Aadel Collection
Situation of Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran Not by the Secretary-General
1989
ENGLII SH/ SPANISH
INITED A
IATIONS
General Assembly
Distr.
GENERAL.
A/44/620
2 November
ENGLISH
ORIGINAL:
Forty—fourth session
Agenda item 12
REPORT OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL
Situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran
ote by the Secretary-General
The Fecretary-General has the honour to transmit to the members of the General
Assembly the interim report prepared by Mr. Reynaldo Galindo Pohl (El Salvador),
Special Representativ. of the Commission on Human Rights on the situation.of human
rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, in accordance with paragraph 14 of
Commission on Human Rights resolution 1989/66 of 8 March 1989 and Economic and
Social Council decision 1989/148 of 24 May 1989.
89—27147 1298h (E)
/ . .
ANNEX
Interim report on the lituation of human rights in the Islamic
Republic of Iran prepared by the Special Representative of
the Commission on Human Rights in accordanco with Commission
r.solution 1989/66 and Economic and Social Council decision
1989/148
CONTENTS
Paragraphs 2Uft
I • INTRODUCTION
II. CO .Q4UNXCATIONS WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC
OF IRA1I ,.....s.....................s...i. .... .e.e.s. .. .. .s
A • Written communications . . . . . . . . . • • • . . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . .
B. Conversations with representatives of the Islamic
Republic of Iran • . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . .
III , INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE
A • Oral information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . • . • . . • . , . , .
1. Witnesses presented by armed opposition groups
2. Witnesses whose appearance was facilitated by the
Iranian Government • . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . . . . .
3 • Baha' i witnesses . . . • . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . . . . .
B • Written information • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • • • . . . . . . • . . .
1. Information provided by the Iranian Government
2. Information provided by other sources
(a) Right to life
(b) Right to freedom from torture or cruel,
inhuman or degrading treatment or puni inment
(c) Information cov' erning the situation of
followers of the Baha'i faith
IV , CO?.2.c NTS AND VIEWS OF Ti iE GOVERNMENT OF THE ISLAMIC
REPUBLIC OF IRAN . . . . , . , . . . a a • • • • a a a a a a a • • • • • . a • • a • a
V • GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
1—6 4
7—16 5
7—14 5
15—16 12
17—89 13
17—57 13
21—43 13
44—52 17
53—57 19
58—89 20
59—62 20
63— 9 21
63—73 21
74—78 23
79—89 23
90—96 26
97 — 129
28
—2—
CONTENTS (continued)
Append I cei
I. NAMES AND PARTICULARS OF PERSONS ALLEGEDLY EXECUTED IN THE ISLAMIC
REPUBLIC OF IRAN IN THE SECOND HALF OF 1988 AND THE BEGINNING OF
1989, SUPPLEMENTARY TO THE LIST CONTAINED IN DOCUMENT E/CN.4/1989/26;
LtST PROVIDED Y NO 4-GOVERNMENTAL SOURCES .............................
II . NAMEP AN ') PARTICULARS OF PERSONS VICTIMS OF TERRORIST ATTACRS; LIST
PROVIDED BY THE IRANIAN GOVERNMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
III. LST OF NAMES AND PARTICULARS OF PERSONS ALLEGEDLY ARRESTED, REARRESTED
OR ECUTED IROVIDED BY A WITNESS 1
IV. OPENLETTERPROVIDEDBYAWITNESS..................................... 1
-3—
I. INTRODUCTION
1. At its forty-fifth session, the Commission on Human Rights decided, by its
resolution 1989/66 of 10 March 1988, to extend the mandate of the Special
Representative, as contained in Commission resolution 1984/54 of 14 March 1984, for
a further year and requested the Special Representative to present an interim
report to the General Assembly at its forty-fourth session on the human rights
situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran, and a final report to the Commission at
its forty-sixth session (pars. 14). In its decision 1989/148 of 24 May 1989, the
Economic and Social Council endorsed that resolution.
2. Previously, the Cenetel Assembly had decid d, by its resolution 43/137 of
8 December 1988, to keep under consideration the situation of human rights in the
Islamic Republic of Iran during its forty-fourth session on the basis of additional
information that might be presented to the Commission on Human Rights and the
Economic and Social Council (p&rs. 13).
3. In compliance with paragraph 14 of Commission on Human Rights resolution
1989/66 and in response also to the General Assembly's decision to keep the
question under consideration on the basis of additional information, the Special
Representative submits herewith his interim report on the situation of human rights
in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The General Assembly welcomed the intention of
the Special Representative to consider several issues pertaining to the legal
system in the Islamic Republic of Iran (resolution 43/137, para. 9). In that
connection, the Special Representative states that his final report to the
Commission on Human Rights at its forty-fifth session included an analysis of that
question (E/Ct4.4/1989/26, paras. 22—57).
4. As in previous years, the interim report concentrates on oral and written
communications with government officials and on events involving human rights in
the Islamic Republic of Iran and their repercussions in the international sphere
and concludes with general observations. In hia final report the Special
Representative intends to consider more general questions, both factual and
doctrinal, including the points of view contained in the letters from the Deputy
Minister for Foreign Affairs transmitted on 26 June and J.2 September 1989, which
are reproduced in this report, and the official opinions to be presented in coming
months, particularly those relating to the application of international instruments
such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international convent 4 .ons, as
well as the declarations which may be made by the Government of the Islamic
Republic of Iran before the termination of his mandate.
5. In order to facilitate comparison, this interim report is arranged in the same
way as previous reports, and is accordingly divided into five sections:
introduction (saut. I), communications between the Government of the Islamic
Republic of Iran and the Special Representative (sect. II) , written and oral
information received by the Special Representative after the renewal of his mandate
(sect. XII), considerations regarding opinions expressed by the Government of the
Islamic Republic of Iran during the discussion of the it€m by the Commission on
Human Rights (sect. IV), general observations (sect. V) and annexes.
6. The Special Representative wishes to point out that, as in previous years, the
intek'im report has been planned and written as the first part of the final report,
owing to he relatively short interval between the preparation of the two reports.
—4-
II. COMMUNICATIONS WITH TW GOVERNMENT OF THE
ISLAMIC PE UBLTC OF IRAN
A. Written cpmmunicationi
7. On 15 March 1989, the Chargé d'affatzes of the Permanent Mission of the
Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations Office •t Geneva addressed the
following letter to the Special Repraaentative
“In reference to paragraphs 11 and 12 of your final report on the human
rights sit tion in the Islamic Republic of Iran to the 45th Session of the
Commission on Hwnan Rights, document E/CN ,4/1989/26, enclosed please find the
English translation of the text of a letter by Mr. Saeed Shahsavandi, former
member of the Central Committee of he ‘Mujahedin Khalq Organization' to
Le Monde, dated 15 February 1989. Mr. Shahsavandi was captured while taking
part in the MKO's military incursion into the territory of the Islamic
Republic of Iran in July 1988.”
For a summary of the letter referred to above, see paragraph 61 below.
8. By note verbale, dated 26 June 1989, the Permanent Mission forwarded to the
Special Representative the following etter addressed to him by
Mr. Mohammad Hossein Lavasani, Deputy Minister for International Affairsi
“In reference to your report No. E/CN.4/1989/26 dated 26 January 1989,
regarding (the] situation of human rights in Iran, the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran wishes to draw your attention to the
following observations on recommendations and suggested measures regarding the
‘pending problems' as itemized in paragraph 77 c.f the aforementioned report.
“1. The Islamic Republic of Iran's extensio ' of ‘full co-operation to
the Special Representative for a total fulfillment of his mandate,
including a v i. it to the Country'.
“It must be recalled that before the preparation of the final report and
the submission of the suggestions and recommendations to the 45th Session of
Commission on Human Rights, the Islamic Republic of Iran as an innovative
measure, originally proposed the adoption of a consensus, instead of a biased
and politically motivated resolution, under which t h. Islamic Republic of Iran
would have been committed to fully co-operate with the Special Representative
in all respects.
“Unfortunately, however, this proposal which was aimed in all honesty at
removing the stalemate in resolving the ‘pending problems' was simply ignored,
only to satisfy the political motivationi of certain malignant Western
sponsors of the resolution.
“It is, therefore, quite strange that the nubject of Iran's full
co-operation with the Special Representative is not only repeated here in the
report but also recommended ‘as a matter of urgency', without even alluding in
passing to the self-serving, obstructionist polici.s of certain sponsors of
the resolution.
—5—
“2. Investigating ‘all allegations of human rights violations and
(reporting) in detail on the results of such investigation'.
“Lists such as the one in the annex to the report No. E/CN.4/1989/26 of
the Special Representative could very easily be prepared by any opposition
group who bear no commitment to the Constitution and respectable values of the
country.
“Definitely, the Islamic Rept'blic of Iran cannot, and will not, hold
itself committed to answering allegations originated from certain terrorist
groups and war-time traitors who have brutally murdered, through
self-professed terrorist as well as military operation, thousands of
defendants of their own country and fellow countrymen, and have treacherously
engaged in espionage activities for the enemy.
“So long as the Commission's information is virtually based on the
self—serving, politically motivated allegations of certain armed terrorists to
the extent that 7 out of 8 so-called witnesses and claimants of human rights
violations in Iran bear their membership in the armed, fifth-column group of
hypocrites, i.e. the self-proclaimed Mujahedeen, there remains no room for
responding to such baseless allegations. Allegations of human rights
violations can be raised only and only after the terrorists have been excluded
as the source of information from the fact-finding and information-gathering
system of the Commission on Human Rights, for the very holding of meeting with
these groups and acquiring information from them is in effect a way of
granting recognition to terrorists and sanctioning terrorism.
“Nonetheless, as an indication of its good-will in co-operating with the
Special Representative, the Islamic Republic of Iran, having reviewed the list
of names annexed to the final report, announces that 140 out of the total list
of persons alleged to have been executed in Tehran are forgeries and virtually
non-existent individuals, which clearly proves the information provided by the
terrorist groups to be purely false and to have been conveyed only for
self-serving political purposes. Needless to point out that any single
forgery suffices to discredit the source of information.
“3, Ensuring that ‘the prison regime conforms to international standards
and that prisoners are not subjected to unjustified or unnecessary
hardships'.
“The Islamic Republic of Iran, inspired by the exalted Islamic teachings,
laws, and regulation, always finds itself morall:' obligated to observe
humanitarian considerations in her treatment of prisoners and to prevent any
ill-treatment. Tliø Islamic Republic of Iran has so far extended substantial
efforts in the rehabilitation and personality development of the prisoners.
“While the Israeli and South African governments , with confirmations and
practical supports of these very sponsors of the show of adopting repetitious
resolutions on the so-called human rights violations, relentlessly, and with
impunity, perpetrate the most horrible tortures and the worst conceivable
kinds of treatment in their prisons, there 3.s indeed great cause for regret to
see that those countries which have staged the strongest campaign against
tortures in Israel and South Africa are being accused of ill-treatment and
torture instead of the real. culprits.
“4. Suppressin ' ‘ill-treatment and torture, during both investigation
and imprisor ent'.
“The Islamic Republic of Iran categorically denies the question of
torture of prisoners and detainees. Issw s of this sort, unfortunately, have
frequently been presented by certain terrorist groups as first-hand
information to the Commission and have subsequently formed the basis for the
reports of the Special Representative and for the judgments of certain
countries.
“As mentioned earlier, so long as armed terrorists and war-time traitors
constitute the source of information for the Commission, such politically
motivated allegations wi]]. not be worth considering much less responding to.
“The punishments currently practiced in Iran under Ta'zirat after a
verdict by court f law, as also publicly reported in Iranian newspapers,
which have been presented by certain terrorist groups as documents of human
rights violations, are entirely based on indisputable laws and regulations
stipulated in the Islamic legal system. Having been derived from the Islamic
judicial system and having met the consensus of all Islamic sects and
persuas3ons throughout the world, they are being enforced in some other
Islamic countries as well,
“Under no circumstances will the Islamic Republic of Iran ever give up
the practice of such divine laws and standards which constitute the
fundamental tenets of the belief system among one billion Moslems in the world
and which must duly be regarded as a credible legal system in the world.
“5. Limiting ‘use of death penalty strictly to the most serious crimes,
(exempting) from death penalty those under 18 years of age and
(replacing) punishments involving torture by punishments compatible with
international standai ds'.
“By its divine outlook, the Islamic judicial system embodies far more
superior values than ani other judicial system for man “nd life. The
practical application of this system has been designed tn such a way as to
effectively safeguard the human values in a comprehensive manner and to remove
impediments to individual growth and exaltation for mankind.
“Within the Islamic law, the unjustified slaying of even a single
individual is being considered as tantamount with a cataclysm or destruction
of the population as a whole; the Holy Quran stipulates: ‘whoever slays a
soul, unless it be for manslaughter or mischief in the land, is as though he
slew all men' (5 32).
“Undoubtedly, no other syste' not even present international laws and
standards, has ever placed such ‘&gher, exalted value on man's life.
Imposition of death penalty in the Isla 'ic Republic of Iran, therefore, is
permitted only and only within this divine framework for maintaining human
values and for preserving the integrity of human society as a whole.
“It must be pointed out that in order to limit the use of a death penalty
many obstacles have been provided in this system, such as paying Diveh (blood
money/restitution) and carrying out the regulation of Ghesemeh (swearing), to
—7—
ensure that fewer people receive death penalty. The long process of
confirming a death sentence from the lower courts to the appellate courts, the
highest judicial court an finally to the Supreme Judicial Council consisting
of several ce mpetent, outstanding lawyer(s].. is a further evidence of built-in
concerns within the judicial system of the Islamic Republic of Iran to provide
legal guarantees for limiting death sentences. Furthermore, death penalty is
also practiced in many other countries based on their own particular penal
codes and judicial systems and cannot be considered as something peculiar to
the Islamic Republic of Iran. Finally, the question of violating
international standards by the Islamic Republic of Iran, we believe, has been
raised not due to honest concern over justice or over violations of
international regulations but only and only because of politically motivated
interests of some particular states which unfortunately seek to impose their
political hegemony in almost all international organizations. It is clearly
observed that while certain states have frequently demonstrated their utmost
disrespect and indifference towards international norms and standards and have
immensely and relentlessly violated human rights, no practical action has ever
been taken against them by appropriate international bodies. This phenomenon
clearly indicates that the states which self-servingly spread charges of humnn
rights violations apparently view international standards not as a set of
values in human relations but simply as a lever of pressure to achieve their
own political interest.
“The Islamic Republic of Iran, in view of the aforementioned facts,
announces that investigation of the situation of human rights in different
countries as conducted by the Commission on Human Rights is tainted by certain
political interests and consequently does not follow its proper, just course.
“Nonetheless, as it has also previously demonstrated its sincerity at
forty-third session of the General Assembly, the Islamic Republic of Iran has
always sought to resolve this problem and to fully co—operate with the
Commission. The Islamic Republic of Iran, in this respect, completely
fulfilled its obligations. According recognition by the Commission to the
false information provided by certain terrorists and armed spies; which in
effect sanctioned their action, on the one hand, and the selective,
discriminating approaches by the Commission as demonstrated clearly at the
45th Session of the Commission during the adoption of the resolutions under
item 12, on the other hand, created obstacles in the way of full co-operation.
“The Islamic Republic of Iran is, therefore, looking forward to the
removal of tI'. s great obstacle for laying the ground for our full cooperation.”
9. By a note verbale, dated 26 June 1989, the Permanent Mission also transmitted
to the Special Representative a note by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which read
as follows:
“In reference to your report No. E/CN.4/1989/26 concerning (the]
situation of human rights in Iran, the Islamic Republic of Iran would like to
draw attention to the following points regarding the annexed list of names (of
persons] supposedly executed in Iran.
“It is quite obvious that those who commit offenses, misdemeanors, or
felonies are punishable according to the statutory laws in each country, and,
in our case, they have been punished according to the Islamic standards.
—8—
“Since the judicial system in each state is enforced independently, the
Islamic Republic of Iran, therefore, does not hold itself obliged to answer
questions which directly violate this axiom. On the other hand, lists such as
the one annexed to Your Excellency's report could very easily be prepared by
any opposition group who bear no commitment toward the Constitution and the
3stablished values in their country.
“In this connection, it is instructive to refer to 140 forged names and
particulars in your annexed list, who prove as false and baseless all
allegations of your sources and which, even taken individually, suffice to
discredit such sources. These forged names and particulars have been pointed
out here (in the attached list) as they had appeared in the annex to your
roport.”
“ Annex
Forged Names and Particulars of Parsons allegedly executed iji the
Islamic Republic of Iran durir g the period of Ju1y-Se tember 1988,
appear in the original report
“ Pages Entries
“22 14, 20
“23 19, 20, 25, 29, 30, 31, 34, 46, 48
“24 12, 29, 34, 44, 55
“25 15, 16, 23, 24, 25, 30, 34, 41
“26 1, 22, 25, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 40
“27 4, 8, 24, 35, 39, 42
“28 5, 6, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 42, 47, 49, 50
“29 2, 13, 17, 24, 30, 40, 42, 44, 47, 50
“30 1, 5, 19, 20, 30, 31, 40, 49, 54
1, 7, 9, ]2, 24, 43, 44, 50, 51, 52
“36 3, 8, 11, 13, 14, 31, 24, 34, 44, 45, 46, 49, 50, 51
“37 6, 12, 17, 19, 23, 25, 26, 31, 37, 313
“38 14, 15, 18, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 46, 47, 50
“39 9, 10, 13, 19, 23, 28, 31, 38
“40 8, 9, 38, 44, 48, 49, 53
“41 12, 13, 15, 43, 49, 50, 54, 55
“42 10, 16, 18, 22”
10. On 10, 12 and 13 July 1989, the Special Representative held hearings with 22
persons who claimed to have direct knowledge and experience relating to the various
aspects of the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Subsequently, the Special Representative addressed two letters, dated
29 August ‘989 and 22 September 1989, to the Permanent Representative of the
Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations Office at Geneva informing him of
those hearings and transmitting summaries of the statements made by the witnesses.
These summaries are reflected in section III of the present report.
11. The letter dated 29 August 1989 addressed to the Permanent Representative read
as follows
“I have the honour to refer to Commision on Human Rights resolution
1989/ 36 concerning the )human rights situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran
—9—
(text attached). As you know, the Commission on Human Rights dc cided to
extend my mandate for a further year and requestt d mc to present an interim
report P the General Assembly at its fc rty_four1h session and a fina] report
to the C mrnission on Human Rights at its forty-sixth session. Resolution
1989/66 was endorsed by the Economic ane Socia] Council in decision 1989/148
of 2 May 1989.
“Zn this connection, I should like to inform you that, during my visit to
Geneva from 10 to 18 July 1989, I conducted, in the framework of my mandate
under Commission on Human Rights resolution 1989/66, a series of informal
hearings with 22 persons who claimed to have first-.)m.nd knowledge and
experience of various aspects of the human rights situation in the Iclamic
Republic of Iran. A summary of the allegations made in the course of these
heari:igs will ), made available to you by the Secretariat in due rourse.
