cause separation
          between us and the regime because we belong to this regime.”
          Another post-election detainee and head of the website “Jomhouriyat,” Hamzeh Karami,
          claimed that Mehdi Hashemi Rafsanjani, the son of the head of the Assembly of Experts,
          did not agree with the electoral process. Karami claimed that under Mehdi Hashemi's
          pressure the website “Jomhouriyat” turned into an “extremist and deconstructive”
          website.
          According to Karami, Jomhouriyat website's personnel printed pamphlets for Mir-Hossein
          Mousavi's campaign headquarters undermining and questioning the ninth administration's
          performance and integrity and distributed them to the public. Karami quoted Jasbi, head
          of the Azad University system (and a supporter of Hashemi Rafsanjani), as having said,
          3 of 6 9/17/2009 5:06 PM
        
          
          Most Shaniefial Sham Trial of 30 Years - Iran Press Watch http://www .iratcresswatch .org /post /4937
          “We must do everything so that someone other than Ahmadinejad becomes the
          president.”
          Claiming that he had no direct responsibilities at the Jomhouriyat website — which was in
          essence run by Mehdi Hashemi — Karami said that he regarded the printing of “pamphlets”
          against Ahmadinejad to be unfair and was opposed to this.
          Hamzeh Karami then accused Mehdi Hashemi of intending to release confidential
          documents during the election.
          Jomhouriyat Website's Office at Azad University
          Masoud Bastani, a journalist detained after the election, also accused Mehdi Hashemi
          Rafsanjani of running the website Jomhouriyat and claimed that the website's office was at
          Azad University: “The website's office was located in one of Azad University's offices, and
          our payments were on Azad University checks.” He claimed that the website serves as the
          psychological warfare headquarters against the regime's officials and said that the website
          sought to portray the ninth administration as inept by publishing false reports.
          Noting that he cooperated with the website RoozOnline, Radio Farda, Radio Chekavak and
          the weekly Shahreban, Bastani said that these media outlets sought to attack the
          administration's four-year record, as well as the Guardian Council, police, Basij and IRGC,
          in addition to sowing seeds of doubt about the election results and the viability of the
          administration's policies.
          As the trial dragged on, Shahabeddin Tabatabaei, a member of Mosharekat Party's central
          committee and the head of its youth branch, expressed regret for having agreed to an
          interview with the BBC about the post-election protests.
          Another post-election detainee was Kian Tajbakhsh who claimed that “the Hashemi
          Rafsanjani government began the plan of cultural transformation.”
          According to the prosecutor's claims, Tajbakhsh was charged with acting against national
          security through “membership in CIA agent Gary Sick's online network,” espionage,
          cooperating with anti-Islamic republic foreign agents, consulting with the Soros
          4 of 6 9/17/2009 5:06 PM
        
          
          Most Shaniefial Sham Trial of 30 Years - Iran Press Watch http://www .iratcresswatch .org /post /4937
          Foundation, which pursues the soft overthrow of the Iranian government, propaganda
          against the regime, disrupting public order by participating in chaos, disorderly conduct
          and creating terror and fear in society.
          Commenting on his soft overthrow activities, this defendant said, “Another instance of this
          is Mr. Mohammad Atrianfar's (a figure close to Hashemi Rafsanjani) trip to New York City
          on the Soros Foundation's invitation, and his meeting with the person of Soros, who is the
          considered to be the main contact between foreign and domestic agents.”
          Calls for Dissolution of Mosharekat Party and Mojahedin Enghelab Organization
          At yesterday's court session, the prosecutor's representative accused the Mojahedin
          Enghelab Organization and Mosharekat Party of involvement in the velvet coup against the
          Islamic Republic and attacked their positions as being in line with those of the Islamic
          Republic's enemies.
          According to the indictment, Mosharekat Party is portrayed as being subservient to the
          United States, propagating conspiratorial thoughts, cooperating with foreign and suspicious
          elements, engaging in abnormal activities, violating the principles of Islam, and engaging
          in treacherous acts against the Iranian people and Islamic Republic regime.
          The prosecutor's representative then called for the dissolution of the reformist Mosharekat
          Party and Mojahedin Enghelab Organization.
          Court Proceedings Are Wrong
          At the end of the fourth trial session, Abdollah Ramezanzadeh, a member of the
          Mosharekat Party and former president Khatami's spokesperson, made unexpected
          statements violating the sham trial organizers' wishes in a surprising manner. He said, “I
          think that the court proceedings are following a wrong route and trend. I believe that the
          ninth administration's policies and executive methods have been wrong, and if the tenth
          administration continues that trend I will continue to oppose it, but will continue to remain
          loyal to the Islamic Republic.”
          5 of 6 9/17/2009 5:06 PM
        
          
          Most Shaniefial Sham Trial of 30 Years - Iran Press Watch http://www.iratçresswatcltorg'post/4937
          Responding to a question about his prison experience, he said, “They told us not to say
          anything, but I was in solitary confinement and this is the seventy-fourth day of my
          incarceration in solitary conferment.”
          Noting that he was arrested on the street and without any warrants, he said, “I disagree
          with the general indictment that was read during the first session by the deputy
          prosecutor. I disagree with the indictment that wants to pit one political faction against
          the regime.”
          [ Posted at Roozonline ]
          Add your comment
          Name:
          Email:
          F Notify me of follow-up comments via email
          Submit
          6 of 6
          9/17/2009 5:06 PM
        

Download Attachments:

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button