Aadel Collection
Resolution 40/141 Adopted by the General Assembly
UNITED A NATIONS ( .- — General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/RES/40/14 1 5 March 1986 _I - — - Fortieth session Agenda item 12 RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY [ on the report of the Third Committee. (A/40/1007)] 40/141. Situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran The General Assembly, Guided by the principles embodied in the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1/ and the International Covenants on Human Rights, 2/ Reaffirming that all Member States have an obligation to promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms and to fulfil the obligations they have undertaken under the various international instruments in this field, Recalling Commission on Human Rights resolutions 1982/27 of 11 March 1982 3/ and 1983/34 of 8 March 1983, 4/ 1/ Resolution 217 A (III) . 2/ Resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex. 3/ See Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, 1982, Supplement . No. 2 (E/1982/12 and Corr.l), chap. XXVI, sect. A. / Ibid., 1983, Supplement No. 3 (E/1983/13 and Corr.l), chap. XXVII, sect. A. 86—06466 2708Z (E) /... BP000666
! - ACTION BY THE U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN IRAN General Assembly resolution 40/141 on the human rights situation in Iran was adopted by the General Assembly at its 116th meeting on 13 December 1985 by 53 votes in favour, 30 against and 45 abstentions. The breakdown of the voting was as follows: In favour (53) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Australia Austria Barbados Belize Belgium Bo tswana Canada Chile Colombia Costa Rica Denmark Dominican Republic El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Fiji Finland France Germany, F.R. Greece Grenada Honduras Iceland Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Jordan Kenya - Lesotho Luxembourg - Mauritius Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Against (30) Albania Algeria Angola Bahrain Bangladesh Benin Brunel Comoros . , Cuba Democratic Yemen Indonesia . Iran Kuwait Libya Malaysia Nicaragua Niger Pakistan Poland Qatar Romania Saudi Arabia Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan - Syria - Tanzania Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen . Abstained (45) Bahamas Bhutan ‘Brazil Burkina Paso Burma Burundi , Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Congo Cyprus Ecuador Egypt' Ethiopia Gabon Ghana Guinea Bissau India Ivory Coast Japan Lebanon Liberia Malawi Maldives Mali Malta Mauritania Nepal Nigeria Oman Papua New Guinea Philippines Senegal Singapore Sri Lanka Sur iname Swaziland (continued on reverse side) —
. — 3 — of minority groups such as the Bah 'is”, on the General Assembly's agenda for 1986. The resolution thus ensures that both the General Assembly and the Commission on Human Rights will continue to concern themselves with these issues. The specific references to the Bah 'is in the text of the resolution are extremely important in terms of maintaining and increasing international concern over the plight of the Bah 'i community in Iran. They also represent a considerable achievement. Strong pressures were exerted to have these references deleted from the text, on the basis that the BahS'f community represents only a very small proportion of the total population of Iran and is only one of a number of oppressed groups, and that the references to the Bahg' s would lose votes for the resolution. The latter argument was certainly true. Many Arab and Muslim delegations made it clear that they would support (or at least not vote against) the resolution if, and only if, the references to the BaM'is were deleted, but that they would vote against the resolution if the references to the Bahg'is were retained. Thanks to strenuous Bah 'i efforts, both in Western capitals and at the United Nations, the references were retained. The resolution was adopted after a week of debate about the worldwide human rights situation. Resolutions were also adopted concerning the human rights situations in Afghanistan (also dealt with for the first time at this session of the Assembly), Chile, El Salvador and Guatemala. (Resolutions about the situation in South Africa had been adopted earlier in the session). : In the course of the debate, the following delegations referred to the situation in Iran in critical terms: Australia, Canada, Fiji, France, Jamaica, Luxembourg (speaking on behalf of the ten Member States of the European Community plus Spain and Portugal, who will become members on 1 January 1986), Norway, St. Lucia, Sweden and the United States. All these delegations except France, Jamaica and Sweden specifically mentioned the situation of the Bahg'is. Bolivia, which, in common with a number of other third world countries, has a policy of not voting on any human rights country situations, nevertheless spoke up for the Bah 'is. In the context of expressing the hope that the situations in all the countries under review (Afghanistan, Chile, El Salvador, Guatemala and Iran) would normalize, the Bolivian representative stressed the importance of freedom of religion for all, including the Bah 'i Faith”. The attitude of the Government of Iran to the resolution and to the Bah 'f issue was significant. First of all, Iranian diplomats mounted an extensive lobbying campaign to persuade other governments not to support a resolution on the human rights situation in Iran. Iran, both publicly and privately, has tried to portray any action on the human rights situation in Iran as anti—Islamic. In addition, Iran made no less than three statements attacking the Bah ' Faith at General Assembly meetings. The Iranian Mission to the United Nations also issued apress release reporting a statement made in Tehran on 29
I $ BAH) I INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY United Nations Office REPORT ON THE ADOPTION BY TEE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE RESOLUTION ON TEE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN IRAN The United Nations General Assembly adopted resolution 40/141 concerning the human rights situation in Iran, including specific references to the situation of the Bah 'is, on Friday 13 December 1985. This is the first time that the General Assembly has ever adopted a resolution about the general human rights situation in Iran, or about the particular situation of the Bah 'is. It is therefore the first time that the international community as a whole has expressed its concern over these issues. The, resolution accordingly represents a major advance in our efforts to secure the widest and clearest possible expression of international concern over the persecution of the BaM'i community in Iran. Its adoption is the result of intensive efforts by National Spiritual Assemblies in national capitals and by the Bah ' International Community's United Nations Offices in New York and Geneva over the past few years — efforts which have been further intensified and concentrated in recent weeks with the goal of achieving such an outcome. . The General Assembly has for some years now been dealing with the human rights situations in' three Latin American countries but it was only through a major and determined effort by governments, by the Bah ' International Community and by other interested non—governmental organisations that it was possible to add the Iranian'situation to the General Assembly's agenda. This action at the General Assembly follows the adoption of resolutions about the human rights situation in Iran, including the particular situation of the Bah 'is, by the United Nations Commission on Human Rights in 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985. The resolution adopted by the Commission in 1985 put these issues on the General Assembly's agenda for the first time at its current session, and (also for the first time) commissioned a report on them for submission to the General Assembly as a basis for its discussions. Mr. Andr&s Aguilar of Venezuela was appointed Special Representative of the Commission on Human Rights, charged with responsibility for . —1— 866 United Nations Plaza. New York, N.Y. 10017. U.S.A. - Cable: BAHAINTCOM New York . Telex: 666363 BICNY . Telephone (212) 486-0560 Representation at the United Nations in New York, Geneva, Vienna and Nairobi . Affiliate Baha', Communities in more than 140 countries