“I would greatly appreciate receiving any information or couu. ,ents that
your Government may wish to provide with regard to these allegations.
“I should also like to inform you that I will again visit .zie Centre for
Human Rights in Geneva from 18 to 22 September 1989, in conne' tion with the
preparation of my interim report to the General . ssembly. I hope that a
meeti 'g may be a anged between us on that occasion in order to continue our
dia1i ,ue.”
12. The letter dated 22 S'.,pcember 1989 addressed to the Permanent Representative
read as followsi
“Xn pursut.nce of my letter dated 29 August 1989, I have the honour to
trans it herewith a summary of the allegations made in the course of the
informal hearings I recentl conducted in the framework of my mandate under
Commission on Human Righ-s resolution 1989/66. Thb above-mentioned summary
reflects statements me y persons who claimed to have first-hand knowledge
and experience of varic s aspects of the human rights situation in the Islamic
Republic of Iran.
“Any information, comments or observations that your Government may wish
to provide with regard to these allegations would be greatly appreciated. In
this connection, I should like to recall that my mandate a.' first established
by the Commission on Human Rights in resolution 1984/54 and extended for the
last time in reoolution 19 ' 9/66 requires me to make a thorough study of the
human rights situation in your country based on such information as I may deam
relevant, including comment. and materials provided by your Government, to be
presented to the Commission at its forty-sixth session.
“I should also like to iinform you that I shall visit the Centre for
Human Rights from 8 to 12 January in connection with the preparation of my
final report to the Commission. I hope that, on that occasion, a meeting may
again be arranged between us to continue our dialogue.”
13 By a note verba]e, dated 12 September 1989, the Permanent Mission forwarded to
the Special Representative a letter addresbed to him by
Mr. Mc .ainmad Hossein Lavasani, Deputy Minister for International Affairs, which
as foLlows:
—10-
“Before anything else, please allow me to convey to you my satisfaction
and pleasure for your cooperation in providing necessary facilities for the
meeting of the special human rights delegation with Your Excellency at the
office of the United Nations. Without doubt, this meeting was materialized as
a result of the intention of the Islamic Republic of Iran to expand
cooperative relations with the Special Representative with a view to enlarging
his knowledge, and the desire of ‘Iour E ccellency to obtain true and correct
ir formation. The gro ' i that met with you was only an indicative example of
numerous other similar cases in the Islamic Republic of Iran. In fact, the
persons who met you were the messengers for numerot's bereaved fathers, mothers
and wives in Iran. With the sincerest sentiments and while still suffering
from the p 'in and distress caused by the violation of the most fundamental
rights of their dear ones, that is, the right to life, each one of them
revealed uLdeniable cases that demonstrated the savage nature and cruelties of
terrorists. Naturally, the least that can be expected from the meeting idth
you of the rei.atives of the victims of the atrocities of the terrorists and
armed groups in Iran is the reflection of rises of violation of human rights
and crimes vf criminal organizations in the international fora so that the
public may become aware of the acts of violence committed by these groups.
You heard the revelations of the families of the victims of terrorism and the
admissions of the former members of the ‘People's Mujjehedin Organization' in
explaining their dastardly acts, a d have also seen all the documonts.
“You probably agree that meeting with menib rs of e terrorist group and
receiving raise information from tiiem wou3d .‘redit to them end their
activities, and encourage them to commit furt - r terrorist acts. Condenina ion
of legal actions in Iran and censuring the im .tth;.)ntatiOn of Islamic
punishment meted out to murderer: of inno,. ent presons constitute indifference
of and disregard to pnins and ufL. rings o those whose representatives met
with you.
“I hope the contacts and cooperation with the Special Representative,
which are desired by the lb.L8ffiiC Reoublic of iran, will produce desirable
results, and will further reveal the realities and facts in Iran as well as
the resulting adverse consequences of defending and supporting terrc Ists
groups.
“Considering that you have become familiar with the part of the realities
regarding the presence and the way terrorists act in Iran, we can therefore
expect that your Excellency, as the Special Representative, will use different
means available to you to direct the Human Rights Commission toward
understanding and true support of human rights. Allow me to once again
reaffirm tFie readiness of the Islamic Republic of Iran to cooperate with the
Special Representative.”
14. On 21 September 1989, the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of
Iran to tne United Nations Office at Geneva addressed the following letter to the
Special Representative:
“I iave the honoui' to communicate to you the enclosed list of 1611
innocent people who have been martyred by the terrorist and mercenary groups
and organizations, pr rticularly, the so-called People's Mujah• deen
Organization (PMO).
—11—
“I would greatly appre iate if you would consider it in your f rthcoming
report on the situation c human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran.”
The above-mentioned list, is reproduced in annex III to the present report.
B. Convarsatio with representatives
of the Islamic Republic of Iran
15. As the dialogue ith the representatives of the Islamic Republic of Iran has
b'oadened, communications have become quick and continuous, since contact has taken
place not only through visits to the diplomatic offices of the Islamic Republic of
Iran or United Nations offices but frequently by telephone. This informal and
direct means of communication has been particularly effective as regards
arrang0ments for the appearance of witnesses and advance announcement of activities
relating to proceedings.
16. On 19 and 22 September 1988 the Special Representative met with
Ambassador Sirous Nasseri, Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran
to the United Natior s Office at Geneva. On those occasions pending problems
relating to the implementation of his mandate were discussed.
—1.?—
III. INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE
A. Oral information
17. On ‘ .0, 12 and 13 .July 1989, the Special Representative conducted hearings
during which 22 ine&viduals described their experiences in Iraniafl prisons, their
court appearances and their knowledge of what had happened to members of thoir
families and other individuals. Eleven of the witnesses stated that they were
sympathizers of the People's Mojahedin, three witnesses referred to the death of
very close relatives through action attributed to the above-mentioned Mojahedin,
and two of the witnesses stated that they were former militants of the Mojahedin
organization who had given up their political mUitancy after their terms in
prison. For reasons of security, the former militants asked that their identities
not be revealed. Five other witnesses, who also asked that their names not be
revealed, were Baha'is.
18. It should be pointed out that for the first time the Government of the Islamic
Republic of Iran sponsorbd the appearance of witnesses, whose testimony differed
considerably from the experience reported by other witnesses who had appeared in
pr&'vious years and the current year.
19. The statements that follow were made by witnesses in the course of oral
depositions. The summary of this testimony reproduces as faithfully as possible
the language and mode of expression of the witnesses examined. The Special
Repre entative considers that further investigation will be necessary before he is
personally convinced of the truth of some of these statements.
20. The summary of the testimony follows. It is divided into three subsections,
in order to maintain the distinctions between the organizations which acted as
sponsors of the witnesses' appearance.
1. Witnesses presentedby armed oppositicn groups
21. On 10 and 12 July 1989 the Special RepLesentative conducted informal hearings
in the course of which 10 persons who claimed to have first-hand knowledge of
various aspects of the human rights situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran
related their experiencR. These persons described themselves as sympathizers of
the Mojahedin organization. They were, in order of appearance before th' Special
Representative: Mariem Torabi, Shansi Ro hanah, Shahrzad Alavi-Shah3di,
Roghieh Jaberi, Yazdian-Azad Kobra, Chorban-Ali Torabi, Fattaneh Ayaz—Poor ,
Zahra Sarayi and Abdel-Hamid Emami. Two witnessi s requested that thei names be
kept confidential.
22. All of the above-mentioned persons st6ted that they had spent from one to
eight years in prison. All of these persons also affirmed that during their
incarceration they had been subjected to torture and had witnessed other prisoners
being tortured. The dates of arrest indicated ranged from 1982 to 1987. One of
those arrested in 1982 was not released from jail until November 1988.
23. They stated that they had witnessed prisoners being executed and tortured to
death. They also alleged that they had not only been subjected to physical
ill-treatment but also to psychological torture to such an extent that some of them
had beome mentally ill. They asserted that there has been a change in the method
-13--
of torture during the last year, psychological torture having largely substituted
physical torture.
24. The witnesses further stated that they had met several prisoners who had
become demented as a result of psychological torture and were kept together with
other prisoners in the same cells. Some of the mentally ill had been driven to
commit uicidei others had been manacled to the carts distributing food and paraded
in ths prison. Their cries and behaviour were used as a demoralization factor
against other detainees. New detainees were placed with the mentally disturbed
prisoners and in some cases the mentally ill attacked the others.
25. During those hearings, two prison officials were charged with inflicting
torturei Haji Davod Rashmain, warden of the Qezel-Hessar prison in Tehran, who is
curren$1y head of the Information Bureau of the Prosecutor's Office at Evin prison
and Asghar Ja'afari, warden of the Gohardasht prison.
26. It was reported that, during the wave of executions in the second part of
1988, many prisoners had seen their sentences changed to capital punishment, a
great number of them having been tried for a second time after serving a previous
sentence. Released pzisoners had been rearrested, tried again and sometimes
executed. Usually the time served during preventive arrest was not taken into
account and the pricon term became effective from the date of the sentence only.
During the afore-mentioned wave of executions, family vtsits had been barred for
three to four months. Some detainees were released, however, under certain
conditions, usually a bail of about $US 25,000 and the obligation to report back to
jail periodically.
27. According to the witnesses, families and relatives of the executed persons
were frequently not told the whereabouts of their places of burial and on several
occasions, protests by families lead to further arrests. From 1988 onwards,
several families of female political prisoners had rec4ived from administrative
officials a certificate of marriage of their imprisoned daughters. These
certificates concerned female prisoners who had allegedly been raped before
execution.
28. One witness, who wished to remain anonymous, reported the arrest of a woman
under the charge of wearing inappropriate clothing (not conforming with officially
admitted colours, such as black and grey) and in one case, a woman who was clothed
decently, was jailed because she had taken a taxi alone.
29. One witness, Roghieh Jaberl, reported that she took close cognizance of the
suicide of one person who drank cleaning fluid, of another who hanged herself and
of a thir4 who cut her wrists. She also testified to the extreme mental and
physical pressure brought upon prisoners who lived in the so-called “residential
units” (non-official prisons), a part of Qezel-Hessar prison near Tehran, where
female prisoners were submitted to psychological torture aimed at driving them mad.
30. She also reported that throughout her five and a half years of captivity she
had been tortured several times, the method consisting of beating aziti whipping by
cables. She said she was put on trial twice and described the proceduke as
follows: The first trial, during which she was blindfolded, took five minutes only
and she was sentenced to one and a half years in prison. At the end of this term,
instead of being released, she was tried again because she had refused to appear on
official television. She was condemned to a further term of three years on the
—14-
charge of beii g a resistant prisoner. She was released one year and a half after
having served the second sentence, i.e., I the end of 1987.
31. Mrs. Roghieb Jaberi further stated that about two months before her release a
hunger strike took place in Evin prison in protest against the poor quality of food
and living conditions. After her release she learned that all hunger strikers had
been put in solitary confinement and had been tortured; some of them had even been
executed. A few of her cellmates who were released had been arrested and shot in
the second half of 1988. She indicated the following names of former cellmates who
were rearrested and sentenced to death: Mariam Mohammadi, Bahman Abadi,
Tamineh Setoodeh, Kheirieh Saffaii, Shekar Mohamma-Zadeh, Zoreh Mir-Esmaeli,
Mahin Amadi, Zahra Saffaii, Soheila Shems-Zadeb, Mehri Rahimi, Foroozan Abdi,
Rogieh Akberi, Ashraf Khodaii, Foroshtch Harnidi, Zahra Bijan Yar,
Nasrin Kemal-Zadeh, and Mahnaz Karani.
32. Another witness, who wished to remain anonymous because of the continuing
detention of his wife and eight-year-old daughter who had unsuccessfully attempted
to leave the country illegally, reported that his trial took a few minutes with no
defence available. He said that he had servea five years of imprisonment and was
released in September 1987 subject to a financial guarantee. He also reported
the fate of several fellow prisoners as follows: Ali-Taher Jooyan 1o'.t za. a niental
balance owing to the severity of torture and set fire to himself, c . sing serious
injuries, which led to his death; another one, named Au Haghverdi, after losing
his senses as a result of torture was shot in one of the mass executions of
political prisoners. The witness further asserted that in many cases relatives of
executed prisoners were not to1 of the burial places and on several occasions
their protests had led to furthek arrests. He also reported having witnessed that
persons who were about to be hanged had shouted that they were not drug smugglers
hut political prisoners.
33. Shahrzad Alavi Shahidi decll2red that sh was arrested in November 1981, was
held in prison until April 1988, and left thu country in March 1989. She said that
during her first nine months in prison she was routinely beaten and lashed, and
when one of her feet became infected she was refused medical treatment on the
pretext that there was no need as she would soon be executed. After nine months'
detention without charge, she was taken to trial blindfolded. The trial took about
five minutes and she was sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment. She was
reinterrogated in 1984 for 10 days and at that time was k,4.cked on her head. As a
result, her left ear was severely damaged. She showed the Special Representative
the scars left by the infected wounds on the sole of left: foot.
34. Shahrzad Alavi Shahidi further tescified that she h. d witnessed the killing
under torture of Sara Mokhtarzadeh, Soheila Yavarzadeh dnd Homa Mesbahi, as well as
the torture of a 10-year-old girl in a wheelchair, whose name she did not know.
She reported too the case of Rafat Kha]id, a female prisoner, who as a result of
torture, including rape, became mad, was not given proper care and finally
committed suicide hi Evin prison in November 1988.
35. The same witness also referred to executions that she said had taken place in
the second half of 1988. She said that she had witnessed the execution of a group
comprising 74 prisoners. Subsequently, other groups of prisoners were taken to a
room which had been turned into a temporary court room; there, a religious judge
asked each prisoner the following question: “In connection with which organization
were you arrested?” If the reply was the Mojahedin organization, the judge would
-15-
issue immediately en execution sentence. Families and relatives of the executed
persons were kept uninformed for lengthy periods of time. On one occasion, 200-300
families and relatives of prisoners were invited to Evin priaon they were then
given sweets and subsequently had to witness the execution of their relatives. In
another case, a prisoner named Nemati who had served many years in Gohardash prison
was waiting for his release; one day before the set date, his family was requested
to go to the prison, where, instead of his release, they learned of his execution.
Accor . ing to the witness, cases similar to this were numerous.
36. Another witness, Fattneh Avaz-Poor, stated that, while in captivity in Evin
prison in the second half of 1988, she had watched thc death under torture of two
women named t4ariam Shaghari and Ghodsi Hava-Keshian, who had been serving prison
terms. She said she had also witnessed the torture of a 57-year-old woman,
arrested in 1987, and that she saw a 10-year-old girl who had to be carried in a
wheelchair because torture had damaged her legs.
37. Shemai Rosharani reported that when she was arrested, her interrogation took
21 days, during which she was blindfolded l1 the time.. She stated that she was
not told why she had been arrested and was regularly lashed with cables. Her
five-month-old baby was with her. Several months later, he was taken away from her
and given without her consent to her mother. Her trial by a religious judge took
15 minutes without the assistance of a defence council. She was sentenced to three
years in prison and the judge told her that the two years she had already served
were not to be counted. She was released after five years of imprisonment.
38. Ms. Rosharani also reportod the severe torture and eventual execution of a
female prisoner, named Batul Akbari. As a result of the tort .tre, Mrs. Akbari could
hardly walk and one of her shoulders was broken. Another female prisoner, named
Razieh Avatollah-Zadeh Shirazi, whom the witness had known earlier, was put in
solitary confinement. She was pregnant and was refused sufficient foods after
giving birth, the prison guards took the baby away and told her that the baby had
been born dead. The witness said that she had also watched the torture of another
woman called Razieh, who was executed in 1988.
39. Yazdian-Azad Kobra reported that in 1988 about 110 female political prisoners
were executed in the ward of Evin prison. She also said that she had witnessed the
execution of a number of prisoners and that the following executed women had shown
marks of torture on the soles of their feeti Mehboobeh Kiaei, Azadeh Tabib,
Soodabch Mnsoori, Hoorieh Beheshti-Taber and Razleh Ayatollah-Zadeh Shirazi.
40. Another witness, Abdel-Hamid Emami, reported the names of some of his
ceilmates who were executed in the second half of 1988 Syed Reza Mir-Karimi,
All Akbar Ebrahim-Poor, Nejat Khatir Sameni, Feizollah Akbari, Karim Mallahi and
Tahmoores Rahim-Nezad, and said that others had been executed more recently, such
as Behzad Kordi, Issa Mazni, Parvia Taghi-Zadeh, Babma Eghbal Maghbooli and
Humid Shaeri.
41. In her deposition, Mariam Torabi reported that in August 1988 a man named
Malek Shabani, formerly a political prisoner, was captured allegedly by government
agents in the city of Bandar Gaz. His ‘arents and relatives frequently inquired
from officials about his fate but no information concerning his whereabouts had yet
been given. In addition, in the second half of 1988, Feizal Allah-Akbar, who was
serving a sentence of eight years' imprisonment was executed a few months before
the date of his release. The guards refused to t 'il his parents about the place of
—16-
burial. ?4ariam Torabi also stated that another long—serving prisoner called
Behzad Kianpoor was recently executed in the city of Bandar Gaz and that a
political prisoner named Soltani lost his mental balance under torture and was
subsequently released.
42. In respect of a]).egations that political prisoners were hanged under the
pretext of being drug traffickers, Ms. Torabi reported having witnessed several
executions at Hashami and Monirieh Squore, Tehran, where the prisoners before being
hanged had shouted that they were not drug trafficke .j but Mojahedin supporters.
She mentioned in particular the cases of two brothers, one of them called
Nasser Mohammed Tachi, and two other persons, one cf them called Hossein, who ware
executed on charges of drug smuggling. Later Mr. Tachi's family was informed that
“his execution had been carried out mistakenly”. The guards returned his
belongings and informed the family of the number of the plot in the Behesht-e-Zahra
cemetery where he had been buried. Due to the mistake, rect gnized by prison
officials, the family received permission for a funer il.
43. According to the testimony of several witnesses, manifestations of protest
were handled with extreme severity. Protests about food and poor living
conditions, which took place in autumn 1988 in Evin prison, had caused prison
officials to react by administering daily beatings, solitary confinement, and even
hangings. It was reported that hunger strikers named Ashraf Abmadi,
Razieh Ayatollah-Zadeh Shirazi, Mariam (olzadeh-Ghafoori and Zohreh Einolyaqin were
summarily tried and hanged in front of other prisoners who were forced to watch the
executions. In Cohardasht prison, cranes had been used to hang the striking
prisoners.
2. 1 jitnesses whose appearance was facilitated by
the Iranian Government
44. On 17 July 1989, the Special Representative conduc' ed hearings with five
witnesses whose visit to GenGva was fa ilita ed by the Iranian Government, Three
had suffered the loss of family members and the other twc claimed to have been
former members of the Mojahedin organization. The ii.e requested that their names
be kept confidential. The testimonies of these witnesses had as a common
denominator the attribution of terrorist actions to the Mojahedin organization and
the indication that the victims of such ections were both government officials and
private individuals.
45. A witness related how her son, after several death threats and attempts on his
life, was finally assassinated by agents of the Mojahedin organization. Two years
later, her husband suffered the same fate. Immediately after the death of her son
and her husband, the clandestine Mojahedin radio station had claimed responsibility
for the assassinations. Acknowledging responsibility, the Mojahedin had also
reported these executions in one of their publicatio ts.
46. Another person stated that his 17-year-old son hed been kidnapped. He celled
the police to carry out investigations. One week later, three bodies were found by
the police. One of these bodies was that of his son. He had been tortured to the
extent that his identification was extremely Mfficu]t. The Mojahedin, in one of
their publications, later assumed responsibility for the death of his son.
According to the witness, the sole apparent reason ior the killing of this young
man was his support for the Islamic revolution.
—17--
47. Another witness described how his two sons went killed by gunfire in the
office of one the two, a cft ntiat. He stated that the Mojahedin also took
responsibility for the asenseination and that the reasons behind this action ware
not clearj it could have been that his sons had treated persons who the Mojahedin
considered as their enemies. According to the witness, these killings were also
reported in Mojahedin pubitcations.
48. The fourth witness dencribed himself as having formerly belonged to the
Mojahedin organization. He said he had joined the organization because he was
interested in participating in political activitied. Afterwards he recognized that
the organization was solal - interested in milita action. He realized his error
in 1360 (1981) in the month of Khordat (22 May-21 June) when, before attending a
demonstration, he was told to he armed and use his arm at his discretion. In the
first clash, 13 to 14 men were killed. In this incident it had become clear to him
that the Mojahedin organization believed that through military action they could
overthrow the Government. One of their attacks consisted of a bomb placed in the
office of the Islamic Republic Party. Another bomb h as its target, the prime
minister and his deputy. These acts, however, did not lead to the result the
orgainization expected because the Government had broad popular support.
49. The same witness stated that he had realized that, not ony were those acts
useless, but that through random vio. ence many innocent people were killed. Once
even a citizen of India was killed because he looked like somebody else. In 1361,
while still a member of the organization, he participated in the kidnapping and
torture of three persons. He estimated that about 57,000 persons were killed in
1364 (1986) and 1365 (198 ) because of Mojahedin actions on the battlefront.
50. The last witness stated that he would like to be acknowledged as the
representative of the political, prisoners in the Islamic Republic of Iran. He had
been arrested because of active support for the Mojahedin organization and
participation before and after the Revolution in armed struggle. At the time of
his arrest, he had commandod over 200 Mojahedin supporters. His arrest took place
in a home used as a bace for armed operations. During the fight. the superior of
the group was killed. Answering a question, he advised that he was tried after a
few months in prison and that he could have had legal counsel but he chose not to
do so, as he recognized he was guilty of the criminal charges against him. When he
was released, the sole condition imposed was to report once a month to the prison.
Replying to further questions, he stated that his family did not suffer harassment
and that his home had not been pillaged. His personal experience derived from his
detention in Evin and Ghesil Hesar (Koralli) prisons.
51. He indicated that he would concentrate his testimony on three main issues:
executions and punishment., treatment of prisoners and facilities and education in
prisons. He stated that, according to his experience, persons guilty of murder as
a rule would be executed. He had encountered in prison persons who had
paEticipated in various killings. One of them was Mehdi Fatha, a member of the
military operations of the Mojahedin. This man acknowledged that he had
participated in four killings and that when 3rrested he was in possession of two
hand grenades.
52. According to his experience and judgement, treatment in Iranian prisons was by
and large humanitarian, especially in regard to female prisoners. Difficulties
with guards were taken carcs of by officers, generally in the framework of general
discussions with the staff. The conditions in prisons were similar to the genera].
-18-
living conditions in the country, which were characterized by certain shortages due
to the war. The treatment given to prisoners, in particular, with regard to
sanitary and educational facilities, was the same as that enjoyed by the entire
Iranian society. He stated that in some ways inmates often had better facilities
than the rest of the civilian population, especially with regard to food supply,
which at times had become problematic because of the war.
3. Baha'i witnesses
53. Five of the persons appearing before the Special Representative were Baha'is.
They requested that their identity not be revealed. All of them described
persecution and harassment to themselves and their families, such as denial of jobs
and professional education and confiscation of property solely on religious
grounds. Imprisonment for participating in Bah'i activities was reported to last
as long as five years. All witnesses described brutal arrest, accompanied by
searches of their homes and confiscation of goods, including religious objects and
literature.
54. Usually arrest was followed by physical and psychological torture. Mock
executions were frequently used method of psychological torture. Torture was used
as an inducement to change faith, to confess links with the deposed monarchic
régime or to confess spying for the benefit of foreign Powers. One of the
witnesses related how his father was sentenced to death by the presiding judge;
however, the verdict was later changed by the Supreme Council in Tehran to 10 years
in exile. A relevant document was submitted to the Special Representative.
55. One person affirmed that he had witnessed a man of Baha'i faith die under
torture, whereas the authorities had reported his death as suicide. Another person
testified that Mr. Tolou , an interrogator especially assi ned to the interrogation
of Bah'ls, inflicted in Kerman such torture to one of the aha'i prisoners, that he
later had to use a walking stick. Two other witnesses related how torture left
them permanently mentally impaired. Three witnesses reported how they were beaten
up and expelled from schools because of their faith.
56. The confiscation of homes and other properties was reported by two witnesses.
One woman, owing to her Baha'i faith, had her government pension withdrawn leaving
her and her family completely destitute. Trials against Baha is continued to be
described as extremely summary and sentences very harsh.
57. One of the witnesses said that he had been drafted into the army despite his
exemption due to a flatfoot. He was interrogated by the officer in charge of
religious beliefs and was arrested after two weeks of leave at home, incarcerated
and finally taken before an Islamic magistrate. The magistrate accused him of
having links with foreign Powers and sent him to prison for two months. After his
release, he was sent back to the army, interrogated again by the officer in charge
of religious beliefs and then by the commanding officer. He was sent to the war
front but decided to desert when another soldier warned him that he was going to be
assassinoted in such a manner as to give the impression that he had been killed in
battle.
—19—
B. Written information
58. The Special Representative has continued to receive written information
contained in documents and reports supplied to him by the Iranian Government and
various organizations devoted to the world-wide defence of human rights, including
non-governmental organizations in consultative status with the Economic and Social
Council. The Special Representative also received more than 3,000 individual
communications containing allegations of human rights violations in the Islamic
Republic of Iran during the previous year. A summary of the relevant information
follows:
1. Information provided by the Iranian Government
59. During the discussion of human rights i' Iran, the Iranian representative
expressed his point of view concerning the final report of the Special
Representative before the Commission on Human Rights on 6 March 1989. On that
occasion, the Iranian representative said that the official response to the annex
of that report, which contains a list of persons executed during the second half of
1988, was being prepared. Pending the complete reply, he atated that 140 names on
that list were false, as the names of the individuals said to have been executed
did not appear in the registers of t-hc' prisons, hospitals or even cemeteries
investigated. That fact indicated that those individuals had not been executed but
had died in battle during the invasion of Iranian territory in July 1988.
60. By a letter dated 15 March 1989, the Permanent Mission of the Islamic RepubUc
of Iran transmitted a copy of a letter dated 15 February 1989 sent by
Mr. Saeed Shaheavandi, a former member of the Central Committee of the People's
Mojahedin Organization to the French newspaper La Honda . Mr. Shaheavandi, a
journalist by profession, was a member of the Central Committee of the
above-mentioned organization from June 1985, took part in the armed incursion by
his organization in July 1988, was taken prisoner and was spending seven months in
prison when he wrote the letter, as he says, of his own volition and on his own
initiative.
61. According to his letter, Mr. Shahsavandi, a member of the organization for 20
years, worked in its publicity and propaganda office and &n that capacity was
responsible for the preparation for propaganda purposes of statements concerning 74
kinds of torture in Iranian prisons, the violation of women prisoners, the
extraction of blood from those sen -nced to death, the confinement of prisoners in
small metal cAlls and their injection with morphine and other narcotics; he also
affirmed, for the same purpose, the existence of an exaggerated number of political
prisoners, amounting to 140,000, and alleged that 70,000 individuals had been
executed from 1981 on. After his irnprisonmez t he realized that the reality in the
Iranian prisons was completely different. According to him, the real number of
political prisoners was about 3,500, of whom 2,600 had been amnestied, leaving only
about 900; he had, moreover, learned that amnesty proceedings for that small group
of political prisoners were in progress.
62. While he was completing his interim report, the Government of the Islamic
Republic of Iran transmitted to the Special Representative nine files concerni.”g
acts ‘f terrorism and a list of individuals who had been the victims of terrorist
acts during the past year. The list referred to is contained in annex II.
Information on the contents of the files will be included in the final report.
—20—
2. Information provided by other sources
(a) Bight to life
63. On 28 February 1989, an interview given to the Ar -language weekly
Al Moataqbal , published in Paris, by the senior Iranian political official
responsible for internal security, was reproduced in mojor newspapers throughout
the world. The following statement was attributed to that officials ‘To settle
this matter once and for all, all those who have been arrested and those who
agitated politically during the Bakhataran campaign have b.en executed according to
the Islamic law. They declared war on the people. Becaus. they killed, they were
killed. All those who stated their support for the Mojahedin were •xecuted.' That
statement was understood and commented on as meaning that the imprisoned politica3
dissidents had been purely and simply eliminated. Three days later, the same
official denied those statements, claiming that he had said that “many members of
the Mojahedine Khalq organization were killed or taken prisoner during the attack
of last July”, and attributed the statement quoted to the imagination of the
journalist. The journalist, Hadar Assad, insisted, in turn, that his version was
correct.
64. From January 1989 on, there were reports of many execution. for ordinary
of fences, considerably exceeding the previous figures for executions for this
category of offences. Some figures will provide an idea of the increase in the
number of executions for ordinary offences. In 1988 147 executions were officially
announced for offences such as murder, rape, aggravated robbery and drug
trafficking. Between January and May 1989, 250 executions wire officially
announced for those of fences, apart from drug traffickers. The executions took
place in public and in groups and on the same day in a number of cities. For
example, 81 executions were reported on the semi day, 27 of them in Tehran, and the
remainder in other cities.
65. Between January and May 1989, more than 900 executions were officially
announced, most of them for drug trafficking. In subsequent months the Iranian
national radio continued to announce the hanging of groups of drug traffickers, so
that the total figure for executions may exceed 1,500 and is apparently increasing.
66. The Iranian national press and radio reported that those •xecutions took place
in public places, generally by hanging. An Italian journalist took a photograph
from his hotel room of eight corpses hanging from cranes ueed for public works, and
a Turkish newspaper published the photograph.
67. The Iranian press and radio also reported that 26 executions took place by
means of stoning. Fourteen of the 26 persons stoned to death were women convicted
of adultery, prostitution or procuring. In April 1989, 12 women and three men were
stoned to death on a football field, and apparently the spectators took part in the
execution of the sentence. According to the law in force, as explained end
commented on on television, the stones used must not be so large that the person
condemned dies quickly nor so small that they cannot be considered stones.
68. The Iranian Government his launched a campaign to eliminate drug traffickers.
From 21 January 1989, a new law came into force which imposed the death penalty as
the sole and mandatory punishment for individuals in possession of more than
5 kilograms of hashish or opium, or more than 30 grams of heroin, codeine,
methadone or morphine.
-21—
69. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has also ta en measures to
speed up judicial proceedings in connection with that offence, with the goal of
reducing the interval between the cc.i mission of the crime and the ‘ iplicatiàn of
the death penalty to no more than 10 days. The country's highest judicial
authorit ' stated on 20 Janubry 1989 that the procedures now in effect involved long
d 1ays and too many formalities and legal steps before the verdict could be carried
our., and that exceptions and loopholeri should be elimin ted. He concluded by
say ng that it was therefore necessary to expedite the trials so that they were
over in three, four or five days, a d the de1. nquent would know that “between the
commission of the crime and the axecr.tion of the penalty there would be a maximum
interval of ten days”. In a statement on 10 February, ti'- same high official noted
that the judiciary was following the new directives and the prisoners were being
executed v,ithin a very few days.
70. On 5 April 1989, the highest official in the Prosecutor's Office said that 313
traffickers had been eliminated, and that on the following day 65 more would be
‘-.anged. Commenting on those events, the high official added that the law had been
applied with great success, the doubts that some groups had expressed at first had
disappeared, and consequently the executions of drug traffickers would continue
until the last trafficker had been eliminated.
71. The Iranian press has reported few political executions so far in 1989.
However, many allegationr have been received that the large number of executions
for drug trafficking masks political executions. The Special Representative has
received information that some political executions took place in secret, including
executions during the first months of 1989.
72. The Special Representative has received and taken note of the followJng
written allegations: that in Tehran, four pol tiua1 prisoners belonging to the
People's Mojahedin organization, including a doctor, were hanged in Badeghien Plaza
in January: that in February, seven political prison rs were hanged at Molavi
Junction, three in Pirozzi Square, three in Haftchenar District, three in Shahpoour
Square, and one in Hashemi Square, all People's Mojahedin; that in March, three
other political prisoners were hanged in the Nezamabad District of Tehran and five
more in .3ha Abdolazim Square. It is alleged that all the individuals executed were
said to be drug traffickers when in reality they were political prisoners and were
executed for political reasons. It has also been reported that 200 political
prisoners executed in the city of Hamedan were falsely presented as drug
traffickers. In some cases, the names had been given of individuals who were
falsely called drug traffickers: Mahmo .id Jabbari, executed in Qazwin,
Homayoun So].ati, hanged in Tehran, Ozman Baluchi, executed in Chah- har. Two of
the witnesses who appeared before the Special Representative this year stated,
apparently without the slightest doubt or hee3.Lation, that, while they were
prisoners at the beginning of 1989 they saw that sr me of t1 ir prison comrades were
listed as drug traffickers, when in reality they were political prisoners, and that
they asserted this on the basis of direct personal acquaint” ce with those
indiv duals.
73. The official news agency, IRNA, reported that two persons had been executed in
the city of Zahedan on 17 June “for plotting against national security”. From
various sources, it has been po sib1e to draw up a list of some 1,700 individuals
possibly executed, either for ordinary offences or for political offences. The
sources include th family and friends of the victims and political opposition
groups of varying tendcncies, which agree that politicc 1 executions are
-22—
continuing. In a reply to Amnesty International, the Permanent Mission of the
Islamic Republ 4 c of Iran in New York stated the fo1lowing “Indeed, authorities o .
the Islamic Republic of Iran have always denied the existence of any political
executions. But that does not contradict other subsequent statements which have
confirmed that spies and terrorists have been executed.”
(b) Right to freedom from torture or cruel,. inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment
74. According to the information received, a common form of torture continued to
be flogging with cables and sometimes barbed-wires. Allegedly, flogging usually
was applied to the sole of the foot and to the legs, and beating was usually
inflicted by several prison guards.
75. N',w methods of torture that left little or no trace on the body of the victims
were described. Among these were* lashing all over the body (in the long run the
scars tend to disappear), suspension from the ceiling, mock hangings, crowding of
prisoners in small rooms with high temperatures and insufficient oxygen. It was
reported that soms prisoners were burned by hot metal rods or by lighted cigarettes.
76. Another method of torture described was the refusal of medical treatment,
using the pain from illness to break the will of the prisoners. For instance,
prisoners with kidney malfunctions resulting from beatings were allegedly prevented
from going to toilets. Prison conditions were described as extremely poor, cells
as being small and deliberately overcrowded, and sanitary facilities were
reportedly kept to a minimum, leading to skin, gall-bladder and other diseases.
Medical assistance and medicine were also said to be insufticient and sometimes
withheld until it was too late to save the life of a prisoner. Political prisoners
were allegedly held together with common law prisoners and mental cases.
77. According to the allegations received, a typical process of torture would
start with lashes over the whole body, to be followed by mock hanging or suspension
from the ceiling. Detainees were said to be held “en masse” in small closed rooms
with high temperatures and in u fficient oxygen. While such practices were being
applied, the guards pressed the prisoners to repent and to appear on official
television confessing their guilt.
78. Alleged forms of psychological torture including watching or listening to
other prisoners being tortured, dissemination of false news about the death of
family members or threat of rape. Attempts to incite prisonerb to join in the
torture of other inmates were also reported.
(c) Information concerning the situation o . followers of the Baha'i faith
79. According to information received, together with the relevant details of
names, places and dates of execution, 197 Baha'is were executed and 15 disappeared
since 1979. As regards 1988, the execution has been reported of two individuals
about whom there is no doubt whatever that they were Baha'is: Bihnam Pasha'i, a
resident of Simnan, who had been imprisoned since 19 vember 1983 and whose family
was notified on 3 December 1988 of his execution i ' the Evin prisons nd
Iraj Afshin, arrested late in 1986, whose family learnt of his execution on
26 November 1988.
-23—
80. At the beginning of January 1989, thd international press published the report
that two army generals sentenced to prison seven years earlier, Ardeshir Ardeatani
and All Jalayer, were executed on the charge that they ware followers of the Baha'i
faith. According to the press reports, the two generals were executed
on 23 December 1988, together with 23 members of the People's Mojahedin
organization. The same cable announced the execution of Zohreh Ainalyagin,
aged 27, who had been a candidate of the Mojahedin for the Iranian Parliament
during the elections of 1980, had been sentenced to 17 jea ' imprisonment in 1981,
and was a member of the political opposition.
81. It has been estimated that in 1986 780 Baha'is rernzt.uie . in prison and that of
those about 200 had been relee sed on bail. In May 1989, reliable sources indicated
that only 14 Baha'is remained in prison. Five of them had been arrested recently.
82. Those Baha'is who were expelled from government posts in the early 1980s, heve
reached the age of retirement and have an acquired right under law to retirement
pensions, continue to be refused them. Nor have they been reinstated in their
posts, even when they are qualified to fill them. Ranchers and farmers who profess
the Baha'i faith continue to be denied admission to agricultural co-operatives.
83. On the other hand, in cert ain respects the situation of the Baha'is has
improved; for example, some s iops which had been closed have been returned to their
former proprietors, and the latter have been permitted to operate them. These
reparation measures have been taken da facto , as the licances necessary for legal
operation of the shops have not been renewed. A few cases have been recorded of
other confiscated property being returned to its owners.
84. Baha'l community proper . .y remains confiscated. Recently, the Baha'is have
been permitted to bury their dead in cemeter 4 .es of their faith, which had been
c1o ed for a number of years. At prosent, fa Baha'i cemeteries remain closed.
85. Since 1988 many children and young people have been readniitted to primary and
secondary schools, but they continue to be denied access to the universities. All
Baha'ia are refused passports or permits to travel abroad.
86. The Ministry of Justice decree under which heirs must be officially certified
as such remains in force, and such certification is denied to Baha'is, who
consequently cannot take legal possession of their irtheritances.
87. The Special Representative has received a number of documents, duly signed and
sealed by officials of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, which
testify to the situation of the Baha'is. These docdments consist of •he
followingt (a) a letter from tb Department of Cereals, informing the addressee, a
retired employee, that In accordance with a judicial order of 6 June 1987, he has
been accused of belonging to “one of the groups that have strayed frorn Islam”, that
is, of being “a member of the Saha'i spy group”; (b) an announcement by the
Department of Industry and Trade of Tebran stating that the Islamic Committee for
the supervision of the distribution of goods confirms that it has cancelled the
ration cards of two individuals because they are Baha'is; (c) a note from
Mr. Aarya-Kinar, Director of the Department of Communications of the Sabulsar
District, dated 7 November 1987 and addressed to the Department of Communications
of Nazindaran Province, which states that the refusal to connect a telephone is
because the individual making the request belongs to the Baha'i community;
(ci) notes from Departments of the Ministry of Justice attesting that, first, an
-24—
individual, who preferred that he remain anonymous in the report, had been granted
a retirement pension and thanking him for his services, and second, stating that
the individual had been deprived of his pension, in conformity with the decision of
the Telecommunications Committee, because “his adherence to the Baha'i faith has
been estab1iahed” and (e) order No. 3261 of the Governor of Rejej Province,
dated 2 May 1987, ordering the closing of the shop owned by an individual of the
Baha'i faith who requested anonymity, and warning him that any action taken against
the order would subject him to criminal 1iability
88. The Special Representative received a translation of an open letter signed by
students of th Montazevi lycée addressed to their schoolmates of the Baha'i faith,
warning them, with threats, not to attend class. The text of the letter is
reproduced in annex IV.
89. The following information appeared in the Iranian press a sv.mmons dat•d
15 November 1988 addressed to Mra. Samadiyyih Musazadih Kuhnan, issued by the
Administrative Errors Investigatory Board summoning her to defend herself against
the charge that she had “relations with the misguided Baha'i sect.”; and a report
published the same day stating that Mr. Imamquli Shadiman had been dismissed from
his job because he was a Baha'i.
—25—
IV. CO .Q4ENTS AND VIEWS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE ISLAMIC
REPUBLIC OF IR?N
90. During the discussion in the Commission on Human Rights on the situation of
human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Iranian representative submitted,
on 6 March 1989, comments and views which should be retained because of their
implications for the implementation of the mandate and, in particular, for the full
co-operation that has year after year been requested of the Government of the
Islamic Republic of Iran by the General Assembly and the Commission on Human Rights.
91. The representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran said on that occasion that
so far 2,000 persons had been granted amnesty and that the exact and definitive
figures for the number of persons amnestied on the occasion of the tenth
anniversary of the Revolution would be communicated to the Special Representative
and the Commission on Human Rignts. When he concluded the present interim report,
the Special Representative had not received the definitive figures for the number
of persons amnestied, which might be due to the fact that, according to information
received, the judicial records of some 900 persons still in prison are being
carefully studied.
92. With regard to the study of human rights and their consequent evaluation, the
representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran asked that the competent organs of
the United Nations should take into account the situation in the country and, in
particular, two factors of the utmost importance: the international war of eight
years' duration and the revolutionary process under harassment and threats from
terrorist and subversive groups. The representative of the Islamic Republic of
Iran repeated the co nplaint that selectivity, inspired by political 4 nterests, was
applied in the determination of the countries subjected to the sc” uttny of the
Commission on Human Rights or to confidential procedure 1503 and called for equal
treatment for all countries that might find themselves in similar situations with
regard to human rights.
93. The representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran said that it was absolutely
necessary to establish the responsibility of groups and orga imtions which, acting
on their own account and separately from the Govarnment, or e . against the
Government, ‘-arried out activities and committed offences that comprised violations
of human rights and to hold them accountable for their acts. In his view, that
very important matter had not received appropriate consideration from the United
Nations. Once again, the Iranian comments rejected the impartiality and veracity
of one of the organizations submitting information on st pposed violations of human
rights. He argued that, in general, denunciations concerning violations of human
rights wore no more than mero allegations without proofs of any kind.
94. The representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran reiterated criticisms
voiced earlier of the text of the resolution of the Commission on Human Rights
containing the mandate of the Special Representative and the text of the draft
resolution extending that mandate, which was then to be put to the vote. He said
that those resolutions contained subjective criteria and lacked objectivity and
good will. He said, in particular, that, as on previous occasions, such
resolutions attempted to confer on groups a status that they did not really have.
That indirect language referred to the attribution of the status of religious
minority to the Baha'is. Those problems had prevented thc. Government of the
Is .amic Republic of Iran from co-operating fully with the Special Representative,
a .though that co-operation, while partial, had been on the increase.
—26-
95, The representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran recalled several times in
his statement the efforts made during the forty-third session of the General
? asembly to arrive at a consensus resolution that would facilitate the discharge of
the man Iate relating to human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Be then said
that those efforts had been very close to fruition but had broken down when the
elements of consensus had been at hands he added that the differences could only be
overcome through dialogue, understanding and mutual co-opeLation. The
representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran concluded tha.t part of his statement
with the following wordss “We remain ready and willing to co-operate and to
upgrade it in light of the consideration which I enumerated”.
96. The representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran also expressed the
readiness of his Government to proceed by way of dialogue, in the event that that
was acceptable to the countries sponsoring draft resolutions, and reiterated that
the Special Representative could play a role - which he qualified as mediation - in
obtaining an agreement between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the sponsors. He
said also that, in his view, the Special Representative had a good theoretical and
conceptual understanding of the proble ns underlying the differences that persisted
between both parties.
—27—
V. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
97. During the period in question, the Special Representative continued to re ive
written and oral allegations of huiiian rights violations in Iran. Those allegations
came from Iranians who had recently fled their country, Iranian organizations based
abroad, including a militant on that utilizes armed force, press and .-adio
reports, generally Iranian or taken from Iranian publicity media, and
non—governmental organizations in consultative status with the United Nations
Economic and Social Council. During the period under consideration, the Special
Representative received testimony denying some of those allegations, such as t e
high number of executions and political arrests and ill-treatment and torture of
prisoners. Attention should be drawn to the diversity of the sources and the
particular attention accorded by the Special Representative to independent sources
and to reports from Iranian communication media.
98. The Special Representative has informed the Government of the Islamic Republic
of Iran of the testimony received. The llagations communicated relate to the
right to life, the right not to be subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment, the right to liberty and security of person. the
right to freedom of conscience and religion and the right to guarantees of an
objective and fair trial.
99. During the forty—fifth session of the Commission on Human Rights, the
representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran said that he had considerably
advanced the preparation of replies to the lists of persons condemned to death
accompanying the 1989 final report of the Special Representative, whose contents
had been communicated to him before its publication, and he added that 140 cases
had been investigated and no trace of the said persons had been found in the
registers of prisons, hospitals, courts and cemeteries, owing to which he
considered that those persons had died during the invasion of Iranian territory in
July 1988. The letter of 26 June 1989 from the Deputy Minister for International
Affairs also contains this information.
100. It will be necessary to wait (or the circumstantiated replies of the Iranian
Government in order to evaluate the contradictory information and proceAd to
investigation by the means available. Also outstanding are the replies, many times
promised, to allegations of violations of human rights and to the lists of persons
executed accompanying previous reports.
101. The information received by the Special Representative, both from witnessos
and from non-governmental ozganizations and other independent sources agreed in
affirming that ill—treatment and torture, both physical and psychological, were
continuing in Iranian prisons. According to the reports, it would seem that,
during the months of the current year, psychological torture has bean prevailing
over physical torture, with the aim of avoiding visible marks.
1.02. On the other hand, some of the witnesses heard, when relating their experience
in Iranian prisons, had stated that they had not been subjected to ill-treatment or
torture. In conformity with that testimony, some prisoners are apparently not so
badly off in some prisons, but, of course, this testimony does not invalidate that
of less fortunate persons, perhaps much more numerous, who were very badly treated
in those prisons. On the basis of the accounts and replies to questioning the
Special Representative is convinced that, in Iranian prisons, the treatment of
-28-
prisoners continues to be completely careless and is therefore left to the
initiatives of the guards and that the investigators use methods at variance with
humanitarian principles in order to extract confessions or information from
prisoners.
103. Reports continued to be received about the lack of procedural guarantees laid
down in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, such as the lack
of impartial proof of the legality of detention, statement of the charges
immediately following arrest, the services of a defence lawyer, the hearing of
defence witnesses, the lack of publicity of the trial, effective appeal and other
irreg%larities. Some of the testimony related to the accused appearing in court
blindfolded, and all the testimony agreed that the verdict was pronounced in a
question of minutes. It was also reiterated that persons who had completed prison
terms continued to be detained for extensive periods on the whim of prison
officials.
104. Reports were still being received about very distressing conditions for
prieoners, for example, overcrowding in small spaces, scarcity of food, highly
deficient and scant sanitary facilities and a lack of medicarnents and adequate and
timely medical treatment.
105. It should be noted that so far there is no information concerning any measure
taken by the Iraniezi authorities to introduce effective procedural guarantees,
eradicate ill-treatment and torture, improve living conditions in the prisons or
assign responsibility to those accused of committing abuses. Consequently, in
these matters, the situation continues to be the same as last year.
106. With regard to allegations of violations of the right to freedom of thought,
conscience and religion and to freedom of expression, the Special Repres.ntative
received information on the situation of adherents of the Baha'i faith. According
to that information, the Baha.is are still being harassed for their faith.
Nevertheless, according to oral and written proofs received in recent month., that
harassment has decreased, and there have been some instances of rectification.
Fourteen are still in prison, and four were executed. Some hundreds who had been
kept in prison for some years have been released. In general, the Bahais are now
admitted to primary and secondary schools, but access to the universities continue
to be blocked. Some of their businesses have actually been reopened, with the
consent or the tolerance of the authorities, but others remained closed. Recently
they have been permitted to use their cemeteries, which had been forbidden to them
for years. On the other hand, the right to travel freely is still denied them. On
the whole, an improvement in the situation is noted, and it is to be hoped that the
Iranian Government will continue on that course to the point of making reparation
for all damages and will make harassment a chapter in history.
107. It should be noted that, according to official information, 2,500 political
prisoners were re1 ased on the occasion of the tenth anniversary of the Revolution
and that 900 remained in prison. The Special Representative announced that amnesty
in his final report to the Commis6ion on Human Rights. On that occasion, some
delegates told him privately that they had doubts 3bout that amnesty and feared
that it might be a question of propaganda. Recently, the Special Representative
has received assessments from armed opposition groups disputing the existence of
the amnesty end stating that, according to the investigations conducted by the
groups, none of the supposed amnestied persons have returned to their horn.. and
that they should therefore be numbered among the disappeared persons.
-29-
108. While awaiting fresh information in particular the conclusion that may be
reached by the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, concerning
these latest presumed disappearances, the Special Representative presents his
personal consideration regarding the cnse on the baeis of the information available
to him. Lacking, of course, direct proofs, he nevertheless maintains his
conviction that an amnesty was decreed on the occasion of the tenth anniversary of
the Revolution. In that regard, he points out that the information media,
generally very zealous, have not categorically denied it but have even implicitly
confirmed it in their commentaries and that the same attitude has been adopted by
non-governmental organiz ations concerned with human rights; furthermore, some of
the witnesses who were heard were released during the period during which the
amnesty was operative, which suggests that they might b counted among the
beneficiaries of that measure of clemency.
109. Assuming the reality and effectiveness of the February 1989 amnesty, it might
be characterized as a step in the right direction towards the disappearance of
political arrests. It is to be hoped that'measures of clemency such as this may be
multiplied on future occasions and complemented by the upgrading of the criminal
laws and the moderate application of the death penalty, although the ideal would,
of course, be its total abolition in all countries of the world.
110. The information emanating from various sources, including Iranian sources, end
to some degree corroborated by official statements, confirmed that politically
motivated mass executions took place in the second quarter of 1988 end that among
those executed were prisoners who were serving sentences, including some whose
sentences were about to be concluded in a few days and others who had been
recaptured. The international communication media and organizations that monitor
human rights agreed that those executions were the culmination of very summary
judicial proceedings, whore there had been any, and that they lacked the procedural
guarantees institutød in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
111. During the past months of 1989, politically motivated executions were also
reported. New information has supplemented the lists of executed persons of the
previous years. Or. the other hand, the Iranian written press and the official news
agency, IRNAI have announced the dramatic increase in the number of executions for
ordinary offences and, in particular, for the offence of drug trafficking. In
addition, allegations have been received according to which many or some of those
executions were political executions disguised with the aim of avoiding the
negative reaction of international opinion. Those allegations, which are extremely
sensitive, merit balanced and prudent examination, and, consequently, the Special
Representative proposes to continue this investigation through the means available
to him.
112. With regard to the mandatory death sentence for drug traffickers, some
comments are called for. Drug traffickers do not enjoy the slightest sympathy in
any country of the world, because they embody and promote one of the worst scourges
of the human race in these closing years of twentieth century. Their actions are
condemnable from every point of view, but this does not mean that they should not
enjoy guaranteea of a fair criminal trial and be recognized as entitled to inherent
rights, just like other human beings.
113. According to reports disseminated by the international press, the Government
of the Islamic Republic of Iran, through a law promulgated on 21 January 1989, made
possession of specific quantities of d:ugs - more than 5 kilograms of hashish or
-30- -
opium or more than 30 grams of heroin, codeine, methadone or morphine - an offence
punishable by death, without eiiy alternative penalty or coneideration of
exonerating, extenuating or aggravating circumstances. Possession of quantities
less then those stated is not punishable. Consumers must give up the habit in six
months; otherwise, they will be taken to re-education camps or health clinics. The
setting of the mandatory death penalty for mere possession of specific quantities
of drugs may give rise to confusion between consumer and trafficker, the one
requiring assistance and the other deserving some kind of punishment, although not
necessarily death. Possession of a gram of a hard drug may make the difference
between being sent to a health clinic or to the gallows 30 grams might indicate a
consumer, while 31 grams could mean the gallows for the possessor, on the legal
presumption, without admitting any proof to the contrary, that he is a drug
trafficker.
114. Possession bf drugs, even in smaller quantities than those indicated, might be
a sign or complementary proof of drug trafficking, but this isolated fact does not
necessarily prove that that is so. Possession of drugs should be combined with
other evidence to constitute a proof of the existence of the offence of drug
trafficking. In this case, the sole fact of possessing a specific quantity of
drugs is sufficient for proof of the offence. It should be pointed out that, in
the past, extreme severity in the treatment of common criminals has never lad to
the eradication of the offence, because that severity attacked the effects of the
problem but left its underlying causes intact.
115. According to reports, drug traffickers are tried by emergency courts,
constituted by a judge, a prosecutor and an intelligence officer, and in this court
the intelligence officer prevails, when the judge should prevail. However odious
the offence and however necessary it may be for a country to declare an open war on
drugs, there is no exemption from observance of procedural guarantees. The speed
of the proceedings, arranged for by means of two circulars distributed to all the
courts and other authorities, ensures that the cases can be closed in three, four
or five days and that a maximum interval of 10 days elapses between commission of
the offence and the punishment. Official statements from high judicial authorities
have announced that of fences are being punished within the above-mentioned limits;
and the time-limits are so short that they do not allow for the defence to be
prepared or for applications for review or appeal or application for pardon to be
made. The risks involved in extremely summary proceedings and the absence of
guarantees of a fair trial are illustrated by the case of possible judicial error
which has been mentioned. All this points towards the recommendation that trial of
the offence of drug trafficking be taken from the emergency courts and handed over
to regular courts and that professional judges should be entrusted with full
responsibility for the application of procedural guarantees ensuring a fair trial.
116. During the period under consideration, the theme of terrorism has been
raised. Pive of the witnesses examined, among them two veteran militants of the
People's ?4ojehedin organization, accused that organization of terrorism. Three
witnesses affirmed that the above-mentioned grouping had claimed responsibility, in
its own publications and on its radio, for the death of members of their families.
117. The same accusation has been made by representatives of the Government of the
Islamic Republic of Iran in international forums, most recently in the statement of
the Iranian representative on 6 March 1989 before the Commission on Human Rights.
Just as the deposition of witnesses is not to be discounted because of the
political position of the organization promoting their appearance, nor can the
—31—
testimony of those who have appeared through the offices of the Government of the
Islamic Republic of Ir '' be rejected, because it is not a question of statements by
one or other of the in ested parties but of individuals relating their personal
experience.
118. Terrorism committed by one of the parties to a civil or international dispute
never legitimates the terrorism with which the other party may respond. Fighting
terrorism with terror has been the erroiieous excuse that has caused indescribable
suffering to persons who have nothing to do with the events. In the long term, the
results have almost always turned against the promoters, because they are
profoundly injuring the feeling of natural piety and natural benevolence towards
other human beings and the ethical and religious ideas that constitute the
deep-lying root of various cultures.
119. The Special Representative has 3tated in previous reports that terrorism is to
be condemned, in all its forms and independently of its origin and motivations,
whether State terrorism or insurrectionist terrorism, because it is in itself a
brutal assault on the fundamental rights of persons. Anti-governmental groups that
use terrorism in order to obtain their political ends incur criminal responsibility
and violate well established end widely recognized norms relating to the protection
of human life and the integrity of persons. Terrorism is inconsistent with the
prevailing international crder. L.ife and liberty are ethical .. nd juridical assets
that are above considerations of party and factional interests, as well as
interstate rivalry and po)l.Pical power struggles. Human rights philosophy does not
ignore questions of internal and external security, because it is based,
inter qua , on the security associated with the state of law, conceived,
constructed and ensured through compliance with human rights norms.
120. Human rights, because of their inherent character and fundamental status have
been recognized as the key element of the modern State and of government by
consent, which, in turn, is the sole title to legitimacy of the command-obedience
binomium. Human rights therefore remain integral in extreme emergencies, even in
those that endanger the existence of the nation itself, and admit only of the
restrictions expressly laid down in the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights. Nor can the condemnable practices of terrorism be legitimately
countered with violations of human rights, on the pretext of State security or
stability of the Government. Moreover, it is precisely in emergency situations,
even acute emergencies, that adherence to human rights and their careful and
constant application is most necessary. In those situations, human rights reveal
their grandeur, their unique role in contemporary societies and their superiority
over politicist theories. Of coursa, the easy life consisting of abandonment or
neglect, laissez-faire and laissez-aller in human rights matters appears the
expeditious and immediately effective way to establish security of State and
Government, but the difficult way is much more constructive and, in the medium and
the long term bears better fruit, including well consolidated stability and
security.
121. According to all, the information, including official information, the
executions of drug traffickers have been carried out through the hangJng in public
places, in various cities on the same day and in groups, of tens or scores of men
and women. This mass implementation of the death penalty, in public and in various
cities at the same time, has negative repercussions on the feeling of personal
security of individuals and might drastically inhibit their expressions of the
exercise of such important rights as freedom of expression, freedom of associat'.on
—32—
. .-. N. . • .. . kV N . tmn .,.,tA'.. .N ..N,I
and political rights in general. The Iranian Government might consider these
possible effects with a view to iectifying, to the extent that might appear
prudent, the modalities currently accompanying the execution of drug traffickers
and other common criminals.
122. Although the state of full co-operation has not yet been attained during the
period under consideration, in spite of the reiterated calls of the United Nations
General Assembly and the Commission on Human Rights,, the Government of Iran has
continued to indicate that it is prepared gradually to increase its co-operation
with the Representative. Full co-operation, which would include in situ
investigation of the human rights situation, has continued to be one of the
short-term goals, but official objections to the language used in the resolutions
annually extandi g the mandate of the Special Representative have been maintained.
123. During the forty-third session of the Genera2 Assembly, negotiations were
conducted with a view to obtaining a consensus resolution and, at the same time,
guaranteeing full Iranian co-operation, including an invitation to the Special
Representative to visit the c.ountry and conduct investigations on the spot. After
extensive negotiations and advances in rapprochement between the positions of the
Iranian Government and the sponsors of the corresponding draft resolution, it was
finally not possible to reach consensus. During the forty-fifth session of the
Commission on Human Rights, thut effort was not repeated.
124. The Special Representative wishes to place on record the fact that he has
maintained personal and written contact with Iranian representatives and that he
has encountered a readiness to clarify outstanding issues, discuss opposing points
of view zir.d examine the most thorny questions in friendly terms. The personal
relations may be described as good, without prejudice to keen discussions end rough
moments, which are inevitable in such a sensitive dialogue, which needs to be
conducted in all frankness and with all the cards on the table.
125. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to make fresh appeals to the Iranian
Government to extend full co-operation to the Special Representative, including a
visit to the country. The countries directly involv ed in this might also decide
whether to repeat efforts to obtain some kind of settlement that, while not
diminishing the protection of human rights and compliance with international pacts
and declarations, might offer a mutually acceptable base for proceeding to another
stage in the developmrnt of the mandate.
• 126. The information reccived, both from official sources and from opposition
sources and independent sources do not contain elements that would, for the m. ..ient,
allow modification of the conclusions at which the Special Representative has
arrived in his earlier reports, particularly in his 1988 interim report to the
General Assembly and his final r€port for the current ear to the Commission on
Human Rights. The Special Representative maintains his conviction that acts are
being commitLed in Iran that are incompatible with international human rigflts
instruments that are binding on the Iranian Government.
127. Consequently, the Special Representative cunsiders that the recommendations
remain current and pertinent which he submitted to the Commission on Human Rights,
in particular those relating to requesting the Government of Iran to consider, as a
matter of urgency, extending its full co-operation and to adopt effective measures
on the following matters: (a) full co-operation with the Special Representative,
including a visit to the country to investigate in situ the allegations submitted,
_33 .
(b) scrupulous investigacion of all the allegations on possible human rights
violations that have been brought to its knowledge since the Commission on Human
Rights established the mandate of the Special Representative in 1984, and a
circumstantiated reply on the result of those investigations to the Special
Representative, so that he can take it into account in the preparation of his final
reports; (c) legislative and administrative steps to ensure fair trials;
(d)” substantial reduction of the number of executions, thus complying with the text
and the intention of the international Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
while avoiding, at the same time, carrying out those executions in such a way that
might be regarded as intimidating; (e) total elimination of ill-treatment and
physical and psychological ‘torture”during interrogations', pre-trial' detention and
punitive detention; (f) crediting prisoners with the time spent in pre-trial
detention so as to reduce the term of punitive detention; (g) a substantIal
improvement in the prison régime by the provision of minimal hygiene conditions and
adequate food, medicaments and medical care for' prisoners, and permitting ‘them
family visjts. On the other hand, close attention should be given to considering
and investigating the allegations that political' prisoners have' been executed' on
charges of drug trafficking. ‘ ‘
128. As a primary action decisive for: ‘the whole ‘process of full enjoyment ‘of human
rights, it seems appropriate to have a political' ‘pronouncement adopted at the
highest level, proclaiming a global policy ‘ f compliance' with ‘international human
rights instruments, followed by w penal norms, principally norms that empower
judges to adapt penalties to the p rticu1ar circumstances of'eaàh case, and
accompanied by concrete measures relating' to' inve'stigation,'supervision and
responsibility at the ‘adthinistrative level. ‘ ‘
129. ‘In conclusion, it should be ‘pointed out that the basic framework with'regard
to human rights has not changed'. The Special ‘Representative maintains his
conviction that the persistence of acts inconsiStéñt with' the international
instruments in force justifies both international concern and study and constant
vigilance by the United Nations General Assembly' and- the Commission on Human Rights.
—34-
APPENDIX I
Names and particulars of persons allegedly executed in
the Islamic Republic of Iran in the second half of
1988 and the beginning of 1989. supplementary to the
list contained in document E/CN.t./1989/25; list
provided by non-governmental sources
Name Forename Date
ABBASI 1.89 Tohran
ABBASI 11. 1.88 Shiraz
ABBASSIAN Behrooz 10.88 Ahwaz
ABDI Esfandiyar (Majid) . ‘.88 Tehran
ABDI Foroozan 9.88 Tehran
AEDI Ghanbar 1988 Lahijan
ABDI Hossein 11.88
ABDOL-HOSSEINI Akbar 9.88 Tehran
ABDOL-HOSSEINI Morteza 9.88 Tehran
ABDOLEOSSEINI Gholam-Hossein 11.88 Karaj (Gohardasht
Prison)
ABDOLLARI Mirfattah 11.88 Teliran
ABDOLVAHAB Hossein 11.21.88 Karaj
ABEDI Hassan 9.88 Tehran
ABEDINI Abbass 9.88 Tehran
ABEDINI Monir 9.88 Tehran
ADEL I 9.88 Babolsar
ADI-S ERIN All 9.88 Ardebil
ADIB Mabmood 9.88 Mashad
ADIBI Siroos 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
AFGHAN Abbass 9.88 Karaj
AFGHANI Hossein 12.88 Tehran
AFRAVI Naji 2.89 Ardebil
AFRAZEH Abbass 1988 Lahijan
AFSALI Esmaeil 9.88 Tehran
AFSARI Hamid 1.89 Babol
APSARI Mohammad 10.88 Amo l
AFSHAR 12.88 Isfahan
-AFSRAR 12.88 Karaj
AF SRAR Akbar 10.88 Ahwaz
AFSHAR Parviz 11.27.88 Tehran
AFSHARKANDI Rasou]. 11.88 Orumieh
AFSHARLU Ahmad 10.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
AGA-NOOR Shahnaz 9.88 Tehran
AGAH 11.88 Mashad
AGHAYAN Abciolvahab 12.88 Larestan
AGHAYAN A ir 1.89 Shahrood
AGHILI Hainid 11.88 Tehran
AGHVAMI Maliheh 1.99 Tehran (Evin Prison)
AGHVAMIPANAB Mohammad-Reza 11. 6.88 ICaraj
AHMiG Saied 11.88 Tehran
AEMAD-NEJAD Farshid 9.88
AITh4ADI 12.88 Tehran
-.1—
Place
?JNADI Abdo l lah 1988 Buehehr
AEMADI Abmad 1.89 Garmiar
AJfl4ADI Ashraf 2.11.88 Tehran
AID4ADI Aai.h 9.88 T.hran
ABMADI ?arah-Naa 9.88 Isfa) an
ABMADI Fariba 8. 6.88 Zefahan
AIThtADI Hassan 3.89 Tehran (Evin Priso )
AMMADI Hushang 11.88 Hamedan
ABMADI Mansur 9.88 Shires
A 4ADI Mohammed 8. 6.88 lefahan
AIfl4ADI Mohammed 1.89 Mashed
ABMADI Mohammed Raze 11.88 Garmear
AIfl4ADI S.yyed 3.89 Tehran (Evin Prison)
?JC4ADIAN Mahin 9.88 Tehren
A 4ADIAN MOGHADDAS Ahmad 10 • 88 Ahwaz
AIThIADPUR 9.88 Isfahan
Am4ADPUR 9.88 lefahan
AIU4ADZADEH 9.88 Reeht
AJDAB-AFSHAR ghar 9.88 T.hran
AZBARI F.izo l lah 12.88 Gorgan
AKBARI-MONFARED Roghiyeh 9.88 T.hran
ARBARIAN FeLor 1988
ARRAMI-FARSI 2.89 Tabran
ARZIA Mine 10.88 T.hran (Evin Prison)
AL-ES'HAQ MeI di 2.89 Qom
AL-t .AMEH Fazilat 9.88 Tehran
ALA'EDDINI Masoud 11.88 Shires
ALAk. ARI Bivas 9.88 Tehran
ALAVI TAFRESHI Af shin 1.20.89 Xaraj
ALl MORADI Behrooz 11.88 Sanandeg
ALI-BEIX A li-kkb er 7.27.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
ALl-POOR Hamid 1.89 Lahijan
ALt -ZADEH Mahmoo d 9.88 Tehran
ALIARBARIAN Majid 11.88 Mashed (Vakilabed
Prison)
ALIDOOST Raze 1988 Lahijan
ALIREZANIA 12.11.88 Tehran
ALIZADEH Ghasem 11.88 Orumieh
ALIZAGHII Zia 11.88 Tahran
ALLAN-POOR Hossein 10.88 Karaj (Gohardasht
Prison)
ALLAEIARI Majid 1.89 Ahwaz
ALLAMEH 11.88 Sernnan
ALLAMEH Fazilat 9.88 Tehran
AMADPUR 9.88 lefahan
AMIN Masoud 11.88 Tehran
M4IN Raze 11.88 Tehran
AMINI Khos ow 8.88 Raraj (Gohardaeht
(Prison)
AMINIAN Alireza 9.88 Mashed
AMIRI 9.88 Mashed
AZ4IRI 1988
—2—
Date
A14 1R 1
AI4IRI
AMJADITOOSI
AMOOZGAR
AMRI
ANNOSNE-SARIXANI
ANOOSHEX
ANSARI
AQVA I PANAR
ARAB VAZIRIFAR
ARABI
ARASTEE
ARDAXANI
ARDESHIRI
ARDESHIRI
ARDE SHIRZADEH
ARDESTANI
ARIAN
ARJMAND
ARJMANDI
ARJMANDI
ARMIN
ARSHADI
AR SHAD I
ARZHANGI
ASSAIl
ASGAR-KNANI
ASGAR-SHAI II
SGARI
ASGAI I
ASGARI
ASGARI
ASGAUHANX
ASGHAR-ZADEH
ASOHARI
ASGHARIP OUR
ASHOURI
ASHRAFZADEGAN
ASHTARI
ASHT IAN I
ASOOPA
ASSADI
AS S AD I
ASSADI
ASSADI-ZADEH
ASSADPOUR
ASSGARI
ATARI
ATARI
ATARI
ATARI TEHRANI
ATI OHER-CHI
Jahanbakhsh
Parvin
Kho8ro 7
AlL
Mojteb
Mohi nm ad
Mo)aeznmad
AlL
Mohanu ad Reza
Alireza
Bahman
Majid
Jafar
Shahran
M•hrdad
Mabmood
Akbar
Mahrnood
Jamal
Javad
Abo ighasem
Ahmad
Majid
Zahra
Ahmad
Mohemma d-R.sa
Shahia
Modjtaba
Mahmood
Siroos
Mohammad
Seyyed Hassan
Mehrdad
Jafar
Al i
Mahmood
Nader
Jalal
Siroos
Nossein
Mebdi
Moha1Tm ad
kambia
Kamal
12. 688
9 • 88
10.88
12.29 .88
9.88
8. 5.88
12.88
9.88
11. 6.88
9 • 88
1.89
1.89
9.88
11.88
11.88
1 • 89
9.88
11.88
1,89
9188
11.88
9.88
9188
9188
9188
9188
9.88
11.17.88
9188
11.88
10.88
9 • 88
9,88
11.88
9,88
9 • 88
9.88
9.88
10.88
9.88
11.88
12.88
11.88
11.88
11.88
11.88
9.88
9.88
9.88
11.88
1.89
11.25.88
Karaj
Karaj
Tehran
Shiras
Arak
D c if UI
Ahwaa
Tehran
Aaraj
Semnan
Garmsar
Shires
Tehrar
Kas.roon
Xa..roozt
Shires
Tebran
Tebran
Shires
Qasvin
Rasht
T.hran
Zanjan
Zanj an
Karaj
Des ful
T.hran
Tehran
Karaj
Tehran
Tabran
Tshran
Tihran
Ansal i
1sf alien
Gorgan
Shabrood
Rasht
Karaj
Tehran
Mashed
1sf alien
Tabris
Tsh ran
1sf alien
Tehran
Tehran
Tehran
Tehran
Zanj an
(Evin Prison)
(Evin Prison)
(Evin Prison)
(Evin Prison)
—3—
1
Forename Dpte Place
ATRAK Farha 8.88 Tahran (Evin Prison)
ATRAK Farrokh-.Zad 8.88 Isfahan
ATTARI Au 1988
ATTARI Shahrbanoo 9.88 Te)iran
AVAZ-ZADEH 1.89 Ganaveh
SHIRAZI (Fatimeh)
AZAD Rahim 3.89 Babol (Guards
Prison)
AZADEH Hassan 11.88 Tehran
AZADIKHAH Rahim 8.88 Homayounshah
AZARASH GRORGANI AlL 9.88 Tehran
AZAflI Davood 9.88 Tehran
AZIMI Hamdam 10.88 Tehran
AZIMI Hoj jet 9.88 Te ran (Evin Prison)
AZIZ-ZADEH MALEKI Shahpour 10.88 Tabriz
AZIZI Ashraf 9.88 Tebran
AZIZI Davar 11.88 Ardebil
AZIZI Ebrahim 11.83 Boroojerd
AZIZI Robebeh 9.88 Tabria
AZIZI Yavar 9.88 Tabris
AZIZSALES Kha li l 9.88 Orumieh
AZMUDEH LEKAZ4I Fakhri 12.88 Rasht
BABAEI 11.11.88 Abhar
BABAEI Mostaf a 10.11.88 Tehran
BABELABI Parviz 12.88 Tehran
BABRI Abri 9.88 Anza li
BAGHERI Arnel 10.88 Tehran
BAGHERI Mehrdad 12.88 Ahwaz
BAGHERI Siroos 11.88
BAGHERIFARD Bagher 10.88 Lahijan
BAGHIAN TOOSI Mobsen 9.88 Mashed
BAHADOR Akram 1988 Tehran
BAHADORI GHASRGHAEI Morad 9.88 Tehran
BAHMANX Hamid 11.88 Teh an
BANRAMI Fereydoon 11.88 Tehran
BAERAMI Kurosh 9.88 Karaj
BANRAMI Mohammad Amir 1.89 Tehran
BAHRAMI Zahra 11.88 Tehran
BAERAMI FARID Mohsen 12. 4.88 Rasht
BABRAMI-HEIDAJI Darioush 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
B A NRKAZEMI 1988 Lahijan
BA}IROLOLOOM Ef fat 9.88 Shiraz
BAKHSHAEI Mahmood 12.88 Tehran
BAKHSHAII Nasro l lah 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
BAKHSHANDEH Davood 12.88 Tehran
BAKHSHI Hossein 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
BAKHSHI TARI Hamid Raza 11.88 Tehran
BAKH SHIAVI Jalil 11.88 Dezfu l
BAKHSHIZADEH 10.88 Gorgan
BAZ4QNIRI Abdol—Sattar 9.88 Isfahan
BANDAR Hamid 11.88 Tehran
BANDI 11.88 Semnan
—4—
Fe rename
BANI M4ERIAN Real 9.88 Xaraj
BARADkRAN-MOQADDAZ4 Ali-Aighar 12 • 88 Mambad
BARkRX Rasoul 9.88 Mashad
BARZAXIPOOR Majid 11.88 Lahijan
BARZEGAR 9.8 Shiras
BATENI Mabmood 1988 Rasht
BAVkR Mi 11.88 Lahijan
SAZYARPOUR Abbas 10.83 Boraujan
BAZThRPOUR azam 10.88 Boraijan
BAZYARPOUR Maeoomeh 10.88 Boraijan
BZHESHTI-TAYAR Ht*rieh 10.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
BEHNIK Macsan 9.88 Mashad
BEHRANGI Abdo l lah 11.88 T.hran
BEHZADI Macsan 9.88 Hashtpar
BEHZADI Moitaf a 8. 5.88 Dieful
BEIK-MOHAk'24).DX Mohammad Reza 9.88 Tihran
BIABANGARD Habib 11.88 T.hran
BIDOKHTI Hoss•in 12.88 T.hran
BXGHAM Amir Mihran 9. 2.88 T.hran
BIGLARI Esmasil 11.88 Tehran
BIGLARI Mehrdad 11.88 Lahijan
BIHANTA-TOOSI Mohemmad 11.88 Machad
BITARAFAN M.hdi 1.15.89 Ohom
BOKHARAEX Makhsoos 8.88 T•hran
BOLBOLIAN Roahan 12. 4.88 T.hran (Evin Prison)
BOOINI Kameran 11.88 T.hran
BOOINI Kiomars 11.88 Tshran
BOORBOOR Kha li l 12.88 8.mnan
BORHANI S.yyed Abmad 11.88 Qasvin
BORHANI Seyyed Mohammed 11.88 Qaivin
Ho as. in
BORJ-ALI Yusief 11.88 T.hran
BOROOJERDI Ehoarow 9.88 T.hran
BORZ-ABADI 9.88 T.hran (Evin Prison)
BORZ A BADI-FARAHANI Mortise 12.88 Arak
CHABARROOSTA 11.88 Shiras
CHAMANI Behzad 11.88 Rasht
CHAR-ROOSTAIl 1988 Ahwas
CHEHR-AZAD Mohammed 9 • 88 Tihran
DADGAR Majid 10.20.88
DADGAR Masaoumeh 10.20.88
DADSETAN Zari 9.88 Raaht
DAXNAMA Afagh 11.88 Tebran
DAKNAMA Majid 11.88 Shires
DM..XRI Maryam 11.88 Rasht
DAMGHANIAN Hassan 9.88 Machad
DANABIFARD Mohammed Ebrahim 9.88 S.mnan
D)NESH Khosrow 9.88 Rasht
DANIALI Soheyl 11.88 T•hran
DARABI Hamid 10.88 T.hran
DARABI Mansareh 9.88 Bor jerd
—5-
Foransii e Place
DARABI Mansoor 10.88 Borujerd
DARABI Moh en 10.08 Sorujerd
DARABI Raze 10.88 Borujerd
DARABI Sasen 9.88 Borujerd
DAR)AZINI Huesein 10.88
DARVI Rashid 9.88 Tehran
DARVISHVAND Mohammad 1988 Masjed Soleiman
DARYARI Mehdi 9.88 Fassa
DASETAXI Changis 8. 5.88 Deaful
DkSHTI Fariba 9.88 Tehran
DASRTISABERI A u 9.8& Tehran
DASTIAN Akbar 11.88 Amol
DAVOODI Gho lam 9.88 Zanjan
DAVOODPOOR Mohaen 9.88 Orumieh
DEHGHANZADEH Mahrnood 10.88 Ahwaz
DELAVAR 9.88 Gonbad
DELAVARI Gholam Raze 11.88 Semnan
DELKASH Faramars 9.88 Karaj
DERAKHSHANI-NXA Mehri 11.88 Tehran
DEZYAkII Mohammed Hossein 9.88 Shahrood
DXBAEI Reze 11.10.88 Rasht
DINAVAND Rahim 1988 D€zfu l
DOLATSHAEI 11.88
EBADI Mahmood 12. 9.88 Tehran
EBRANIMI Asgher 11.88
EBRAHIMI Jaafar 11.23.88
EBRAHIMI Karim 1988 Tehran
EBRAHIMI Nasser 1988 Tehran
EBRAHIMIAN Hadi 9.88 Shahrood
EFTEKHARI Masoud 12.88 Tehran
EGHBALI NAMIN Mehr&n 9.88 Tehren
EHTERAMX Seyyed Mahdi 10.88 Ahwaz
EIDZPOOR 1.89 Ganaveh
BIDIPOUR 11.88 Shires
EKUTIARI 11.88 Kerend
EMAMI Hedayatoi lah 1.89 Abhar
EMAMI Nasro ll eh 1.89 Abhar
ENSI Sadigheh 9.88 Tehran
ESFANDIARI-NOORI Farshad 9.88 Tehran
ESHOHI 8.88 Ahwaz
ESKANDARI Gholam Hossein 1988
ESKANDARI Mahmood 11.88 Tehran
ESKANDARI Mohammed 3.89 Karaj (Ghezelhesar
Prison)
ESLAMBUL-CHI Hamid 1.89 Mashed
ESLAMI 9.88
ESLAMI Farah 11.88 11am
ESL.AMI Maryam 3.89 Mashad (Vakilabad
Prison)
ESLAMI Mehran 1. 9.88 Karaj
ESMAEILI Effat 11.88 Tehran
—6—
F renaine Date
ESMAKILI Fatemeh 6. 8.88 lafahan
ESMAEILI Zraj 8.88 Tehran
ESMAEILI Parvaneh 6. 8.88 lafahan
ESMAEXLI Saber 9.88 Tehran
ESMAEILI-POUR Ef fat 9.88 Tehran
ESMAEILIAN 12.88 1sf ahan
ESNA-ASHARI 9.88 Tehran
ESNA-ASHARI Tehran
EVAZI-ALAMDARI A u 9.08 Tehran
EVAZX-ALAMDARX Faremars 9.88 Tehran
FAICHARZADER Au 11.88 Maihad
FAXRRI Nader 11.88
FALLAHI 11.88 Ke manehah
FANI Mohamrn d 9.88 Maah d
FARAMARZI Mehrdad 9.88 Tehran
FARAMARZX Nahid 1.10.89 flandaca.bbaaa
FARDIPOOR Parvin 1988 Maa .d Soleiman
FARHADI Babram 1988 Raeht
FARHMII 1.89
FARIAD-ABADI Hassan 9.88 Tabris
FARIDAN 1988 Ahwaz
FARIDAN ESFAHANI Sadegh 11.88 Ahwaz
FARIDANI 12.88 Ahwaz
?ARJAD 12.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
FARSX Hassan 11.88 T.hran
FARSI Kasem 9.88 Mashed
FARZANEH-SANI Mehrdad 11.88 T.hran (Evin Prison)
FATEHALI-ASHTIANI Sadri 11.88 T.hran
FATEMI M hsen 11.88 Sav.h
FATEMI Moheen 11.88 Sav.h
FATHI Ah a6 11.88 Semnan
FATRI-KUYEHKI yasir 11.88 Tehren (Evin Prison)
FATTAHIAN Soheyla 9.88 Tehran
FAZL ALI Hossein 11.88 Tehran
FAZLI Alit -eu 11.88 T.hran
FAZEIX Hassan 11.88 Zanjan
FAZLI Mahmood 11.88 Tehran
FEIZ-ABADI Gholam Nassau 11.88 Tehran
FEIZ-ABADI Gholam Hossein 11.88 Tehran
FEREYDOONI Mehdi 11.88 Karaj (Gohardaaht
Prison)
FEYZI Bahran 9.88 Tehran
FIROOZMAND Gho larn 11.88
FIROUZI Mahtab 9.88 Tehran
FOOLADI 11.88 Tehran
FOOLADI Hadi 10 • 88 Reaht
FOROOZAN 10.11.88 Rasht
FORSAT Mohaxnmad Javad 11.88 Shiraz
GALLEH-DAR 12.88 Khorram Abad
GANJIKHANI Behrooz 9.88 Tehran
GARABI Mohsen 9.88 Mashed
GERAMI Ramezan 12.88 lafahan
—7—
Name Forename Date Place
GHADAI4I Hooahaug 12.88 Amol
GHkFURI 11.88 Ghaemsh hr
GHkFFARZADEGAN Davar 11.88 Ardebil
GHkFOORI Hassan (Mohsen) 9.88 Mashad
QH .HREMANI kyyoub 2.89 Tehran
OHALAVAND Hojat-O l lah 9.88 Desful
GHkLAVAND Hojjat 8. 5.88 Desful
OHALAVAND Mohammad Reza 8. 5.88 Dezfu l
OHALAV).ND Soghra 8. 5.88 Dezfu l
OHALAVAND Yahya 8.88 Ahwaz
OHALEHEX 9.88 Tehran
GHALEHEI 9.88 Tehran
OHANBARI Taher 9.88 Tehran
OHANBARI Teymoor 1988 Massed Soleiman
GHANDHARI-ALAVIJEH Manuchehr 11.88 Tehran
OHANE TABRIZI Nader 1988
GRANEX Hassan 11.88 Rasht
OHANIMATI-OL-KARIZI Hojtaba 10.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
GHANNADI Saeid Mohammad 11.88 Rasht
GHARAEI Hamid 9.88 Mashed
GHAEAEI Mehdi 9.88 Mashed
GRASEMI 2.89 Shires
GHASHGHAEI Morad 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
OHASHGHAEIAN Asghar 11.88 Tehran
GHASHGHAEIAN Reza 11.88 Tehran
GHASSEMI 12.88 Tehran
GHASSEMI-SIiOKRIAZI Salman 10.30.88 Tabriz
GHAVAZ4I Moheen 9.88 Lahijan
GHA OOR NMAFABADI Ebrahim 8.88 1sf ahan
GHAZANFARPOOR MOGHADDAM Alireza 2. 8.89 Karaj (Gohardasht
Prison)
GHAZNAVI Katayoon 9.88 Tehran
GHAZVINI Hossein 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
GHIAMX 1988 Ahwaz
GHOBAD-POUR Marziyeh 9.88 Tehran
GHOBADRAR Manuchehr 9.88 Tehran
OHODSINIA Simm 9.88 Tehran
OHOLAMI Ahamd 9.88 Ghaemshahr
GHOLAMI Au Asghar 8.88 Mashad
GHOLAMI Hojjatol lah 9.88 Tehran
GHOLAMX Mohammad 9.88 Tehran
OHOLAMI Parvin 9.88 Oruznieh
GHOLI-POOR Shaban 11.88 Hainedan
GHOMIAN Behrooz 9.88 Tehran
GRORAYSHI Masiha 12.88 Zanjan
GHORBANI Ahmad 11. 3.88 Orumieh
OHORBANI Mahin 9.88 Tehran
GHORBANI Senobar 9.88 Tehran
GHOREISHI A.bo lfaz l 11.88 Semnan
GROREISHI Jalal 9.88
GO}IARNIA Farideh 9.88 Karaj
GOLCHINI 9.88 Anzali
—8—
Nsrne
GOLESTANI Xwnal 9.88 Shiras
GOLPAYEGANI Hassan 1.89 Garmsar
G OLZADEH-GHAFOORI Hadi 11.88 T.hran
GOLZADEH-GHAFOORX Hossein 8.88 Tehran
GOLZADEH-GHAFOORX HarLem 12.88 Tshran
000DARZX Hassan 11.88
GOODARZX Ma id 12.88
000DARZX Hinoo 1.21.89 F& lian
GOODARZI Minu 11.23.88 Shires
GOODARZI Ni na 11.88
000DARZI Parvis 9.88 Hsm.dan
GOODARZX Shehbas 11.23.88 Shires
GORGIN lussef 11.88 Tshran
GORJI 9.88
GOVARAI'I Au 1.89 Qasvin
HABIBI Ebrahim 9.88 T•hran
HADI-POOR Seyy.d Hemid 9.88 Ahwai
MABE l Parvin 9.88 T•hran
HAGHANI Hoessin 11.88 Lahijan
HAGIIIGHAT Moha nad 11.88 Tabnis
HAGHIGHAT TALkS Taher 9.8 T.hran
HAGHIOHI Roghieh 1.8 l T.hran
HAGHIGHI Shahin 1988 Rasht
HAGHIGHI FARD Mohammed 9.88 T.hran
HAGHIGHIAN ROODSARI 11.88 T.hran
HAGHIGHIAN ROODSARI Au Naghi 11.16.88 Rasht
HAJ AKBARI Soh.i la 9.88 T.hran
HAJ-AGHAII Ghaasem 10.88 Xaraj (Gohardasht
Prison)
R AJ-MOHA*IADI Zohreh 9.88 Tshran
HAJI NEJAD All 12.88 Karaj
HAJIA-NEJAT Lsi la 11.88
HAJIAN Nile 1988
HAKIMI Siroos 11.88 T.hran
HAMEDANI Farhad 8.88 Kerend
HAMIDI Fereshteh 9.88 Tehran
HA*IAMI Mohammad 11.88 Mashed (Vakilebad
Prison)
HAMZEH Shalalvand 12.88 Karaj
HAMZEHEI Fat.meh 9.88 Tshran
HANAEI Moheen 9.88 Mashed
HANIF 11. 3.88 Orwnieh
HANIF Roghiyeh 9.88 Tehran
HANI 'ZADEII Fereydoon 12.88 Desful
HAQVERDI All 9.88 Tehran
HARIRI Abbas 11.88 Karaj
HARIRI Khalil (Yaghoob) 11.88 Zanjan
HARIRI Magheoud 10.88 Raaht
HARIRI Mohien 11.88 Rasht
HARRIAN Masoud 12.88 T.hran (Evin Prison)
HASANPOUR Letif 9.29.88 Tshran
HASHEMI Jafar (Hadi) 8.88 Mashed
—9—
Name Forename Date Place
HASHEMI Mahdokht 12.88 Tehran
HASHEMX-BAJGIRAN Jamshid 9.88 Isfahan
HASHEMIAN 11.88 Qaavin
HASHEMIAN Habib 9.88 Tehran
HASHEMIAN Mohammad 1.89 Tehran (Evin Prison)
H A SHEMZADEH Mashallah 9.88 Mashad
HASSANI Mabmood 7.30.88
HASSANI Yaqoub 11.88 Karaj (Qezeihessar
Prison)
HASSANPOOR Hassan 9.88 Orwnieh
HASSANZADEH 11.88 Maragheh
HAYDARI Zohreh 9.88 Tehran
HAZRATX Hossein 12.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
HEIDARX 12.88 Mashad
HEIDARI Farrokh 11.88 Tehran
HEIDARI Seyyed A].i 11.88 Tehran
HEIDARI Shahin 10.88 Dezful
HEIDARIEH Hossein 7.31.88 Mashad
HEIDARIEH Mohammad 7.31.88 Mashad
HEIDARNIA Saeid 11.88 Tabriz
HEJRATI Mirzarnan 12.88 Lahijan
HE?.24AT 1 Abdolrahman 11.88 Tehran
HENDIJANI Farid 1988 Ahwaz
HENDJANI Farid 9.88 Rasht
HESAM Asgar 11.88 Tabriz
HESAMI Mohammad-Ali 9.88 Birjand
HEYDARI 12.88 Mashad
HEYDARI 12.88 Mashad
HEYDARI Shirin 9.88 Tehran
HOOSHMAND Amano l lah 11.88 Shiraz
HOOSHMAND liojjat 12.88 Bandaranza li
HOSEINI Seyyed Nasrollah 12.88 Kermanshah
HOSEINPOOR Qolam 12.88 Bushehr
HOSSEIN-ZADER ERBANI Soosan 9.88 Tehran
HOSSEINI 11.88 Tebran (Evin Prison)
HOSSEINI Abolfazi. 9.88 Chiraz
HOSSEINI Akbar 12.88 Tehran
HOSSEINI Etrat 9.88 Shiraz
HOSSEINI Layli 9.88 Tehran
HOSSEINI Mir .-Hossein 12. 1.88 Khoy
HOSSEINI Mohammad Hossein 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
HOSSEINI Mohammad Hossein 3.89 Booshehr
HOSSEINI Parviz 9.88 Gachsaran
HOSSEINI Reza 12.88 Tehran
HOSSEINI Saeid 8.88 Tahran
HOSSEINI Seyyed Esmaeil 9.88 Gonardasht
HOSSEINPOOR 1.89 Ganaveh
HOVEIDA Mehrdad 9.88 Tehran
HUSHANGI 11.88 Kermanshah
ILBAKI 11.88 Tehran
IRANI Majid 9.88 Tehran
-10-.
Place
Name
Forename
Att
IZA.DI
I ZADI
JAAFANI
Javad (Hesam)
Mehdi
Seyy.d Mohammad
Reza (Mabmood)
Fahirneh
Jalal
I raj
Ami r i
AI uiiad
Jafar
Fahimeh
Hooshi
Mitra
Mob amm ad
Hadi
M.hdi
Rosa
Siroos
Abdoirassul
Gholam Ha&san
Masoud
All
Ar f a
Mohammad Saeid
Far) ad
Farhad
Shahi n
Fereydoon
Al i
Hushang
All
Shahpoor
Aboighasem
Ardeshi r
Farangis
Hamed
H am i i
Mary n
Esfandiar
12.88
12.88
1.89
9.88
10.88
9.88
11.88
11.88
11.88
11.29.88
10,88
11.88
2. 9.88
9 • 88
9.88
19.88
9.88
9.88
9.88
11.88
12.88
11. 11. 88
9.88
2.89
11.88
11. 15. 88
10.88
9.88
1.89
9.88
10. 23. 88
11.88
11.88
12.88
11.88
9.88
11.88
8. 2.88
11.88
1.89
9.88
10. 23. 88
9.88
11.88
11.88
9.88
9.88
12.88
11.88
12.18.88
Shires
Hams dan
Xe rmanshah
T.hran
Xermanshah
Tehran
Tehran
Tahran
Tehran
Tehran
Mashed
Tehran
Bandarabbass
Tehran
Tehran
Karaj
Shahrood
Qasvin
Tehran
Abbar
Boroojerd
Mashed
Shires
Tehran
Tehran
Shires
Tehran
Xaraj
Xe rmanshah
Tehran
Tehran
Tebran
Tehran
Behbahen
Rashan
Kermanshah
Tehran
Tehran
Xe rmanshah
Xaraj
Shiras
Tehran
Tehran
Xe rmanshah
Tehran
Shires
Xaraj
(Evin Prison)
(Evin Prison)
(Evin Prison)
JAM4EH
JABBARI
JA3BARI
JABBARI AN
JABBARIAN
JABBARIAN
JAFAR-ZADEH
JAFFARI
JABANBAKHSH
JAHANOIRI
JAHANGIRI
JAHROMI
JALAA
JALALI
JAL.ALI
JALALI
JALALI AN
JALALIAN
JAMA • AT
JAMASBI
JAMEH-AWJA .T
JAMEHDAR
JANI
JANNATI
JASEMI.
JAVAN SHOJA MOFRAD
JAVIDNIA
JAVIDYAR
JEBRAEELI
JEBRAEELI
JER
JODAKI
JOLGHAZ I
KADKHODA
KAFFASH
KAFFASH-POOR
KAFFASHIAN
KAFFASHIAN
KAJIRI ZI
KAHRI ZI
KALANTAR
KALANTAR
KALANTAR
KALANTARI
KAIJINTARI
KALANTARI
KALHOR
(Evin Prison)
(Evin Prison)
—11—
Name Foi ename Data Place
KAMAL-ZADEH Nasrin 9.88 Tebran
KM.thLI Marjan 9.88 Tehxan
KARI K! Hassan 11.88
KARAMI MAHA ADI Boozarjomehr 10.88 Tabriz
RARGARMOZD Bahram 1988 .hwaa
KARIM NEJAD Mohsen 8.88 Tebran
a(ARIMI 11.88
RARIMI All 9.88 Tehran
KARI 1I Hossein 9.88 Tehran
KARIMI Mohauunadshah 10.88
KARIMI Moslem 11.88
KARIMI N Masumeh 11.29.88 Tehran
(Shur. ngiz)
KARIMIA.N Mehri 11.88 Teh:an
KARIMZADEH Saber 9.38 Tehran
KARIMZADEH Sab3r 11.88 Ardebil
KASHLNIAN Kiomars 11.88 Kermanshah
KASRAI'I Mahmood 1988 Ahwaz
KAVEH 1.89 Arak
KAZAZI Jalal 9.88 Tehra i
KAZEM-BAYGI Maryam 9.88 Tehran
KAZEMI—ABAD Behrooz 9.88 Lahijan
KAZEMI-FARD Mehdi 9.88 T *hran
KESARI Hadi 11.88 Rasht
KESHAVARZ Fatho].lah 9.88 Gach-Saran
KESHMIRI Abbas 11.88 Tehran
KEYVANPOOR Mostafa 1.89 Shiraz
KHM. .GHI Nasser 9.88 Tehran
KNALIL. Esmaei]. 9.88 Mashed
KH AT. .I1 .I Ebrahim 9.88 Mashed
KHAL LPO0R Noorol lah 1.89 Karaj (Gohardasht
Prison)
KHALILZADEH Davood 1.89 Oroomeieh
KHANBANI Mostafa 12.88 Tabran
K}JANI Amir 9.88 Tehran
KHANI Moheen 9.88 Mashed
KH NJANI Nasreen 11.88 Semnan
KHANM0HN 2vfADI KNEIDAN Ahmcd 8.88 Kerend
KNANSARI Hassan 10.88 Tehran
KNANSARI Seyyed H ssan 11.88 1 tran
KHARRAD Morteza 9.88 Shiraz
RHASI 12.88 Tehran
KHATIBZAL”EH Mohammad 9.88 Tehran
KHMTARI Ainit 11.88 Lahijan
HAZAEI Sadegh 9 88 Mashed
KHE ADMAND Mahnaz 10.88 Tehran
KHEZRI Asghar 9.8 Tehran
KHEZRI Hamid 9.88 Tahran
KHEZRI Mostafa 9.88 Tehran
KHODA- AHKSHI Sohrab 9.88 Karaj
KHODABANDEH Ghasem 10.88 Qazvin
KHODABANDEHLOO 9.88 Tehran
—12—
Name Forename
KIIODMOO Mohammed 9.88 T.hran
KHODM4I Majid 9.08
KHOLDI Ref at 11.88 Tehren
RHORS./NDI Saeid 9.88 X.rmanshah
KEOSH X}!OO u seef 2.89
KHOSHAFKAR I heli1 11.88 krd•bi l
HOSHFAM AlL 11.88 Roodsar
KEOSHKHAB Abbass 9.88 Shires
XHOSHNFVIS AlL 9.88 Meshed
KHUSRAVANI M. di 11.88 Bushshr
KEOSRAVI 1.89 Ti ran
KNOSRAVI Jafar 11.88 Tehxen
KHOSRAVX Zahra 9.88 T.hran
KHOSR 0 00RJI Abdolla i 12.88 Tebren
KHOSR000RJI Hemid 12.88 T.hrau
KHOSR0 00RJI Mohammed 12.88 Tshren
KHOSROVANI 9.88 Tehzen
KIA POUR Akbar 9.88 0o qen
KXA- OJOOR 9.88 T•hrer'
KIABI Sa ud 11.88 TehLan
KIAMARZI Nader 9.88 T.hren
KXANI Kho srow 11.88 T.hran
KIANI Seham 1988 Kaz.roon (Noorebad)
KIANI Salman 12.88 T.hran (Evin Prison)
KIANI-DEUXORDI Simm 9.88 T•hren
KIKHAH Saniad 9.88 Shires
KXThNFAR 9 • 88 T.hran
KXThNFAR 9.88 Tthren
KODIRI Aliresa 11.88 Tehran
KOLAGHOOCHI 9.88 T.bran
KOLAR-KAJ Masoud 1988 Ahwez
KOLAHKAJ Maecud 1988 Ahwas
KOMPANI Hooshang 11.88 Tehren
KOOHESTANI ShaMe 11.88 Ma. jed-Soleiman
KOOHI Parvin 8.8$ Isfehan
KOORMANI 9.88 Tebren
LA'ALX Jamehid 11.88 Khorramabad
LAAL 9.88 Khorrainabad
LAHIJANI 1988
ATIF Akbar 11.88 Tehran
LATIF A liakbar 9.88 T.hran (Svin Prison)
LATIFI Hojjat 11.88 Lahijan
LATIL'I Mojgan 10.88 Tebran
ATIF1 Nasser 1988 Babol
LATIPPOOR Marzieh 9.88 Shires
LAYEGH Shehpoor 11.88 Ahwea
LAYEGH Shehpoor 1988 Ahwes
LESANI Nader 12.88 Tsh au
LOTFI Alireza 1 .88 Isfahan
HAANAVI Sasid 2.89 Ahwei
MAASOOMI AlL 8.88 Boruj.rd
MADANI Morteza 9.68 Tehran (Evin Prison)
—13—
____ f aname Date Place
MMIBOUBI 11.10.88 Rasht
MABJOOBI Anijad 9.88 Zanjan
MMD400DI 11.88 Kazeroon
M)Jfl400DZADEH Siavosh 11.88 Tehran
MAIThIUDI Mahnrod 8. 4.88 Haniedan
M A1 4UDI Sasean 12.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
M)Jfl4UDI-FAR Abdol-khad 11. 3.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
MLJDI Asghar 11.88 Tehran
MAKIANI Abdoirahim 10.88 Deaful
MAKIANI Karim 8. 5.88 Desful
MAKVANLI Ali-Hossein 11.88 Ahwaz
MALAYERI Adel 11.88 Tehran
MALAYERI /li 11.88 Tehran
MALAYERI Mahvash 3.89 Tehran (Evin Prison)
MALEKI Assadollah 9.88 Ksrmanshah
MALEKI Eino]lah 10.88 Kermanshah
(1 ado 11 ah)
MALEKI Maryam 1.89 Shahrood
MALEKI—ANARAKI Majid 11. 1.88 Tahran
MALLAHI Karim 9.88 Gorgan
M?INDEGAR Hossein 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
MANSOORt Kiumars 11.88 Tehran
MANSOORIAN 9.88 Tehran
MARZANEHSANI Mehdad 11.88 Tehran Evi Prison)
MARZOJI 9.88 Gonbad
MASHADI MOHAMMADALI Abmad 12.88 Tehran
KHARRAT
MASHADI-BAGHBAN Soroor 12.88 Tehrau
MASJEDI Asghar 11.88 Tebran
MASOORI Iraj 12.88 Khorramabad
MASOUDI Saeid 9.88 Zanjan
MASOUDI-FAR 9.88 Kermanshah
MASSIH Parvia 9.88 Geobsaran
MAZAHERI Suss n 12.88 Tehran
MAZENI Eissa 11. 4.88 Tehran
MAZRUEX 9.88 Rasht
ME'EMARAN Afehin 10.88 Karaj (Goha dasht
Prison)
MEFTAHI Mehran 1988 Ahwaa
MEHDI-ZADEH Nastaran 9.88 Tehran
MEHDIZADEH Ahma d 10.38 Tehran
MEHDIZADEH Majid 11.88 Tehran
MEHR-ALIYAN Mehdi (Hashem) 9.88 Tebran
MEHR ABIAN Au 12.88 Tehran
MEHRANI Mohsen 10.88 Gorgan
MEHRIPOUR Moha mmed 11.88 Lahijan
MEIAHI 12.88 Ahwaz
MEIAHI 12.88 Ahwaa
MENBARI Mohammad 12.88 Tehran
MESCHI Masoud 9.88 Tehran
MESGARI Jamsh 1988 Gachsaran
MESIIKAT Mohammed Hassan 9.88 Tebran
-14-
Na Tia Forename
MIMEH Darioosh 11.88 Tehr n
MINAXI Kha li l 12.11.88
MIR-FkKHRM 11.88 T.hran
MIR-HEIDkRI Zohr.h 9.88 Tehran
MIR-HOSSEINI Farajo l lah 1t.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
MIR-RAHIMI Soheila 1988
MIR-Vk1U ZADEN 1988
MIRAIM4 Abbas 11.88 Shirsa
MIRSARDO Lotfali 11.88 .rman
MIRSHARI AlL 9.88 Mashed
MIRSHAHIDI Jamahid 9.88 Mashed
MIRVASEH Mohammed Mi 12. 2.88 Rasht
MIRZAEI 9.88 Zenjan
MIRZ .EI Hojat 2.89
MIRZAEX Mostaf a 10.27.88 Tehran
MIRZAEI Parvia 12.88 Tehran
MIRZAEI Shahnaz 9.88 Hamedan
MIRZAEI Zahra 12.88 Ahwaz
MIRZAI 000DARZI Qassem 1.89 Tehran
MIRZAIE Rouros 11.10.88 Rasht
MIRZ AIE ourosh 11.10.88 Raeht
MOADELLI Kavoos 9.88 Shires
MOAGHAR-MOGHADM4 Gholasn Hossein 9.88 Mashed
MOAKKEDI Hossein 11.88 Semnan
MOALLEMI .N Khodadad 9.88 Tehran
MOAYERI }lamid Reza 9.88 Tehran
MO8AR ARI AlL 10.88 Tehran
MOBINI Mehdi 1.89 araj
MODARESS KAMALI Mehdt 8.88 T.hran (Evin Prison)
MODARR SSI 11,88 Est*nbanat
MOBIN 9.88 Tehran
MOEIN-ALZAKER Aghdas 9.88 Tehran
MOEIN—SRIR AZI Seyyed Hassan 5.88 Tebran (Evin Prison)
MOEINI 12.88 Shires
HOEXHI Fariba 9.88 Shires
MOEZZI Hassan 10.88 Tabria
MOGHADAM Ghas.m 9.88 Meshed
MOGHADAM Mohammed 9.88 Meshed
MOHAGER Maryam 9.88 Tahran
MOHAJERI Au ‘3.88 Tehran
MOHM'Q4AD RHANI Saeid 9.88 Shahrood
MOHM'Q'IAD REZABI 988 Karaj
MOHA '24AD TAHER NMJAR Saeid 12.13.88 Tehren (Evin Prison)
4OHM .24kD-ABADI Reza 10.88 Arak
MOHM . 4AD-NEJAD 9.88 Lahijar
MOHAkQ4AD-RAHIMY Soheila 9.88 Tehran
MOHAZ .24AD-ZADEH Jamal 11.88 Remhormoz
MOHA*IAD-ZADEH Shokr 9.88 Tehran
MOHAMMADALIZADEH Shahbana li 1988 Babol
MOHM.24ADALIZADEH Shahbanali 8.30.88 Sari
MOHA .2'(k )I All 1 .88 Tehran
MOHAMMADI Aeghar Tehra
-15-
Forename Date
ace
MOHM'QdADI
MOHAZ4MADI
MO1W.24AD 1
MOHAI*4ADI
MOHA*IADI
MOHA*tADI BAIThIAN-ABADX
MORA*(ADI BAW4AN-l BADI
MOHM04ADI OHANNADI
MOHA*IADI KOSSEIN POUR
MOHAZ.Q4ADX MIR-MOGHIMI
MOHAl.Q. ADI - SARVESTANI
MOHA* ADI ZADER
MOHA?Q4ADRAHIMI
MOHM.Q4ADREZAI • I
MOUSEN-ABADI
MOHSENI
MOHSENI BERENJABAD
MOJADDED
MOJARRAD
MOJDEH
MOJTABAI
MOKVANDI
MOT LAZADEH
MONAFI
MONSHI
MONT AZERI
MONTAZER I
MOODI
MOOI AVI
MOOSAVI AN
MOOSAVI FARD
MORABBI
MORADI
MORADI
MORADI -SHALAL
MORADZADEH SARVESTANI
MOR SHED ZADEH
MORTAZAVI
MORTAZAVI
MOSAYEB POUR
MOSHREFEDDIN
MOSHTAGHI
MOSTAFAE I
MOSTAFAVI
MOSTAFAVI
MOTAGHITALAB
MOTTAGHI TALAB
MOTTAGHI -TALAB
MOUSAVI
MOUSAVI
MOUSSAVI
Firooz
Panahandeh
Saeid
Shahnaa
Vali
Ma ry am
Mohammad Reza
Saeid
Mehdi
Al i
Gho lain -Reaa
Mohsen
Farangis
Az im
Re a a
Amir Hossein
Yahya
Jafar
Asghar
Kiomars
Fakhri
Bijan
Yahya
Kaaem
Vahid
Mahmood
Morteaa
Khal ii
Mabmood
Nasser
Sahan
Zarqham
Moni reh
Jalal
Re a a
Mohammad Reza
Seyyed Hossein
Jefar
Bahran
Mahxnood
Mohammed
Keyvan
Koyvan
Reza
Saeid
Amni r
Ashraf
Mebdi
Seyyed Nasser
9.88
9.88
9.88
9.88
9.88
11. 8.88
11. 8.88
9.88
12.88
12.88
1.89
11.88
11.88
10.88
11.88
11.88
11.88
1988
9.88
11.88
8. 6.88
11.88
2.89
8.88
9.88
12.88
11.88
9.88
9.88
11.88
10.88
10.88
11.88
11.88
8.88
9.88
9.88
9.88
9.88
9.88
9.88
10.88
9.88
9.88
11.88
1988
Masjed Soleiman
Kerman
Tehran
Ardebi 1
Tehran (Evin Prison)
Isfahan
Ahwaa
Ardebil
1sf than
Tehran
Or urn ieh
hwaa
Birjand
Shirea
Shahr-Kord
Arak
Tab r i a
Tehran
Tehran
Tehran
Rasht
Mashad
Tehran (Evin Prison)
Shirea
Kermanshah
Tehran
Ahwaz
Tehran
Tabr i a
Ahwaa
Shiraz
Ahwaa
Shiraa
Tehran
Tahran
Ahwaz
Tehran
Mashad
Tehran
Tehran
Rasht (Guards
Prison)
Rasht
Rasht
Tehran
Gorgan
10.88
11.88
12.88
9.88
1988
—16—
Name Forename
MOUSSkVX-NE ThD Raze 9.88 T•hran (Evin Prison)
NADERI 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
N .DXMI 11.88 Ksrmansheh
NAGMDI DOORBATI Mohammed 11.88 Xare)
NAGHI—POOR AMIRZADI Oholem-Reza 10. 8.88 Mashed
NMAF—ABADX Ghand-O l lah 9.88 T•hren
NMAFX AZAD Abedin 9.88 Rasht
NMJARXAI Ebrehim 9.88 Tehran
NAKHAIX Akbar 11.88 Shires
N .ZHAXX Hamid 12.88 Pale
NAMAXIAN Habib-O l lah 9.88 Arak
NASABI Azain 9.88 Earaj
NAS).RI Kaveh 1.89 karej
NASERI Manuchehr 9.88 Tehren
NASOORI Mahvaeh 988 Xeraj
NASOORI Pooran 9.88 eraj
NASRABADI Hair 12.88 T.hran
NASSABI Azaim-0l-Sadat 9.88 Xaraj (Gohardazht
Prison)
NASSER Masoud 2. 8.8t1 Kare (Goherdasht
Prison)
NASSIR MOOHADDAM Hazer 10.88 Khorramebad
NASSIRI Hossein 2.89 Tehran (Evin Prison)
NASSRX Seyyed Mohammed 8188 Hamedaii
Hehdi
NAVA l Ashxef 10. 2.88 Hemedan
NAYERX Moheen 9.88 T•hran
NAZARI 11.88 Xeraj
NAZ).RI Hemid 10.88 Me leyer
NAZEMI 8.88 Golpayegan
NAZERI Raze 8. 2.88 Kashan
NAZERI Zahre 8. 2.88 Eashen
NEIAVAND Ab dol lah 10.88 T•hran
NEINAVAEI Sheila 9.88 Tehren
NEINEX Bahram 1988/89
NEJATI Seyye Hoseein 8. 6.88 T.hren
NEJATI-MOHARRAMI Amin 9.88 Mashed
NEMATI Farain 9.88 Tehran
NEMATI Ohanbar 11.88 Tehran
NEMATI Mabmood 12.88 T.hran
NEMATIOLLAHI Amir 9.88 Kerej
NIKAMDAM 9.88 Kangevar
NXKFAR AlL 1988 Rasht
NIKXAR Raze 9.88 Shires
NXKMAM Au 11.23.88 Shires
klIKOO Fariba 9.88 Tehran
NIKOO-EGHBAL Fatemeh-Zahra 12.88 Tihran
NIKOOXAR AlL 11.88 T.hren (Evin Prison)
NILGHAZ AlL 1.89 Xeraj
NOORAXI Jahangir 1.89 Khorrexnabad
NOORAMIN Mohammed Raze 1.10.89 Xarej
—17-
Name Forenbzne Date
NOORI Narges 9.88 Orumieh
NOORI-NI1( Mahnaz 10.88 Tohran (Evin Prison)
NOORI-NIK Mohammad 11.88 Arak
NOROOZI 1.89 Ahwaz
NOROOZI Esmaei l 10.88 Tebran
NOROOZI Kianoosh 12.88 Karaj
NOROOZI Mehdi 9.88 Tehran
NOROOZI Mohanimad 9.88 Tebran
NOROOZI Mohammad Reza 2.89 Oruniieh
NOROOZI Mostafa 1988
NOUR-MOHAM4ADX Parvaneb 9.88 Tehran
NOUR-MOHM .Q4ADI Sa leheh 9.88 Tehran
NOURI Hossein 12.88 Tehran
NOURI Naeiin 12.88 Tehran
NOZARI Habibo l lah 11.88
OLFATI Nazi 9.88 Tehran
OMAR-ALI Saf6ar 9.88 Karaj
OMRANI 11.88 Tehran
OMRANJ 9.88 Xsfahan
OORAKI Nasrin 10.88 Tehran
OROUJI-ZAREH Jaber 11.88 Rasht
OSATI AlL 10.88
OSTOVARI Kambiz 11.88 Tehran
OUJI amal 9.88 Shiraz
PABL.EVANNES}IAN Morteza 9.88 Karaj
PAIDAR-ARANI Mansur 9.88 Tehran (. vin Prison)
PAIDAR-ARANX Man&ur 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
PAJMAN-FAR Mahboobeh 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
PAKBAZ Maryam 9.88 Tehran
PAXRAVAN 11.88 M3shad
PANARI Shahin 9.88 Tehran
PAPEX Nemat 11.88 Dordood
PABSt Babak 2.11.89 Tehran (Evin prison)
PARVARER Ahinad 11.11.88 Noshahr
PARVIZI Atnir Hossein 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
PARVIZI Hossein 2.89
PAYDAR-ARANX Mash l1ah 9.88 Kashan
PEIKAR Farshid 10.20.88 Tebran
PIROOZZADEN Nasser 9.88 Ahwaz
P O OR-ALHOSSEINI Zia 1988
PO OR-MIRZA Arash 1988 Tehran (Evin Prison)
PO ORKASHKOOLI Fatemeh 10.88 Shiraz
POUR KASHKOOL 1 I Farzaneh 12.16.88 Shiraz
GRAS HGHAE I
POUR MANSOURI Parsa 9.88 Thhran
POUR-EGHBALI Parvin 9.88 Tehran
POUR-IVAZ Farzan 11.88 Rasht
POUR-MOHM .g4AD JAFAR Masoud 11.88 Tehran
JALALI
POURDANA 12.88 Bandaranzali
POURDANA Reza 12.88 Bandaransali
—18-
Name
RABIBI Nais.r 1988
RABIEI Abbas 1988
RAMATI A li-Aaqhar ii.. 9.88 Xhoy
RANBAR-KHAM Yahya 11.88 T.hrab
RARBARI Majid 11.88 Tehran
RAE! Masoud 9.88 Tehren
RABIM EJAD Tehmures 10. 3.88 Gorgan
RAHIMI 11.88 Gorgen
RAHIMI 11. 1.88 Shires
RARIMI Kilvan 11.88 Tshran
RABIMI M.hdi 1988
RAHIMI Soheila 9.88 Tehran
RAEXMI-M AT'AM Hassan 10.88 Karaj
RAHIMIAN 11.88 Shires
RAWOINI Heasan 9.88 Shahrood
RABMANIAN Moheen 11.88 Shires
RAIST Sa ud 9.88 Borujurd
RAJABI Reniid 11.88 S.mnan
RAJABI Mohammed-Ruse 11.88 S.mnan
RAJAEI Fat.msh 9.88 T.hrau
RAJAX Abmad 11.. 8 Borujird
RAKI Abdoiresa 1988 Masj.d Solilman
RAKI Hamid 9.88 Masj.v Sol.iman
RAMEZANX Habib 12.16.88 Tuhr u i
RAMEZANI Mohammed Hoasein 1988 Relamebad
RAMZX Behead 1.89 T.hran
RM4ZX ESMAEELX Bebsed 1988 T.hran (Evin Prison)
RANJEAR Sammad 11.88 T.hran
R)NJBAR MASS01 EHI Tah ereh 8. 5.88 Desful
RANJEAR SHUREH-DEL Sanm%ed 12. 4.88 Tehren (EviD Prison)
RASHXDI Mohammed 11.88 Ahwas
Oholam Hoesein 12.88 Ahwai
RASHTCHXAN tdaaoud 11.88 Tshran
RASSOULI knir 10.20.88 Tshran
RASSOULXNEZHAD Sa.id 12.88 Ahwes
RAVANDI Amir 9.88 T•hran
RAVIJZADER Ebrahim 12.88 T.hran
•RA:BAN Ferideh 8.19.88 Tehran
RAZ. Rajebali 1988 Tabri .
RAZZAGHI Meshid 11.88 T.hran
REYSHANRI 9.88 Bushehr
!ZA-KRANX Soudabeh 9.88 Tehren
REZA-SOLTAN! Fatemeh 9.88 Tehran
REZAEI 11.11.88 Abhar
REZAEX Akbar 9.88 Isfahan
REZAEI Aliresa 11.88 Ahwas
REZAEI Mahmood 9.88 Xaraj
REZAE! Nadereh 12.88 Ahwez
REZAEI Shahriar 1.89 Tehren
RBZAEI Yuaeef 11.88 Karaj (Goherdaeht
Prison)
REZAEX JARROMI Manuchehr 9.88 Tehren (Evin Prison)
-19—
Name Forename Data Place
P.EZAEI-ZADEH Alireza 11.88 Tehran
REZAEXAN Rasool 2. 9.88 Gohardasht
REZ) .II Pariaa 3.988
REZAII Teimoor 12.88 Shiraz
REZAXI-TAROHOBEN Hojjat 1988
RVASHABI Abdollah 9.88 Bandarabbas
REE ?JHAHI Gholam 9.88 Bandarabbas
REZVANI Majid 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
RIAZI Harnid 9.88 Mashad
RIThHI 9.88 Tehran
PIYAIiX 9.88 Tehran
RIZEB-VANDI Hakimeh 11.88 11am
ROBAT-SARPUSH Mohammed 9.88 Mas ad
ROOD Mohammed 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
NOON Hesean 1988 Raeht
ROOX-PARVAR Abmad 9.88 Tehran
ROOZBANA'X Mohsen 9.88 Tehran
ROOZEH-DAR Mel 11.88 Tehran
ROSTM4I Majid 9.88 Zanjan
ROUZITALAB Pervia 11.88 Shirea
SAADAT 11.88
SA'ADATI 4ansureh 9.88 Shires
SAADAT-HOSSEINI Abolfeal 12.88 Shires
SAADAT-HOSSEINI Aboltazi 12.88 Shires
SABAHI Haye 1eh 9 • 88 Tehran
SABZDEL Majid 1988 Meajed
SADAF Mohammed 8. 2.88 Kaahan
SADEGH-BAYGI Hosasin .2.88 Raraj
SADEGI .BAYGI Parivash 11.88 Tehren
SADEGHI A u 9.88 Karej
SADEGHI Farsin 9.88 Tehr zi
SADEGHI Firoos 1.89 Tabris
SADEGHI Hossein 9.88 Shahxood
SADEGHI Mostafa 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
SADIDIYAN Mebdi 9.88 Mashed
SADOOGHI Mousse 10.88 Shires
SAEEDI 11.88 Shires
SAEIDI Abdolleh 8.88 Tehren
SA.EXDI Au 9.88 Tehren
SAEIDI Amir U.88 Tehren
SAEIDX Hossein 9.88 Tahren
SAEIDI-SHARIF-ABAD AlL 9.88 Mashed
SAEIDI-SHARIF-ABAD Mohammed Resa 9.88 Mashed
SAFARI Zahre 9.88 Tehran
SAFAI'I Dariooah 9.88
SAFAI'I Mahboobeh 10.20.88 Tehran
SAFARI Hossein 9.88 Lahijan
SAFARI Karim 1988 Tehran (Evin Prison)
SAFAVI Abbas 9.88 Mashed
FAFAVI Abolfesi 11.88 Mashed
SAFAVI Hamid 11. 1.88 Karaj
SAFDARI Hessen 10.88 Mashed
—20—
Name Forename
SAFFARIAN Jami l.h 0.88 Ithoramabad
SkGHERI KHODA-PARAST Maryam 7.29.88 T.hran
SkOVAND Fereydoon 8. 5.88 Deiful
SAGVAND Parviz 9.88 D•iful
SAGVAND Parvir 8. 5.88 Deiful
SAHABI 11.88 T•hran
SARAMI 2.89 Gohardaaht
SkXHAEI Assado l lah 12. 7.88 Shiraz
SkKHAEI Farah 9.88 Tebran
SkKHAEI M5naur 12. 7.88 Shiraz
Sk HAEI Zahra 9.88 Tehran
SkLABSHOUR Fayzollab 11.88 Rasht
SALARI Alireza 9.88 Ahwaz
S A LEHI 2.89 Lahijan
SALEHI Abbaz 1988 Ahwaz
SALEHX Alunad 9.88 Bhahrood
SALEHI A li-Akbar 11.88 Ahvaz
SALEHI Susan 9.29.88 Tehran
SALEHIZADEH Siavosh 1988 Ahwaz
SM..EMI -MOADDAB Javad 9 • 88 Tehran
SkL .IMI 9.88 Tehran
S A LIMI Nader 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
SA M .N-ZkDEH Hakirneh 9.88 Tehran
SAMADI A)i 1988
SAMADZADEH Mehran 9.88 Xaraj
SM4ANDAR 9.88 Tahran (Evin Prison)
SAMANDAR M nijeh 8.88 Tebran
SAMANDARI Mahmood 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
SAIZADEGAN Mohammad 11.88 Lahijan
S A NAIX Hossein 11. 1.88 Shires
SANI-SHAROHI Javad 9.88 Shires
SARAJI JABBARI Rasoul 11.88 Tehran
SARAYDAR Mohammed R•za 11.88 T.hran
SAREHOSH Jahan-Bakhsh 9.88 Tehran
SARRAFI Abbas 9.88 Tehran
SAT'HZ Abbas 10.88
SATTAR-NEJAD Seyyed-As edo l la 12.88
SATTARI Parvis 9.88 Teb an
SAVABI 1988
SAY-ThHI Hayedeh 9.88 Tehran
SAYYADI Ebrahirn 10.88 Ra.ht
SAYYADPOOR Reza 10.88 Xhorramabad
SAYYARI Jafar 8. 2.88 Kashan
SEDAGHAT 10.88 Tehran
SEDAGHAT 10.88 Tehran
SEDAGHAT S eid 11.88 Lahijan
SEDIGH Farhad 9.88 Ramsar
SEOHLEINI AlI-Reza 9.88 Borooj.rd
SEGHLEINI Gholam 11.88 Boroojerd
SFIHAT Ardalan 9.88 Ardabil
SEIFI Siarnak 11.88 T.hran
—21—
Name Forename Date Place
SEYNDI As ar 9.88 Tahran
SEYFI Br am 11.88 Tehran
SEYF! Sh, ariar .89 Eermanshah
SEYTED ARMAD QOOSHCHI Sey e6 Mohammad 8. 3.b8 Tahrau
SBYYED—AIC4ADI Seyyed-Mohsen 9 • 88 Tehran
SHAABANI 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
SHAABANI DARYANI AlL 9.8 Tehran
SMAB-ZENDEHDAR Zahra 9 • P 8 Tebran
SHABAN-ZADER Asarn 9.88 Roodsar
SHABANI Abdoijabbar 12.88 Tehran
SHADLOO A liasghar 1988 Tehran (Evin Prison)
SHAERX Nasser 2,89 Amo].
SHAFIBI 12.88 Mashad
SHAFIPOUR Ziba 12.88 Masjed Soleiman
SHAN-MOHAZ'24AD1 Sara 9.88 Tebran
SHAHI-MOGHANI Behrooa 9.88 Tehran
SHAHEARAMI AlL 9.88
SHAHKARAZ4I Hojat 9.88
SHANMIRI Mehr 1ad 10.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
SHANMORADI Ataol lah 9.88 Shiraz
SHANPAR Sou dabeh 9.88 Tehran
SHAKER Mahahid 9.88 Shiraz
SHALALVAND Hanizeb 1988 Tehran (Evin Prison)
SHAMS 11.8 5 Borujerd
L'IAMS Hemid 9.88 Tehran (Evir Prison)
SHAMEZADEX Soheyla 9.88 Tehran
SHANGOLNIA Ghafoor 9.88 Lahijan
SHARAPODDIN Bahram 11.88 Ahwaz
SHARIATI Mohammad-Reza 9.88 Langarood
SHARIATI Sima 1988
SHARIF Ahmad 9.88 Gachsaran
SHARIFI Shabram 9.88 Tehran
SHAYAN Khosruw 1.89 Tehran
SHAYBSTEH Masoud 11.88 :ehran (Evin Prison)
SHEIKH-MOHA*tADI Ah n iad 9.88 Tehran
SHEIKH-MOHM'Q4ADX Reza 9.88 Tebran
SHEIKH-REZAEI Hossein 8. 2.88 Kashan
SHEXEHANI 9.88 Tehran
SHEXK}1I 1988 Dezfu l
SHEMIRANI (AYATOLLAH) 9.88 Hafshajansha Hr-Kord
SHEY SANI Saham 11.88 Shiraz
SHIRALI Shahpoor 10.88 Dezfu l
(Gho lam-Reza)
SHIRAL .I Shapoor 8. 5.88 Deztu l
SHIRMOHA*IADI Afsaneh 11.88
SHIRZAD Au 11.88 Orumieh
SHO'A Fereydoon 11.88 Lahijan
SHOJAEI Nasrin 10.88 Isfahan
SHOKOOHI Mansoor 1988 Sabzevar
SHOKRI 11.88 Ghaemshahr
SHOKRI 11.88 Ghaemshahr
SHOKRI Peyman 11. 3.88 Ozumieb
—22—
Name Forename Date Place
SHOKROLLABIAN-CHESHMEH Hassan 8.28.88 Tehran
SIAH MANSOOR KHORIN Sadrolab 2. 4.89 Tehran
SIAVASHI Akbar 8. 6.89 Nahavand
SINk kfaaneh 9.88 Tebran
SIRANG 9.88 Tehran
SOBHANI Hossein 12.88 Karaj (Ghezelhesar
Prison)
SOHEILI MOhanirMsd 9.88 Mashad
SORREVARDI Mohsen 9.88 Tehran
S0L ElM) .NI Azar 9.88 Karaj
SOLEIMANI Farhad 9.88 Rasht
SOLEIMANI-FARD Shahrokh 11.88 Tehran
SOI TANI Parhad 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
SOOMI lussef 10.88 Raaht
SOTUDEH 11. 1.88 Shiras
TA-AVONI R .NJI Amir 7.28.88 Tehran
TABANI Behnam 1. 8.89 Tehran
TABANI Hossein (Behnaxn) 3.89 Tehran (Evin Prison)
TABATABABI Ahxnad 11.88 Tehran
TABATABAEI Majid 11.88 Tehran
TABIB Aaadeh 9.88 Tehran
TABIBI-NEJAD 1.89 Tabris
TAGH-DAREH Azam 9.88 Tehran
TAGHAVI Abbas 9.88 Tabris
TAllER KHANI Mohanimad 11.88 Tehran
TAHERI Aghafakhr 11.88 Isfaban
TAllER! Hamid 11.88 Tabris
TAHERI Javad 9.88 Tehr n (Evin Prison)
TAllER! Mohanimad 11.88
TAMER! Seyyed Faithr 8.88 Ysfahan
TAHIROL-ESLAMZADEH Seyyed Mebdi 12.88 Ahwaz
TAIThIASBIAN 9.88 Tehran
TAHSILI Nahld 8. 3.88 Tehran
TAIKANDI All 10.89 Karaj (Gohardasht
Prison)
TAJ-AKBARI Manijeh 9.88 Tehran
TALAEI 12.23.88 Tehran
TAIJEB BIDOKHTI Abo lfazl 11.83 Mashad
T, LEBI 8. 8.88 11am
TAL.EBI Adel 11.88 Tehran
TALEBI All 8. 8.88 11am
TAfJEBI Hassan 3.16.89 Marand
TALEBIAN Morteza 8. 2.88 Rashan
TAT EGHANI Hamid 11.8* Tehran (Evin Prison)
TAI ESHI Bijan 1988 Rasht
TAM Jafar 9.88 Kermanshah
TAMADDONIFAR Davood 9.88 Ardebil
TAQIZADEH Ebrahim 11.88 Tabria
TARANI 10.89 Karaj (Gohardaaht
Prison)
1988 Ahwaz
Ebrahim 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
—23 —
Name Forename Pate Place
TARIGHAT Mohainmad 9.88 Tabria
TARIGHAT Zahra 11.88
TARSHIZI Reza 1.89 Tehxan
TARZ-ALI (ZAND-ARYA) Bahram 10.28.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
TASHAROFI 11.88 Semnan
TASHARROFI Hassan 9.88 Semnan
T A VAKK OLI Shapoor 1988 Ahwaa
TAVAKOLI Rajab 11.88 Ghaemshahr
TAVAKOLI Shahpoor 1988 Ahwaz
TAVALLOLI Nasro llah 10.88 Shiraz
TAVANAEIAN-FARD t4aryam 9.88 Tehran
TEBABATI 9.88 Babol
TENRANI Mohammad 9.88 Shabrood
TOL.IYAT Masoud 9.88 Birjand
TOOSI Javad 12.88 Mashad
TOOTOONCHI Kha lil 9.88 Zanjan
TOOTOONCHI Massourneh 10.20.88 Hamedan
TOOZAEI Bahram 9.88 Tebran
TORABI A.1 mad 1988 Orumieb
TORABI Habib 1.89 Shahrood
TORABI Vahab 1.89 Shahrood
TORABI-NAVXD Javad i2.88 Hamedan
VAEZ-ZADEH Seyyed Mohsen 1988 Babol
VAFAEI Ghassem 9.88 Tehran
VAKILI Masoud 11.88 Mashad (Vakilabad
Prison)
VALI Changiz 9.88 Dezful
VARP OSHT! Kobra 8.88 Isfahan
VASEFI Shahin 11.88 Ahwaz
VASIGH Kazem 2.89 Ardebil
VATANPARAST Manuchehr 9.88 Shiraz
VAZIRI Hossein Au 9.88 Mashad
YACHOUBI Behrooz 10.88 Shahrkord
YAGHOUBI Hojjato l].ah 11.88
YAMANI Mohsen 11.88 Qazvin
YAZDANI hmad 1.89 Tehran
YAZDI Morteza 10.29.88 Tehran
YAZDJERDI Mahmood 11.88 Tehran
YEK-KALAM (HASSANI) Masoud 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
YOUSEFI Amir 2.89 Tehran (1 vin Prison)
YOUSEFI Mohsen 2.89
YUSEF-NEJAD Mohammad 11. 1.88 Shiraz
YUSSEFI Miiihnaz 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
ZABETI Ja].il 9.88 Mashad
ZAEEDI- ARBESTANI Sobrab 11.88 Tehian ( vin Prison)
ZAKERI 11. 1.88 Shiraz
ZAKI Abbas 11.88 Gohardasht
ZAMANI Assadol lah 2.89 Garrnsar
ZAMANIPOOR Cede-Au 1988 Ldhijan
ZAND Reza 8.88 Karaj
ZARANDI Koorosh 1.89 Karaj (Cohardasht
Prison)
Name Forename Date
ZARE'E Farhad 9.23.88 Zfthedan
ZAREZADEM Mobsen 11.88 Hamedan
ZkRFCRI Farahnaa 9.88 Tehran
ZARKANI Nahid 9.88 Tehran
ZXA-MIRZAEI Parvaneh 9.88 Tehran
ZIAEI MIRZA.EI Farzaneh 9.88 Tehran
ZXNAEI Mohammad 11.88 Shiras
ZXThEX Seyyed Mohammad 9.88 Tehran
ZOI FkGHARI Akbar 11.88 Semnan
ZOLFAGHAPI Hojjat 11.88 Semnan
ZOLFAGHARI Parviz 11.88 Shahr-Kord
ZOLFAQARI Ahmad 11.88 Orumieh
A do11ah 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
Adel 9.88 Tehran
Ahmad 9.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
Aeghar 12.88 Shiras
Badri 7.30.88 Salmas
Behnam 11.88 Tehran
Ebrahim 12.88 Tehran
rand 9.88 Tehran
Fend 1988 Rasht
Farid 12.88 Shires
Fereydoon 12.88 Desful
Fereydoon 9.88 Tehran
Ghorban 1988 Karaj
Hadi 11.88 Tehren
Hamid 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
Hamid 9.88 Behbehan
Hassan 11.88 Tehran
Hassan 9.88 Raeht
Hooriyeh 11.88 Tehran
Hooshang 11.88 Tehran
Hossein 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
Hossein 11.88 Tehran
Majid 1988
Majid 12.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
Marzieh 11.88 Tehran
Mehrdad 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
Mehrdad 12. 7.88 Ahwaz
Mehrdad 11.88 Lahijan
Mehri 11.88 Tehran
Mehyar 7.28.88 Tehran
Mohammed 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
Mohammed 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
Mohammed 11.88 Tehran (Ev n Prison)
Mohaminad Reza 11.88 Karaj
Mohsen 10.88 Tehran
Nasser 7.28.88 Tehran
Nasser 9.88 ‘ Karaj
Parvin 11. 6.88 Khoram.-Abad
Reza 9.88 Tehran
—25—
Name Forename Date 1ace
Reza 9.88 Karaj
Roghieh 11.88 Tebran (Evin Prison)
Saeid 11.88 Tebran
Shahin 1988 Tehran (Evin Prison)
Shirin 11.88 Tehran
Siavash 9.88 Karaj
Siroos 12.88 Shiraz
Zahra 2. 9.88 Rasht
Zahra 11.88 Tehran (Evin Prison)
-26-
